Advertisement

Law and Philosophy

, Volume 36, Issue 6, pp 675–705 | Cite as

Public Reason and Religion: The Theo-Ethical Equilibrium Argument for Restraint

  • Paul BillinghamEmail author
Open Access
Article
  • 555 Downloads

Abstract

Most public reason theorists believe that citizens are under a ‘duty of restraint’. Citizens must refrain from supporting laws for which they have only non-public reasons, such as religious reasons. The theo-ethical equilibrium argument purports to show that theists should accept this duty, on the basis of their religious convictions. Theists’ beliefs about God’s nature should lead them to doubt moral claims for which they cannot find secular grounds, and to refrain from imposing such claims upon others. If successful, this argument would defuse prominent objections to public reason liberalism. This paper assesses the theo-ethical equilibrium argument, with a specific focus on Christian citizens. I argue that Christians should seek theo-ethical equilibrium, but need not endorse the duty of restraint. I establish this in part through examining the important theological concept of natural law. That discussion also points to more general and persistent problems with defining ‘public reasons’.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Matthew Anderson, Cécile Laborde, John Perry, Kevin Vallier, Jeremy Waldron, Stuart White, and two anonymous reviewers for this journal for helpful comments. Earlier versions of this paper were presented at the University of Oxford Philosophy of Religion Works in Progress Group and at a conference on religion and public justification at University College London. Thanks to all who attended on those occasions for their questions and feedback, and especially to Christopher Kyle and Aurélia Bardon.

References

  1. Audi, Robert, ‘Liberal Democracy and the Place of Religion in Politics’, in Robert Audi and Nicholas Wolterstorff, Religion in the Public Square: The Place of Religious Convictions in Political Debate (London: Rowman & Littlefield, 1997).Google Scholar
  2. Audi, Robert, ‘Natural Reason, Natural Rights, and Governmental Neutrality Toward Religion’, Religion and Human Rights 4(2) (2009), 157-175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Audi, Robert, Democratic Authority and the Separation of Church and State (New York: Oxford University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bamforth, Nicholas C., and Richards, David A.J., Patriarchal Religion, Sexuality, and Gender: A Critique of New Natural Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
  5. Barth, Karl, Church Dogmatics, Vol. 2 Pt. 2, eds. G.W. Bromiley and T.F. Torrance (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1957).Google Scholar
  6. Barth, Karl, ‘Political Decisions in the Unity of the Faith’, in his Against the Stream: Shorter Post-War Writings, 1946–1952 (London: SCM Press, 1954).Google Scholar
  7. Biggar, Nigel, Behaving in Public: How to Do Christian Ethics (Grand Rapids, MI: W.B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2011).Google Scholar
  8. Eberle, Christopher J., Religious Conviction in Liberal Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fergusson, David, Community, Liberalism and Christian Ethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
  10. Finnis, John, ‘Is Natural Law Theory Compatible with Limited Government?’, in George, Robert P. (ed.), Natural Law, Liberalism, and Morality (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996), pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
  11. Finnis, John, ‘Marriage: A Basic and Exigent Good’, The Monist 91(3–4): (2008), 388–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gascoigne, Robert, The Public Forum and Christian Ethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
  13. George, Robert P., and Wolfe, Christopher, ‘Natural Law and Public Reason’ in George, Robert P. and Wolfe, Christopher (eds.), Natural Law and Public Reason (Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 2000), pp. 51–74.Google Scholar
  14. Greenawalt, Kent, ‘Natural Law and Public Reasons’, Villanova Law Review 47(3): (2002), 531–552.Google Scholar
  15. Greenawalt, Kent, ‘What Are Public Reasons?’, Journal of Law, Philosophy and Culture 1(1): (2007), 79–105.Google Scholar
  16. Habermas, Jürgen, ‘Religion in the Public Sphere’, European Journal of Philosophy 14(1): (2006), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Haddorff, David, Christian Ethics as Witness: Barth’s Ethics for a World at Risk (Eugene, OR.: Cascade Books, 2010).Google Scholar
  18. Hunsinger, George, ‘Karl Barth’, in Witte Jr., John and Alexander, Frank S. (eds.), The Teachings of Modern Christianity on Law, Politics, and Human Nature, Vol. 1 (New York: Columbia University Press, 2006), pp. 352–380.Google Scholar
  19. Laborde, Cécile, ‘Justificatory Secularism’, in D’Costa, Gavin, Evans, Malcolm, Modood, Tariq and Rivers, Julian (eds.), Religion in a Liberal State (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
  20. Lister, Andrew, Public Reason and Political Community (London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2013).Google Scholar
  21. Lott, Micah, ‘Restraint on Reasons and Reasons for Restraint: A Problem for Rawls’s Ideal of Public Reason’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87(1) (2006), 75–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mahoney, John, The Making of Moral Theology: A Study of the Roman Catholic Tradition (New York: Oxford University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
  23. Perry, Michael J., Religion in Politics: Constitutional and Moral Perspectives (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
  24. Perry, Michael J., Under God? Religious Faith and Liberal Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Peter, Fabienne, ‘Epistemic Foundations of Political Liberalism’, Journal of Moral Philosophy 10(5): (2013), 598–620.Google Scholar
  26. Pope, Stephen, ‘Reason and Natural Law’, in Meilaender, Gilbert and Werpehowski (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Theological Ethics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), pp. 148-167.Google Scholar
  27. Rawls, John, Political Liberalism, expanded edition (New York: Columbia University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
  28. Riordan, Patrick, ‘Permission to Speak: Religious Arguments in Public Reason’, The Heythrop Journal 45(2): (2004), 178–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Swan, Kyle, ‘Can a Good Christian be a Good Liberal?’, Public Affairs Quarterly 20(2): (2006), 163–173.Google Scholar
  30. Vallier, Kevin, Liberal Politics and Public Faith: Beyond Separation (Oxford: Routledge, 2014).Google Scholar
  31. Wolterstorff, Nicholas, ‘The Role of Religion in Decision and Discussion of Political Issues’, in Audi, Robert and Wolterstorff, Nicholas (eds.), Religion in the Public Square: The Place of Religious Convictions in Political Debate (London: Rowman & Littlefield, 1997).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Christ Church, University of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations