Advertisement

Historical patterns of fire severity and forest structure and composition in a landscape structured by frequent large fires: Pumice Plateau ecoregion, Oregon, USA

  • R. Keala HagmannEmail author
  • Andrew G. Merschel
  • Matthew J. Reilly
Research Article
  • 40 Downloads

Abstract

Context

Lack of quantitative observations of extent, frequency, and severity of large historical fires constrains awareness of departure of contemporary conditions from those that demonstrated resistance and resilience to frequent fire and recurring drought.

Objectives

Compare historical and contemporary fire and forest conditions for a dry forest landscape with few barriers to fire spread.

Methods

Quantify differences in (1) historical (1700–1918) and contemporary (1985–2015) fire extent, fire rotation, and stand-replacing fire and (2) historical (1914–1924) and contemporary (2012) forest structure and composition. Data include 85,750-ha tree-ring reconstruction of fire frequency and extent; > 375,000-ha timber inventory following > 78,900-ha fires in 1918; and remotely-sensed maps of contemporary fire effects and forest conditions.

Results

Historically, fires > 20,000 ha occurred every 9.5 years; fire rotation was 14.9 years; seven fires > 40,469 ha occurred during extreme drought (PDSI < − 4.0); and stand-replacing fire occurred primarily in lodgepole (Pinus contorta var. murrayana). In contemporary fires, only 5% of the ecoregion burned in 30 years, and stand-replacing fire occurred primarily in ponderosa (Pinus ponderosa) and mixed-conifer. Historically, density of conifers > 15 cm dbh exceeded 120 trees/ha on < 5% of the area compared to 95% currently.

Conclusions

Frequent, large, low-severity fires historically maintained open-canopy ponderosa and mixed-conifer forests in which large fire- and drought-tolerant trees were prevalent. Stand-replacing patches in ponderosa and mixed-conifer were rare, even in fires > 40,469 ha (minimum size of contemporary “megafires”) during extreme drought. In this frequent-fire landscape, mixed-severity fire historically influenced lodgepole and adjacent forests. Lack of large, frequent, low-severity fires degrades contemporary forest ecosystems.

Keywords

Ponderosa pine Lodgepole pine Landscape patterns of fire severity Stand-replacing fire Megafire Dry forest restoration 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Constructive reviews from James K. Agee, Peter M. Brown, Emily K. Heyerdahl, Meg A. Krawchuk, and two anonymous reviewers substantially improved our manuscript. We gratefully acknowledge financial support for preparation of additional inventory data from the Klamath Tribes and for this project from Oregon Department of Forestry; College of Forestry, Oregon State University; and US Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station, Corvallis, Oregon.

Supplementary material

10980_2019_791_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (5.2 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 5294 kb)
10980_2019_791_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (1.4 mb)
Supplementary material 2 (PDF 1411 kb)
10980_2019_791_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (1.4 mb)
Supplementary material 3 (PDF 1425 kb)
10980_2019_791_MOESM4_ESM.pdf (238 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (PDF 237 kb)

References

  1. Agee JK (1981) Initial effects of prescribed fire in a climax Pinus contorta forest. Crater Lake National Park, OregonGoogle Scholar
  2. Agee JK (1993) Fire ecology of Pacific Northwest forests. Island Press, Washington, D. C.Google Scholar
  3. Arno SF, Sneck KM (1977) A method for determining fire history in coniferous forests of the mountain west. Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, USDA Forest Service, OgdenGoogle Scholar
  4. Baker WL (2012) Implications of spatially extensive historical data from surveys for restoring dry forests of Oregon’s eastern Cascades. Ecosphere 3:1–39Google Scholar
  5. Bork JL (1984) Fire history in three vegetation types on the eastern side of the Oregon Cascades. Ph.D. diss,. Oregon State University, CorvallisGoogle Scholar
  6. Bright GA (1912) A study of the growth of yellow pine in Oregon. Unpublished typescript report obtained from the National Archives, College Park, MD; record group 95. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, p 106. http://fs.usda.gov/detail/umatilla/learning/history-culture
  7. Brown PM, Wu R (2005) Climate and disturbance forcing of episodic tree recruitment in a southwestern ponderosa pine landscape. Ecology 86:3030–3038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carlson GT (1979) Soil resource inventory: Winema National Forest. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest RegionGoogle Scholar
  9. Cook ER, Woodhouse CA, Eakin CM, Meko DM, Stahle DW (2004) Long-term aridity changes in the western United States. Science 306:1015–1018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cowlin RW, Briegleb PA, Moravets FL (1942) Forest resources of the ponderosa pine region of Washington and Oregon. USDA Forest Service, Washington, DCCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Deur D (2009) “A caretaker responsibility”: revisiting Klamath and Modoc traditions of plant community management. J Ethnobiol 29:296–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dieterich JH (1980) The composite fire interval–a tool for more accurate interpretation of fire history. In: Stokes MA, Dieterich JH (eds) Proceedings of the Fire History Workshop, October 20–24, 1980, Tucson, AZ. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ft. Collins, CO. p. 8–14, GTR-RM-81Google Scholar
  13. Eidenshink J, Schwind B, Brewer K, Zhu Z, Quayle B, Howard S (2007) A project for monitoring trends in burn severity. Fire Ecol 3:3–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Elliott FA (1914) State Board of Forestry Map of the State of Oregon, compiled by Theodore Rowland under the direction of F.A. Elliott, State ForesterGoogle Scholar
  15. Farris CA, Baisan CH, Falk DA, Yool SR, Swetnam TW (2010) Spatial and temporal corroboration of a fire-scar-based fire history in a frequently burned ponderosa pine forest. Ecol Appl 20:1598–1614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Franklin JF, Johnson KN (2012) A restoration framework for federal forests in the Pacific Northwest. J For 110:429–439Google Scholar
  17. Gannett H (1902) The forests of Oregon. Professional Paper No. 4, Series H, Forestry 1. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, Geological Survey. 36 p. ForestryGoogle Scholar
  18. Gara RI, Littke WR, Agee JK, Geiszler DR, Stuart JD, Driver CH (1985) Influence of fires, fungi and mountain pine beetles on development of a lodgepole pine forest in south-central Oregon. In: Baumgartner DM, Krebill RG, Arnott JT, Weetman GF (eds) Lodgepole pine: the species and its management symposium proceedings, Washington State University, Pullman, May 8–10, 1984. pp 153–162Google Scholar
  19. Geist JM, Cochran PH (1991) Influences of volcanic ash and pumice deposition on productivity of western interior forest soils. In: Harvey AE, Neuenschwander LF (eds) Proceedings: management and productivity of western-montane forest soils, 10–12 April 1990, Boise, ID. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-280, Ogden, UT. pp. 82–89Google Scholar
  20. Hagmann RK, Franklin JF, Johnson KN (2013) Historical structure and composition of ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests in south-central Oregon. For Ecol Manage 304:492–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hagmann RK, Stevens JT, Lydersen JM, Collins BM, Battles JJ, Hessburg PF, Levine CR, Merschel AG, Stephens SL, Taylor AH, Franklin JF, Johnson DL, Johnson KN (2018) Improving the use of early timber inventories in reconstructing historical dry forests and fire in the western United States. Ecosphere 9:e02232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Harrington CA, comp (2003) The 1930s survey of forest resources in Washington and Oregon. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-584. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. p 123Google Scholar
  23. Hessburg PF, Churchill DJ, Larson AJ, Haugo RD, Miller C, Spies TA, North MP, Povak NA, Belote RT, Singleton PH (2015) Restoring fire-prone Inland Pacific landscapes: seven core principles. Landscape Ecol 30:1805–1835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Heyerdahl EK, Loehman RA, Falk DA (2014) Mixed-severity fire in lodgepole pine dominated forests: are historical regimes sustainable on Oregon’s Pumice Plateau, USA? Can J For Res 44:593–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Heyerdahl EK, Loehman RA, Falk DA (2018) A multi-century history of fire regimes along a transect of mixed-conifer forests in central Oregon, USA. Can J For Res.  https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2018-0193 Google Scholar
  26. Holmes RL (1983) Program COFECHA User’s Manual. Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research, The University of Arizona, TucsonGoogle Scholar
  27. James DG, Seymour L, James TS (2014) Population biology and behavior of the imperiled Philotiella leona (Lycaenidae) in South Central Oregon. J Lepid Soc 68:264–273Google Scholar
  28. Johnston JD, Bailey JD, Dunn CJ, Lindsay AA (2017) Historical fire-climate relationships in contrasting interior Pacific Northwest forest types. Fire Ecol 13:18–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Levine CR, Cogbill CV, Collins BM, Larson AJ, Lutz JA, North MP, Restaino CM, Safford HD, Stephens SL, Battles JJ (2017) Evaluating a new method for reconstructing forest conditions from General Land Office survey records. Ecol Appl 27:1498–1513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Littell JS, McKenzie D, Wan HY, Cushman SA (2018) Climate change and future wildfire in the Western United States: an ecological approach to nonstationarity. Earth’s Future 6:1097–1111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Loidi J, Fernández-González F (2012) Potential natural vegetation: reburying or reboring? J Veg Sci 23:596–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Marlon JR, Bartlein PJ, Gavin DG, Long CJ, Anderson RS, Briles CE, Brown KJ, Colombaroli D, Hallett DJ, Power MJ (2012) Long-term perspective on wildfires in the western USA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:E535–E543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Merritt ML (1916) Progress report: yellow pine fire damage, Deschutes National Forest. http://fs.usda.gov/detail/umatilla/learning/history-culture
  34. Merschel AG, Heyerdahl EK, Spies TA, Loehman RA (2018) Influence of landscape structure, topography, and forest type on spatial variation in historical fire regimes, Central Oregon, USA. Landscape Ecol 33(7):1195–11209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Merschel AG, Vora RS, Spies TA (2019) Conserving dry old-growth forest in Central Oregon, USA. J For.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jofore/fvy085 Google Scholar
  36. Miller JM, Keen FP (1960) Biology and control of the western pine beetle: a summary of the first fifty years of research. No. 800. US Department of AgricultureGoogle Scholar
  37. Miller JD, Thode AE (2007) Quantifying burn severity in a heterogeneous landscape with a relative version of the delta Normalized Burn Ratio (dNBR). Remote Sens Environ 109:66–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. North M (2012) Managing Sierra Nevada forests. PSW-GTR-237. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany, p 184Google Scholar
  39. North MP, Stephens SL, Collins BM, Agee JK, Aplet G, Franklin JF, Fule PZ (2015) Reform forest fire management. Science 349:1280–1281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. North MP, Stevens JT, Greene DF, Coppoletta M, Knapp EE, Latimer AM, Restaino CM, Tompkins RE, Welch KR, York RA (2019) Tamm review: reforestation for resilience in dry western US forests. For Ecol Manage 432:209–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ohmann JL, Gregory MJ (2002) Predictive mapping of forest composition and structure with direct gradient analysis and nearest-neighbor imputation in coastal Oregon, USA. Can J For Res 32:725–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ohmann JL, Gregory MJ, Roberts HM, Cohen WB, Kennedy RE, Yang Z (2012) Mapping change of older forest with nearest-neighbor imputation and Landsat time-series. For Ecol Manage 272:13–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ohmann JL, Gregory MJ, Roberts HM (2014) Scale considerations for integrating forest inventory plot data and satellite image data for regional forest mapping. Remote Sens Environ 151:3–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Omernik JM, Griffith GE (2014) Ecoregions of the conterminous United States: evolution of a hierarchical spatial framework. Environ Manage 54:1249–1266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Palmer WC (1965) Meteorological Drought. Research Paper No. 45. Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce. Weather BureauGoogle Scholar
  46. Parks SA, Holsinger LM, Panunto MH, Jolly WM, Dobrowski SZ, Dillon GK (2015) Wildland fire deficit and surplus in the western United States, 1984–2012. Ecosphere 6:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Patterson JE (1929) Pandora moth, a periodic pest of western pine forests. USDA Technical Bulletin No. 137, Washington, D.C., USAGoogle Scholar
  48. Plummer FG. (1912) Forest fires: their causes, extent, and effects, with a summary of recorded destruction and loss. Bulletin 117. US Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  49. Reilly M, Dunn C, Meigs G, Spies T, Kennedy R, Bailey J, Briggs K (2017) Contemporary patterns of fire extent and severity in forests of the Pacific Northwest, USA (1985–2010). Ecosphere 8:e01695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Reilly MJ, Elia M, Spies TA, Gregory MJ, Sanesi G, Lafortezza R (2018) Cumulative effects of wildfires on forest dynamics in the eastern Cascade Mountains, USA. Ecol Appl 28:291–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Reynolds RT, Sánchez Meador AJ, Youtz JA, Nicolet T, Matonis MS, Jackson PL, DeLorenzo DG, Graves AD (2013) Restoring composition and structure in Southwestern frequent-fire forests: a science-based framework for improving ecosystem resiliency. RMRS-GTR-310. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, CO, p 76Google Scholar
  52. Safford HD, Stevens JT (2017) Natural Range of Variation (NRV) for yellow pine and mixed conifer forests in the Sierra Nevada, southern Cascades, and Modoc and Inyo National Forests, California, USA. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station. PSW-GTR-256, Albany, CAGoogle Scholar
  53. Spies TA, Hessburg PF, Skinner CN, Puettmann, KJ, Reilly, MJ, Davis, RJ, Kertis, JA, Long, JW, Shaw, DC (2018) Chapter 3: Old growth, disturbance, forest succession, and management in the area of the Northwest Forest Plan. In: Spies TA, Stine PA, Gravenmier R, Long JW, Reilly MJ, tech. coords. (eds) Synthesis of science to inform land management within the Northwest Forest Plan area. PNW-GTR-966. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR. In: Anonymous, pp 95–243Google Scholar
  54. State of Oregon (1923) Twelfth Annual Report of the State Forester to the Governor for the Year Ending December 31, 1922. State Printing Department, SalemGoogle Scholar
  55. Stephens SL, Collins BM, Biber E, Fulé PZ (2016) US federal fire and forest policy: emphasizing resilience in dry forests. Ecosphere.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1584 Google Scholar
  56. Stephens SL, Collins BM, Fettig CJ, Finney MA, Hoffman CM, Knapp EE, North MP, Safford H, Wayman RB (2018) Drought, tree mortality, and wildfire in forests adapted to frequent fire. Bioscience 68:77–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stine PA, Hessburg PF, Spies TA, Kramer MG, Fettig CJ, Hansen AJ, Lehmkuhl JF, O’Hara KL, Polivka KM, Singleton PH, Charnley S, Merschel A, White R (2014) The ecology and management of moist mixed-conifer forests in eastern Oregon and Washington: a synthesis of the relevant biophysical science and implications for future land management, PNW-GTR-897. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, p 254Google Scholar
  58. Stuart JD, Agee JK, Gara RI (1989) Lodgepole pine regeneration in an old, self-perpetuating forest in south central Oregon. Can J For Res 19:1096–1104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Swetnam T, Wickman BE, Paul HG, Baisan CH (1995) Historical patterns of western spruce budworm and Douglas-fir tussock moth outbreaks in the northern Blue Mountains, Oregon since A.D. 1700. GTR-PNW-484. USDA Forest Service, Portland, Oregon, USAGoogle Scholar
  60. Ter Braak CJ (1986) Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67:1167–1179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Thomas DS, Butry DT, Gilbert SW, Webb DH, Fung JF (2017) The costs and losses of wildfires: a literature review, Special Publication (NIST SP)—1215. U.S. Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Maryland.  https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.1215 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. USFS (1993) Region 6 interim old-growth definitions for the Douglas-fir series, grand fir/white fir series, interior Douglas-fir series, lodgepole pine series, Pacific silver fire series, ponderosa pine series, Port Orford cedar series, tanoak (redwood) series, western hemlock series. USDA Forest Service, Portland, ORGoogle Scholar
  63. USFS (2010) Fremont-Winema National Forest, Pacific Northwest Region, USDA Forest Service, Plant Association. http://fs.fed.us/r6/data-library/gis/frewin/index.shtml
  64. Walcott CD (1900) Twenty-first annual report of the director of the United States geological survey, 1899–1900: part V-forest reserves. No. 21Google Scholar
  65. Weaver H (1961) Implications of the Klamath fires of September 1959. J For 59:569–572Google Scholar
  66. Westerling AL (2016) Increasing western US forest wildfire activity: sensitivity to changes in the timing of spring. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0178 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Applegate Forestry LLCCorvallisUSA
  2. 2.School of Environmental and Forest SciencesUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  3. 3.Department of Forest Ecosystems and Society, College of ForestryOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA
  4. 4.Department of Biological SciencesHumboldt State UniversityArcataUSA

Personalised recommendations