Law and Philosophy

, Volume 30, Issue 2, pp 167–199 | Cite as

Legal Statements and Normative Language

  • Luís Duarte d’AlmeidaEmail author


Can there be a non-reductivist, source-based explanation of the use of normative language in statements describing the law and legal situations? This problem was formulated by Joseph Raz, who also claimed to have solved it. According to his well-known doctrine of ‘detached’ statements, normative legal statements can be informatively made by speakers who merely adopt, without necessarily sharing, the point of view of someone who accepts that legal norms are justified and ought to be followed. In this paper I defend two theses. I argue, first, that the notion of a detached statement cannot be made to work, and that Raz’s problem is thus not thereby solved. But the problem itself, I also suggest, is a false one.


Practical Reason Legal Statement Legal Reason Pure Theory Normative Language 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University CollegeOxfordUK
  2. 2.LanCog Group and Law FacultyUniversity of LisbonLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations