Landscape Ecology

, Volume 34, Issue 6, pp 1313–1327 | Cite as

Local habitat association does not inform landscape management of threatened birds

  • Claire E. FarrellEmail author
  • Lenore Fahrig
  • Greg Mitchell
  • Scott Wilson
Research Article



Species that use open patches in forested landscapes often select clearcuts. However, it is unknown whether local associations with clearcuts translate to an effect of clearcut amount in the surrounding landscape on occupancy or abundance at local sites. This question is important because forest management decisions are made at landscape scales.


We examined whether the amount of clearcut in the surrounding landscape influenced site occupancy of two threatened aerial insectivores, Common Nighthawk and Eastern Whip-poor-will. Both species nest in/near clearcuts at a local-scale.


We used acoustic recorders placed on edges of recent clearcuts (≤ 15 years old, n = 49 sites) to measure presence-absence. We estimated occupancy in relation to the proportion of clearcut and open wetland within the surrounding landscapes at spatial extents between 0.5 and 5.0 km.


Occupancy of Eastern Whip-poor-will was not related to clearcut amount in the surrounding landscape at any scale. Common Nighthawk occupancy was lower in sites surrounded by landscapes with higher proportion of older (11–15 years old) clearcuts. Both species’ occupancy was higher in sites where the surrounding landscapes had higher proportions of open wetland.


Two possible mechanisms for our results include multi-scale selection of breeding sites or demographic responses to higher productivity in wetlands than clearcuts; both need further study. Our results show how the association of species with clearcut habitats at a local scale does not necessarily translate to a higher occurrence of those species at the landscape scale at which management decisions are made.


Aerial insectivore Scale of effect Wetlands Cross-scale extrapolation Landscape composition Forest management 



This work was funded through the National Wildlife Research Centre of Environment and Climate Change Canada and a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) grant to LF. We thank our field assistants Amanda Findlay and Cameron Leitrants for their help in collecting data and Gabriel Blouin-Demers and Rob Mackereth for their assistance in the development of this project. We also thank Gabriel Blouin-Demers, Stacey Robinson, and Steve Cooke for their insightful comments.

Supplementary material

10980_2019_843_MOESM1_ESM.docx (332 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 331 kb)


  1. Akresh ME, King DI (2016) Eastern Whip-poor-will breeding ecology in relation to habitat management in a pitch pine-scrub oak barren. Wildl Soc Bull. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexander I, Cresswell B (1990) Foraging by nightjars caprimulgus-europaeus away from their nesting areas. IBIS 132:568–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barton K (2018) MuMIn: multi-model inference. Accessed 15 Aug 2018
  4. Brennan J, Bender DJ, Conteras TA, Fahrig L (2002) Focal patch landscape studies for wildlife management: optimizing sampling effort across scales. In: Liu J, Taylor WW (eds) Integrating landscape ecology into natural resource management. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 68–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brigham RM, Fenton MB (1991) Convergence in foraging strategies by two morphologically and phylogenetically distinct aerial insectivores. J Zool 223:475–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brigham RM, Ng J, Poulin RG, Grindal SD (2011) Common nighthawk (Chordeiles minor). In: Poole A (ed) The birds of North America Online. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, IthicaGoogle Scholar
  7. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multi-model inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Chaundry-Smart RFC, Smith SM, Malcolm JR, Bellocq MI (2012) Comparison of moth communities following clear-cutting and wildfire disturbance in the southern boreal forest. Forest Ecol Manage 270:273–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cink CL (2002) Eastern Whip-poor-will (Antrostomus vociferous). In: Poole A (ed) The birds of North America Online. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, IthicaGoogle Scholar
  10. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) (2007) COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Common Nighthawk Chordeiles Minor in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada, Ottawa, ON
  11. DeGraaf RM, Yamasaki M (2003) Options for managing early-successional forest and shrubland bird habitats in the northeastern United States. Forest Ecol Manage 185:179–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Degregorio BA, Chiavacci SJ, Benson TJ, Sperry JH, Weatherhead PJ (2016) Nest predators of North American birds: continental patterns and implications. Bioscience 66:655–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Downes CM, Collins BT, Damus M (2005) Canadian bird trends web site Version 2.1. Migratory Birds Conservation Division, Canadian Wildlife Service, Gatineau, QuebecGoogle Scholar
  14. English PA, Nocera JJ, Pond BA, Green DJ (2017) Habitat and food supply across multiple spatial scales influence the distribution and abundance of a nocturnal aerial insectivore. Landscape Ecol 32:343–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Environment Canada (2014a) Bird conservation strategy for bird conservation region 12 in Ontario and Manitoba: Boreal Hardwood Transition. Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment Canada, Ottawa, ON.
  16. Environment Canada (2014b) Bird conservation strategy for bird conservation region 8 in Ontario Region: Boreal Softwood Shield. Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment Canada, Ottawa, ON.
  17. Environment Canada (2014c) North American breeding bird survey—Canadian results and analysis website version 3.00. Environment Canada, Gatineau, Quebec. Accessed 15 June 2014Google Scholar
  18. Environment Canada (2014d) North American breeding bird survey—Canadian trends website, Data-version 2012. Environment Canada, Gatineau, Quebec, K1A 0H3Google Scholar
  19. Environment Canada (2015) Recovery strategy for eastern whip-poor-will (Antrostomus vociferous) in Canada. Species at Risk Act Recovery Strategy Series. Environment Canada, Ottawa, pp vii +57Google Scholar
  20. Environment Canada (2016) Recovery strategy for common nighthawk (Chordeiles minor) in Canada. Species at Risk Act Recovery Strategy Series. Environment Canada, Ottawa, pp vii +49Google Scholar
  21. Fahrig L, Arroyo-Rodríguez V, Bennett JR, Boucher-Lalonde V, Cazetta E, Currie DJ, Eigenbrod F, Ford AT, Harrison SP, Jaeger JA, Koper N (2019) Is habitat fragmentation bad for biodiversity? Biol Conserv 230:179–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Farrell CE, Wilson S, Mitchell G (2017) Assessing the relative use of clearcuts, burned stands, and wetlands as breeding habitat for two declining aerial insectivores in the boreal forest. For Ecol Manage 386:62–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fiske I, Chandler R (2017) unmarked: an R package for fitting hierarchical models of wildlife occurrence and abundance. J Stat Softw 43:1–23Google Scholar
  24. Garlapow RM (2007) Whip-poor-will prey availability and foraging habitat: implications for management in a pitch pine/scrub oak barren habitats. Masters Thesis. University of MassachussetsGoogle Scholar
  25. Hins C, Ouellet J, Dussault C, St-Laurent M (2009) Habitat selection by forest-dwelling caribou in managed boreal forest of eastern Canada: evidence of a landscape configuration effect. For Ecol Manage 31:636–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hoffman T (2018) MoonCalc.,90.5057,3/2018.06.19/11:28/1/0. Accessed 19 June 2018
  27. Hollander FA, Van Dyck H, Martin GS, Titeux N (2011) Maladaptive habitat selection of a migratory passerine bird in a human-modified landscape. PLoS ONE 6:e25703CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Hovick TJ, Miller JR (2013) Broad-scale heterogeneity influences nest selection by Brown-headed Cowbirds. Landscape Ecol 28:1493–1503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hurvich CM, Tsai CL (1989) Regression and time series model selection in small samples. Biometrika 76:297–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hutto RL, Hejl SJ, Preston CR, Finch D (1993) Effects of silvicultural treatments on forest birds in the Rocky Mountains: implications and management recommendations. In: Finch DM, Stangel PW (eds) Status and management of neotropical migratory birds. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Ser. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-229, pp 386–391Google Scholar
  31. Iglay RB, Miller DA, Leopold BD, Wang G (2012) Carabid beetle response to prescribed fire and herbicide in intensively managed, mid-rotation pine stands in Mississippi. For Ecol Manage 281:41–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jackson HB, Fahrig L (2015) Are ecologists conducting research at the right scale? Global Ecol Biogeogr 24:52–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jedlikowski J, Chibowski P, Karasek T, Brambilla M (2016) Multi-scale habitat selection in highly territorial bird species: exploring the contribution of nest, territory and landscape levels to site choice in breeding rallids (Aves: Rallidae). Acta Oecol 73:10–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jones J (2001) Habitat selection studies in avian ecology: a critical review. Auk 118:557–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kellner KF, Ruhl PJ, Dunning JB, Riegel JK, Swihart RK (2016) Multi-scale responses of breeding birds to experimental forest management in Indiana, USA. For Ecol Manage 382:64–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kirk DA, Hobson KA (2001) Bird-habitat relationship in jack pine boreal forests. For Ecol Manage 147:217–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Knight EC, Ng JW, Mader CE, Brigham RM, Bayne EM (2018) An inordinate fondness for beetles: first description of common nighthawk (Chordeiles minor) diet in the boreal biome. Wilson J Ornithol 130:525–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lee M, Fahrig L, Freemark K, Currie DJ (2002) Importance of patch scale vs landscape scale on selected forest birds. Oikos 96:110–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Legrand HG, Chamberlain MJ, Moser EB (2007) Diversity and abundance of breeding birds in a managed loblolly pine forest in Louisiana. Am Midl Nat 157:329–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lehnen SE, Rodewald AD (2009) Investigating area-sensitivity in shrubland birds: responses to patch size in a forested landscape. For Ecol Manage 257:2308–2316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mackenzie DI, Nichols JD, Lachman GB, MacKenzie DI, Nichols JD, Lachman GB, Droege S, Andrew Royle J, Langtimm CA (2002) Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are less than one. Ecology 83:2248–2255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McRae DJ, Duchesne LC, Freedman B, Lynham TJ, Woodley S (2001) Comparisons between wildfire and forest harvesting and their implications in forest management. Environ Rev 9:223–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mills AM (1986) The influence of moonlight on the behavior of goatsuckers (Caprimulgidae). Auk 2:370–378Google Scholar
  44. Moorman CE, Russell KR, Greenberg CH (2011) Reptile and amphibian response to hardwood forest management and early successional habitats. In: Greenberg C, Collins BS, Thompson F III (eds) Sustaining young forest communities in managing forest ecosystems series, vol 21. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 191–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Natural Resources Canada (NRCAN) (2017) 8 facts about Canada’s boreal forest. Accessed 6 July 2018
  46. Naugle DE, Higgins KF, Nusser SM, Carter JW (1999) Scale-dependent habitat use in three-species of prairie wetland birds. Landsc Ecol 14:267–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nebel S, Mills A, McCracken JD, Taylor PD (2010) Declines of aerial insectivores in North America follow a geographic gradient. Avian Conserv Ecol 5:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Nielsen SE, Boyce MS, Stenhouse GB (2004) Grizzly bears and forestry I: selection of clearcuts by grizzly bears in west-central Alberta, Canada. For Ecol Manage 199:51–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (OMNRF) (2010) Forest management guide for conserving biodiversity at the stand and site scales. Toronto: Queen’s Printer for Ontario, p 211. Access 9 April 2019
  50. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry (OMNRF) (2014) Forest resources inventory technical specifications 2009. Queen’s Printer for Ontario. Peterborough, On. Accessed 19 July 2018
  51. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry (OMNRF). (2018a) Management units and forest management plan renewal schedules. Accessed 19 June 2018
  52. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry (OMNRF). (2018b) Ontario’s forest regions. Accessed 4 July 2018
  53. Pickens BA, King SL (2014) Multiscale habitat selection of wetland birds in the northern Gulf Coast. Estuaries Coasts 37:1301–1311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Poulin RG, Grindal SD, Brigham RM (1996) Common Nighthawk (Chordeiles minor). In: Poole A, Gill F (eds) The Birds of North America, No. 213. The Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, PA, and the American Ornithologists’ Union, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  55. Purves E. (2015) The role of breeding habitat loss in the decline of Eastern Whip-poor-will (Antrostomus vociferous) populations in Canada. Masters Thesis. Queen’s UniversityGoogle Scholar
  56. R Core Team (2017) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
  57. Rand GJ (2014) Home range use, habitat selection, and stress physiology of Eastern Whip-poor-wills (Antrostomus vociferus) at the northern edge of their range. Msc. Thesis, Trent UniversityGoogle Scholar
  58. Raynor GS (1941) The nesting habits of the Whip-poor-will. Bird-Banding 12:98–104Google Scholar
  59. Reitsma LR, Holmes RT, Sherry TW (1990) Effects of Removal of red squirrels, Tamiasciurus hudsonicus, and Eastern Chipmunks, Tamias striatus, on nest predation in a northern hardwood forest: an artificial nest experiment. Oikos 57 (3):375–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Robertson BA (2009) Nest-site selection in a postfire landscape: do parents make tradeoffs between microclimate and predation risk? Auk 126:500–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rowe JF, Scotter GW (1973) Fire in the boreal forest. Quatern Res 3:444–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rushing CS, Ryder TB, Marra PP (2016) Quantifying drivers of population dynamics for a migratory bird throughout the annual cycle. Proc R Soc B 283:2015–2846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Russell RE, Royle JA, Saab VA, Lehmkuhl JF, Block WM, Sauer JR (2009) Modeling the effects of environmental disturbance on wildlife communities: avian responses to prescribed fire. Ecol Appl 19:1253–1263CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Shin D, Yoo J (2016) Reproductive success of Eurasian eagle-owls in wetland and non-wetland habitats of west-central Korea. J Raptor Res 50:241–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Smith CE (2012) Initial response of amphibian and small mammal species to timber and coarse woody debris harvest in aspen-dominated forests of northern Minnesota. MSc Thesis. Retrieved from the University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy, Accessed 15 July 2018
  66. Spitzer K, Danks HV (2006) Insect biodiversity of boreal peat bogs. Annu Rev Entomol 51:137–161CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Sponsler DB, Johnson RM (2015) Honey bee success predicted by landscape composition in Ohio, USA. PeerJ 3:e838CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  68. Stark JD, Chen XD, Johnson CS (2012) Effects of herbicides on Behr’s metalmark butterfly, a surrogate species for the endangered butterfly, Lange’s metalmark. Environ Pollut 164:24–27CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Stelfox JB (1995) Relationships between stand age, stand structure, and biodiversity in aspen mixedwood forests in Alberta. Alberta Environmental Centre and Canadian Forest Service, Vegreville and Edmonton, p 308Google Scholar
  70. Stenger JM, Rehm-Lorber JA, White CM, Pavlacky DC Jr (2011) Monitoring the Birds of Agate Fossil Beds National Monument: 2010 Annual Report. Rocky Mountain Bird Observatory, BrightonGoogle Scholar
  71. Streby HM, Andersen DE (2013) Movements, cover-type selection, and survival of fledgling ovenbirds in managed deciduous and mixed coniferous-deciduous forests. For Ecol Manage 287:9–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Tews J, Brose U, Grimm V, Tielbörger K, Wichmann MC, Schwager M, Jeltsch F (2004) Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: the importance of keystone structures. J Biogeogr 31:79–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Thompson DG, Pitt DG (2011) Frequently asked questions (FAQs) on the use of herbicides in Canadian Forestry. Frontline Forestry Research Applications, Canadian Forest Service. Sault Ste. Marie, ON. Accessed 15 May 2019
  74. Tozer DC, Hoare JC, Inglis JE, Yaraskavitch J, Kitching H, Dobbyn S (2014) Clearcut with seed trees in red pine forests associated with increased occupancy by Eastern Whip-poor-wills. For Ecol Manage 330:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Tremblay JA, Ibarzabal J, Dussault C, Savard JL (2009) Habitat requirements breeding black-backed woodpeckers (Picoides arcticus) in managed, unburned, boreal forest. Avian Conserv Ecol 4:2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Twedt DK (2015) Estimating regional landbird populations from enhanced North American Breeding Bird Surveys. J Field Ornithol 86:352–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. White CG, Schweitzer SH, Moore CT, Parnell IB III, Lewis-Weis LA (2010) Evaluation of the landscape surrounding Northern Bobwhite nest sites: a multiscale analysis. J Wildl Manage 69:1528–1537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wilson S, Ladeau SL, Tøttrup AP, Marra PP (2011) Range-wide effects of breeding and non–breeding season climate on the abundance of a Neotropical migrant songbird. Ecology 92:1789–1798CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Wilson MD, Watts BD (2006) Effect of moonlight on detection of Whip-poor-wills: implications for long-term monitoring strategies. J Field Ornithol 77:207–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Wilson MD, Watts BD (2008) Landscape configuration effects on distribution and abundance of Whip-poor-wills. Wilson J Ornthol 120:778–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Zimmerling JR, Francis CM, Roy C, Calvert AM (2017) How well does forestry in Ontario’s boreal forest emulate natural disturbances from the perspective of birds? Avian Conserv Ecol 12(2):10CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Geomatics and Landscape Ecology Research Laboratory (GLEL), Department of BiologyCarleton UniversityOttawaCanada
  2. 2.Wildlife Research Division, Environment and Climate Change CanadaNational Wildlife Research CentreOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations