Landscape Ecology

, Volume 33, Issue 11, pp 1997–2011 | Cite as

Characterizing combined fire and insect outbreak disturbance regimes in British Columbia, Canada

  • Philip J. BurtonEmail author
  • Yan Boulanger
Research Article



Fires and insect outbreaks are important agents of forest landscape change, but the classification and distribution of these combined processes remain unstudied aspects of forest disturbance regimes.


We sought to map areas of land characterized by homogenous fire regime (HFR) attributes and by distinctive combinations of fire, bark beetles and defoliating insect outbreaks, and how their distribution might change should current climatic trends continue.


We used a 41-year history of mapped fires and forest insect outbreaks to classify HFRs and combined fire and insect disturbance regimes (HDRs). Spatially constrained cluster analysis of 2524 20-km grid cells used mean annual area burned, ignition Julian date, fire size and fire frequency to delineate HFR zones. Mean annual areas burned, affected by bark beetles, and affected by defoliators were used to delineate HDR zones. Random forests classification used climate associations of HDRs to project likely changes in their distribution.


Eighteen HFR zones accounted for 30% of variance, compared to 27 HDR zones accounting for 59% of variance. Fire regime designation had low predictive power in explaining 23 homogenous insect outbreak regimes or the 27 HDRs. Climate change projections indicate a northward migration of current HDR zones. Conditions suitable for defoliator outbreaks are projected to increase, resulting in a projected increase in the total rate of forest disturbance.


When describing forest disturbance regimes, it is important to consider the combined and possibly interacting agents of tree mortality, which can result in emergent properties not predictable from any single agent.


Disturbance interactions Disturbance regime Fire regime Insect outbreaks Spatially constrained cluster analysis Climate change 



We thank Steve Taylor and Gurp Thandi for compiling the B.C. Natural Disturbance Database, and Bryan Pettit for preparing the gridded polygon intersections and summaries. This work was supported by the Future Forest Ecosystems Science Council of British Columbia (Project FFESC-B1-2009-12), the Forest Change Program of the Canadian Forest Service (Natural Resources Canada), and the Research Office of the University of Northern British Columbia (Fund 26911). The constructive suggestions of two anonymous reviewers are gratefully acknowledged.

Supplementary material

10980_2018_710_MOESM1_ESM.doc (3 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 3114 kb)


  1. Anonymous (1995). Biodiversity guidebook. Forest practices code of british columbia. B.C Ministry of Forests and B.C. Environment. Accessed 17 Dec 2017
  2. Arora VK, Boer GJ (2010) Uncertainties in the 20th century carbon budget associated with land use change. Glob Change Biol 16(12):3327–3348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Assunção RM, Neves MC, Câmara G, da Costa Freitas, C (2006) Efficient regionalization techniques for socio-economic geographical units using minimum spanning trees. Int J Geogr Info Sci 20:797–811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baskerville GL (1975) Spruce budworm: super silviculturist. For Chron 51(4):138–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bentz BJ, Régnière J, Fettig CJ, Hansen EM, Hayes JL, Hicke JA, Kelsey RG, Negrón JF, Seybold SJ (2010) Climate change and bark beetles of the western United States and Canada: direct and indirect effects. Bioscience 60(8):602–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bergeron Y, Leduc A (1998) Relationships between change in fire frequency and mortality due to spruce budworm outbreak in the southeastern Canadian Boreal Forest. J Veg Sci 9(4):492–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boulanger Y, Gauthier S, Burton PJ, Vaillancourt M-A (2012) An alternative fire regime zonation for Canada. Int J Wildland Fire 21(8):1052–1064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boulanger Y, Gauthier S, Burton PJ (2014) A refinement of models projecting future Canadian fire regimes using homogeneous fire regime zones. Can J For Res 44(4):365–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buma B (2015) Disturbance interactions: characterization, prediction, and the potential for cascading effects. Ecosphere 6(4):70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burton PJ, Boulanger Y (2018) Data from: characterizing combined fire and insect outbreak disturbance regimes in British Columbia. Dryad Digit Repository, Canada. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burton P, Taylor S, Thandi G (2005) Challenges in defining the disturbance regimes of northern British Columbia. J Ecosyst Manag 6(2):119–123.
  12. CCFM (Canadian Council of Forest Ministers) (2012) Forest pest monitoring in Canada: current situation, compatibilities, gaps and proposed enhanced monitoring program. Canadian Forest Service, Natural Resources Canada. Accessed 6 Nov 2017
  13. Cohen WB, Spies TA, Alig RJ, Oetter DR, Maiersperger TK, Fiorella M (2002) Characterizing 23 years (1972–95) of stand replacement disturbance in western Oregon forests with Landsat imagery. Ecosystems 5(2):122–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cutler DR, Edwards TC, Beard KH, Cutler A, Hess KT, Gibson J, Lawler JJ (2007) Random forests for classification in ecology. Ecology 88(11):2783–2792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Daniels LD, Gray RW (2006) Disturbance regimes in coastal British Columbia. J Ecosyst Manag 7(2):44–56Google Scholar
  16. DeLong SC (2007) Implementation of natural disturbance-based management in northern British Columbia. For Chron 83(3):338–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Geertsema M, Clague JJ, Schwab JW, Evans SG (2006) An overview of recent large catastrophic landslides in northern British Columbia, Canada. Eng Geol 83(1–3):120–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gordon AD (1999) Classification, 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Guo D (2008) Regionalization with dynamically constrained agglomerative clustering and partitioning (REDCAP). Int J Geogr Inf Sci 22:801–823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Guo D (2011) REDCAP: a zonation toolkit (version 2.0.0)—User manual. Department of Geography, University of South CarolinaGoogle Scholar
  21. Guo D, Wang H (2011) Automatic region building for spatial analysis. Trans GIS 15:29–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Haughian SR, Burton PJ, Taylor SW, Curry C (2012) Expected effects of climate change on forest disturbance regimes in British Columbia. J Ecosyst Manag 13(1):1–24. Google Scholar
  23. Henning C (2015) Fpc: Flexible procedures for clustering. R package version 2.1-10.
  24. Hof AR, Dymond CC, Mladenoff DJ (2017) Climate change mitigation through adaptation: the effectiveness of forest diversification by novel tree planting regimes. Ecosphere 8(11):e01981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2007) Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Working Group II Report, IPCC Fourth Assessment Report. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  26. Kasischke ES, Turetsky MR (2006) Recent changes in the fire regime across the North American boreal region—spatial and temporal patterns of burning across Canada and Alaska. Geophys Res Lett 33(9):L09703. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Malley JD, Kruppa J, Dasgupta A, Malley KG, Ziegler A (2012) Probability machines: consistent probability estimation using nonparametric learning machines. Methods Inf Med 51(1):74–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McCloskey SPJ,  Daniels LD, McLean JA (2009) Potential impacts of climate change on Western Hemlock Looper outbreaks. Northwest Sci 83:225–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Morgan P, Hardy CC, Swetnam TW, Rollins MG, Long DG (2001) Mapping fire regimes across time and space: understanding coarse and fine-scale fire patterns. Int J Wildland Fire 10(4):329–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Murdock TQ, Taylor SW, Flower A, Mehlenbacher A, Montenegro A, Zwiers FW, Alfaro R, Spittlehouse DL (2013) Pest outbreak distribution and forest management impacts in a changing climate in British Columbia. Environ Sci Policy 26:75–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. R Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
  32. Régnière J, Nealis V, Porter K (2009) Climate suitability and management of the gypsy moth invasion into Canada. Biol Invas 11(1):135–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Runkle JR (1985) Disturbance regimes in temperate forests. In: Pickett STA, White PS (eds) The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics. Academic Press, Cambridge, pp 17–33Google Scholar
  34. Schulte LA, Mladenoff DJ (2005) Severe wind and fire regimes in northern forests: historical variability at the regional scale. Ecology 86:431–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Segal M, Xiao Y (2011) Multivariate random forests. Wiley Interdisciplinary Rev 1:80–87Google Scholar
  36. Stocks BJ, Mason JA, Todd JB, Bosch EM, Wotton BM, Amiro BD, Flannigan MD, Hirsch KG, Logan KA, Martell DL, Skinner WR (2002) Large forest fires in Canada, 1959–1997. J Geophys Res 108:8149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Taylor SW (2006) Development and analysis of a british columbia natural disturbance database. Final report for project Y06-2233 to B.C. Forest Science Program. Pacific Forestry Centre, Canadian Forest Service, Nat Resour Canada. p. 22. Accessed 7 Nov 2017
  38. Turner MG, Gardner RH (2015) Landscape disturbance dynamics. In: Turner MG et al (eds) Landscape ecology in theory and practice: pattern and PROCESS. Springer, New York, pp 175–228Google Scholar
  39. Wang T, Hamann A, Spittlehouse D, Murdock TN (2012) ClimateWNA: high-resolution spatial climate data for western North America. J Appl Meteorol. Climatol 51:16–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Weed AS, Ayres MP, Hicke JA (2013) Consequences of climate change for biotic disturbances in North American forests. Ecol Monogr 83(4):441–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. White JC, Wulder MA, Hermosilla T, Coops NC, Hobart GW (2017) A nationwide annual characterization of 25 years of forest disturbance and recovery for Canada using Landsat time series. Remote Sens Environ 194:303–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wong C, Dorner B, Sandmann H (2003) Estimating historical variability of natural disturbances in British Columbia. Land Management Handbook 53. B.C. Ministry of Forests and B.C. Ministry of Sustainable Resource Management. p. 140Google Scholar
  43. Woods AJ, Heppner D, Kope HH, Burleigh J, Maclauchlan L (2010) Forest health and climate change: a British Columbia perspective. For Chron 86(4):412–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wotton BM, Nock CA, Flannigan MD (2010) Forest fire occurrence and climate change in Canada. Int J Wildland Fire 19(3):253–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wright MN (2016) Ranger: a fast implementation of random forests. R package version 0.6.0.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Northern British ColumbiaTerraceCanada
  2. 2.Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Laurentian Forestry CentreQuebecCanada

Personalised recommendations