Advertisement

Landscape Ecology

, Volume 34, Issue 2, pp 259–274 | Cite as

Assessing source-sink stability in the context of management and land-use change

  • Julie A. HeinrichsEmail author
  • Joshua J. Lawler
  • Nathan H. Schumaker
  • Lauren E. Walker
  • David A. Cimprich
  • Amy Bleisch
Research Article

Abstract

Context

Management actions and land-use change can disrupt interdependent population processes, re-define population networks, and change source-sink dynamics. Yet we know little about the types of changes that can de-stabilize source-sink dynamics and how such changes could affect management decisions.

Objectives

We examined the degree to which source-sink status and strength could change under a range of management actions and land-use change scenarios including different patterns and extents of habitat loss, restoration, demographic improvements from parasitism control, and increased frequencies inter-population movement.

Methods

We developed an empirically-rich, spatially explicit, individual-based model for the formerly endangered Black-capped vireo in Texas. We simulated the network-wide consequences of different kinds of changes and compared the resulting source-sink strength, status, and regional abundance across scenarios. We gauged source-sink stability by the degree to which system changes caused the reversal of source or sink status.

Results

The stability of source-sink characterizations differed with the type of change. Source-sink dynamics were less responsive to small changes to population structure and changes that minimally affected demographic conditions. Source-sink status was most responsive to changes that affected habitat patterns and quality.

Conclusions

Accurately classifying sources and sinks is challenging, particularly in variable and directionally changing systems. The stability of source-sink classifications depends on the type of management or land-use change. Management actions may need to weigh interventions that improve regional abundance against those that alter regional source-sink dynamics as abundance and source-sink states can be sensitive to different kinds of change.

Keywords

Black-capped vireo Source-sink dynamics Management Habitat restoration Spatially explicit individual-based model Land-use change 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank John Marzluff and Chad Wilsey for input and useful discussions.

Funding

Funding was provided by Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (SERDP) as part of project RC-2120. The content of this manuscript does not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the United States government and no official endorsement should be inferred.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

10980_2018_768_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (444 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 444 kb)

References

  1. Bancroft BA, Lawler JJ, Schumaker NH (2016) Weighing the relative potential impacts of climate change and land-use change on an endangered bird. Ecol Evol 6:4468–4477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Breininger DR, Carter GM (2003) Territory quality transitions and source-sink dynamics in a Florida scrub-jay population. Ecol Appl 13:516–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cilimburg AB, Lindberg MS, Tewksbury JJ, Hejl SJ (2002) Effects of dispersal on survival probability of adult yellow warblers (Dendroica Petechia). Auk 119:778–789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cimprich DA, Heimbuch M (2011) Monitoring of the Black-capped vireo during 2011 on Fort Hood, Texas. Endangered Species Monitoring and Management at Fort Hood, Texas: 2011 Annual Report. Natural and Cultural Resources Management Branch. Fort HoodGoogle Scholar
  5. Cimprich DA, Heimbuch M (2012) Monitoring of the Black-capped vireo during 2012 on Fort Hood, Texas. Endangered Species Monitoring and Management at Fort Hood, Texas: 2012 Annual Report. Natural and Cultural Resources Management Branch. Fort HoodGoogle Scholar
  6. Cimprich DA, Kostecke RM (2006) Distribution of the black-capped vireo at Fort Hood, Texas. Southwest Nat 51:94–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cimprich DA, Sexton CW, Mcdowell PK, Lasley G, Simper WS (2009) Long-distance dispersal records for the Black-capped vireo. Bull Tex Ornithol Soc 42:44–47Google Scholar
  8. Copeland HE, Doherty KE, Naugle DE, Pocewicz A, Kiesecker JM (2009) Mapping Oil and gas development potential in the US intermountain west and estimating impacts to species. Plos One 4:e7400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crowder LB, Lyman SJ, Figueira WF, Priddy J (2000) Source-sink population dynamics and the problems of siting marine reserves. Bull Mar Sci 66:799–820Google Scholar
  10. Eckrich GH, Koloszar JA, Goering MD (1999) Effective landscape management of brown-headed cowbirds at Fort Hood, Texas. Stud Avian Biol 18:267–274Google Scholar
  11. Franco D, Ruiz-Herrera A (2015) To connect or not to connect isolated patches. J Theor Biol 370:72–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Furrer RD, Pasinelli G (2016) Empirical evidence for source—sink populations: a review on occurrence, assessments and implications. Biol Rev 91:782–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Graber JW (1961) Habitat requirements and life history of the black-capped vireo (Vireo atricapilla). Ecol Monogr 31:313–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hannah L, Midgley GF, Millar D (2002) Climate change-integrated conservation strategies. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 11:485–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Heinrichs JA, Bender DJ, Gummer DL, Schumaker NH (2010) Assessing critical habitat: evaluating the relative contribution of habitats to population persistence. Biol Conserv 143(9):2229–2237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Heinrichs JA, Lawler JJ, Schumaker NH, Wilsey CB, Bender DJ (2015) Divergence in sink contributions to population persistence. Conserv Biol.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12540 Google Scholar
  17. Heinrichs JA, Lawler JJ, Schumaker NH (2016) Intrinsic and extrinsic drivers of source-sink dynamics. Ecol Evol.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2029 Google Scholar
  18. Heinrichs JA, Lawler JJ, Schumaker NH, Wilsely CB, Monroe KC, Aldridge CL (2018) A multispecies test of source-sink indicators to prioritize habitat for declining populations. Conserv Biol 32:648–657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Holt RD (1985) Population dynamics in two-patch environments: some anomalous consequences of an optimal habitat distribution. Theor Popul Biol 28:181–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kanda LL, Fuller TK, Sievert PR, Kellogg RL (2009) Seasonal source-sink dynamics at the edge of a species’ range. Ecology 90:1574–1585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kostecke RM, Cimprich DA (2008) Adult and Juvenile survival of black-capped vireos within a large breeding population in Texas. The Condor 110:251–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Loreau M, Daufresne T, Gonzalez A, Gravel D, Guichard F, Leroux SJ, Loeuille N, Massol F, Mouquet N (2013) Unifying sources and sinks in ecology and earth sciences. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 88:365–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Morris DW (2011) Source–sink dynamics emerging from unstable ideal freehabitat selection. In: Liu J, Hull V, Morzillo AT, Wiens JA (eds) Sources, sinks and sustainability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 58–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pulliam RH (1988) Sources, sinks, and population regulation. Am Nat 132:652–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ratzlaff A (1987) Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants: determination of the black-capped vireo to be an endangered species. Fed Reg 52:37420–37423Google Scholar
  26. Runge JP, Runge MC, Nichols JD (2006) The role of local populations within a landscape context: defining and classifying sources and sinks. Am Nat 167:925–938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schumaker NH, Brookes A (2018) HexSim: a modeling environment for ecology and conservation. Landscape Ecol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-017-0605-9 Google Scholar
  28. U.S. Geological Survey, 20140331, NLCD 2011 Land Cover (2011) U.S. Geological Survey, Sioux Falls, SDGoogle Scholar
  29. Vega Rivera JH, Ortega-Huerta MA, Sarkar S, Rappole JH (2011) Modelling the potential winter distribution of the endangered Black-capped Vireo (Vireo atricapilla). Bird Conserv Int 21:92–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Walker L (2015) Population dynamics of the endangered Black-capped Vireo (Vireo atricapilla)Google Scholar
  31. Walker LE, Marzluff JM, Cimprich DA (2016) Source-sink population dynamics driven by a brood parasite: a case study of an endangered songbird, the black-capped vireo. Biol Conserv 203:108–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Weegman MD, Bearhop S, Fox AD, Hilton GM, Walsh AJ, McDonald JL, Hodgson DJ (2016) Integrated population modelling reveals a perceived source to be a cryptic sink. J Anim Ecol 85:467–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wilkins N, Powell RA, Conkey AAT, Snelgrove AG (2006) Population status and threat analysis for the black-capped vireo. Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TXGoogle Scholar
  34. Wilsey CB, Lawler JJ, Cimprich DA (2012) Performance of habitat suitability models for the endangered black-capped vireo built with remotely-sensed data. Remote Sens Environ 119:35–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wilsey CB, Lawler JJ, Cimprich D, Schumaker NH (2014) Dependence of the endangered black-capped vireo on sustained cowbird management. Conserv Biol 28:561–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Environmental and Forest SciencesUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  2. 2.Natural Resource Ecology LaboratoryColorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA
  3. 3.Department of Fisheries and WildlifeOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA
  4. 4.Natural and Cultural Resources Management Branch, Environmental DivisionFort HoodUSA

Personalised recommendations