Landscape metrics as a framework to measure the effect of landscape structure on the spread of invasive insect species
- 479 Downloads
With accelerated land-use change throughout the world, increased understanding of the relative effects of landscape composition and configuration on biological system and bioinvasion in particular, is needed to design effective management strategies. However, this topic is poorly understood in part because empirical studies often fail to account for large gradients of habitat complexity and offer insufficient or even no replication across habitats.
The aim of this study was to disentangle the independent and interactive effects of landscape composition and landscape configuration on the establishment and spread of invasive insect species.
We explore a spatially-explicit, mechanistic modeling framework that allows for systematic investigation of the impact of changes in landscape composition and landscape configuration on establishment and spread of invasive insect species. Landscape metrics are used as an indicators of invasive insect establishment and spread.
We showed that the presence of an Allee effect leads to a balance between the effectiveness of spread and invasion success. Spread is maximized at an intermediate dispersal level and inhibited at both low and high levels of dispersal. The landscape, by either increasing or mitigating the dispersal abilities of a species, can lead to a rate of spread under a dispersal threshold for which density and spread is at the highest.
Our study proposes that change in landscape structure is an additional explanation of the highly variable spread dynamics observed in natural and anthropogenic landscapes. Consequently, a landscape-scale perspective could significantly improve spread risk assessment and the design of control or containment strategies.
KeywordsInvasive insects Heterogeneous landscape Landscape metrics Population dynamics Invasive spread Spatially-explicit stochastic models
Thanks are due to all involved, including Ursula Torres, Mariona Roige and Marona Rovira Capdevila for their help with the interpretation of the results. Work was supported by Bio-Protection Research Centre, Canterbury, New Zealand.
- Bartoń K (2016) MuMIn: multi-model inference, version 1.15.6. URL: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/MuMIn/index.html
- Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S, Christensen RHB, Singmann H, Dai B, Eigen adn Grothendieck G (2015) lme4: linear mixed-effects models using ’Eigen’ and S4, version 1.1-10. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/index.html
- Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Hanski IA, Gaggiotti OE (2004) Ecology, genetics and evolution of metapopulations. Elsevier, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
- Huntley B, Barnard P, Altwegg R, Chambers L, Coetzee BW, Gibson L, Hockey PA, Hole DG, Midgley GF, Underhill LG, Willis SG (2010) Beyond bioclimatic envelopes: dynamic species’ range and abundance modelling in the context of climatic change. Ecography 33(3):621–626Google Scholar
- Lustig A, Worner SP, Pitt JPW, Doscher C, Stouffer DB, Senay SD (2017) A modelling framework for the establishment and spread of invasive species in heterogeneous environments. Ecol Evol 10.1002/ece3.2915
- McGarigal K, Cushman S, Ene E (2012) FRAGSTATS v4: spatial pattern analysis program for categorical and continuous maps. http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html
- Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being. Millennium ecosystem assessment. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Morel-Journel T, Girod P, Mailleret L, Auguste A, Blin A, Vercken E (2015) The highs and lows of dispersal: how connectivity and initial population size jointly shape establishment dynamics in discrete landscapes. Oikos 0:01–009Google Scholar
- Pitt JPW (2008) Modelling the spread of invasive species across heterogeneous landscapes. PhD thesis, Lincoln University, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
- Shigesada N, Kawasaki K (1997) Biological invasions: theory and practice. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Tobin PC, Blackburn LM (2007) Slow the spread: a national program to manage the gypsy moth. General Technical Report-Northern Research Station, USDA Forest Service (NRS-6)Google Scholar
- Tobin PC, Liebhold AM, Anderson E (2015) Estimating spread rates of non-native species: the gypsy moth as a case study. In: Venette RC (ed) Pest Risk Modelling and Mapping for Invasive Alien Species. CAB International and USDA, Wallingford, pp 131–144Google Scholar