How do land-use legacies affect ecosystem services in United States cultural landscapes?
- 807 Downloads
Landscape-scale studies of ecosystem services (ES) have increased, but few consider land-use history. Historical land use may be especially important in cultural landscapes, producing legacies that influence ecosystem structure, function, and biota that in turn affect ES supply.
Our goal was to generate a conceptual framework for understanding when land-use legacies matter for ES supply in well-studied agricultural, urban, and exurban US landscapes.
We synthesized illustrative examples from published literature in which landscape legacies were demonstrated or are likely to influence ES.
We suggest three related conditions in which land-use legacies are important for understanding current ES supply. (1) Intrinsically slow ecological processes govern ES supply, illustrated for soil-based and hydrologic services impaired by slowly processed pollutants. (2) Time lags between land-use change and ecosystem responses delay effects on ES supply, illustrated for biodiversity-based services that may experience an ES debt. (3) Threshold relationships exist, such that changes in ES are difficult to reverse, and legacy lock-in disconnects contemporary landscapes from ES supply, illustrated by hydrologic services. Mismatches between contemporary landscape patterns and mechanisms underpinning ES supply yield unexpected patterns of ES.
Today’s land-use decisions will generate tomorrow’s legacies, and ES will be affected if processes underpinning ES are affected by land-use legacies. Research priorities include understanding effects of urban abandonment, new contaminants, and interactions of land-use legacies and climate change. Improved understanding of historical effects will improve management of contemporary ES, and aid in decision-making as new challenges to sustaining cultural landscapes arise.
KeywordsLand-use change Urban ecosystems Exurban ecosystems Agricultural ecosystems Historical ecology
We thank Matthias Bürgi for inviting us to develop this paper, and four anonymous reviewers for constructive feedback on an earlier version. We acknowledge funding from the US National Science Foundation, especially the Long-term Ecological Research (DEB-1440297 and DEB-1440485) and Water, Sustainability and Climate (DEB-1038759) Programs, and support to MGT from the University of Wisconsin-Madison Vilas Trust. CZ acknowledges support from a Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada doctoral fellowship.
- Ager S (2015) Taking back Detroit. Part 2: rethinking Detroit. National Geographic. http://www.nationalgeographic.com/taking-back-detroit/explore-detroit.html. Accessed April 2017
- Alanen AR, Melnick RZ (2000) Preserving cultural landscapes in America. The Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
- Beauregard RA (2012) Strategic thinking for distressed neighborhoods. In: Dewar ME, Thomas JM (eds) The city after abandonment. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, pp 227–243Google Scholar
- Betz CR, Balousek J, Fries G, Nowak P (2005) Lake Mendota: improving water quality. LakeLine 25:47–52Google Scholar
- Broward County Climate Change Action Plan (2015) Local strategy to address global climate change. http://www.broward.org/NaturalResources/ClimateChange/Documents/BrowardCAPReport2015.pdf. Accessed October 2016
- US Census Bureau (2010) Michigan census of population. http://www.census.gov/quickfacts/table/PST045215/26. Accessed October 2016
- Carpenter SR, Lathrop RC, Nowak P, Bennett EM, Reed T, Soranno PA (2006) The ongoing experiment: restoration of Lake Mendota and its watershed. In: Magnuson JJ, Kratz TK, Benson BJ (eds) Long-term dynamics of lakes in the landscape: long-term ecological research on north temperate lakes. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 236–256Google Scholar
- Delcourt PA, Delcourt HR (2004) Prehistoric native Americans and ecological change: human ecosystems in eastern North America since the Pleistocene. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Detroit Future City (2013) http://detroitworksproject.com/research-tools/key-topics/. Accessed October 2016
- Dewar M, Thomas JM (eds) (2012) The city after abandonment. University of Pennsylvania Press, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
- Donovan S, Goldfuss C, Holdren J (2015) Memorandum for Executive Departments and Agencies: Incorporating ecosystem services into Federal decision making. https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/memoranda/2016/m-16-01.pdf. Accessed October 2016
- Duke JM, Messer KD, Michael HA, Sparks DL (2014) The joint risks of anticipated sea-level rise and coastal contaminated sites: economic and scientific evidence. University of Delaware, Department of Applied Economics and Statistics Research Report 14-10Google Scholar
- Gonzalez A, Mouquet N, Loreau M (2009) Biodiversity as spatial insurance: the effects of habitat fragmentation and dispersal on ecosystem functioning. In: Naeem S, Bunker DE, Hector A, Loreau M, Perrings C (eds) Biodiversity, ecosystem functioning and ecosystem services. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 134–146Google Scholar
- Haddad NM, Brudvig LA, Clobert J, Davies KF, Gonzalez A, Holt RD, Lovejoy TE, Sexton JO, Austin MP, Collins CD, Cook WM, Damschen EI, Ewers RM, Foster BL, Jenkins CN, King AJ, Laurance WF, Levey DJ, Margules CR, Melbourne BA, Nicholls AO, Orrock JL, Song D, Townshend JR (2015) Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth’s ecosystems. Sci Adv 1:e1500052PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Helm A, Hanski I, Partel M (2005) Slow response of plant species richness to habitat loss and fragmentation. Ecol Lett 9:72–77Google Scholar
- Kraft GJ, Browne BA, DeVita WM, Mechenich DJ (2007) Agricultural pollutant penetration and steady state in thick aquifers. Ground Water 46:21–50Google Scholar
- Kremen C, Williams NM, Aizen MA, Gemmill-Herren B, LeBuhn G, Minckley R, Packer L, Potts SG, Roulston T, Steffan-Dewenter I, Vázquez DP, Winfree R, Adams L, Crone EE, Greenleaf SS, Keitt TH, Klein A, Regetz J, Ricketts TH (2007) Pollination and other ecosystem services produced by mobile organisms: a conceptual framework for the effects of land-use change. Ecol Lett 10:299–314PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Luck GW, Harrington R, Harrison PA, Kremen C, Berry PM, Bugter R, Dawson TP, de Bello F, Díaz S, Feld CK, Haslett JR, Hering D, Kontogianni A, Lavorel S, Rounsevell M, Samways MJ, Sandin L, Settele J, Sykes MT, van den Hove S, Vandewalle M, Zobel M (2009) Quantifying the contribution of organisms to the provision of ecosystem services. Bioscience 59:223–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- MacLeish WH (1994) The day before America, changing the nature of the continent. Houghton Mifflin, BostonGoogle Scholar
- Mechenich D (2015) Interactive well water quality viewer 1.0. University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point, Center for Watershed Science and Education. http://www.uwsp.edu/cnr-ap/watershed/Pages/WellWaterViewer.aspx. Accessed October 2016
- Mitchell MGE, Bennett EM, Gonzalez A, Lechowicz MJ, Rhemtulla JM, Cardille JA, Vanderheyden K, Poirier-Ghys G, Renard D, Delmotte S, Albert CH, Rayfield B, Dumitru M, Huang H, Larouche M, Liss KN, Maguire DY, Martins KT, Terrado M, Ziter C, Taliana L, Dancose K (2015a) The Monteregie connection: linking landscapes, biodiversity, and ecosystem services to improve decision making. Ecol Soc 20:15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- National Park Service. Guidelines for the treatment of cultural landscapes: defining landscape terminology. https://www.nps.gov/tps/standards/four-treatments/landscape-guidelines/terminology.htm. Accessed April 2017
- Nelson E, Mendoza G, Regetz J, Polasky S, Tallis H, Cameron DR, Chan KMA, Daily GC, Goldstein J, Kareiva PM, Lonsdorf E, Naidoo R, Ricketts TH, Shaw MR (2009) Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Front Ecol Environ 7:4–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- NOAA (2014) State of the coast. Communities: The U.S. population living at the coast. http://stateofthecoast.noaa.gov/population/welcome.html. Accessed October 2016
- Pearson SM, Smith AB, Turner MG (1998) Forest fragmentation, land use, and cove-forest herbs in the French Broad River Basin. Castanea 63:382–395Google Scholar
- Radeloff VC, Nelson E, Plantinga AJ, Lewis DJ, Helmers D, Lawler JJ, Withey JC, Beaudry F, Martinuzzi S, Butsic V, Lonsdorf E, White D, Polasky S (2012) Economic-based projections of future land use in the conterminous United States under alternative policy scenarios. Ecol Appl 22:1036–1049PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- The Cultural Landscape Foundation. Vernacular landscapes. https://tclf.org/places/learn-what-are-cultural-landscapes/vernacular-landscapes. Accessed April 2017
- Turner MG, Carpenter SR, Gustafson EJ, Naiman RJ, Pearson SM (1998) Land use. In: Mac MJ, Opler PA, Doran P, Haecker C (eds) Status and trends of our nation’s biological resources, vol 1. National Biological Service, Washington, pp 37–61Google Scholar
- US Environmental Protection Agency (1996) Environmental indicators of water quality in the United States. EPA-841-r-96-002:24. US EPA, Office of Water, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
- Valiente-Banuet A, Aizen MA, Alcántara JM, Arroyo J, Cocucci A, Galetti M, García MB, García D, Gómez JM, Jordano P, Medel R, Navarro L, Obeso JR, Oviedo R, Ramírez N, Rey PJ, Traveset A, Verdú M, Zamora R (2014) Beyond species loss: the extinction of ecological interactions in a changing world. Funct Ecol 29:299–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Walker BH, Carpenter SR, Rockstrom J, Crépin A-S, Peterson GD (2012) Drivers, “slow” variables, “fast” variables, shocks, and resilience. Ecol Soc 17:30Google Scholar
- Weber R, Gaus C, Tysklind M, Johnston P, Forter M, Hollert H, Heinisch E, Holoubek I, Lloyd-Smith M, Masunaga S, Moccarelli P, Santillo D, Seike N, Symons R, Torres JPM, Verta M, Varbelow G, Vijgen J, Watson A, Costner P, Woelz J, Wycisk P, Zennegg M (2008) Dioxin- and POP-contaminated sites—contemporary and future relevance and challenges. Environ Sci Pollut Res 15:363–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Whitney GG (1994) From coastal wilderness to fruited plain: a history of environmental change in temperate North America 1500 to the present. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Wisconsin Initiative on Climate Change Impacts (2011) Wisconsin’s changing climate: impacts and adaptation. Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, and Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. www.wicci.wisc.edu. Accessed Oct 2016