Landscape Ecology

, Volume 34, Issue 10, pp 2279–2294 | Cite as

Seasonal effects of habitat structure and weather on the habitat selection and home range size of a mammal in agricultural landscapes

  • Martin MayerEmail author
  • Wiebke Ullmann
  • Rebecca Heinrich
  • Christina Fischer
  • Niels Blaum
  • Peter Sunde
Research Article



Human land use intensified over the last century and simultaneously, extreme weather events have become more frequent. However, little is known about the interplay between habitat structure, direct short-term weather effects and indirect seasonal effects on animal space use and behavior.


We used the European hare (Lepus europaeus) as model to investigate how habitat structure and weather conditions affect habitat selection and home range size, predictors for habitat quality and energetic requirements.


Using > 100,000 GPS positions of 60 hares in three areas in Denmark and Germany, we analyzed habitat selection and home range size in response to seasonally changing habitat structure, measured as vegetation height and agricultural field size, and weather. We compared daily and monthly home ranges to disentangle between direct short-term weather effects and indirect seasonal effects of climate.


Habitat selection and home range size varied seasonally as a response to changing habitat structure, potentially affecting the availability of food and shelter. Overall, habitat structure and seasonality were more important in explaining hare habitat selection and home range size compared to direct weather conditions. Nevertheless, hares adjusted habitat selection and daily home range size in response to temperature, wind speed and humidity, possibly in response to thermal constrains and predation risk.


For effective conservation, habitat heterogeneity should be increased, e.g. by reducing agricultural field sizes and the implementation of set-asides that provide both forage and shelter, especially during the colder months of the year.


European hare GPS Habitat selection Home range Lepus europaeus Weather 



We thank the Leibniz Centre for agricultural landscape research (ZALF), the long-term research platform “AgroScapeLab Quillow” (Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF) e.V.), the European fund for rural development (EFRE) in the German federal state of Brandenburg and the DFG funded research training group ‘BioMove’ (RTG 2118-1) for funding the German part of the study. We also thank the Leibnitz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research Berlin–Niederfinow and Jochen Godt from the University of Kassel for providing the nets to catch hares, all students and hunters that helped with trapping, and the landowners for allowing us to work on their land. Further, we thank Lars Haugaard for hare captures in Denmark, Erik Lykke for allowing us to work on his land, and Sebastian Behnke from the Danish Hunters Association for his help and support. Animal captures were approved by the Federal Nature Conservation Act (§ 45 Abs. 7 Nr. 3) and the local nature conservation authority (reference number LUGV V3-2347-22-2013 and 55.2-1-54-2532-229-13) with economical funding form the Danish Environmental Agency. Finally, we thank two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.

Supplementary material

10980_2019_878_MOESM1_ESM.docx (1.2 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 1187 kb)
10980_2019_878_MOESM2_ESM.docx (36 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 35 kb)


  1. Amor JM, Newman R, Jensen WF, Rundquist BC, Walter WD, Boulanger JR (2019) Seasonal home ranges and habitat selection of three elk (Cervus elaphus) herds in North Dakota. PLoS ONE 14:e0211650PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson DP, Forester JD, Turner MG, Frair JL, Merrill EH, Fortin D, Mao JS, Boyce MS (2005) Factors influencing female home range sizes in elk (Cervus elaphus) in North American landscapes. Landscape Ecol 20:257–271Google Scholar
  3. Arnold TW (2010) Uninformative parameters and model selection using Akaike’s information criterion. J Wildl Manag 74:1175–1178Google Scholar
  4. Aronsson M, Low M, López-Bao JV, Persson J, Odden J, Linnell JD, Andrén H (2016) Intensity of space use reveals conditional sex-specific effects of prey and conspecific density on home range size. Ecol Evol 6:2957–2967PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Attias N, Oliveira-Santos LGR, Fagan WF, Mourão G (2018) Effects of air temperature on habitat selection and activity patterns of two tropical imperfect homeotherms. Anim Behav 140:129–140Google Scholar
  6. Bar-On YM, Phillips R, Milo R (2018) The biomass distribution on Earth. Proc Natl Acad Sci 115:6506–6511PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Barton K (2016) Package “MuMIn”: multi-model inference. R package, Version 1.15. 6. Accessed 10 Feb 2018Google Scholar
  8. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Package ‘lme4’. Convergence 12Google Scholar
  9. Benton TG, Vickery JA, Wilson JD (2003) Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? Trends Ecol Evol 18:182–188Google Scholar
  10. Börger L, Franconi N, Ferretti F, Meschi F, Michele GD, Gantz A, Coulson T (2006) An integrated approach to identify spatiotemporal and individual-level determinants of animal home range size. Am Nat 168:471–485PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Bowler DE, Benton TG (2005) Causes and consequences of animal dispersal strategies: relating individual behaviour to spatial dynamics. Biol Rev 80:205–225PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Boyce MS, Vernier PR, Nielsen SE, Schmiegelow FK (2002) Evaluating resource selection functions. Ecol Model 157:281–300Google Scholar
  13. Boyle SA, Lourenço WC, Da Silva LR, Smith AT (2009) Home range estimates vary with sample size and methods. Folia Primatol 80:33–42PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Bradshaw WE, Holzapfel CM (2006) Evolutionary response to rapid climate change. Science 312:1477–1478PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Braham M, Miller T, Duerr AE, Lanzone M, Fesnock, La Pre L, Driscoll D, Katzner T (2015) Home in the heat: dramatic seasonal variation in home range of desert Golden Eagles informs management for renewable energy development. Biol Conserv 186:225–232Google Scholar
  16. Cai W, Borlace S, Lengaigne M, Van Rensch P, Collins M, Vecchi G, Timmermann A, Santoso A, McPhaden MJ, Wu L (2014) Increasing frequency of extreme El Niño events due to greenhouse warming. Nat Clim Change 4:111Google Scholar
  17. Ceballos G, Ehrlich PR, Dirzo R (2017) Biological annihilation via the ongoing sixth mass extinction signaled by vertebrate population losses and declines. Proc Natl Acad Sci 114:E6089–E6096PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Coumou D, Rahmstorf S (2012) A decade of weather extremes. Nat Clim Change 2:491Google Scholar
  19. DeAngelis DL (2018) Individual-based models and approaches in ecology: populations, communities and ecosystems. CRC Press, USAGoogle Scholar
  20. Donald P, Green R, Heath M (2001) Agricultural intensification and the collapse of Europe’s farmland bird populations. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:25–29Google Scholar
  21. Douglas DJ, Vickery JA, Benton TG (2009) Improving the value of field margins as foraging habitat for farmland birds. J Appl Ecol 46:353–362Google Scholar
  22. Frafjord K (2016) Influence of reproductive status: home range size in water voles (Arvicola amphibius). PLoS ONE 11:e0154338PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Garner WW, Allard HA (1920) Effect of the relative length of day and night and other factors of the environment on growth and reproduction in plants. Mon Weather Rev 48:415Google Scholar
  24. Goudie AS (2018) Human impact on the natural environment. Wiley, USAGoogle Scholar
  25. Haddad NM, Brudvig LA, Clobert J, Davies KF, Gonzalez A, Holt RD, Lovejoy TE, Sexton JO, Austin MP, Collins CD (2015) Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth’s ecosystems. Sci Adv 1:e1500052  PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Halekoh U, Højsgaard S, Yan J (2006) The R package geepack for generalized estimating equations. J Stat Softw 15:1–11Google Scholar
  27. Heldbjerg H, Sunde P, Fox AD (2017) Continuous population declines for specialist farmland birds 1987–2014 in Denmark indicates no halt in biodiversity loss in agricultural habitats. Bird Conserv Int 28:1–15Google Scholar
  28. InVeKoS (2014) Integriertes Verwaltungs- und KontrollsystemGoogle Scholar
  29. Kay GM, Driscoll DA, Lindenmayer DB, Pulsford SA, Mortelliti A (2016) Pasture height and crop direction influence reptile movement in an agricultural matrix. Agric Ecosyst Environ 235:164–171Google Scholar
  30. Kingsley MC, Stirling I (1991) Haul-out behaviour of ringed and bearded seals in relation to defence against surface predators. Can J Zool 69:1857–1861Google Scholar
  31. Laiolo P (2005) Spatial and seasonal patterns of bird communities in Italian agroecosystems. Conserv Biol 19:1547–1556Google Scholar
  32. Leal AI, Acácio M, Meyer CF, Rainho A, Palmeirim JM (2019) Grazing improves habitat suitability for many ground foraging birds in Mediterranean wooded grasslands. Agric Ecosyst Environ 270:1–8Google Scholar
  33. Lenis Sanin Y, Zuluaga Cabrera AM, Tarazona Morales AM (2016) Adaptive responses to thermal stress in mammals. Rev Med Vet 31:121–135Google Scholar
  34. Li B, Chen C, Ji W, Ren B (2000) Seasonal home range changes of the Sichuan snub-nosed monkey (Rhinopithecus roxellana) in the Qinling Mountains of China. Folia Primatol 71:375–386PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Lister BC, Garcia A (2018) Climate-driven declines in arthropod abundance restructure a rainforest food web. Proc Natl Acad Sci 115:E10397–E10406PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Llewelyn J, Macdonald SL, Moritz C, Martins F, Hatcher A, Phillips BL (2018) Adjusting to climate: acclimation, adaptation, and developmental plasticity in physiological traits of a tropical rainforest lizard. Integr Zool 13:411–427PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Macdonald DW, Barrett P (1993) Mammals of Britain & Europe. HarperCollins, UKGoogle Scholar
  38. Mayer M, Ullmann W, Sunde P, Fischer C, Blaum N (2018) Habitat selection by the European hare in arable landscapes: the importance of small-scale habitat structure for conservation. Ecol Evol 8:11619–11633PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Meichtry-Stier KS, Duplain J, Lanz M, Lugrin B, Birrer S (2018) The importance of size, location, and vegetation composition of perennial fallows for farmland birds. Ecol Evol 8:9270–9281PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Murray C, Minderman J, Allison J, Calladine J (2016) Vegetation structure influences foraging decisions in a declining grassland bird: the importance of fine-scale habitat and grazing regime. Bird Study 63:223–232Google Scholar
  41. Murtaugh PA (2009) Performance of several variable-selection methods applied to real ecological data. Ecol Lett 12:1061–1068PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H (2013) A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods Ecol Evol 4:133–142Google Scholar
  43. Pavliska PL, Riegert J, Grill S, Šálek M (2018) The effect of landscape heterogeneity on population density and habitat preferences of the European hare (Lepus europaeus) in contrasting farmlands. Mamm Biol 88:8–15Google Scholar
  44. Pe’Er G, Zinngrebe Y, Hauck J, Schindler S, Dittrich A, Zingg S, Tscharntke T, Oppermann R, Sutcliffe LM, Sirami C (2017) Adding some green to the greening: improving the EU’s ecological focus areas for biodiversity and farmers. Conserv Lett 10:517–530Google Scholar
  45. Petrovan S, Ward A, Wheeler P (2013) Habitat selection guiding agri-environment schemes for a farmland specialist, the brown hare. Anim Conserv 16:344–352Google Scholar
  46. Prevedello J, Forero-Medina G, Vieira M (2011) Does land use affect perceptual range? Evidence from two marsupials of the Atlantic Forest. J Zool 284:53–59Google Scholar
  47. R Core Team (2013) R: A language and environment for statistical computingGoogle Scholar
  48. Ramankutty N, Mehrabi Z, Waha K, Jarvis L, Kremen C, Herrero M, Rieseberg LH (2018) Trends in global agricultural land use: implications for environmental health and food security. Ann Rev Plant Biol 69:789–815Google Scholar
  49. Rivrud IM, Loe LE, Mysterud A (2010) How does local weather predict red deer home range size at different temporal scales? J Anim Ecol 79:1280–1295PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Rödel HG, Dekker JJ (2012) Influence of weather factors on population dynamics of two lagomorph species based on hunting bag records. Eur J Wildl Res 58:923–932Google Scholar
  51. Rühe F (1999) Effect of stand structures in arable crops on brown hare (Lepus europaeus) distribution. Gibier Faune Sauvag (France) 16:317–337Google Scholar
  52. Rühe F, Hohmann U (2004) Seasonal locomotion and home-range characteristics of European hares (Lepus europaeus) in an arable region in central Germany. Eur J Wildl Res 50:101–111Google Scholar
  53. Ruzicka RE, Conover MR (2012) Does weather or site characteristics influence the ability of scavengers to locate food? Ethology 118:187–196Google Scholar
  54. Sánchez-Bayo F, Wyckhuys KA (2019) Worldwide decline of the entomofauna: a review of its drivers. Biol Conserv 232:8–27Google Scholar
  55. Schai-Braun SC, Hackländer K (2013) Home range use by the European hare (Lepus europaeus) in a structurally diverse agricultural landscape analysed at a fine temporal scale. Acta Theriol 59:277–287Google Scholar
  56. Schai-Braun SC, Rödel HG, Hackländer K (2012) The influence of daylight regime on diurnal locomotor activity patterns of the European hare (Lepus europaeus) during summer. Mamm Biol 77:434–440Google Scholar
  57. Schai-Braun SC, Reichlin TS, Ruf T, Klansek E, Tataruch F, Arnold W, Hackländer K (2015) The European hare (Lepus europaeus): a picky herbivore searching for plant parts rich in fat. PLoS ONE 10:e0134278PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Schiermeier Q (2018) Droughts, heatwaves and floods: how to tell when climate change is to blame. Nature 560:20–22PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Schmidt NM, Asferg T, Forchhammer MC (2004) Long-term patterns in European brown hare population dynamics in Denmark: effects of agriculture, predation and climate. BMC Ecol 4:15PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. Seltmann MW, Ruf T, Rödel HG (2009) Effects of body mass and huddling on resting metabolic rates of post-weaned European rabbits under different simulated weather conditions. Funct Ecol 23:1070–1080Google Scholar
  61. Smith RK, Jennings NV, Robinson A, Harris S (2004) Conservation of European hares Lepus europaeus in Britain: is increasing habitat heterogeneity in farmland the answer? J Appl Ecol 41:1092–1102Google Scholar
  62. Smith RK, Jennings NV, Harris S (2005) A quantitative analysis of the abundance and demography of European hares Lepus europaeus in relation to habitat type, intensity of agriculture and climate. Mamm Rev 35:1–24Google Scholar
  63. Sprogis KR, Raudino HC, Rankin R, MacLeod CD, Bejder L (2016) Home range size of adult Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops aduncus) in a coastal and estuarine system is habitat and sex-specific. Mar Mamm Sci 32:287–308Google Scholar
  64. Sunde P, Thorup K, Jacobsen LB, Rahbek C (2014) Weather conditions drive dynamic habitat selection in a generalist predator. PLoS ONE 9:e88221PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  65. Tapper S, Barnes R (1986) Influence of farming practice on the ecology of the brown hare (Lepus europaeus). J Appl Ecol 23:39–52Google Scholar
  66. Togunov RR, Derocher AE, Lunn NJ (2017) Windscapes and olfactory foraging in a large carnivore. Sci Rep 7:46332PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  67. Travis J (2003) Climate change and habitat destruction: a deadly anthropogenic cocktail. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:467–473Google Scholar
  68. Tscharntke T, Klein AM, Kruess A, Steffan-Dewenter I, Thies C (2005) Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity–ecosystem service management. Ecol Lett 8:857–874Google Scholar
  69. Ullmann W, Fischer C, Pirhofer-Walzl K, Kramer-Schadt S, Blaum N (2018) Spatiotemporal variability in resources affects herbivore home range formation in structurally contrasting and unpredictable agricultural landscapes. Landscape Ecol 33:1–13Google Scholar
  70. van Beest FM, Van Moorter B, Milner JM (2012) Temperature-mediated habitat use and selection by a heat-sensitive northern ungulate. Anim Behav 84:723–735Google Scholar
  71. Vaughan N, Lucas EA, Harris S, White PC (2003) Habitat associations of European hares Lepus europaeus in England and Wales: implications for farmland management. J Appl Ecol 40:163–175Google Scholar
  72. Vermessungsverwaltung B (2014) Geobasisdaten zur tatsächlichen NutzungGoogle Scholar
  73. Vickery W, Bider J (1981) The influence of weather on rodent activity. J Mamm 62:140–145Google Scholar
  74. Walther G-R, Post E, Convey P, Menzel A, Parmesan C, Beebee TJ, Fromentin J-M, Hoegh-Guldberg O, Bairlein F (2002) Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature 416:389PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Whittingham MJ, Evans KL (2004) The effects of habitat structure on predation risk of birds in agricultural landscapes. IBIS 146:210–220Google Scholar
  76. World Meteorological Organization W (2018) July sees extreme weather with high impactsGoogle Scholar
  77. Yasué M, Quinn JL, Cresswell W (2003) Multiple effects of weather on the starvation and predation risk trade-off in choice of feeding location in Redshanks. Funct Ecol 17:727–736Google Scholar
  78. Zuur A, Ieno E, Walker N, Saveliev A, Smith G (2009) In: Gail M, Krickeberg K, Samet JM, Tsiatis A, Wong W (eds) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Spring Science and Business Media, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BioscienceAarhus UniversityRøndeDenmark
  2. 2.Plant Ecology and Conservation Biology, University of PotsdamPotsdamGermany
  3. 3.Institute for Landscape BiogeochemistryLeibniz-Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF)MünchebergGermany
  4. 4.Restoration Ecology, Department of Ecology and Ecosystem ManagementTechnische Universität MünchenFreisingGermany

Personalised recommendations