Something is lost and something is gained: loss and replacement of species and functional groups in ant communities at fragmented forests
- 63 Downloads
Small fragments of natural habitats with an increased proportion of edges are common landscape traits following agricultural expansion. Consequences of habitat fragmentation are widely documented. However, functional and mechanistic approaches are still needed in order to understand these changes.
We studied habitat loss and edge effects on ant communities, addressing changes in species and functional group diversity, and the relative importance of β-diversity components.
In an endangered Neotropical forest, we sampled ants in edge and interior habitats using pitfall traps, during three summers (28 sites). We calculated taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity and partitioned taxonomic and functional β-diversity into replacement and loss/gain components.
We found more species and functional groups at edge than interior habitats, and four species were edge indicators. Habitat loss negatively affected total abundance and that of particular functional groups (fungus-growers and cryptic species) but had a positive effect on taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity as well as abundance of opportunists and predators. Species and functional group replacement drove β-diversity, being linked to habitat loss. However, interactions between habitat loss and edges explained the loss/gain of taxonomic and functional composition.
Fragmentation led to enriched ant communities at edges, possibly resulting from a higher influx of matrix species as edges become pervasive. This highlights the need to assess the spillover between habitats to understand its influence. Moreover, species replacement and the decrease of functional groups due to habitat loss could have an impact on ecosystem processes in which ants play an important role.
KeywordsAnts β-diversity components Chaco Serrano Edge effects Functional groups Habitat loss
We are thankful to the field owners that allowed us to work in their lands, to field assistants for their valuable help and to two anonymous reviewers for their helpful suggestions.
This work was performed with grants from the National Scientific and Technical Research Council or Argentina (CONICET; PIP 112 201201 00662), the Secretariat of Science and Technology of Córdoba (SECyT) and with an Internal Grant Agency of the Faculty of Environmental Sciences at the Czech University of Life Sciences Prague (Grants No. 42900/1312/3166).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that there are no financial or other types of conflicts of interest that bias this work.
- Bartoń K (2009) MuMIn: multi-model inference. R package, version 0.12. 2. http://CRAN.R-project.org/. Accessed 20 June 2018
- Bates D, Sarkar D (2007) lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.9975-12. http://CRAN.R-project.org/. Accessed 20 June 2018
- Breheny P, Burchett W (2016) visreg: visualization of regression models. R package version 2.5-0. http://CRAN.R-project.org/. Accessed 23 September 2018
- De Cáceres M, Jansen F, De Caceres MM (2016) Package ‘indicspecies’. R package version 1. 7.6. http://CRAN.R-project.org/. Accessed 20 June 2018
- Dejean A, Gibernau M (2000) A rainforest ant mosaic: the edge effect (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology 35:385–402Google Scholar
- Fernández F (2003) Introducción a las hormigas de la región Neotropical. Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, BogotáGoogle Scholar
- Gagic V, Bartomeus I, Jonsson T, Taylor A, Winqvist C, Fischer C, Slade EM, Steffan-Dewenter I, Emmerson M, Potts SG, Tscharntke T, Weisser W, Bommarco R (2015) Functional identity and diversity of animals predict ecosystem functioning better than species-based indices. Proc R Soc Lond B 282:20142620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gámez-Virués S, Perović DJ, Gossner MM, Börschig C, Blüthgen N, De Jong H, Simons NK, Klein AM, Krauss J, Maier G, Scherber C, Steckel J, Rothenwöhrer C, Steffan-Dewenter I, Weiner CN, Weisser W, Werner M, Tscharntke T, Westphal C (2015) Landscape simplification filters species traits and drives biotic homogenization. Nat Commun 6:8568CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Haddad NM, Brudvig LA, Clobert J, Davies KF, Gonzalez A, Holt RD, Lovejoy TE, Sexton JO, Austin MP, Collins CD, Cook WM, Damschen EI, Ewers RM, Foster BL, Jenkins CN, King AJ, Laurance WF, Levey DJ, Margules CR, Melbourne BA, Nicholls AO, Orrock JL, Song D, Townshend JR (2015) Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth’s ecosystems. Sci Adv 1:e1500052CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Magurran AE (2004) Measuring biological diversity. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Henry M, Stevens H, Szoecs E, Wagner H (2013) Package ‘vegan’. Community ecology package version 2(9). http://CRAN.R-project.org/. Accessed 20 June 2018
- Perfecto I, Armbrecht I, Philpott SM, Soto-Pinto L, Dietsch TV (2007) Shaded coffee and the stability of rainforest margins in Latin America. In: Tscharntke T, Leuschner C, Zelle M, Guhadja E, Bidin A (eds) The stability of tropical rainforest margins: linking ecological, economic and social constraints of land use and conservation. Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp 227–263Google Scholar
- Philpott SM, Perfecto I, Armbrecht I, Parr CL (2010) Ant diversity and function in disturbed and changing habitats. In: Lach L, Parr C, Abbott K (eds) Ant ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 137–156Google Scholar
- Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, the R Development Core Team (2013) nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-109. http://CRAN.R-project.org/. Accessed 20 June 2018
- R Development Core Team (2008) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org. Accessed 20 May 2018
- Sobrinho TG, Schoereder JH, Sperber CF, Madureira MS (2003) Does fragmentation alter species composition in ant communities (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)? Sociobiology 42:329–342Google Scholar
- Southwood TRE, Henderson PA (2000) Ecological methods. Blackwell Science, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Vasconcelos HL, Carvalho KS, Delabie JH (2001) Landscape modifications and ant communities. In: Bierregaard RO Jr, Gascon C, Lovejoy TE, Mesquita R (eds) Lessons from Amazonia: the ecology and conservation of a fragmented forest. Yale University Press, New Haven, pp 199–207Google Scholar