An early synthesis of the habitat amount hypothesis
The ecological literature is filled with studies highlighting the importance of both habitat loss and fragmentation on biodiversity. The patch concept has been central to these findings, being also at the heart of many ecological theories. Recently, the habitat amount hypothesis has been proposed as an alternative, where the patch concept is put to a rest, and both patch size and patch isolation effects on species richness are reduced to a single gradient: habitat loss in the landscape.
As this theory stated clear predictions that could be experimentally tested, many formal tests of the hypothesis have been published recently and this study aims at synthesizing their results.
A meta-analysis of 13 tests of the habitat amount hypothesis was conducted, to produce a single combined test of the theory.
The 13 tests combined suggest that effects of patch size and isolation, while controlling for habitat amounts, do exist although their overall effect is weak (r = 0.158).
Literal interpretations of the habitat amount hypothesis, where patch size and isolation have absolutely no effect on species richness, are probably oversimplifications of the processes at work. Still, the theory could prove useful as a baseline of the effects of habitat loss, against which patch size and isolation effects must be contrasted.
KeywordsHabitat amount hypothesis Fragmentation Meta-analysis Biodiversity Species richness
Thanks to Raphaël Proulx, Vincent Maire and Lael Parrott for stimulating discussions on the subject. This manuscript was greatly improved by insightful reviews from Lenore Fahrig, Nick Haddad and Jessica Lindgren. The author acknowledges a grant from Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC).
- Hubbell SP (2001) The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Levins R (1969) Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Bull Entomol Soc Am 15:237–240Google Scholar
- R Core Team (2017) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Core Team, ViennaGoogle Scholar
- Rosenberg KV, Rohrbaugh RW, Barker SE, Hames RS, Lowe JD, Dhondt AA (1999) Land manager’s guide to improving habitat for scarlet tanagers and other forest-interior birdsGoogle Scholar
- Sterne JA, Egger M (2005) Regression methods to detect publication and other bias in meta-analysis. In: Rothstein HR, Sutton AJ, Borenstein M (eds) Publication bias in meta-analysis. Prevention, assessment and adjustments. Wiley, Chichester, pp 99–110Google Scholar
- Thompson FR III, Donovan TM, DeGraaf RM, Faaborg J, Robinson SK (2002) A multi-scale perspective of the effects of forest fragmentation on birds in eastern forests. Stud Avian Biol 25:8–19Google Scholar