Resource concentration mechanisms facilitate foraging success in simulations of a pulsed oligotrophic wetland
- 39 Downloads
Movement of prey on hydrologically pulsed, spatially heterogeneous wetlands can result in transient, high prey concentrations, when changes in landscape features such as connectivity between flooded areas alternately facilitate and impede prey movement. Predators track and exploit these concentrations, depleting them as they arise.
We sought to describe how prey pulses of fish rapidly form and persist on wetland landscapes, while enduring constant consumption by wading birds, without being fully depleted. Specifically, we questioned how is the predator–prey relationship mediated by interactions between animal movement and dynamic landscape connectivity?
Two models were developed of the predator–prey-landscape system with qualitatively different representations of space, to identify and quantify prey pulsing dynamics that were robust across modeled assumptions. The first included a homogeneous landscape described by simple geometry, and implicit fish movement as wetland volume contracts. The second modeled transverse movement across a heterogeneous landscape, with isolated drying patches.
Both models produced rapid fish prey concentrations as the wetland dried to shallow water depths. These conditions are critical for making prey available to wading birds. Fish were also rapidly depleted by birds, representing daily caloric intake supporting birds. Model 1 provided average estimates across the modeled domain. Model 2 mapped locations of emerging prey hotspots on the landscape through time.
Our models tracked predator, prey, and landscape dynamics in parallel, inducing systems dynamics from empirical observations. Explicit inclusion of dynamic wetland hydrologic connectivity, a key landscape mechanism, allowed for a comprehensive picture of links between landscape dynamics and the adapted predator–prey system.
KeywordsPulsed ecosystem Fish community Wading bird colonies Seasonality Hydrology Landscape topography
We thank the editors of The Auk for permission to reprint results from Kushlan (1976), and Gus Engman and four anonymous reviewers for their generous time and contributions. This work was supported by The USGS’s Greater Everglades Priority Ecosystem Science and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
- Bancroft GT, Strong AM, Sawicki RJ, Hoffman W, Jewell SD (1994) Relationship among wading bird foraging patterns, colony locations, and hydrology in the Everglades. In: Davis SM, Ogden JC (eds) Everglades, the ecosystem and its restoration. Lucie Press, Delray Beach, pp 615–657Google Scholar
- Gunderson LH, Loftus WF (1993) The Everglades. In: Martin WH, Boyce SG, Echternacht AC (eds) Biodiversity of the Southeastern United States: lowland terrestrial communities. John Wiley & Sons Inc, New York, pp 199–255Google Scholar
- Jones J, U.S. Geological Survey (2011) Everglades Depth Estimation Network (EDEN) October 2011 Digital Elevation Model (DEM)Google Scholar
- Junk WJ, Bayley PB, Sparks RE (1989) The flood pulse concept in river–floodplain systems. Can Spec Publ Fish Aquat Sci 106(1):110–127Google Scholar
- Kushlan JA (1973) An ecological study of an Alligator Pond in the Big Cypress Swamp of southern Florida. M.S Thesis. University of MiamiGoogle Scholar
- Kushlan JA (1976) Wading bird predation in a seasonally fluctuating pond. Auk 93(3):464–476Google Scholar
- Kushlan JA (1986). Responses of wading birds to seasonally fluctuating water levels: strategies and their limits. Colon Waterbirds, pp 155–162Google Scholar
- Kushlan JA, Ogden JC, Higer AL (1975) Relation of water level and fish availability to wood stork reproduction in the Southern Everglades, Florida. Rep. 75-434, US Geological Survey, Tallahassee, FL. Liston SE. 2006. Interactions between nutrient availability and hydroperiod shape macroinvertebrate communities in Florida Everglades marshes. Hydrobiologia 569:343–357Google Scholar
- MATLAB and Statistics Toolbox Release (2016) The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, Massachusetts, United StatesGoogle Scholar
- Middleton BA (ed) (2002) Flood pulsing in wetlands: restoring the natural hydrological balance. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Ogden JC (1994) A comparison of wading bird nesting colony dynamics (1931-1946 and 1974-1989) as an indication of ecosystem conditions in the Southern Everglades. In: Davis SM, Ogden JC (eds) Everglades, the ecosystem and its restoration. Lucie Press, Delray Beach, pp 533–570Google Scholar
- Swanson GA, Duebbert HF (1989) Wetland habitats of waterfowl in the prairie pothole region. Northern Prairie Wetlands. Iowa State University Press, Ames, pp 228–267Google Scholar
- Trexler JC, Loftus WF, Jordan F, Chick JH, Kandl KL, McElroy TC, Bass OL Jr (2002) Ecological scale and its implications for freshwater fishes in the Florida Everglades. In: Porter JW, Porter KG (eds) The Everglades, Florida Bay, and coral reefs of the Florida keys: an ecosystem sourcebook. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 53–181Google Scholar
- U.S. Geological Survey, National Water Information System (2017). https://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis/inventory?<agency_code=USGS&site_no=02288900>