Multi-model comparison on the effects of climate change on tree species in the eastern U.S.: results from an enhanced niche model and process-based ecosystem and landscape models
- 1.6k Downloads
Species distribution models (SDM) establish statistical relationships between the current distribution of species and key attributes whereas process-based models simulate ecosystem and tree species dynamics based on representations of physical and biological processes. TreeAtlas, which uses DISTRIB SDM, and Linkages and LANDIS PRO, process-based ecosystem and landscape models, respectively, were used concurrently on four regional climate change assessments in the eastern Unites States.
We compared predictions for 30 species from TreeAtlas, Linkages, and LANDIS PRO, using two climate change scenarios on four regions, to derive a more robust assessment of species change in response to climate change.
We calculated the ratio of future importance or biomass to current for each species, then compared agreement among models by species, region, and climate scenario using change classes, an ordinal agreement score, spearman rank correlations, and model averaged change ratios.
Comparisons indicated high agreement for many species, especially northern species modeled to lose habitat. TreeAtlas and Linkages agreed the most but each also agreed with many species outputs from LANDIS PRO, particularly when succession within LANDIS PRO was simulated to 2300. A geographic analysis showed that a simple difference (in latitude degrees) of the weighted mean center of a species distribution versus the geographic center of the region of interest provides an initial estimate for the species’ potential to gain, lose, or remain stable under climate change.
This analysis of multiple models provides a useful approach to compare among disparate models and a more consistent interpretation of the future for use in vulnerability assessments and adaptation planning.
KeywordsClimate change Eastern United States Multi-model comparison TreeAtlas DISTRIB LANDIS PRO Linkages Forests
Many people are to be thanked, for we authors are dependent on data collected by others! Forest inventory data are paramount, as are historic and potential future climate data along with environmental data, all geographically referenced. We thank Eric Gustafson and journal reviewers for reviewing the manuscript. This project was funded by the USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station and Eastern Region, the United States Geological Survey Northeast Climate Science Center, and the University of Missouri-Columbia. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent views of the funding agencies. This manuscript is submitted for publication with the understanding that the United States Government is authorized to reproduce and distribute reprints for governmental purposes.
- Blum B (1990) Picea rubens Sarg. Red Spruce. In: Burns RM, Honkala BH (eds) Silvics of North America, Conifers, vol 1. USDA Forest Service, Agriculture Handbook 654, Washington, DC, pp 250–259Google Scholar
- Box G, Draper NR (1987) Empirical model-building and response surfaces. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Brandt L, He H, Iverson L, Thompson FR, Butler P, Handler S, Blume-Weaver R et al (2014) Central Hardwoods ecosystem vulnerability assessment and synthesis: a report from the Central Hardwoods climate change response framework project. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, General technical report NRS-124, Newtown Square, PAGoogle Scholar
- Brose PH, Dey DC, Phillips RJ, Waldrop TA (2013) A meta-analysis of the fire-oak hypothesis: does prescribed burning promote oak reproduction in Eastern North America? For Sci 59(3):322–334Google Scholar
- Brose PH, Dey DC, Waldrop TA (2014) The fire-oak literature of Eastern North America: synthesis and guidelines. General technical report NRS-135. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newtown Square, PAGoogle Scholar
- Butler PR, Iverson L, Thompson FR, Brandt L, Handler S, Janowiak M, Connolly S et al (2015) Central Appalachians forest ecosystem vulnerability assessment and synthesis: a report from the Central Appalachians climate change response framework project. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, General technical report NRS-146, Newtown Square, PAGoogle Scholar
- Coumou D, Rahmstorf S (2012) A decade of weather extremes. Nat Clim Change 2:491–496Google Scholar
- DeHayes DH, Jacobson GL, Schaberg PG, Bongarten B, Iverson L, Dieffenbacher-Krall AC (2000) Forest responses to changing climate: lessons from the past and uncertainty for the future. In: Mickler RA, Birdsey RA, Hom JL (eds) Responses of northern forests to environmental change. Ecological studies series. Springer, New York, pp 495–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dijak W, Hanberry B, Fraser JS, He HS, Thompson III FR, Wang WJ (in press) Revision and application of the LINKAGES model to simulate forest growth in Central Hardwood landscapes in response to climate change. Landscape EcolGoogle Scholar
- Holm S (1979) A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat 6(2):65–70Google Scholar
- IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Working group II contribution to the IPCC 5th assessment report. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, StanfordGoogle Scholar
- Janowiak MK, Swanston CW, Nagel LM, Brandt LA, Butler PR, Handler SD, Shannon PD, Iverson LR, Matthews SN, Prasad A, Peters MP (2014) A practical approach for translating climate change adaptation principles into forest management actions. J For 112:423–433Google Scholar
- Landscape Change Research Group (2014) Climate change atlas. Northern Research Station, US Forest Service, Delaware. www.nrs.fs.fed.us/atlas
- Matthews SN, Iverson L, Peters M, Prasad AM (in press) Assessing potential climate change pressures throughout this century across the Conterminous United States: mapping plant hardiness zones, heat zones, and growing degree days. Northern Research Station Research map.Google Scholar
- Melillo JM, Melillo TC, Richmond T, Yohe GW (2014) Climate change impacts in the United States: the third national climate assessment. U.S. Global Change Research Program, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Nakicenovic N, Alcamo J, Davis G, Cambridgede Vries B, Fenhann J, Gaffin S (2000) IPCC special report on emissions scenarios. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Pederson N, D’Amato AW, Dyer JM, Foster DR, Goldblum D, Hart JL et al (2014) Climate remains an important driver of post-European vegetation change in the eastern United States. Glob Change Biol 2:2105–2110Google Scholar
- Prasad AM, Iverson LR, Matthews SN, Peters MP (2016) A multistage decision support framework to guide tree species management under climate change via habitat suitability and colonization models, and a knowledge-based scoring system. Landscape Ecol. doi: 10.1007/s10980-016-0369-7
- Rohde R, Muller RA, Jacobsen R, Muller E, Perlmutter S, Rosenfeld A, Wurtele J, Groom D, Wickham C (2012) A new estimate of the average earth surface land temperature spanning 1753–2011. Geoinfor Geostat 1:1Google Scholar
- Swanston CW, Janowiak MK (2012) Forest adaptation resources: climate change tools and approaches for land managers. General technical report NRS-87. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newtown Square, PAGoogle Scholar
- Wang W, He HS, Thompson III FR, Fraser J, Dijak W (in press) Forest biomass and species distributions under climate change in the Northeastern U.S.: accounting for effects of succession and harvest. Landscape EcolGoogle Scholar
- Woodall C, Conkling B, Amacher M, Coulston J, Jovan S, Perry C, Schulz B, Smith G, Wolf SW (2010) The forest inventory and analysis database. Version 4.0: database description and users manual for Phase 3. USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newtown SquareGoogle Scholar
- Wullschleger S, Gunderson C, Tharp ML, West D, Post W (2003) Simulated patterns of forest succession and productivity as a consequence of altered precipitation. In: Hanson P, Wullschleger S (eds) North American temperate deciduous forest responses to changing precipitation regimes. Ecological studies. Springer, New York, pp 433–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar