Advertisement

Landscape Ecology

, Volume 33, Issue 12, pp 2103–2119 | Cite as

The emergence of heterogeneity in invasive-dominated grassland: a matter of the scale of detection

  • E. J. RaynorEmail author
  • C. D. Griffith
  • D. Twidwell
  • W. H. Schacht
  • C. L. Wonkka
  • C. P. Roberts
  • C. L. Bielski
  • D. M. Debinski
  • J. R. Miller
Research Article

Abstract

Context

Plant invasions of native ecosystems are one of the main causes of declines in biodiversity via system-simplification. Restoring native biodiversity can be particularly challenging in landscapes where invasive species have become dominant and where a new set of feedbacks reinforce an invaded state and preclude restoration actions. We lack an understanding of the response of invaded systems to landscape-level manipulations to restore pattern and process relationships and how to identify these relationships when they do not appear at the expected scale.

Objectives

To better understand how fire and grazing influence landscape-level heterogeneity in invaded landscapes, we assess the scale at which grazing pressure and seasonality mediate the success of re-introducing a historical disturbance regime, grazing driven by fire (termed pyric herbivory), to an invasive plant-dominated landscape.

Methods

We manipulated grazing timing and intensity in exotic grass-dominated grasslands managed for landscape heterogeneity with spring fire and grazing. In pastures under patch-burn grazing management, we evaluated the spatial and temporal variability of plant functional groups and vegetation structure among and within patches managed with separate grazing systems: season-long stocking and intensive early stocking.

Results

Warm- and cool-season grasses exhibited greater among-patch variability in invasive-plant dominated grassland under intensive early grazing than traditional season-long grazing, but landscape-level heterogeneity, as measured through vegetation structure was minimal and invariable under both levels of grazing pressure, which contrasts findings in native-dominated systems. Moreover, within-patch heterogeneity for these functional groups was detected; contrasting the prediction that among-patch heterogeneity, in mesic grasslands, manifests from within-patch homogeneity.

Conclusions

In invaded grasslands, manipulation of grazing pressure as a process that drives heterogeneous vegetation patterns influences native and non-native grass heterogeneity, but not heterogeneity of vegetation structure, within and among patches managed with fire. Fire and grazing-moderated heterogeneity patterns observed in native grass-dominated grasslands likely differ from invasive grass-dominated grasslands with implications for using pyric herbivory in invaded systems.

Keywords

Biological invasion Fire-grazer interaction Information visualization Non-stationarity Patch-burn grazing Semi-variance 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank many individuals from the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, the Iowa Department of Natural Resources, U.S Fish & Wildlife Service, the Missouri Department of Conservation, the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, and Iowa State University who helped with field data collection or funding for this study. Special thanks to Heidi Hillhouse, Kayla Tarr, Gunnar Malek-Madani, Jon Soper, Dee Ebbeka, Amanda Hefner, Aaron Shropshire, Jace Stott, Doug Tosoni, and Madison Hergenrader.

Supplementary material

10980_2018_725_MOESM1_ESM.docx (968 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 968 kb)

References

  1. Allen C, Holling C (2010) Novelty, adaptive capacity, and resilience. Ecol Soc 15(3):24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen CD, Savage M, Falk DA, Suckling KF, Swetnam TW, Schulke T, Stacey PB, Morgan P, Hoffman M, Klingel JT (2002) Ecological restoration of southwestern ponderosa pine ecosystems: a broad perspective. Ecol Appl 12(5):1418–1433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen TF, Starr TB (1982) Hierarchy: perspectives for ecological complexity. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson MJ, Ter Braak CJF (2003) Permutation tests for multi-factorial analysis of variance. J Stat Comput Simul 73(2):85–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson MJ, Walsh DCI (2013) PERMANOVA, ANOSIM, and the Mantel test in the face of heterogeneous dispersions: what null hypothesis are you testing? Ecol Monogr 83(4):557–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Archibald S, Bond WJ, Stock WD, Fairbanks DHK (2005) Shaping the landscape: fire–grazer interactions in an african savanna. Ecol Appl 15(1):96–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Axelrod DI (1985) Rise of the Grassland Biome, Central North America. Bot Rev 51(2):163–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bielski CH, Twidwell D, Fuhlendorf SD, Wonkka CL, Allred BW, Ochsner TE, Krueger ES, Carlson JD, Engle DM (2018) Pyric herbivory, scales of heterogeneity and drought. Funct Ecol 32(6):1599–1608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bowman DMJS, Perry GLW, Marston JB (2015) Feedbacks and landscape-level vegetation dynamics. Trends Ecol Evol 30(5):255–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brooks ML, D’Antonio CM, Richardson DM, Grace JB, Keeley JE, DiTomaso JM, Hobbs RJ, Pellant M, Pyke D (2004) Effects of invasive alien plants on fire regimes. Bioscience 54(7):677–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Collins SL, Calabrese LB (2012) Effects of fire, grazing and topographic variation on vegetation structure in tallgrass prairie. J Veg Sci 23(3):563–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. D’Antonio CM, Tunison JT, Loh RK (2000) Variation in the impact of exotic grasses on native plant composition in relation to fire across an elevation gradient in Hawaii. Austral Ecol 25(5):507–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. D’Antonio CM, Vitousek PM (1992) Biological invasions by exotic grasses, the grass/fire cycle, and global change. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 23(1):63–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Daubenmire RF (1959) A canopy-coverage method of vegetational analysis. Northwest Sci 33:43–64Google Scholar
  15. Davies KW, Svejcar TJ, Bates JD (2009) Interaction of historical and nonhistorical disturbances maintains native plant communities. Ecol Appl 19(6):1536–1545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Delaney JT, Moranz RA, Debinski DM, Engle DM, Miller JR (2016) Exotic-dominated grasslands show signs of recovery with cattle grazing and fire. PLoS ONE 11(11):e0165758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Development Core Team R (2018) R: a language and environment for statisitcal computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  18. Duchardt CJ, Miller JR, Debinski DM, Engle DM (2016) Adapting the fire-grazing interaction to small pastures in a fragmented landscape for grassland bird conservation. Rangel Ecol Manag 69(4):300–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Engle DM, Fuhlendorf SD, Roper A, Leslie DM (2008) Invertebrate community response to a shifting mosaic of habitat. Rangel Ecol Manag 61(1):55–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Forman RT, Godron M (1981) Patches and structural components for a landscape ecology. Bioscience 31(10):733–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Franklin JF, Lindenmayer D, MacMahon JA, McKee A, Magnuson J, Perry DA, Waide R, Foster D (2000) Threads of Continuity. Conserv Pract 1(1):8–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fuhlendorf SD, Engle DM (2001) Restoring heterogeneity on rangelands: ecosystem management based on evolutionary grazing patterns. Bioscience 51(8):625–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fuhlendorf S, Engle D (2004) Application of the fire–grazing interaction to restore a shifting mosaic on tallgrass prairie. J Appl Ecol 41(4):604–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fuhlendorf SD, Engle DM, Elmore RD, Limb RF, Bidwell TG (2012) Conservation of pattern and process: developing an alternative paradigm of rangeland management. Rangel Ecol Manag 65(6):579–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fuhlendorf SD, Engle DM, Kerby J, Hamilton R (2009) Pyric herbivory: rewilding landscapes through the recoupling of fire and grazing. Conserv Biol 23(3):588–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fuhlendorf SD, Fynn RWS, McGranahan DA, Twidwell D (2017) Heterogeneity as the basis for rangeland management. In: Briske DD (ed) Rangeland systems: processes, management and challenges. Springer, Cham, pp 169–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gaertner M, Biggs R, Te Beest M, Hui C, Molofsky J, Richardson DM (2014) Invasive plants as drivers of regime shifts: identifying high-priority invaders that alter feedback relationships. Divers Distrib 20(7):733–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gaertner M, Holmes PM, Richardson DM (2012) biological invasions, resilience and restoration. In: Andel JV, Aronson J (eds) Restoration ecology. Wiley, New York, pp 265–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hartnett DC, Hickman KR, Walter LEF (1996) Effects of bison grazing, fire, and topography on floristic diversity in tallgrass prairie. J Range Manag 49:413–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hobbs NT, Schimel DS, Owensby CE, Ojima DS (1991) Fire and grazing in the tallgrass prairie: contingent effects on nitrogen budgets. Ecology 72(4):1374–1382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Holling CS (1992) Cross-scale morphology, geometry, and dynamics of ecosystems. Ecol Monogr 62(4):447–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Johnstone JF, Allen CD, Franklin JF, Frelich LE, Harvey BJ, Higuera PE, Mack MC, Meentemeyer RK, Metz MR, Perry GLW, Schoennagel T, Turner MG (2016) Changing disturbance regimes, ecological memory, and forest resilience. Front Ecol Environ 14(7):369–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Koerner SE, Collins SL (2013) Small-scale patch structure in North American and South African grasslands responds differently to fire and grazing. Landscape Ecol 28(7):1293–1306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Limb RF, Hovick TJ, Norland JE, Volk JM (2018) Grassland plant community spatial patterns driven by herbivory intensity. Agric Ecosyst Environ 257:113–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lindenmayer D, Hobbs RJ, Montague-Drake R et al (2008) A checklist for ecological management of landscapes for conservation. Ecol Lett 11(1):78–91PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Loreau M, Naeem S, Inchausti P, Bengsston J, Grime JP, Hector A, Hooper DU, Huston MA, Raffeali D, Schmid B, Tilman D, Wardle DA (2001) Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challenges. Science 294(5543):804–808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Maresh Nelson SB, Coon JJ, Duchardt CJ, Miller JR, Debinski DM, Schacht WH (2018) Contrasting impacts of invasive plants and human-altered landscape context on nest survival and brood parasitism of a grassland bird. Landscape Ecol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-018-0703-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McGill BJ, Dornelas M, Gotelli NJ, Magurran AE (2015) Fifteen forms of biodiversity trend in the Anthropocene. Trends Ecol Evol 30(2):104–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McGranahan DA, Engle DM, Fuhlendorf SD, Miller JR, Debinski DM (2012a) An invasive cool-season grass complicates prescribed fire management in a native warm-season grassland. Nat Areas J 32(2):208–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McGranahan DA, Engle DM, Fuhlendorf SD, Winter SJ, Miller JR, Debinski DM (2012b) Spatial heterogeneity across five rangelands managed with pyric-herbivory. J Appl Ecol 49(4):903–910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McGranahan DA, Engle DM, Fuhlendorf SD, Winter SL, Miller JR, Debinski DM (2013a) Inconsistent outcomes of heterogeneity-based management underscore importance of matching evaluation to conservation objectives. Environ Sci Policy 31:53–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McGranahan DA, Engle DM, Miller JR, Debinski DM (2013b) An invasive grass increases live fuel proportion and reduces fire spread in a simulated grassland. Ecosystems 16(1):158–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McGranahan DA, Hovick TJ, Elmore RD, Engle DM, Fuhlendorf SD, Winter SL, Miller JR, Debinski DM (2016) Temporal variability in aboveground plant biomass decreases as spatial variability increases. Ecology 97(3):555–560PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. McNaughton S (1983) Physiological and ecological implications of herbivory. Physiological Plant Ecology III. Springer, Cham, pp 657–677Google Scholar
  45. Michener WK, Jones MB (2012) Ecoinformatics: supporting ecology as a data-intensive science. Trends Ecol Evol 27(2):85–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Moranz RA, Fuhlendorf SD, Engle DM (2014) Making sense of a prairie butterfly paradox: the effects of grazing, time since fire, and sampling period on regal fritillary abundance. Biol Conserv 173:32–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Wagner H (2013) Package ‘vegan’. Community ecology package, version 2(9)Google Scholar
  48. Oliver TH, Isaac NJB, August TA, Woodcock BA, Roy DB, Bullock JM (2015) Declining resilience of ecosystem functions under biodiversity loss. Nat Commun 6:10122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. O’Neill RV (1986) A hierarchical concept of ecosystems. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  50. Owen-Smith N (2004) Functional heterogeneity in resources within landscapes and herbivore population dynamics. Landscape Ecol 19(7):761–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Peters DPC, Pielke RA, Bestelmeyer BT, Allen CD, Munson-McGee S, Havstad KM (2004) Cross-scale interactions, nonlinearities, and forecasting catastrophic events. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101(42):15130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pillsbury FC, Miller JR, Debinski DM, Engle DM (2011) Another tool in the toolbox? Using fire and grazing to promote bird diversity in highly fragmented landscapes. Ecosphere 2(3):1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Raynor EJ, Joern A, Briggs JM (2015) Bison foraging responds to fire frequency in nutritionally heterogeneous grassland. Ecology 96(6):1586–1597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Raynor EJ, Joern A, Nippert JB, Briggs JM (2016) Foraging decisions underlying restricted space use: effects of fire and forage maturation on large herbivore nutrient uptake. Ecol Evol 6(16):5843–5853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Raynor EJ, Joern A, Skibbe A, Sowers M, Briggs JM, Laws AN, Goodin D (2017) Temporal variability in large grazer space use in an experimental landscape. Ecosphere 8(1):e01674Google Scholar
  56. Ribeiro Jr PJ, Diggle PJ, Ribeiro Jr MPJ (2016) Package ‘geoR’Google Scholar
  57. Ricketts AM, Sandercock BK (2016) Patch-burn grazing increases habitat heterogeneity and biodiversity of small mammals in managed rangelands. Ecosphere 7(8):e01431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Robel R, Briggs J, Dayton A, Hulbert L (1970) Relationships between visual obstruction measurements and weight of grassland vegetation. J Range Manag 23:295–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Roughgarden JD (1977) Patchiness in the spatial distribution of a population caused by stochastic fluctuations in resources. Oikos 29(1):52–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Scasta JD, Duchardt C, Engle DM, Miller JR, Debinski DM, Harr RN (2016) Constraints to restoring fire and grazing ecological processes to optimize grassland vegetation structural diversity. Ecol Eng 95:865–875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Seastedt TR, Hobbs RJ, Suding KN (2008) Management of novel ecosystems: are novel approaches required? Front Ecol Environ 6(10):547–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Setterfield SA, Rossiter-Rachor NA, Hutley LB, Douglas MM, Williams RJ (2010) BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH: turning up the heat: the impacts of Andropogon gayanus (gamba grass) invasion on fire behaviour in northern Australian savannas. Divers Distrib 16(5):854–861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sianga K, van Telgen M, Vrooman J, Fynn RW, Langevelde F (2017) Spatial refuges buffer landscapes against homogenisation and degradation by large herbivore populations and facilitate vegetation heterogeneity. Koedoe 59(2):1–13Google Scholar
  64. Soranno PA, Cheruvelil KS, Bissell EG, Bremigan MT, Downing JA, Fergus CE, Filstrup CT, Henry EN, Lottig NR, Stanley EH, Stow CA, Tan P, Wagner T, Webster KE (2014) Cross-scale interactions: quantifying multi-scaled cause–effect relationships in macrosystems. Front Ecol Environ 12(1):65–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Suding KN, Hobbs RJ (2009) Threshold models in restoration and conservation: a developing framework. Trends Ecol Evol 24(5):271–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tews J, Brose U, Grimm V, Tielbörger K, Wichmann MC, Schwager M, Jeltsch F (2004) Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: the importance of keystone structures. J Biogeogr 31(1):79–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Tucker MA, Böhning-Gaese K, Fagan WF et al (2018) Moving in the Anthropocene: global reductions in terrestrial mammalian movements. Science 359(6374):466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Turner MG (1989) Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on process. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 20(1):171–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Twidwell D, Fuhlendorf SD, Taylor CA, Rogers WE (2013) Refining thresholds in coupled fire–vegetation models to improve management of encroaching woody plants in grasslands. J Appl Ecol 50(3):603–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Twidwell D, West AS, Hiatt WB, Ramirez AL, Winter JT, Engle DM, Fuhlendorf SD, Carlson JD (2016) Plant invasions or fire policy: which has altered fire behavior more in tallgrass prairie? Ecosystems 19(2):356–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wu J (2004) Effects of changing scale on landscape pattern analysis: scaling relations. Landscape Ecol 19(2):125–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wu JG, Loucks OL (1995) From balance of nature to hierarchical patch dynamics: a paradigm shift in ecology. Q Rev Biol 70(4):439–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Yoganand K, Owen-Smith N (2014) Restricted habitat use by an African savanna herbivore through the seasonal cycle: key resources concept expanded. Ecography 37(10):969–982CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Agronomy and HorticultureUniversity of Nebraska-LincolnLincolnUSA
  2. 2.Department of EcologyMontana State UniversityBozemanUSA
  3. 3.Department of Natural Resources and Environmental SciencesUniversity of IllinoisUrbanaUSA

Personalised recommendations