Investigating landscape phase transitions in Mediterranean rangelands by recurrence analysis
Socio-ecological landscapes typically characterized by non-linear dynamics in space and time are difficult to be analyzed using standard quantitative methods, due to multiple processes interacting on different spatial and temporal scales. This poses a challenge to the identification of appropriate approaches for analyzing time series that can evaluate system properties of landscape dynamics in the face of disturbances, such as uncontrolled fires.
The purpose is the application of non-linear methods such as recurrence quantification analysis (RQA) to landscape ecology. The examples concern the time series of burnt and unburnt Mediterranean rangelands, to highlight potential and limits of RQA.
We used RQA together with joint recurrence analysis (JRA) to compare the evolutionary behavior of different land uses.
Time series of forests and grasslands in rangelands present both periodic and chaotic components with a rather similar behavior after the fire and clear transitions from less to more regular/predictable dynamics/succession. Results highlight the impacts of fire, the recovery capacity of land covers to pre-burnt levels, and the decay of synchronization towards the previous regime associated with vegetation secondary succession consistent with early successional species.
RQA and JRA with their set of indices (recurrence rate: RR, laminarity: LAM, determinism: DET, and divergence: DIV) can represent new sensitive measures that may monitor the adaptive capacity and the resilience of landscapes. However, future applications are needed to standardize the analysis by strengthening the accuracy of this approach in describing the ongoing transformations of natural and man-managed landscapes.
KeywordsRecurrence quantification analysis (RQA) Non-linear analysis Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) Fire disturbance Predictability Secondary succession
Piero Medagli is gratefully acknowledged for his suggestions and field surveys as well as the three anonymous reviewers for their useful suggestions and comments that have strongly improved the original version of the manuscript. We also acknowledge the ERASMUS funding program and one DFG Grant to N. Marwan (RTG 2043/1, Natural Hazards and Risks in a Changing World).
- Avi P, No’am GS (1998) Role of grazing in Mediterranean rangeland ecosystems. BioScience 48: 1007-1017Google Scholar
- Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (2003) Navigating social-ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Biondi E, Casavecchia S, Beccarisi L, Marchiori S, Medagli P, Zuccarello V (2010) Le serie di vegetazione della Regione Puglia. In: Blasi C (ed) La vegetazione d’Italia. Palombi, Rome, pp 391–409Google Scholar
- Magurran AE (2004) Measuring biological diversity. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Mulder C, Bennett EM, Bohan DA, Bonkowski M, Carpenter SR, Chalmers R, Cramer W, Durance I, Eisenhauer N, Fontaine C, Haughton AJ, Hettelingh J-P, Hines J, Ibanez S, Jeppesen E, Krumins JA, Ma A, Mancinelli G, Massol F, McLaughlin Ó, Naeem S, Pascual U, Peñuelas J, Pettorelli N, Pocock MJO, Raffaelli D, Rasmussen JJ, Rusch GM, Scherber C, Setälä H, Sutherland WJ, Vacher C, Voigt W, Vonk JA, Wood SA, Woodward G (2015) 10 years later: Revisiting priorities for science and society a decade after the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Adv Ecol Res 53:1–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Müller F, Bergmann M, Dannowski R, Dippner JW, Gnauck A, Haase P, Jochimsen MC, Kasprzak P, Kröncke I, Kümmerlin R, Küster M, Lischeid G, Meesenburg H, Merz C, Millat G, Müller J, Padisák J, Schimming CG, Schubert H, Schult M, Selmeczy G, Shatwell T, Stoll S, Schwabe M, Soltwedel T, Straile D, Theuerkauf M (2016) Assessing resilience in long-term ecological data sets. Ecol Indic 65:10–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Peterson GD (2002) Estimating resilience across landscapes. Conserv Ecol 6(1):17. http://www.consecol.org/vol6/iss1/art17/
- USGS (2014) USGS global visualization viewer. https://glovis.usgs.gov/. Accessed 10 Dec, 2014
- Walker B, Carpenter S, Anderies J, Abel N, Cumming G, Janssen M, Lebel L, Norberg J, Peterson GD, Pritchard R (2002) Resilience management in social-ecological systems: A working hypothesis for a participatory approach. Conserv Ecol 6:14. http://www.consecol.org/vol6/iss1/art14
- Walker B, Holling CS, Carpenter SR, Kinzig A (2004) Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social–ecological systems. Ecol Soc 9(2):5. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/art5
- Walker BH, Salt D (2006) Resilience thinking: sustaining ecosystems and people in a changing world. Island Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
- Zaccarelli N, Petrosillo I, Zurlini G, Riitters KH (2008) Source/sink patterns of disturbance and cross-scale effects in a panarchy of social-ecological landscapes. Ecol Soc 13:26. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss1/art26
- Zurlini G, Petrosillo I, Aretano R, Castorini I, D’Arpa S, De Marco A, Pasimeni MR, Semeraro T, Zaccarelli N (2014b) Key fundamental aspects for mapping and assessing ecosystem services: predictability of ecosystem service providers at scales from local to global. Ann Bot 4:53–63Google Scholar