The value of linking paleoecological and neoecological perspectives to understand spatially-explicit ecosystem resilience
Predicting ecosystem resilience is a challenge, especially as climate change alters disturbance regimes and conditions for recovery. Recent research has highlighted the importance of spatially-explicit disturbance and resilience processes to long-term ecosystem dynamics. “Neoecological” approaches characterize resilience mechanisms at relatively fine spatio-temporal resolutions, but results are difficult to extrapolate across broad temporal scales or climatic ranges. Paleoecological methodologies can consider the effects of climates that differ from today. However, they are often limited to coarse-grained spatio-temporal resolutions.
In this synthesis, we describe implicit and explicit examples of studies that incorporate both neo- and paleoecological approaches. We propose ways to build on the strengths of both approaches in an explicit and proactive fashion.
Linking the two approaches is a powerful way to surpass their respective limitations. Aligning spatial scales is critical: Paleoecological sampling design should incorporate knowledge of the spatial characteristics of the disturbance process, and neoecological studies benefit from a longer-term context to their conclusions. In some cases, modeling can incorporate non-spatial data from paleoecological records or emerging spatial paleo-data networks with mechanistic disturbance/recovery processes that operate at fine spatiotemporal scales.
Linking these two complementary approaches is a powerful way to build a complete understanding of ecosystem disturbance and resilience.
KeywordsDisturbance Resilience Paleoecology Climate change Synthesis Scale
This manuscript developed from discussions at the Novus II workshop at Estes Park, Colorado, U.S.A. (https://novusrcn.wordpress.com/) Financial support for the workshop was provided by NSF DEB-1145815 to KM, PH, DG, MM, and SP. We thank the reviewers for their helpful comments.
- Aranbarri J, González-Sampériz P, Valero-Garcés B, Moreno A, Gil-Romera G, Sevilla-Callejo M, García-Prieto E, Di Rita F, Mata MP, Morellón M, Magri D (2014) Rapid climatic changes and resilient vegetation during the Lateglacial and Holocene in a continental region of south-western Europe. Glob Planet Change 114:50–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Baker WL (2009) Fire ecology in Rocky Mountain landscapes. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- Blois JL, Gotelli NJ, Behrensmeyer AK, Faith JT, Lyons SK, Williams JW, Amatangelo KL, Bercovici A, Du A, Eronen JT, Graves GR (2014) A framework for evaluating the influence of climate, dispersal limitation, and biotic interactions using fossil pollen associations across the late quaternary. Ecography 37(11):1095–1108Google Scholar
- Dale VH, Joyce LA, McNulty S, Neilson RP, Ayres MP, Flannigan MD, Hanson PJ, Irland LC, Lugo AE, Peterson CJ, Simberloff D (2001) Climate change and forest disturbances: climate change can affect forests by altering the frequency, intensity, duration, and timing of fire, drought, introduced species, insect and pathogen outbreaks, hurricanes, windstorms, ice storms, or landslides. BioScience 51(9):723–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Davis M, Calcote R, Sugita S, Takahara H (1998) Patchy invasion and the origin of a hemlock-hardwoods forest mosaic. Ecology 79:2641–2659Google Scholar
- Dymerski AD, Anhold JA, Munson AS (2001) Spruce beetle (Dendroctonus rufipennis) outbreak in Engelmann spruce (Picea engelmannii) in central Utah, 1986–1998. West N Am Nat 61:19–24Google Scholar
- Foster DR, Boose ER (1992) Patterns of forest damage resulting from catastrophic wind in central New England, USA. J Eco 80(1):79–98Google Scholar
- McBride JR (1983) Analysis of tree rings and fire scars to establish fire history. Tree-Ring Bull 43:51–67Google Scholar
- Mustaphi CJC, Pisaric MF (2013) Varying influence of climate and aspect as controls of montane forest fire regimes during the late Holocene, south-eastern British Columbia, Canada. J Biogeogr 40(10):1983–1996Google Scholar
- Mustaphi CJC, Pisaric MF (2014) Holocene climate–fire–vegetation interactions at a subalpine watershed in southeastern British Columbia, Canada. Quant Res 81(2):228–239Google Scholar
- Perry GL, Wilmshurst JM, McGlone MS (2014) Ecology and long-term history of fire in New Zealand. N Z J Ecol 38:157–176Google Scholar
- Pickett STA, White PS (1985) The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics. Academic Press Inc., Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers, New York, p 472Google Scholar
- Sinton DS (1996) Spatial and temporal patterns of windthrow in the Bull Run Watershed, Oregon. PhD thesis, Oregon State UniversityGoogle Scholar