A practical method for creating a digital topographic surface for ecological plots using ground-based measurements
Digital elevation models (DEMs) are widely used in landscape ecology to link topographic features with biotic and abiotic factors. However, to date, high-resolution, affordable, and easy to process elevation data are not available for many regions.
Here we propose a field-based method for efficiently and inexpensively collecting or analysing already existing slope data. We compare the field approach to two commonly used remote sensing techniques to test the similarly of the DEMs using different methods.
To provide an ecological example of the method, we selected four 1-ha forest plots and compared the DEM generated by using our field method with those derived from: (i) coarse (~ 30 m pixel) data from the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission and (ii) high-resolution (~ 1 m) data from Light Detection and Ranging devices (LiDAR).
Field- and LiDAR-based DEMs showed strong concordance in two of the four sites. The sites where field-based and LiDAR DEMs substantially differed, suffered from relatively few LiDAR sampling points. Diagnostic tests suggested that the field–LiDAR discrepancy was due to dense over-storey vegetation, which reduced LiDAR’s accuracy due to a failure to penetrate the forest canopy adequately in some areas.
Our method has the advantage of being quick and cheap to collect yet able to produce small-scale (plot-scale) DEMs of high quality. By using the R-code we have provided, ecologists will be able to use slope data (collected using any means) to generate a DEM without the need of specific skills in spatial sciences.
KeywordsDigital elevation models DEM Topography Plots Algorithm Remote sensing Slope LiDAR SRTM Forests
This study was supported by Australian Research Council Laureate Fellowship under award number FL160100101. Jessie C. Buettel and Barry W. Brook were supported by Centre of Excellence for Australian Biodiversity and Heritage under award number CE170100015.
- Chang K-t, Tsai B-w (1991) The effect of DEM resolution on slope and aspect mapping. Cartogr Geogr Inf Syst 18(1):69–77Google Scholar
- Gong J, Li Z, Zhu Q, Sui H, Zhou Y (2000) Effects of various factors on the accuracy of DEMs: an intensive experimental investigation. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 66(9):1113–1117Google Scholar
- Hu J (1995) Methods of generating surfaces in environmental GIS applications. In: 1995 ESRI user conference proceedingsGoogle Scholar
- Mitchard ETA, Saatchi SS, White LJT, Abernethy KA, Jeffery KJ, Lewis SL, Collins M, Lefsky MA, Leal ME, Woodhouse IH, Meir P (2012) Mapping tropical forest biomass with radar and spaceborne LiDAR in Lopé National Park, Gabon: overcoming problems of high biomass and persistent cloud. Biogeosciences 9:179–191Google Scholar
- R Core Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar