Islands in the forest: effects of patch size and isolation on farmland bird species richness and community composition of farmland patches in forest landscapes
- 72 Downloads
Theory predicts that species diversity of isolated habitat patches depends on patch size and isolation. However, there are few previous studies of how patch size and isolation influence community composition. This study tested theory using small and isolated farmland patches in a forested matrix.
I tested whether bird species diversity and community composition of isolated farmland patches depended on patch size, measures of isolation (e.g. distance from the main farmland areas; up to 15 km), and other variables such as presence of human habitation.
Farmland bird species diversity and community composition (relative proportions of different ecological guilds) of 130 farmland patches within forest landscapes were recorded in Norway.
Species diversity and proportion of the species that nested on the ground or low in bushes increased with patch size. Distance from the main farmland region was not related to species diversity or community composition, but species diversity increased when there were stepping stones present. Sites inhabited by humans had higher species diversity, a larger proportion of species nesting high in trees or in cavities (such as in buildings), and a larger proportion of resident species. Other variables were less important. There was also a strong relationship between the occupancy of individual species in the main farmland region and their occupancy in the forest region, suggesting that colonisation pressure also influenced species diversity of these habitat islands.
I found weak evidence of isolation effects on bird species diversity and community composition of farmland patches within forest, whereas most of the variation was explained by patch size and presence of humans.
KeywordsBird community Island biogeography Habitat patches Species diversity Species traits
I thank Roar Økseter for help with producing maps, and Geir A. Sonerud and two anonymous reviewers for comments on the manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.
- Bélichon S, Clobert J, Massot M (1996) Are there differences in fitness components between philopatric and dispersing individuals? Acta Oecol 17:503–517Google Scholar
- Dale S, Andersen GS, Eie K, Bergan M, Stensland P (2001) Guide til fuglelivet i Oslo og Akershus. Norsk Ornitologisk Forening, avdeling Oslo og Akershus, OsloGoogle Scholar
- Haftorn S (1971) Norges Fugler. Universitetsforlaget, OsloGoogle Scholar
- Kålås JA, Dale S, Gjershaug JO, Husby M, Lislevand T, Strann K-B, Strøm H (2015) Norwegian Red List for Species 2015. Birds Aves. Norwegian Biodiversity Information Centre, TrondheimGoogle Scholar
- MacArthur RH, Wilson EO (1967) The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar