A social-ecological approach to land-use conflict to inform regional and conservation planning and management
- 64 Downloads
Conflict over land use is endemic to natural resource management given the limited availability of resources and multiple stakeholders’ interests, but there has been limited research to examine conflict from an integrative social-ecological perspective.
We sought to determine how the potential for land use conflict—a social construct—was related (or not) to ecological systems of landscapes.
Using participatory mapping data from a regional case study in Australia, we identified the potential for land use conflict using a model that combines spatially-explicit place values with preferences for specific land uses related to development and conservation. Multiple proxies of biodiversity were used to evaluate the landscape’s ecological systems at ecosystems and species levels. Range maps were used to identify areas of high species diversity value using the conservation planning software Zonation.
We spatially intersected conflict areas with landscape attributes and found the potential for conflict over conservation to be higher in coastal areas than inland areas, more likely to be located in areas with moderate vegetation cover, more concentrated in ecosystems classified as ‘No Concern’ with moderate to high native vegetation. Potential conflict over conservation was disproportionately higher in areas with higher species diversity derived from conservation modelling.
The social-ecological associations in conflict analysis can inform impact assessment of land use plans on biodiversity, assist development of effective approaches to reconcile conservation and other land uses, support conservation planning by identifying priorities for conflict negotiation and understanding underlying factors for conflict.
KeywordsLand use conflict Conservation conflict Social data Ecological evaluation Conservation planning Spatial prioritization
- Australian Bureau of Statistics (2013) Australian demographic statistics December 2012. http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Latestproducts/. Accessed 11 Sept 2013
- Beyer HL (2012) Geospatial modelling environment (Version 0.7.1.0). (software). http://www.spatialecology.com/gme
- Binney J (2008) The economic and social implications of the Baffle Creek Basin water resource plan. Marsden Jacob Associates, CamberwellGoogle Scholar
- Brown G, Donovan S (2013) Escaping the national forest planning Quagmire: using public participation GIS to assess acceptable national forest use. J For 111(2):115–125Google Scholar
- Department of Environment (2015) Species of National Environmental Significance. http://www.environment.gov.au/science/erin/databases-maps/snes. Accessed 17 Apr 2015
- Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (2012) Baffle Basin Assessment, Burnett-Mary Regional Management Group NRM RegionGoogle Scholar
- Hastik R, Basso S, Geitner C, Haida C, Poljanec A, Portaccio A, Vrščaj B, Walzer C (2015) Renewable energies and ecosystem service impacts. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 48:608–623Google Scholar
- Hersperger AM, Ioja C, Steiner F, Tudor CA (2015) Comprehensive consideration of conflicts in the land-use planning process: a conceptual contribution. Carpath J Earth Environ Sci 10:5–13Google Scholar
- Hill R, Dyer GA, Lozada-Ellison LM, Gimona A, Martin-Ortega J, Munoz-Rojas J, Gordon IJ (2015) A social-ecological systems analysis of impediments to delivery of the Aichi 2020 Targets and potentially more effective pathways to the conservation of biodiversity. Glob Environ Change-Human Policy Dimens 34:22–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Klare MT (2001) Resource wars: the new landscape of global conflict. Metropolitan Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Moilanen A, Meller L, Lepanen J, Montesino Pouzols A, Arponen A, Kujala H (2012) Zonation: spatial conservation planning framework and software version 3.1 user manual Helsingin Yliopisto, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
- Queensland Government (2015) Regional Ecosystem Description Database (REDD). https://www.qld.gov.au/environment/plants-animals/plants/ecosystems/download/. Accessed 1 Sept 2015
- Queensland Government (2016) Threats to wildlife. https://www.ehp.qld.gov.au/wildlife/threats/. Accessed 19 Apr 2017
- Recher H, Lim L (1990) A review of current ideas of the extinction, conservation and management of Australia’s terrestrial vertebrate fauna. Surrey Beatty & Sons for the Ecological Society of Australia, Baulkham Hills, pp 287–301Google Scholar
- Sayer J, Sunderland T, Ghazoul J, Pfund JL, Sheil D, Meijaard E, Venter M, Boedhihartono AK, Day M, Garcia C, van Oosten C (2013) Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110:8349–8356CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Yell123 (2014) Business directories. http://yell123.com/. Accessed 1 Feb 2014