Spatiotemporal patterns of cheatgrass invasion in Colorado Plateau National Parks
- 25 Downloads
Exotic annual grasses are transforming native arid and semi-arid ecosystems globally by accelerating fire cycles that drive vegetation state changes. Cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum), a particularly widespread and aggressive exotic annual grass, is a key management target in national parks of the western United States due to its impacts on wildfire and biodiversity loss. Cheatgrass is known for its high interannual variability and can grow in a wide range of conditions.
The objectives were to (1) map the presence and persistence of cheatgrass in national park units across a 11-year period using remote sensing, and (2) identify the biophysical parameters that correlate with cheatgrass persistence.
We used remote sensing and GIS tools to develop a systematic model to characterize the status and environmental correlates of cheatgrass invasions in seven national park units in the western United States.
On average cheatgrass covered 3.8% of park areas, each park ranging from 0.8 to 24.8% coverage. Where cheatgrass was detected, persistent populations across time (hotspots) made up on average 13% of cheatgrass areas. Hotspots were found in areas with deeper plant-available water, lower elevations, colder mean winter temperatures, flatter slopes, higher soil clay content, and lower mean fall precipitation.
Study results identified spatiotemporal patterns of plant invasions and key environmental drivers that influence invasion patterns. GIS tool development and analysis from this study were used to generate invasion maps for each park, which can be used to mitigate wildfire and biodiveristy loss.
KeywordsBromus tectorum Cheatgrass Plant invasion Wildfire Remote sensing GIS Spatial modeling
We gratefully acknowledge the funding provided by the Utah NASA Space Grant Consortium. Thanks to Phil Allen and Bruce Roundy for providing valuable feedback. We also thank Dennis Eggett for guidance on the statistical analysis, Ryan Howell and Catherine McQueen for their time and assistance in GIS data processing, and Kirk Sherrill for his dedication to remote sensing analysis. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
- Bradford JB, Lauenroth WK (2009) Controls over invasion of Bromus tectorum: the importance of climate, soil, disturbance and seed availability. J Veg Sci 17:693–704.Google Scholar
- Bureau of Reclamation n (2016) Report to Congress Operations of Glen Canyon Dam Pursuant to the Grand Canyon Protection Act of 1992 Reclamation: Managing Water in the WestGoogle Scholar
- Christensen JH, Hewitson B, Busuioc A, Chen A, Gao X, Held R, Jones R, Kolli RK, Kwon UK, Laprise R (2007) Regional climate projections. In: Climate change, 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, chapter 11. University Press, Cambridge, pp 847–940.Google Scholar
- ESRI (2011) ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10.3. Environmental Systems Research Institute, RedlandsGoogle Scholar
- Germino MJ, Chambers JC, Brown CS (2015) Exotic brome-grasses in arid and semiarid ecosystems of the western US. Springer, ChamGoogle Scholar
- Hillel D (1998) Environmental soil physics: fundamentals, applications, and environmental considerations. Elsevier, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Hollander M, Wolfe DA, Chicken E (2013) Nonparametric statistical methods, vol 751. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
- Institute SAS (1990) SAS/STAT user’s guide: version 6, vol 2. Sas Institute, CaryGoogle Scholar
- JMP Pro (1989–2012) v13 Cary, NC: SASGoogle Scholar
- Kokaly RF (2011) Detecting cheatgrass on the Colorado Plateau using Landsat data: a tutorial for the DESI software. US Geol Surv Open File Rep 2010(1327):88Google Scholar
- Maciel EL, Pan W, Dietze R, Peres RL, Vinhas SA, Ribeiro FK, Palaci M, Rodrigues RR, Zandonade E, Golub JE (2010) Spatial patterns of pulmonary tuberculosis incidence and their relationship to socio-economic status in Vitoria, Brazil. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 14:1395–1402.Google Scholar
- Mack RN (2010) Fifty years of ‘Waging war on cheatgrass’: research advances, while meaningful control languishes. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, pp 253–265Google Scholar
- Miller ME (2018) Early season invasives mapping 2001-2010, Washington County, Utah, USA. https://doi.org/10.5066/p9QEJGD8
- Morgan RPC (2009) Soil erosion and conservation. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
- Morrow LA, Stahlman PW (1984) The history and distribution of downy brome (Bromus tectorum) in North America. Weed Sci 32:2–6Google Scholar
- National Park System Advisory Board (2001) Rethinking the national parks for the 21st century. National Park Service, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
- R Development Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Development Core Team, ViennaGoogle Scholar
- Smith LI (2002) A tutorial on principal components analysis. Cornell University, IthacaGoogle Scholar
- Soil Survey Staff (2015) Web soil survey. Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- State of Utah Division of Technology and Information Services (2003) Utah Automated Geographic Reference Center. https://gis.utah.gov
- Utah Office of Tourism (2017) Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute Travel and tourism industry metrics. Utah Office of Tourism, Salt Lake CityGoogle Scholar
- Vitousek PM, Dantonio CM, Loope LL, Westbrooks R (1996) Biological invasions as global environmental change. Am Sci 84:468–478Google Scholar
- West AM, Evangelista PH, Jarnevich CS, Kumar S, Swallow A, Luizza MW, Chignell SM (2017) Using multi-date satellite imagery to monitor invasive grass species distribution in post-wildfire landscapes: an iterative, adaptable approach that employs open-source data and software International. J Appl Earth Observ Geoinform 59:135–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar