Advertisement

Landscape Ecology

, Volume 34, Issue 3, pp 473–485 | Cite as

Responses of small mammals to land restoration after mining

  • Eric Adjei LawerEmail author
  • Anne-Christine Mupepele
  • Alexandra-Maria Klein
Review Article
  • 112 Downloads

Abstract

Context

Land degradation from mining influences biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. However, comparative studies using small mammal functional groups within rehabilitated mining sites are missing, despite their significant ecological contributions.

Objectives

We investigated the recovery of small mammals according to their trophic guild and terrestriality in restored mining sites and analyzed whether they were influenced by restoration scheme (active or passive), restoration time, mineral type, body mass and invasive species. We were especially interested in whether functional groups showed different recovery patterns across time.

Methods

We classified small mammals into functional groups according to trophic levels distinguishing carnivores, herbivores and omnivores, and according to their terrestriality categorized as above ground-dwelling (AGD) and fossorial and/or ground-dwelling individuals (FGD). We studied small mammal recovery globally following restoration of mining sites based on a meta-analysis using effect sizes. Influences of environmental variables were investigated with linear mixed models using effect sizes as response variable.

Results

We did not find significant differences for restoration scheme and time but we did for mineral type, body mass and invasive species in terms of population (abundance) recovery. Trajectories of functional group recoveries differed: FGD and herbivores quickly recovered after mining activities stopped, but declined later, whereas AGD, carnivores and omnivores recovered within the first few years or decades.

Conclusions

Our results highlight the different vulnerability of functional groups, and the importance of considering this in conservation interventions.

Keywords

Restoration Mining Small mammals Degradation Functional group Conservation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) and the Ghanaian government (i.e. Ministry of Education) for supporting EAL’s PhD study in Germany.

Supplementary material

10980_2019_785_MOESM1_ESM.docx (122 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 122 kb)
10980_2019_785_MOESM2_ESM.csv (18 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (CSV 18 kb)
10980_2019_785_MOESM3_ESM.csv (0 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (CSV 0 kb)
10980_2019_785_MOESM4_ESM.R
Supplementary material 3 (R 18 kb)

References

  1. Banks SC, Dujardin M, McBurney L, Blair D, Barker M, Lindenmayer DB (2011) Starting points for small mammal population recovery after wildfire: recolonisation or residual populations? Oikos 120:26–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnes AD, Jochum M, Mumme S, Haneda NF, Farajallah A, Widarto TH, Brose U (2014) Consequences of tropical land use for multitrophic biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Nat Commun 5:5351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using {lme4}. J Stat Softw 67:1–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Belovsky GE (1997) Optimal foraging and community structure: the allometry of herbivore food selection and competition. Evol Ecol 11:641–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benayas JMR, Bullock JM, Newton AC (2008) Creating woodland islets to reconcile ecological restoration, conservation, and agricultural land use. Front Ecol Environ 6:329–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Benayas JMR, Newton AC, Diaz A, Bullock JM (2009) Enhancement of biodiversity and ecosystem services by ecological restoration: a meta-analysis. Science 325:1121–1124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Birch JC, Newton AC, Aquino CA, Cantarello E, Echeverría C, Kitzberger T, Schiappacasse I, Garavito NT (2010) Cost-effectiveness of dryland forest restoration evaluated by spatial analysis of ecosystem services. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:21925–21930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bleher B, Böhning-Gaese K (2001) Consequences of frugivore diversity for seed dispersal, seedling establishment and the spatial pattern of seedlings and trees. Oecologia 129:385–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blum WEH (2013) Soil and land resources for agricultural production: general trends and future scenarios—a worldwide perspective. Int Soil Water Conserv Res 1:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boadi S, Nsor CA, Antobre OO, Acquah E (2016) An analysis of illegal mining on the Offin shelterbelt forest reserve, Ghana: implications on community livelihood. J Sustain Min 15:115–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brock RE, Kelt DA (2004) Keystone effects of the endangered Stephens’ kangaroo rat (Dipodomys stephensi). Biol Conserv 116:131–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chazdon RL (2014) Second growth: the promise of tropical forest regeneration in an age of deforestation. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chazdon RL, Guariguata MR (2016) Natural regeneration as a tool for large-scale forest restoration in the tropics: prospects and challenges. Biotropica 48:716–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Colautti RI, MacIsaac HJ (2004) A neutral terminology to define ‘invasive’ species. Divers Distrib 10:135–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cole LES, Bhagwat SA, Willis KJ (2014) Recovery and resilience of tropical forests after disturbance. Nat Commun 5:3906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Collaboration for Environmental Evidence (2013) Guidelines for systematic review and evidence synthesis in environmental management. Version 4.2. Environ Evid, p 78Google Scholar
  17. Cristescu RH, Frère C, Banks PB (2012) A review of fauna in mine rehabilitation in Australia: current state and future directions. Biol Conserv 149:60–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Crouzeilles R, Curran M, Ferreira MS, Lindenmayer DB, Grelle CEV, Rey Benayas JM (2016) A global meta-analysis on the ecological drivers of forest restoration success. Nat Commun 7:11666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Crouzeilles R, Ferreira MS, Chazdon RL, Lindenmayer DB, Sansevero JBB, Monteiro L, Iribarrem A, Latawiec AE, Strassburg BBN (2017) Ecological restoration success is higher for natural regeneration than for active restoration in tropical forests. Sci Adv 3:e1701345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Davidson AD, Lightfoot DC, McIntyre JL (2008) Engineering rodents create key habitat for lizards. J Arid Environ 72:2142–2149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Delibes-Mateos M, Delibes M, Ferreras P, Villafuerte R (2008) Key role of European rabbits in the conservation of the Western Mediterranean Basin Hotspot. Conserv Biol 22:1106–1117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dickersin K, Min YI (1993) Publication bias: the problem that won’t go away. Ann N Y Acad Sci 703:135–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dunn RR (2004) Recovery of faunal communities during tropical forest regeneration. Conserv Biol 18:302–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Edwards DP, Sloan S, Weng L, Dirks P, Sayer J, Laurance WF (2014) Mining and the African environment. Conserv Lett 7:302–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Floren A, Linsenmair KE (2001) The influence of anthropogenic disturbances on the structure of arboreal arthropod communities. Plant Ecol 153:153–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fox BJ (1982) The influence of disturbance (fire, mining) on ant and small mammal species diversity in Australian Heathland. In: Proceedings of the symposium on dynamics and management of Mediterranean-type ecosystems. Technical Report PSW-58. Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Berkeley, Carlifonia, pp 213–219Google Scholar
  27. Fox BJ, Fox MD (1984) Small-mammal recolonization of open-forest following sand mining. Austral Ecol 9:241–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gálvez Bravo L, Belliure J, Rebollo S (2009) European rabbits as ecosystem engineers: warrens increase lizard density and diversity. Biodivers Conserv 18:869–885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gilbertson M (1996) Organochlorine contaminants in the Great Lakes. Ecol Appl 6:966–971Google Scholar
  30. Gilman AC, Letcher SG, Fincher RM, Perez AI, Madell TW, Finkelstein AL, Corrales-Araya F (2016) Recovery of floristic diversity and basal area in natural forest regeneration and planted plots in a Costa Rican wet forest. Biotropica 48:798–808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gornish ES, Lennox MS, Lewis D, Tate KW, Jackson RD (2017) Comparing herbaceous plant communities in active and passive riparian restoration. PLoS ONE 12:e0176338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Grant WE, French NR (1980) Evaluation of the role of small mammals in grassland ecosystems: a modelling approach. Ecol Model 8:15–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gregory NC, Sensenig RL, Wilcove DS (2010) Effects of controlled fire and livestock grazing on bird communities in East African Savannas. Conserv Biol 24:1606–1616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Grueber CE, Nakagawa S, Laws RJ, Jamieson IG (2011) Multimodel inference in ecology and evolution: challenges and solutions. J Evol Biol 24:699–711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gurevitch J, Hedges LV (1999) Statistical issues in ecological meta-analysis. Ecology 80:1142–1149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Harding EK, Gomez S (2006) Positive edge effects for arboreal marsupials: an assessment of potential mechanisms. Wildl Res 33:121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hayward GF, Phillipson J (1979) Community structure and functional role of small mammals in ecosystems. Ecology of small mammals. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 135–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hein S, Jacob J (2015) Recovery of small rodent populations after population collapse. Wildl Res 42:108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hinds PW (1999) Restoration following bauxite mining in Western Australia. Stud On-Line J 4:1–6Google Scholar
  40. Hinton JJ (2005) Communities and small-scale mining: an integrated review for development planning. World Bank Mining Group, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  41. Hobba WA (1993) Effects of underground mining and mine collapse on the hydrology of selected basins in West Virginia. U.S. Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 2384. http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/wsp2384. Accessed 4 Dec 2018
  42. Hogsden KL, Harding JS (2011) Consequences of acid mine drainage for the structure and function of benthic stream communities: a review. Freshw Sci 31:108–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hota P, Behera B (2016) Opencast coal mining and sustainable local livelihoods in Odisha, India. Miner Econ 29:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Howladar MF (2016) Environmental impacts of subsidence around the Barapukuria Coal Mining area in Bangladesh. Energy Ecol Environ 1:370–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hull Sieg C (1987) Great plains wildlife damage control workshop proceedings wildlife damage management, internet center for small mammals: pests or vital components of the ecosystem. Great Plains Wildl Damage Control Workshop Proc 97:88–92Google Scholar
  46. Jones KE, Bielby J, Cardillo M, Fritz SA, O’Dell J, Orme CDL, Safi K, Sechrest W, Boakes EH, Carbone C, Connolly C, Cutts MJ, Foster JK, Grenyer R, Habib M, Plaster CA, Price SA, Rigby EA, Rist J, Teacher A, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Gittleman JL, Mace GM, Purvis A (2009) PanTHERIA: a species-level database of life history, ecology, and geography of extant and recently extinct mammals. Ecology 90:2648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Jones HP, Schmitz OJ (2009) Rapid recovery of damaged ecosystems. PLoS ONE 4:e5653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Jordán F, Liu W, Mike Á (2009) Trophic field overlap: a new approach to quantify keystone species. Ecol Model 220:2899–2907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kalies EL, Chambers CL, Covington WW (2010) Wildlife responses to thinning and burning treatments in southwestern conifer forests: a meta-analysis. For Ecol Manag 259:333–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kemp JE, Ellis AG (2017) Significant local-scale plant-insect species richness relationship independent of abiotic effects in the temperate cape floristic region biodiversity hotspot. PLoS ONE 12:e0168033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kirkland GL (1976) Small mammals of a mine waste situation in the Central Adirondacks, New York: a case of opportunism by Peromyscus maniculatus. Am Nat 95:103–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Larkin JL, Maehr DS, Krupa JJ, Cox JJ, Alexy K, Unger DE, Barton C (2008) Small mammal response to vegetation and spoil conditions on a reclaimed surface mine in eastern Kentucky. Southeast Nat 7:401–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lemly D (2009) Aquatic hazard of selenium pollution from coal mining. In: Fosdyke GB (ed) Coal mining: research, technology and safety. Nova Science Publishers, New York, p 17Google Scholar
  54. Mascia MB, Pailler S (2011) Protected area downgrading, downsizing, and degazettement (PADDD) and its conservation implications. Conserv Lett 4:9–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Maurer BA, Brown JH, Dayan T, Enquist BJ, Ernest SKM, Hadly EA, Haskell JP, Jablonski D, Jones KE, Kaufman DM, Lyons SK, Niklas KJ, Porter WP, Roy K, Smith FA, Tiffney B, Willig MR (2004) Similarities in body size distributions of small-bodied flying vertebrates. Evol Ecol Res 6:783–797Google Scholar
  56. Meli P, Holl KD, Benayas JMR, Jones HP, Jones PC, Montoya D, Mateos DM (2017) A global review of past land use, climate, and active vs. passive restoration effects on forest recovery. PLoS ONE 12:e0171368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Michał B, Rafał Z (2014) Responses of small mammals to clear-cutting in temperate and boreal forests of Europe: a meta-analysis and review. Eur J For Res 133:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Molloy PP, Reynolds JD, Gage MJG, Mosqueira I, Côté IM (2008) Links between sex change and fish densities in marine protected areas. Biol Conserv 141:187–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Moreno-Mateos D, Meli P, Vara-Rodríguez MI, Aronson J (2015) Ecosystem response to interventions: lessons from restored and created wetland ecosystems. J Appl Ecol 52:1528–1537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Morrison EB, Lindell CA (2011) Active or passive forest restoration? Assessing restoration alternatives with avian foraging behavior. Restor Ecol 19:170–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Munguía M, Trejo I, González-Salazar C, Pérez-Maqueo O (2016) Human impact gradient on mammalian biodiversity. Glob Ecol Conserv 6:79–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Nakagawa S, Cuthill IC (2007) Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists. Biol Rev 82:591–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Nakagawa S, Santos ESA (2012) Methodological issues and advances in biological meta-analysis. Evol Ecol 26:1253–1274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Novotny V, Drozd P, Miller SE, Kulfan M, Janda M, Basset Y, Weiblen GD (2006) Why are there so many species of herbivorous insects in tropical rainforests? Science 313:1115–1118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Obiri S, Mattah PAD, Mattah MM, Armah FA, Osae S, Adu-kumi S, Yeboah PO (2016) Assessing the environmental and socio-economic impacts of artisanal gold mining on the livelihoods of communities in the Tarkwa Nsuaem municipality in Ghana. Int J Environ Res Public Health 13:160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Ogada DL, Gadd ME, Ostfeld RS, Young TP, Keesing F (2008) Impacts of large herbivorous mammals on bird diversity and abundance in an African savanna. Oecologia 156:387–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Olden JD, LeRoy Poff N, Douglas MR, Douglas ME, Fausch KD (2004) Ecological and evolutionary consequences of biotic homogenization. Trends Ecol Evol 19:18–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Parrotta JA (1992) The role of plantation forests in rehabilitating degraded tropical ecosystems. Agric Ecosyst Environ 41:115–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Peters RH (1983) The ecological implications of body size. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Phelps LB, Holland L (1987) Soil compaction in topsoil replacement during mining reclamation. Environ Geochem Health 9:8–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Phelps KL, Mcbee K (2010) Population parameters of Peromyscus leucopus (White-Footed Deermice) inhabiting a heavy metal contaminated Superfund site. Southwest Nat 55:363–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Pringle RM, Kimuyu DM, Sensenig RL, Palmer TM, Riginos C, Veblen KE, Young TP (2015) Synergistic effects of fire and elephants on arboreal animals in an African savanna. J Anim Ecol 84:1637–1645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. R Core Team (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/
  74. Reeson AF, Measham TG, Hosking K (2012) Mining activity, income inequality and gender in regional Australia. Aust J Agric Resour Econ 56:302–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Reichl C, Schatz M, Zsak G (2017) World mining data: minerals production (Vol. 32). WORLD MINING DATA C. Reichl, M. Schatz, G. Zsak Volume 32 Minerals Production Vienna 20 17 International Organizing Committee for the World Mining Congresses, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  76. Ren Y, Lü Y, Fu B, Zhang K (2017) Biodiversity and ecosystem functional enhancement by forest restoration: a meta-analysis in China. Land Degrad Dev 28:2062–2073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Rhodes DH, Richmond ME (1983) The influence of soil moisture, texture, and temperature on nest-site selection and burrowing activity by the pine vole, Microtus pinetorum. In: Eastern pine and meadow vole symposia, p 173Google Scholar
  78. Rohatgi A (2017) WebPlotDigitizer—Extract data from plots, images, and maps. Version 4.0. https://automeris.io/WebPlotDigitizer/. Accessed 5 Jan 2018
  79. Rosenstock SS, Anderson DR, Giesen KM, Leukering T, Carter MF (2002) Landbird counting techniques: current practices and an alternative. Auk 119:46–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Ryszkowski L (1975) The ecosystem role of small mammals. Ecol Bull 19:139–145Google Scholar
  81. Schielzeth H, Forstmeier W (2009) Conclusions beyond support: overconfident estimates in mixed models. Behav Ecol 20:416–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Schorr MS, Backer JC (2006) Localized effects of coal mine drainage on fish assemblages in a cumberland plateau stream in tennessee. J Freshw Ecol 21:17–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Schwartz MW, Brigham CA, Hoeksema JD, Lyons KG, Mills MH, van Mantgem PJ (2000) Linking biodiversity to ecosystem function: implications for conservation ecology. Oecologia 122:297–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Shono K, Cadaweng EA, Durst PB (2007) Application of assisted natural regeneration to restore degraded tropical forestlands. Restor Ecol 15:620–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Shoo LP, Freebody K, Kanowski J, Catterall CP (2016) Slow recovery of tropical old-field rainforest regrowth and the value and limitations of active restoration. Conserv Biol 30:121–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Sidorovich V, Solovej I, Sidorovich A, Rotenko I (2008) Effect of felling on the distribution of rodents and their predators in a transitional mixed forest. Polish J Ecol 56:309–321Google Scholar
  87. Spake R, Ezard THG, Martin PA, Newton AC, Doncaster CP (2015) A meta-analysis of functional group responses to forest recovery outside of the tropics. Conserv Biol 29:1695–1703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Torbert JL, Burger JA (2000) Forest land reclamation. Reclamation of drastically disturbed lands. American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp 371–398Google Scholar
  89. Tropek R, Kadlec T, Karesova P, Spitzer L, Kocarek P, Malenovsky I, Banar P, Tuf IH, Hejda M, Konvicka M (2010) Spontaneous succession in limestone quarries as an effective restoration tool for endangered arthropods and plants. J Appl Ecol 47:139–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Tuomainen U, Candolin U (2011) Behavioural responses to human-induced environmental change. Biol Rev 86:640–657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Turchin P (1998) Quantitative analysis of movement: measuring and modeling population redistribution in animals and plants. Sinauer Associates, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  92. Vleck D (1979) The energy cost of burrowing by the pocket gopher Thomomys bottae. Physiol Zool 52:122–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Vleck D (1981) Burrow structure and foraging costs in the fossorial rodent, Thomomys bottae. Oecologia 49:391–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Walser G (2000) Economic impact of world mining (IAEA-SM-362). In: International symposium on the uranium production cycle and the environment. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Vienna (Austria), p 315Google Scholar
  95. Whitney KD, Gabler CA (2008) Rapid evolution in introduced species, ‘invasive traits’ and recipient communities: challenges for predicting invasive potential. Divers Distrib 14:569–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Wickham H (2009) ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Wilman H, Belmaker J, Simpson J, de la Rosa C, Rivadeneira MM, Jetz W (2014) EltonTraits 10: species-level foraging attributes of the world’s birds and mammals. Ecology 95:2027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Wong BBM, Candolin U (2015) Behavioral responses to changing environments. Behav Ecol 26:665–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. World Bank (2008) Communities, artisanal and small-scale mining (CASM). http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTOGMC/Resources/CASMFACTSHEET.pdf. Accessed 3 Jan 2018  
  100. Wu D-L, Luo J, Fox BJ (1996) A comparison of ground-dwelling small mammal communities in primary and secondary tropical rainforests in China. J Trop Ecol 12:215–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Zahawi RA, Reid JL, Holl KD (2014) Hidden costs of passive restoration. Restor Ecol 22:284–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Zhang Y, Liu J (2003) Effects of plateau zokors (Myospalax fontanierii) on plant community and soil in an Alpine meadow. J Mammal 84:644–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nature Conservation and Landscape EcologyUniversity of FreiburgFreiburgGermany
  2. 2.Department of Biodiversity Conservation and ManagementUniversity for Development StudiesTamaleGhana

Personalised recommendations