Landscape Ecology

, Volume 31, Issue 1, pp 43–53 | Cite as

Persistence and habitat associations of Purple Martin roosts quantified via weather surveillance radar

  • Eli S. Bridge
  • Sandra M. Pletschet
  • Todd Fagin
  • Phillip B. Chilson
  • Kyle G. Horton
  • Kyle R. Broadfoot
  • Jeffrey F. Kelly
Research Article



Weather surveillance radars (WSR) have been used to locate roost sites used by Purple Martins (Progne subis) for decades. Improvements in radar data processing and accessibility now make it possible to monitor roosts over a broad spatial scale.


We sought to locate all of the Purple Martin roosts in North America and to use the data to evaluate (1) the land cover types associated with roosts (2) relationships among roost persistence, land cover type, and regional population trends.


We used mosaicked images of radar reflectivity based on the NEXRAD WSR network to locate 234 Purple Martin roosts that were active between 2009 and 2014. Of these roosts, we ground-truthed a subset of 57 with site visits and reports from citizen scientists. We assigned roosts to different classes based on local land cover, and used a variety of statistical and spatial analyses to address the objectives listed above.


Roosts were mainly associated with forest, cropland, urban, and water land cover types, with cropland being the most common. There was an apparent preference for urban sites, and urban roosts were associated with the high year-to-year persistence. We found no correlation between roost persistence and regional population trends in data from the North American Breeding Bird Survey (BBS).


Although they use a diverse array of roosting habitats, urban roosting areas appear to be increasingly important for Purple Martins. Persistence of urban roosts was high, which aligns with the species’ unique natural history and its association with human societies.


Aerial insectivores Aeroecology Purple Martin Radar Remote sensing Roost behavior 



This study was funded by NSF-EAGER Grant 143210. We thank the Purple Martin Conservation Association for sharing their database of martin roost locations, and we thank Jacob van der Ploeg for ground-truthing martin roosts locations in Texas, Oklahoma, Arkansas, Missouri, and Kansas during the summer of 2012.


  1. Baddeley A, Turner R (2005) Spatstat: an R package for analyzing spatial point patterns. J Stat Softw 12(6):1–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown CR (1997) Purple Martin (Progne subis). In: Poole A (ed), The birds of North America. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY. Available via doi: 10.2173/bna.287
  3. Burney CW (2002) A study of swallow roosts found in the Eastern United States. Cornell University, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  4. Chilson PB, Frick WF, Kelly JF, Howard KW, Larkin RP, Diehl RH, Westbrook JK, Adam Kelly T, Kunz TH (2011) Partly cloudy with a chance of migration: weather, radars, and aeroecology. B Am Meteorol Soc 93(5):669–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dray S, Dufour AB (2007) The ade4 package: implementing the duality diagram for ecologists. J Stat Softw 22(4):1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Drummond MA, Auch R (2014) Land-cover change in the United States Great Plains. Available via Accessed 23 Mar 2015
  7. Drummond MA, Loveland TR (2010) Land-use pressure and a transition to forest-cover loss in the Eastern United States. Bioscience 60(4):286–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Drummond MA, Auch RF, Karstensen KA, Sayler KL, Taylor JL, Loveland TR (2012) Land change variability and human-environment dynamics in the United States Great Plains. Land Use Policy 29(3):710–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fraser KC, Stutchbury BJM, Kramer P, Silverio C, Barrow J, Newstead D, Mickle N, Tautin J (2013) Consistent range-wide pattern in fall migration strategy of Purple Martin (Progne subis), despite different migration routes at the Gulf of Mexico. Auk 130:291–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gauthreaux SA Jr (2006) Bird migration: methodologies and major research trajectories (1945–1995). Condor 98:442–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jetz W, McPerson JM, Guralnick RP (2012) Integrating biodiversity distribution knowledge: toward a global map of life. Trend Ecol Evol 27(3):151–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kelly J, Shipley J, Chilson P, Howard K, Frick W, Kunz T (2012) Quantifying animal phenology in the aerosphere at a continental scale using NEXRAD weather radars. Ecosphere 3(2):16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Laughlin AJ, Taylor CM, Bradley DW, Leclair D, Clark RC, Dawson RD, Dunn PO, Norris DR (2013) Integrating Information from geolocators, weather radar, and citizen science to uncover a key stopover area of an aerial insectivore. Auk 130(2):230–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Loveland TR, Acevedo W (2014) Land cover change in the Eastern United States. Available via Accessed 23 Mar 2015
  15. Natural Resources Canada, The Canada Centre for Mapping and Earth Observation, United States Geological Survey, Insituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI), Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad, Comisión Nacional Forestal (2010) North American land cover at 250 m spatial resolutionGoogle Scholar
  16. Omernik JM, Griffith GE (2014) Ecoregions of the conterminous United States: evolution of a hierarchical spatial framework. Environ Manage 54(6):1249–1266PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pettorelli N, Ryan S, Mueller T, Bunnefeld N, Jedrzejewsk B, Lima M, Kausrud K (2011) The Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI): unforeseen successes in animal ecology. Clim Res 46:15–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. R Core Team (2014) A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Accessed 15 Nov 2014
  19. Rajala T, Illian J (2012) A family of spatial biodiversity measures based on graphs. Environ Ecol Stat 19(4):545–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ray JD (1995) Purple Martins in northwest Texas. Purple Martin Update 6(3):10–12Google Scholar
  21. Russell KR, Gauthreaux SA (1998) Use of weather radar to characterize movements of roosting purple martins. Wildl Soc Bull 26:5–16Google Scholar
  22. Russell KR, Gauthreaux SA (1999) Spatial and temporal dynamics of a Purple Martin pre-migratory roost. Wilson Bull 111:354–362Google Scholar
  23. Russell KR, Mizrahi DS, Gauthreaux SA (1998) Large-scale mapping of Purple Martin pre-migratory roosts using WSR-88D weather surveillance radar. J Field Ornithol 69(3):509–509Google Scholar
  24. Sauer JR, Hines JE, Fallon JE, Pardieck KL, Ziolkowski DJ Jr, Link WA (2014) The North American breeding bird survey, results and analysis 1966–2013. USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, MDGoogle Scholar
  25. Schimel D (2011) The era of continental-scale ecology. Front Ecol Environ 9(6):311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tarof S, Brown CR (2013) Purple Martin (Progne subis). In: Poole A (ed) The birds of North America Online. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  27. Tautin J, Cousens B, Kostka K, Kotska S, Airola DA (2009) Addressing regional declines in Purple Martin populations. In: Rich T. D., Arizmendi C., Demarest D., Thompson C. (eds), Tundra to tropics: connecting birds, habitats and people. In: Proceedings of the fourth international partners in flight conference. Partners in Flight, McAllen, TX, pp 82–87Google Scholar
  28. Tøttrup AP, Klaassen RH, Strandberg R, Thorup K, Kristensen MW, Jørgensen PS, Fox J, Afanasyev V, Rahbek C, Alerstam T (2012) The annual cycle of a trans-equatorial Eurasian–African passerine migrant: different spatio-temporal strategies for autumn and spring migration. Proc R Soc 279(1730):1008–1016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wiegand T, Gunatilleke CVS, Gunatilleke IAUN, Huth A (2007) How individual species structure diversity in tropical forests. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(48):19029–19033PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wilson A, Bonaparte CL, Jameson R, Ord G, Hetherington WM (1831) American ornithology; or the natural history of the birds of the United States. Constable and co., EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  31. Winkler DW (2006) Roosts and migrations of swallows. Hornero 21:85–97Google Scholar
  32. Zhang J, Howard K, Langston C, Vasiloff S, Kaney B, Arthur A, Van Cooten S, Dempsey C (2011) National mosaic and multi-sensor QPE (NMQ) system—description, results and future plans. Bull Am Meteorol Soc. doi: 10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00047.1 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Oklahoma Biological Survey and Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Ph.D. ProgramUniversity of OklahomaNormanUSA
  2. 2.Oklahoma Biological SurveyUniversity of OklahomaNormanUSA
  3. 3.Advanced Radar Research Center and School of MeteorologyUniversity of OklahomaNormanUSA
  4. 4.Oklahoma Biological Survey, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Ph.D. Program, Department of Biology, and Advanced Radar Research CenterUniversity of OklahomaNormanUSA
  5. 5.Oklahoma Biological Survey and Department of BiologyUniversity of OklahomaNormanUSA
  6. 6.Oklahoma Biological Survey, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Ph.D. Program, and Department of BiologyUniversity of OklahomaNormanUSA

Personalised recommendations