Hard Determinism and Punishment: A Practical Reductio
- 866 Downloads
How can hard determinism deal with the need to punish, when coupled with the obligation to be just? I argue that even though hard determinists might find it morally permissible to incarcerate wrongdoers apart from lawful society, they are committed to the punishment’s taking a very different form from common practice in contemporary Western societies. Hard determinists are in fact committed to what I will call funishment, instead of punishment. But, by its nature funishment is a practical reductio of hard determinism: it makes implementing hard determinism impossible to contemplate. Indeed, the social practices that hard determinism requires turn out to be morally bad even according to hard determinism itself. I conclude by briefly reflecting upon the implications.
KeywordsMoral Responsibility Free Action Lawful Society Strict Liability Moral Position
- Sher, George (1987). Desert. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Smilansky, Saul (2000). Free Will and Illusion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Strawson, Galen (2002). “The Bounds of Freedom”, Oxford Handbook on Free Will. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Waller, Bruce (1990). Freedom Without Responsibility. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar