A conceptual framework for the governance of multiple ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes

  • Aude VialatteEmail author
  • Cecile Barnaud
  • Julien Blanco
  • Annie Ouin
  • Jean-Philippe Choisis
  • Emilie Andrieu
  • David Sheeren
  • Sylvie Ladet
  • Marc Deconchat
  • Floriane Clément
  • Diane Esquerré
  • Clelia Sirami
Research Article



While the concept of ecosystem services (ES) is well established in the scientific and policy arenas, its operationalization faces many challenges. Indeed, ES supply, demand and flow are related to ecological and social processes at multiple space and time scales, leading to complex interactions in the provision of multiple ES.


To develop a conceptual framework (CF) to facilitate the study and governance of multiple ES in agricultural social-ecological landscapes.


We examined the ecological and social literatures to identify how approaches at the landscape level contribute to a better understanding of ES supply, demand and flow in agricultural systems. After detailing our CF, we use a case study to illustrate how methods from different disciplines can be combined to operationalize our CF.


The literature suggests that the landscape level is likely to be the level of organization that will make it possible to (i) integrate different components of ES co-production, i.e. ecological processes, agricultural practices and social structures, (ii) understand interactions between stakeholders, including ES co-producers and beneficiaries, (iii) explicit ES trade-offs, i.e. social choices between ES.


The production of multiple ES at the landscape level involves different types of interdependencies among ES co-producers and beneficiaries. These need to be addressed in concerted and integrated ways to achieve sustainable and equitable governance of agricultural landscapes.


Agricultural practices Biodiversity Companion modeling Ecological functions Mapping Remote sensing Social interactions Stakeholders Spatio-temporal scales Trade-offs 



The authors acknowledge the INRA Metaprogram Ecoserv for supporting part of their projects on ecosystem services.


  1. Abbas F, Merlet J, Morellet N, Verheyden H, Hewison AJM, Cargnelutti B, Angibault JM, Picot D, Rames JL, Lourtet B, Aulagnier S, Daufresne T (2012) Roe deer may markedly alter forest nitrogen and phosphorus budgets across Europe. Oikos 121:1271–1278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alignier A, Raymond L, Deconchat M, Menozzi P, Monteil C, Sarthou J-P, Vialatte A, Ouin A (2014) The effect of semi-natural habitats on aphids and their natural enemies across spatial and temporal scales. Biol Control. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allan E, Bossdorf O, Dormann CF, Prati D, Gossner MM, Tscharntke T, Blüthgen N, Bellach M, Birkhofer K, Boch S, Böhm S, Börschig C, Chatzinotas A, Christ S, Daniel R, Diekötter T, Fischer C, Friedl T, Glaser K, Hallmann C, Hodac L, Hölzel N, Jung K, Klein AM, Klaus VH, Kleinebecker T, Krauss J, Lange M, Morris EK, Müller J, Nacke H, Pašalić E, Rillig MC, Rothenwöhrer C, Schall P, Scherber C, Schulze W, Socher SA, Steckel J, Steffan-Dewenter I, Türke M, Weiner CN, Werner M, Westphal C, Wolters V, Wubet T, Gockel S, Gorke M, Hemp A, Renner SC, Schöning I, Pfeiffer S, König-Ries B, Buscot F, Linsenmair KE, Schulze E-D, Weisser WW, Fischer M (2014) Interannual variation in land-use intensity enhances grassland multidiversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111:308–313CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Allen TFH, Starr TB (1982) Hierarchy: perspectives for ecological complexity, 2nd edn. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  5. Andrade TO, Outreman Y, Krespi L, Plantegenest M, Vialatte A, Gauffre B, Baaren Jv (2015) Spatiotemporal variations in aphid-parasitoid relative abundance patterns and food webs in agricultural ecosystems. Ecosphere 6:art113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Andrieu E, Cabanettes A, Alignier A, Van Halder I, Alard D, Archaux F, Barbaro L, Bouget C, Bailey S, Corcket E, Deconchat M, Vigan M, Villemey A, Ouin A (2017) Edge contrast does not modulate edge effect on plants and pollinators. Basic Appl Ecol. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Antrop M (2000) Background concepts for integrated landscape analysis. Agrirc Ecosyst Environ 77:17–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Assessment ME (2005) Millennium ecosystem assessment. Ecosystems and human well-being: biodiversity synthesis. World Resources Institute, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  9. Balent G, Gibon A (2011) Interactions of grasslands with forest at the landscape level: topical issues and challenges attached to land management in agro–silvo–pastoral landscapes. In: Grassland productivity and ecosystems services, pp 239–250Google Scholar
  10. Barnaud C, Antona M (2014) Deconstructing ecosystem services: uncertainties and controversies around a socially constructed concept. Geoforum 56:113–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Barnaud C, Corbera E, Muradian R, Salliou N, Sirami C, Vialatte A, Choisis J-P, Dendoncker N, Mathevet R, Moreau C, Reyes-García V, Boada M, Deconchat M, Cibien C, Garnier S, Maneja R, Antona M (2018) Ecosystem services, social interdependencies, and collective action: a conceptual framework. Ecol Soc. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Barnaud C, Theil L, Choisis J-P, Eychenne C (2015) Les services écosystémiques: une notion savante déconnectée des représentations locales? Une analyse des représentations locales de l’élevage en zone agricole défavorisée. In: Environnement, politiques publiques et pratiques locales. L’Harmattan. Béringuier P, Blot F, Desailly B, Saqalli M, Paris, pp 26–49Google Scholar
  13. Bastian O, Grunewald K, Syrbe R-U, Walz U, Wende W (2014) Landscape services: the concept and its practical relevance. Landscape Ecol 29:1463–1479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Batary P, Fischer J, Báldi A, Crist T, Tscharntke T (2011) Does habitat heterogeneity increase farmland biodiversity? Front Ecol Environ 9:152–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Begg GM, Cook S, Dye R, Ferrante M, Franck P, Lavigne C, Lövei G, Mansion-Vaquié A, Pell JK, Petit S, Quesada N, Ricci B, Wratten S, Birch A (2017) A functional overview of conservation biological control. Crop Prot 97:145–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bennett EM, Cramer W, Begossi A, Cundill G, Díaz S, Egoh BN, Geijzendorffer IR, Krug CB, Lavorel S, Lazos E, Lebel L, Martín-López B, Meyfroidt P, Mooney HA, Nel JL, Pascual U, Payet K, Harguindeguy NP, Peterson GD, Prieur-Richard A-H, Reyers B, Roebeling P, Seppelt R, Solan M, Tschakert P, Tscharntke T, Turner B, Verburg PH, Viglizzo EF, White PC, Woodward G (2015) Linking biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human well-being: three challenges for designing research for sustainability. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 14:76–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bennett EM, Peterson GD, Gordon LJ (2009) Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecol Lett 12:1394–1404CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Berbés-Blázquez M, González JA, Pascual U (2016) Towards an ecosystem services approach that addresses social power relations. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 19:134–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bertrand C, Baudry J, Burel F (2016) Seasonal variation in the effect of landscape structure on ground-dwelling arthropods and biological control potential. Basic Appl Ecol 17:678–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bianchi FJJA, Booij CJH, Tscharntke T (2006) Sustainable pest regulation in agricultural landscapes: a review on landscape composition, biodiversity and natural pest control. Proc Biol Sci 273:1715–1727CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Bieling C, Plieninger T, Pirker H, Vogl CR (2014) Linkages between landscapes and human well-being: an empirical exploration with short interviews. Ecol Econ 105:19–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Blanco J, Dendoncker N, Barnaud C, Sirami C (2019) Ecosystem disservices matter: towards their systematic integration within ecosystem service research and policy. Ecosyst Serv 36:100913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Blanco J, Sourdril A, Deconchat M, Ladet S, Andrieu E (2018) Social drivers of rural forest dynamics: a multi-scale approach combining ethnography, geomatic and mental model analysis. Landsc Urban Plan. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Blitzer EJ, Dormann CF, Holzschuh A, Klein A-M, Rand TA, Tscharntke T (2012) Spillover of functionally important organisms between managed and natural habitats. Agric Ecosyst Environ 146:34–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Boulanger V, Baltzinger C, Said S, Ballon P, Picard J-f, Dupouey J-L (2015) Decreasing deer browsing pressure influenced understory vegetation dynamics over 30 years. Ann For Sci 72:367–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Braat LC (2018) Five reasons why the Science publication “Assessing nature’s contributions to people” (Diaz et al. 2018) would not have been accepted in ecosystem services. Ecosyst Serv 30:A1–A2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Bretagnolle V, Gaba S (2015) Weeds for bees? A review. Agron Sustain Dev 35:891–909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Burkhard B, Crossman N, Nedkov S, Petz K, Alkemade R (2013) Mapping and modelling ecosystem services for science, policy and practice. Ecosyst Serv Complete. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Carpenter S, Bennett E, Peterson G (2006) Scenarios for ecosystem services: an overview. Ecol Soc 1:1Google Scholar
  30. Carrié R, Andrieu E, Cunningham SA, Lentini PE, Loreau M, Ouin A (2017a) Relationships among ecological traits of wild bee communities along gradients of habitat amount and fragmentation. Ecography 40:85–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Carrié R, Andrieu E, Ouin A, Steffan-Dewenter I (2017b) Interactive effects of landscape-wide intensity of farming practices and landscape complexity on wild bee diversity. Landscape Ecol. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Chaplin-Kramer R, O’Rourke M, Blitzer E, Kremen C (2011) A meta-analysis of crop pest and natural enemy response to landscape complexity. Ecol Lett 14:922–932CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Choisis JP, Thévenet C, Gibon A (2012) Analyzing farming systems diversity: a case study in south-western France. Span J Agric Res 10:605–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Cleaver F (2002) Reinventing institutions: bricolage and the social embeddedness of natural resource management. Eur J Dev Res 14:11–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Clement F (2013) For critical social-ecological system studies: integrating power and discourses to move beyond the right institutional fit. Environ Conserv 40:1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Cochet H (2012) The systeme agraire concept in francophone peasant studies. Geoforum 43:128–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Collins S, Carpenter R, Swinton S, Gragson T, Orenstein D, Grimm N, Grove M, Harlan SL, Knapp A, Kofinas G, Magnuson J, McDowell W, Melack JM, Ogden LA, Robertson GP, Smith MD, Whitmer AC (2011) An integrated conceptual framework for social ecological research. Front Ecol Environ 9:351–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Conseil de l’Europe (2000) European landscape conventionGoogle Scholar
  39. Costanza R, Andrade F, Antunes P, van den Belt M, Boesch D, Boersma D, Catarino F, Hanna S, Limburg K, Low B, Molitor M, Pereira JG, Rayner S, Santos R, Wilson J, Young M (1999) Ecological economics and sustainable governance of the oceans. Ecol Econ 31:171–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Costanza R, d'Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O'Neill RV, Paruelo J, Raskin RG, Sutton P & van den Belt M (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–260. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Côté SD, Rooney TP, Tremblay J-P, Dussault C, Waller DM (2004) Ecological impacts of deer overabundance. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:113–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Da Ponte E, Kuenzer C, Parker A, Rodas O, Oppelt N, Fleckenstein M (2017) Forest cover loss in Paraguay and perception of ecosystem services: a case study of the Upper Parana Forest. Ecosyst Serv 24:200–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Daily GC, Polasky S, Goldstein J, Kareiva PM, Mooney HA, Pejchar L, Ricketts TH, Salzman J, Shallenberger R (2009) Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver. Front Ecol Environ 7:21–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Daw T, Brown K, Rosendo S, Pomeroy R (2011) Applying the ecosystem services concept to poverty alleviation: the need to disaggregate human well-being. Environ Conserv 38:370–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Daw TM, Coulthard S, Cheung WWL, Brown K, Abunge C, Galafassi D, Peterson GD, McClanahan TR, Omukoto JO, Munyi L (2015) Evaluating taboo trade-offs in ecosystems services and human well-being. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112:6949–6954CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. De Palma A, Abrahamczyk S, Aizen MA, Albrecht M, Basset Y, Bates A, Blake RJ, Boutin C, Bugter R, Connop S, Cruz-Lopez L, Cunningham SA, Darvill B, Diekotter T, Dorn S, Downing N, Entling MH, Farwig N, Felicioli A, Fonte SJ, Fowler R, Franzen M, Goulson D, Grass I, Hanley ME, Hendrix SD, Herrmann F, Herzog F, Holzschuh A, Jauker B, Kessler M, Knight ME, Kruess A, Lavelle P, Le Feon V, Lentini P, Malone LA, Marshall J, Pachon EM, McFrederick QS, Morales CL, Mudri-Stojnic S, Nates-Parra G, Nilsson SG, Ockinger E, Osgathorpe L, Parra A, Peres CA, Persson AS, Petanidou T, Poveda K, Power EF, Quaranta M, Quintero C, Rader R, Richards MH, Roulston T, Rousseau L, Sadler JP, Samnegard U, Schellhorn NA, Schuepp C, Schweiger O, Smith-Pardo AH, Steffan-Dewenter I, Stout JC, Tonietto RK, Tscharntke T, Tylianakis JM, Verboven HAF, Vergara CH, Verhulst J, Westphal C, Yoon HJ, Purvis A (2016) Predicting bee community responses to land-use changes: effects of geographic and taxonomic biases. Sci Rep. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Deconchat M, Gibon A, Cabanettes A, du Bus de Warnaffe G, Hewison M, Garine E, Gavaland A, Lacombe J-P, Ladet S, Monteil C, Ouin A, Sarthou J-P, Sourdril A, Balent G (2007) How to set up a research framework to analyze social-ecological interactive processes in a rural landscape. Ecol Soc. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Dendoncker N, Boeraeve F, Crouzat E, Dufrene M, König A, Barnaud C (2018) How can integrated valuation of ecosystem services help understanding and steering agroecological transitions? Ecol Soc. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Dendoncker N, Keune H, Jacobs S, Erik G-B (2013) Inclusive ecosystem services valuation. In: Ecosystem services: global issues, local practices, Elsevier, pp 3–12Google Scholar
  50. Díaz S, Pascual U, Stenseke M, Martín-López B, Watson RT, Molnár Z, Hill R, Chan KMA, Baste IA, Brauman KA, Polasky S, Church A, Lonsdale M, Larigauderie A, Leadley PW, van Oudenhoven APE, van der Plaat F, Schröter M, Lavorel S, Aumeeruddy-Thomas Y, Bukvareva E, Davies K, Demissew S, Erpul G, Failler P, Guerra CA, Hewitt CL, Keune H, Lindley S, Shirayama Y (2018) Assessing nature’s contributions to people. Science 359:270–272CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Duru M, Therond O, Martin G, Martin-Clouaire R, Magne M-A, Justes E, Journet E-P, Aubertot J-N, Savary S, Bergez J-E, Sarthou JP (2015) How to implement biodiversity-based agriculture to enhance ecosystem services: a review. Agron Sustain Dev 35:1259–1281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Egarter Vigl L, Depellegrin D, Pereira P, de Groot R, Tappeiner U (2017) Mapping the ecosystem service delivery chain: capacity, flow, and demand pertaining to aesthetic experiences in mountain landscapes. Sci Total Environ 574:422–436CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Elyakime B, Cabanettes A (2013) Financial evaluation of two models for energy production in small French farm forests. Renew Energy 57:51–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Fahrig L, Baudry J, Brotons L, Burel FG, Crist TO, Fuller RJ, Sirami C, Siriwardena GM, Martin J-L (2011) Functional landscape heterogeneity and animal biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. Ecol Lett 14:101–112CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Fedele G, Locatelli B, Djoudi H (2017) Mechanisms mediating the contribution of ecosystem services to human well-being and resilience. Ecosyst Serv 28:43–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Federico P, Hallam TG, McCracken GF, Purucker ST, Grant WE, Correa-Sandoval AN, Westbrook JK, Medellin RA, Cleveland CJ, Sansone CG, López JD, Betke M, Moreno-Valdez A, Kunz TH (2008) Brazilian free-tailed bats as insect pest regulators in transgenic and conventional cotton crops. Ecol Appl Publ Ecol Soc Am 18:826–837Google Scholar
  57. Felipe-Lucia MR, Martín-López B, Lavorel S, Berraquero-Díaz L, Escalera-Reyes J, Comín FA (2015) Ecosystem services flows: why stakeholders’ power relationships matter. PLoS ONE 10:e0132232CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Fischer A, Eastwood A (2016) Coproduction of ecosystem services as human–nature interactions—an analytical framework. Land Use Policy 52:41–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Fisher B, Turner RK, Morling P (2009) Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecol Econ 68:643–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Franks JR (2011) The collective provision of environmental goods: a discussion of contractual issues. J Environ Plan Manag 54:637–660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Fuller R, Gill R (2001) Ecological impacts of increasing numbers of deer in British woodland. Forestry. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Galafassi D, Daw T, Munyi L, Brown K, Barnaud C, Fazey I (2017) Learning about social-ecological trade-offs. Ecol Soc. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Garibaldi LA, Steffan-Dewenter I, Kremen C, Morales JM, Bommarco R, Cunningham SA, Carvalheiro LG, Chacoff NP, Dudenhöffer JH, Greenleaf SS, Holzschuh A, Isaacs R, Krewenka K, Mandelik Y, Mayfield MM, Morandin LA, Potts SG, Ricketts TH, Szentgyörgyi H, Viana BF, Westphal C, Winfree R, Klein AM (2011) Stability of pollination services decreases with isolation from natural areas despite honey bee visits. Ecol Lett 14:1062–1072CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Garrido P, Elbakidze M, Angelstam P (2017) Stakeholders’ perceptions on ecosystem services in Östergötland’s (Sweden) threatened oak wood-pasture landscapes. Landsc Urban Plan 158:96–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Gibon A (2005) Managing grassland for production, the environment and the landscape. Challenges at the farm and the landscape level. Livest Prod Sci 96:11–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Gibon A, Mottet A, Ladet S, Fily M (2006) Supporting livestock-farming to sustainable management of natural resources and landscapes: a case study in the Davantaygue valley (Pyrénées, France). In: Book of abstracts of the 57th annual meeting of the european association for animal production 12, 2006; 57 annual meeting of the european association for animal production, Antalya, TUR, 2006-09-17-2006-09-20, pp 98–98Google Scholar
  67. Goldman LR, Thompson BH, Daily G (2007) Institutional incentives for managing the landscape: inducing cooperation for the production of ecosystem services. Ecol Econ 64:333–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Gómez-Baggethun E, Ruiz-Pérez M (2011) Economic valuation and the commodification of ecosystem services. Prog Phys Geogr 35:613–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Guyot V, Castagneyrol B, Vialatte A, Deconchat M, Jactel H (2016) Tree diversity reduces pest damage in mature forests across Europe. Biol Lett 12:20151037CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  70. Hajer MA (1995) The politics of environmental discourse: ecological modernization and the policy process. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  71. Hamilton SK (2015) The ecology of agricultural landscapes: long-term research on the path to sustainability. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  72. Hein L, van Koppen K, de Groot RS, van Ierland EC (2006) Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecol Econ 57:209–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Holzschuh A, Dormann FC, Tscharntke T, Steffan-Dewenter I (2012) Mass-flowering crops enhance wild bee abundance. Oecologia 172:6Google Scholar
  74. Howe C, Suich H, Vira B, Mace GM (2014) Creating win-wins from trade-offs? Ecosystem services for human well-being: a meta-analysis of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies in the real world. Glob Environ Chang 28:263–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Irby LR, Zidack WE, Johnson JB, Saltiel J (1996) Economic damage to forage crops by native ungulates as perceived by farmers and ranchers in montana. J Range Manag 49:375–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Isaac M, Erickson B, Quashie-Sam S, Timmer V (2007) Transfer of knowledge on agroforestry management practices: the structure of farmer advice networks. Ecol Soc. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Kelemen E, Nguyen G, Gomiero T, Kovács E, Choisis J-P, Choisis N, Paoletti MG, Podmaniczky L, Ryschawy J, Sarthou J-P, Herzog F, Dennis P, Balázs K (2013) Farmers’ perceptions of biodiversity: lessons from a discourse-based deliberative valuation study. Land Use Policy 35:318–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. King E, Cavender-Bares J, Balvanera P, Mwampamba T, Polasky S (2015) Trade-offs in ecosystem services and varying stakeholder preferences: evaluating conflicts, obstacles, and opportunities. Ecol Soc. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Koschke L, Fürst C, Frank S, Makeschin F (2012) A multi-criteria approach for an integrated land-cover-based assessment of ecosystem services provision to support landscape planning. Ecol Ind 21:54–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Kremen C, Williams NM, Aizen MA, Gemmill-Herren B, LeBuhn G, Minckley R, Packer L, Potts SG, Roulston T, Steffan-Dewenter I, Vázquez DP, Winfree R, Adams L, Crone EE, Greenleaf SS, Keitt TH, Klein A-M, Regetz J, Ricketts TH (2007) Pollination and other ecosystem services produced by mobile organisms: a conceptual framework for the effects of land-use change. Ecol Lett 10:299–314CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Kumar M, Kumar P (2008) Valuation of the Ecosystem services: a psycho-cultural perspective. Ecol Econ 64:808–819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Landis D (2016) Designing Agricultural Landscapes for Biodiversity-Based Ecosystem Services. Basic Appl Ecol. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Larigauderie A, Mooney HA (2010) The Intergovernmental science-policy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services: moving a step closer to an IPCC-like mechanism for biodiversity. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 2:9–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Leeuwis C, van den Ban AW (2004) Communication for rural innovation: rethinking agricultural extension. Blackwell Publishing Ltd., OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Lefebvre M, Espinosa M, Gomez y Paloma S, Paracchini ML, Piorr A, Zasada I (2015) Agricultural landscapes as multi-scale public good and the role of the common agricultural policy. J Environ Planning Manag 58:2088–2112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Lescourret F, Magda D, Richard G, Adam-Blondon A-F, Baudry J, Bardy M, Doussan I, Dumont B, Lefèvre F, Litrico I, Martin-Clouaire R, Montuelle B, Pellerin S, Plantegenest M, Tancoigne E, Thomas A, Guyomard H, Soussana J-F (2015) A social–ecological approach to managing multiple agro-ecosystem services. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 14:68–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Losey JE, Vaughan M (2006) The economic value of ecological services provided by insects. Bioscience 56:311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Maalouly M, Franck P, Bouvier J-C, Toubon J-F, Lavigne C (2013) Codling moth parasitism is affected by semi-natural habitats and agricultural practices at orchard and landscape levels. Agric Ecosyst Environ 169:33–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Maass JM, Balvanera P, Castillo A, Daily GC, Mooney HA, Ehrlich P, Quesada M, Miranda A, Jaramillo VJ, García-Oliva F, Martínez-Yrizar A, Cotler H, López-Blanco J, Pérez-Jiménez A, Búrquez A, Tinoco C, Ceballos G, Barraza L, Ayala R, Sarukhán J (2005) Ecosystem services of tropical dry forests: insights from longterm ecological and social research on the Pacific coast of Mexico. Ecol Soc 10:1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Maine JJ, Boyles JG (2015) Bats initiate vital agroecological interactions in corn. Proc Nat Acad Sci 112:12438–12443CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Manuel-Navarrete D, Gallopín GC, Blanco M, Díaz-Zorita M, Ferraro DO, Herzer H, Laterra P, Murmis MR, Podestá GP, Rabinovich J, Satorre EH, Torres F, Viglizzo EF (2009) Multi-causal and integrated assessment of sustainability: the case of agriculturization in the Argentine Pampas. Environ Dev Sustain 11:621–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Marrec R, Caro G, Miguet P, Badenhausser I, Plantegenest M, Vialatte A, Bretagnolle V, Gauffre B (2017) Spatiotemporal dynamics of the agricultural landscape mosaic drives distribution and abundance of dominant carabid beetles. Landscape Ecol 32:2383–2398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Martín-López B, Gómez-Baggethun E, García-Llorente M, Montes C (2014) Trade-offs across value-domains in ecosystem services assessment. Ecol Ind 37:220–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Martín-López B, Iniesta-Arandia I, García-Llorente M, Palomo I, Casado-Arzuaga I, Amo DGD, Gómez-Baggethun E, Oteros-Rozas E, Palacios-Agundez I, Willaarts B, González JA, Santos-Martín F, Onaindia M, López-Santiago C, Montes C (2012) Uncovering ecosystem service bundles through social preferences. PLoS ONE 7:e38970CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  95. McLeod JG, Campbell CA, Dyck FB, Vera CL (1992) Optimum seeding date for winter wheat in Southwestern Saskatchewan. Agron J 84:86–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Monteiro L, Lavigne C, Ricci B, Franck P, Toubon J-F, Sauphanor B (2013) Predation of codling moth eggs is affected by pest management practices at orchard and landscape levels. Agric Ecosyst Environ 166:4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Moreau C, Barnaud C, Mathevet R (2019) Conciliate agriculture with landscape and biodiversity conservation: a role-playing game to explore trade-offs among ecosystem services through social learning. Sustainability 11:310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Morellet N, Moorter B, Cargnelutti B, Angibault J-M, Lourtet B, Merlet J, Ladet S, Hewison A (2011) Landscape composition influences roe deer habitat selection at both home range and landscape scale. Landscape Ecol 26:999–1010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Mosse D (1997) The symbolic making of a common property resource: history, ecology and locality in a tank-irrigated landscape in South India. Dev Change 28:467–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Müller F, de Groot R, Willemen L (2010) Ecosystem services at the landscape scale: the need for integrative approaches. Landscape 23:1–11Google Scholar
  101. Muradian R, Rival L (2012) Between markets and hierarchies: the challenge of governing ecosystem services. Ecosyst Serv 1:93–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Olson M (1971) The logic of collective action: public goods and the theory of groups, second printing with new preface and appendix (Harvard Economic Studies). Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  103. Opdam P, Coninx I, Dewulf A, Steingröver E, Vos C, van der Wal M (2016) Does information on landscape benefits influence collective action in landscape governance? Curr Opin Environ Sustain 18:107–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. The Political economy of institutions and decisions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Ostrom E (2005) Understanding institutional diversity. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  106. Ostrom E (2010) Beyond markets and states: polycentric governance of complex economic systems. Am Econ Rev 100:641–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Ostrom E, Gardner R, Walker J (1994) Rules, games, and common-pool resources. University of Michigan Press, Ann ArborCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Pahl-Wostl C, Craps M, Dewulf A, Mostert E, Tabara D, Taillieu T (2007) Social Learning and water resources management. Ecol Soc. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Palomo I, Felipe-Lucia MR, Bennett EM, Martín-López B, Pascual U (2016) Chapter six—disentangling the pathways and effects of ecosystem service co-production. In: Woodward G, Bohan DA (eds) Advances in ecological research, vol 54. Ecosystem services: from biodiversity to society, Part 2. Academic Press, Cambridge, pp 245–283Google Scholar
  110. Pelosi C, Goulard M, Balent G (2010) The spatial scale mismatch between ecological processes and agricultural management: do difficulties come from underlying theoretical frameworks? Agric Ecosyst Environ 139:455–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Peterson G, Harmáčková Z, Meacham M, Queiroz C, Jiménez-Aceituno A, Kuiper J, Malmborg K, Sitas N, Bennett E (2018) Welcoming different perspectives in IPBES: “nature’s contributions to people” and “ecosystem services”. Ecol Soc. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Pimentel D, Wilson C, McCullum C, Huang R, Dwen P, Flack J, Tran Q, Saltman T, Cliff B (1997) Economic and environmental benefits of biodiversity. Bioscience 47:747–757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Plieninger T, Kizos T, Bieling C, Le Dû-Blayo L, Budniok M-A, Bürgi M, Crumley C, Girod G, Howard P, Kolen J, Kuemmerle T, Milcinski G, Palang H, Trommler K, Verburg P (2015) Exploring ecosystem-change and society through a landscape lens: recent progress in European landscape research. Ecol Soc. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Potschin M, Haines-Young R (2013) Landscapes, sustainability and the place-based analysis of ecosystem services. Landscape Ecol 28:1053–1065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Prager K (2015) Agri-environmental collaboratives as bridging organisations in landscape management. J Environ Manage 161:375–384CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. Prager K, Reed M, Scott A (2012) Encouraging collaboration for the provision of ecosystem services at a landscape scale—rethinking agri-environmental payments. Land Use Policy 29:244–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Primmer E, Furman E (2012) Operationalising ecosystem service approaches for governance: do measuring, mapping and valuing integrate sector-specific knowledge systems? Ecosyst Serv 1:85–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Puech C, Poggi S, Baudry J, Aviron S (2015) Do farming practices affect natural enemies at the landscape scale? Landscape Ecol 30:125–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Putman RJ, Moore NP (2002) Impact of deer in lowland Britain on agriculture, forestry and conservation habitats. Mammal Rev 28:141–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Quétier F, Rivoal F, Marty P, de Chazal J, Thuiller W, Lavorel S (2010) Social representations of an alpine grassland landscape and socio-political discourses on rural development. Reg Environ Change 10:119–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Rand AT, Tylianakis J, Tscharntke T (2006) Spillover edge effects: the dispersal of agriculturally subsidized insect natural enemies into adjacent natural habitats. Ecol Lett 9:603–614CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  122. Raudsepp-Hearne C, Peterson GD, Bennett EM (2010) Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:5242–5247CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  123. Raymond MC, Kenter JO, Plieninger T, Turner NJ, Alexander KA (2015) Comparing instrumental and deliberative paradigms underpinning the assessment of social values for cultural ecosystem services. Zenodo. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Raymond L, Vialatte A, Plantegenest M (2014) Combination of morphometric and isotopic tools for studying spring migration dynamics in Episyrphus balteatus. Ecosphere 5:art88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Ricci B, Franck P, Toubon J-F, Bouvier J-C, Sauphanor B, Lavigne C (2009) The influence of landscape on insect pest dynamics: a case study in southeastern France. Landscape Ecol 24:337–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Robards MD, Schoon ML, Meek CL, Engle NL (2011) The importance of social drivers in the resilient provision of ecosystem services. Glob Environ Change 21:522–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Robertson PG, Gross KL, Hamilton SK, Landis DA, Schmidt TM, Snapp SS, Swinton SM (2014) Farming for ecosystem services: an ecological approach to production agriculture. Bioscience 64:404–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Rodríguez J, Beard J, Bennett E, Cumming G, Cork S, Agard J, Dobson A, Peterson G (2006) Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services. Ecol Soc. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Röling NG, Wagemakers MA (1998) A new practise: facilitating sustainable agriculture. In: Röling G, Wagemakers MA (eds) Facilitating sustainable agriculture: participatory learning and adaptive management in times of environmental uncertainty. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 3–22Google Scholar
  130. Roume A, Deconchat M, Raison L, Balent G, Ouin A (2011) Edge effects on ground beetles at the woodlot-field interface are short-range and asymmetrical. Agric For Entomol 13:395–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Ryschawy J, Joannon A, Choisis J-P, Gibon A, Le Gal P-Y (2013) Evaluating innovative scenarios to enhance mixed crop-livestock farms sustainabilityGoogle Scholar
  132. Salliou N, Barnaud C (2017) Landscape and biodiversity as new resources for agro-ecology? Insights from farmers’ perspectives. Ecol Soc 22:16Google Scholar
  133. Salliou N, Barnaud C, Vialatte A, Monteil C (2017) A participatory Bayesian belief network approach to explore ambiguity among stakeholders about socio-ecological systems. Environ Modell Softw 96:199–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Salliou N, Vialatte A, Monteil C, Barnaud C (2019) First use of participatory Bayesian modeling to study habitat management at multiple scales for biological pest control. Agron Sustain Dev 39:7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Sarthou J-P, Ouin A, Arrignon F, Barreau G, Bouyjou B (2005) Landscape parameters explain the distribution and abundance of Episyrphus balteatus (Diptera: Syrphidae). Eur J Entomol 102:539–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Schellhorn NA, Gagic V, Bommarco R (2015) Time will tell: resource continuity bolsters ecosystem services. Trends Ecol Evol 30:524–530CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  137. Schmitz J, Hahn M, Brühl CA (2014) Agrochemicals in field margins—an experimental field study to assess the impacts of pesticides and fertilizers on a natural plant community. Agric Ecosyst Environ 193:60–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Scholte SSK, van Teeffelen AJA, Verburg PH (2015) Integrating socio-cultural perspectives into ecosystem service valuation: a review of concepts and methods. Ecol Econ 114:67–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Selman P (2006) Planning at the landscape scale, vol 12. RTPI library series edition, Routledge, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Shackleton CM, Ruwanza S, Sanni GKS, Bennett S, Lacy PD, Modipa R, Mtati N, Sachikonye M, Thondhlana G (2016) Unpacking Pandora’s box: understanding and categorising ecosystem disservices for environmental management and human wellbeing. Ecosystems 19:587–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Sirami C, Caplat P, Popy S et al (2017) Impacts of global change on species distributions: obstacles and solutions to integrate climate and land use. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 26:385–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Smith HF, Sullivan CA (2014) Ecosystem services within agricultural landscapes—farmers’ perceptions. Ecol Econ 98:72–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Sourdril A, Andrieu E, Cabanettes A, Elyakime B, Ladet S (2012) How to maintain domesticity of usages in small rural forests? lessons from forest management continuity through a french case study. Ecol Soc. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Spangenberg JH, Görg C, Truong DT, Tekken V, Bustamante JV, Settele J (2014) Provision of ecosystem services is determined by human agency, not ecosystem functions. Four case studies. Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manage 10:40–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Stallman HR (2011) Ecosystem services in agriculture: determining suitability for provision by collective management. Ecol Econ 71:131–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Swinton S, Lupi F, Robertson GP, Hamilton S (2007) Ecosystem services and agriculture: cultivating agricultural ecosystems for diverse benefits. Ecol Econ 64:245–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Teixeira FZ, Bachi L, Blanco J, Zimmermann I, Welle I, Carvalho-Ribeiro SM (2019) Perceived ecosystem services (ES) and ecosystem disservices (EDS) from trees: insights from three case studies in Brazil and France. Landscape Ecol. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. Termorshuizen WJ, Opdam P (2009) Landscape services as a bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development. Landscape Ecol 24:1037–1052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. Therond O, Duru M, Roger-Estrade J, Richard G (2017) A new analytical framework of farming system and agriculture model diversities. A review. Agron Sustain Dev. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. Thierry H, Vialatte A, Choisis J-P, Gaudou B, Parry H, Monteil C (2017) Simulating spatially-explicit crop dynamics of agricultural landscapes: the ATLAS simulator. Ecol Inform 40:62–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. Thompson Hobbs N (1996) Modification of ecosystems by ungulates. J Wildl Manag 60:695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. Turkelboom F, Leone M, Jacobs S, Turkelboom F, Leone M, Jacobs S, Kelemen E, García-Llorente M, Baró F, Termansen M, Barton DN, Berry P, Stange E, Thoonen M, Kalóczkai Á, Vadineanu A, Castro AJ, Czúcz B, Röckmann C, Wurbs D, Odee D, Preda E, Gómez-Baggethun E, Rusch GM, Pastur GM, Palomo I, Dick J, Casaer J, van Dijk J, Priess JA, Langemeyer J, Mustajoki J, Kopperoinen L, Baptist MJ, Peri PL, Mukhopadhyay R, Aszalós R, Roy SB, Luque S, Rusch V (2018) When we cannot have it all: ecosystem services trade-offs in the context of spatial planning. Ecosyst Serv 29:566–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. Vasseur C, Joannon A, Aviron S, Burel F, Jean-Marc M, Baudry J (2013) The cropping systems mosaic: how does the hidden heterogeneity of agricultural landscapes drive arthropod populations? Agric Ecosyst Environ 166:3–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Verburg PH, van Berkel DB, van Doorn AM, van Eupen M, van den Heiligenberg HARM (2010) Trajectories of land use change in Europe: a model-based exploration of rural futures. Landscape Ecol 25:217–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. Veres A, Petit S, Conord C, Lavigne C (2013) Does landscape composition affect pest abundance and their control by natural enemies? A review. Agric Ecosyst Environ 166:110–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  156. Vialatte A, Simon J-C, Dedryver C-A, Fabre F, Plantegenest M (2006) Tracing individual movements of aphids reveals preferential routes of population transfers in agroecosystems. Ecol Appl Publ Ecol Soc Am 16:839–844Google Scholar
  157. Vialatte A, Tsafack N, Hassan DA, Duflot R, Plantegenest M, Ouin A, Villenave-Chasset J, Ernoult A (2017) Landscape potential for pollen provisioning for beneficial insects favours biological control in crop fields. Landscape Ecol 32:465–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. Villamagna AM, Angermeier PL, Bennett EM (2013) Capacity, pressure, demand, and flow: a conceptual framework for analyzing ecosystem service provision and delivery. Ecol Complex 15:114–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. Vuillot C, Coron N, Calatayud F, Sirami C, Mathevet R, Gibon A (2016) Ways of farming and ways of thinking: do farmers’ mental models of the landscape relate to their land management practices? Ecol Soc. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  160. Wu J (2013) Landscape sustainability science: ecosystem services and human well-being in changing landscapes. Landscape Ecol 28:999–1023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  161. Zhang W, Ricketts T, Kremen C, Carney K, Swinton S (2007) Ecosystem services and dis-services to agriculture. Ecol Econ 64:253–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aude Vialatte
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Cecile Barnaud
    • 1
    • 2
  • Julien Blanco
    • 1
    • 2
  • Annie Ouin
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jean-Philippe Choisis
    • 1
    • 2
  • Emilie Andrieu
    • 1
    • 2
  • David Sheeren
    • 1
    • 2
  • Sylvie Ladet
    • 1
    • 2
  • Marc Deconchat
    • 1
    • 2
  • Floriane Clément
    • 1
    • 2
  • Diane Esquerré
    • 1
    • 2
  • Clelia Sirami
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Dynafor, Université de Toulouse, INRA, INPT, INPT - EI PURPANToulouseFrance
  2. 2.Ltser Zone Atelier « Pyrénées Garonne »ToulouseFrance

Personalised recommendations