Influence of fire refugia spatial pattern on post-fire forest recovery in Oregon’s Blue Mountains
- 340 Downloads
Fire regimes in many dry forests of western North America are substantially different from historical conditions, and there is concern about the ability of these forests to recover following severe wildfire. Fire refugia, unburned or low-severity burned patches where trees survived fire, may serve as essential propagule sources that enable forest regeneration.
To quantify the influence of fire refugia spatial pattern and other biophysical factors on the process of post-fire tree regeneration; in particular examining both the proximity and density of surrounding refugia to characterize the landscape of refugial seed sources.
We surveyed regeneration at 135 sites in stand-replacement patches across a gradient of fire refugia density in eastern Oregon, USA. We characterized the influence of refugial seed source pattern and other environmental factors on the abundance of regenerating seedlings, and examined the relationship between post-fire climate and the temporal pattern of ponderosa pine seedling establishment.
Tree seedlings were present in 83% of plots 12–17 years post-fire, and densities varied substantially (0–67800 stems ha−1, median = 1100). Variation in seedling abundance was driven by the spatial patterns of refugial seed sources. Despite widespread post-fire shrub cover, high-severity burned forests have not undergone a persistent type conversion to shrublands. Ponderosa pine seedling establishment peaked 5–11 years after fire and was not closely associated with post-fire climate.
Fire refugia and the seed sources they contain fostered tree regeneration in severely burned patches. Management practices that reduce refugia within post-fire landscapes may negatively influence essential forest recovery processes.
KeywordsMixed-conifer forest Resilience Refugia Tree regeneration US Pacific Northwest Wildfire
This research was funded by the National Fire Plan through agreements between the Aldo Leopold Wilderness Research Institute and Oregon State University (16-JV-11221639-101) and Western Colorado University (16-JV-11221639-107). Access to field sites was facilitated by the Ochoco, Umatilla, and Malheur National Forests. We thank Jean McCalmont, Julie VanSandt, and Claire Tortorelli for assistance with data collection, and Marc-André Parisien for comments on earlier drafts. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
- Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2014) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:48Google Scholar
- Boag AE (2018) Climate change and wildfire: implications for forest management in the Blue Mountains of eastern Oregon. University of Colorado, BoulderGoogle Scholar
- Burns RM (1983) Silvicultural systems for the major forest types of the United States. Agricultural Handbook 445. USDA Forest Service, Washington, D.C., USAGoogle Scholar
- Burns RM, Honkala BH (1990) Silvics of North America. Agricultural Handbook 654. USDA Forest Service, Washington, D.C., USAGoogle Scholar
- Conrad SG, Jaramillo AE, Kermit Cromack J, Rose S (1985) The role of the genus Ceanothus in western forest ecosystems. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report, PNW-GTR-182. Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR, USAGoogle Scholar
- Donato DC, Harvey BJ, Turner MG (2016) Regeneration of montane forests 24 years afer the 1988 Yellowstone fires: a fire-catalyzed shif in lower treelines? Ecosphere 7:1–16Google Scholar
- Downing WM (2018) Fire refugia function and composition in dry mixed-conifer forests of Oregon’s Blue Mountains. Oregon State UniversityGoogle Scholar
- Hall FC (1976) Fire and vegetaion in the Blue Mountains–Implications for land managers. In: Page Proceedings of the annual Tall Timbers fire ecology conference. Tall Timbers Research Station, Tallahassee, Florida, pp. 155–170Google Scholar
- Johnson CG, RR Clausnitzer (1992) Plant associations of the Blue and Ochoco Mountains. R6-ERW-T-036092. Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR, USAGoogle Scholar
- Key CH, Benson NC (2006) Landscape assessment: ground measure of severity, the composite burn index. In: Lutes DC (ed) FIREMON: fire effects monitoring and inventory system. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report 164-CD. Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA, pp LA8–LA15.Google Scholar
- Meddens AJ, Kolden CA, Lutz JA, Smith AM, Cansler CA, Abatzoglou JT, Meigs GW, Downing WM, Krawchuk MA (2018) Fire refugia: what are they, and why do they matter for global change? BioScience 68(12):944–954Google Scholar
- Powell D (1994) Effects of the 1980 s western spruce budworm outbreak on the Malheur National Forest in northeastern Oregon. USDA Forest Service Technical Report R6-FI&D-TP-12-94. Pacific Northwest Region Forest Insects and Disease Group, Portland, OR, USAGoogle Scholar
- Safford HD (2013) Natural Range of Variation (NRV) for yellow pine and mixed conifer forests in the bioregional assessment area, including the Sierra Nevada, southern Cascades, and Modoc and Inyo National Forests. Unpublished report. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Region, Vallejo, CAGoogle Scholar
- Shatford JPA, Hibbs DE, Puettmann KJ (2007) Conifer regeneration after forest fire in the Klamath-Siskiyous: how much, how soon? J For 105:139–146Google Scholar
- Stine P, Hessburg P, Spies T, Kramer M, Fettig CJ, Hansen A, Lehmkuhl J, O’Hara K, Polivka K, Singleton P, Charnley S, Merschel A, White R (2014) The ecology and management of moist mixed-conifer forests in eastern Oregon and Washington: a synthesis of the relevant biophysical science and implications for future land management. USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report, PNW-GTR-897. Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, Oregon, USAGoogle Scholar
- Swanson FJ (1981) Fire and geomorphic processes. In: Bonnicksen TM, Christensen NL, Lotan JE (eds) Mooney HA. Fire regimes and ecosystem properties, USDA General Technical Report WO-26. USDA Forest Service, pp 401–444Google Scholar
- Turner MG, Gardner RH, O’neill RV, O’Neill RV (2015) Landscape ecology in theory and practice. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Wahlenberg WG (1930) Effect of ceanothus brush on western yellow pine plantations in the northern Rocky Mountains. J Agric Res 41:601–612Google Scholar
- Wang T, Hamann A, Spittlehouse D, Carroll C (2016) Locally downscaled and spatially customizable climate data for historical and future periods for North America. PLoS ONE 11:1–17Google Scholar
- Wiens JA (2011) Central concepts and issues of landscape ecology. In: Gutzwiller KJ (ed) Applying landscape ecology in biological conservation. Springer, Berlin, pp 3–21Google Scholar
- Zavitkovski J, Newton M, El-Hassan B (1969) Effects of snowbrush on growth of some conifers. J For 67:242–246Google Scholar