Law and Philosophy

, Volume 27, Issue 2, pp 123–150 | Cite as

Say What? A Critique of Expressive Retributivism

  • Nathan Hanna


Hate Crime Adequate Criticism Legal Punishment Hard Treatment Preventive Detention 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



Many thanks to Kenneth Baynes, Ishani Maitra and three anonymous referees for Law and Philosophy for helpful comments on earlier versions of this paper. Thanks also to participants at the 15th annual Harvard-MIT Graduate Philosophy Conference, where I presented a shorter version of the paper, and to my commentator Japa Pallikkathayil for helpful comments and questions.


  1. Adler M.D. (2000) Expressive Theories of Law: A Skeptical Overview. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 148: 1363–1501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Davis M. (1991) Punishment as Language: Misleading Analogy for Desert Theorists. Law and Philosophy 10: 311–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dolinko D. (1991) Some Thoughts About Retributivism. Ethics 101: 537–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Duff R.A. (2001) Punishment, Communication and Community. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  5. Duff R.A. (1992) Alternatives to Punishment – or Alternative Punishments? In: W. Cragg (eds.) Retributivism and Its Critics. Stuttgart: Franz SteinerGoogle Scholar
  6. Feinberg J. (1965) The Expressive Function of Punishment. The Monist 49: 397–423Google Scholar
  7. Golash D. (2005) The Case Against Punishment. New York: New York University PressGoogle Scholar
  8. Hampton, J., ‹An Expressive Theory of Retribution’, in W. Cragg (ed.), Retributivism and Its Critics. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 1992a), 1–25Google Scholar
  9. Hampton J. (1992b) Correcting Harms versus Righting Wrongs: The Goal of Retribution. UCLA Law Review 39: 1659–702Google Scholar
  10. Hampton, J., ‹The Retributive Idea’, in J.G. Murphy and J. Hampton (eds.), Forgiveness and Mercy (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988), 111–161Google Scholar
  11. Hart H.L.A. (1963) Law, Liberty, and Morality. Stanford: Stanford University PressGoogle Scholar
  12. Hart, H.L.A., ‹Prolegomenon to the Principles of Punishment’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 60 (1959): 1–26, reprinted in H.L.A. Hart, Punishment and Responsibility (New York: Oxford University Press, 1968), 1–27Google Scholar
  13. von Hirsch A. (1993) Censure and Sanctions. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  14. Kleinig J. (1991) Punishment and Moral Seriousness. Israel Law Review 25: 401–421Google Scholar
  15. Lucas J.R. (1968) Or Else. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 69: 207–222Google Scholar
  16. Mackie J.L. (1982) Morality and the Retributive Emotions. Criminal Justice Ethics 1: 3–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Matravers M. (2000) Justice and Punishment. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  18. Moore M. (1993) Justifying Retributivism. Israel Law Review 27: 15–49Google Scholar
  19. Narayan U. (1993) Appropriate Responses and Preventive Benefits: Justifying Censure and Hard Treatment in Legal Punishment. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 13: 166–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nozick R. (1981) Philosophical Explanations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
  21. Primoratz, I. (1989a) Justifying Legal Punishment. Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press InternationalGoogle Scholar
  22. Primoratz I. (1989b) Punishment as Language. Philosophy 64: 187–205Google Scholar
  23. Sayre-McCord G. (2001) Criminal Justice and Legal Reparations as an Alternative to Punishment. Philosophical Issues 11: 502–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Scanlon, T., ‹The Significance of Choice’, in S. McMurrin (ed.), The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, vol. viii (Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 1988), 151–216Google Scholar
  25. Skillen A. (1980) How to Say Things With Walls. Philosophy 35: 509–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophySyracuse UniversitySyracuseUSA

Personalised recommendations