Advertisement

A global evaluation of forest interior area dynamics using tree cover data from 2000 to 2012

Abstract

Context

Published maps of global tree cover derived from Landsat data have indicated substantial changes in forest area from 2000 to 2012. The changes can be arranged in different patterns, with different consequences for forest fragmentation. Thus, the changes in forest area do not necessarily equate to changes in forest sustainability.

Objective

The objective is to assess global and regional changes in forest fragmentation in relation to the change of forest area from 2000 to 2012.

Methods

Using published global tree cover data, forest and forest interior areas were mapped in 2000 and 2012. The locations of forest interior change were compared to the locations of overall forest change to identify the direct (pixel level) and indirect (landscape level) components of forest interior change. The changes of forest interior area were compared to the changes of total forest area in each of 768 ecological regions.

Results

A 1.71 million km2 (3.2 %) net loss of global forest area translated to a net loss of 3.76 million km2 (9.9 %) of forest interior area. The difference in loss rates was consistent in most of the 768 ecological regions. The indirect component accounted for 2.44 million km2 of the net forest interior change, compared to 1.32 million km2 that was attributable to the direct component.

Conclusion

Forest area loss alone from 2000 to 2012 underestimates ecological risks from forest fragmentation. In addition to the direct loss of forest, there was a widespread shift of the remaining global forest to a more fragmented condition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 99

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Andersen T, Carstensen J, Hernández-Garcia E, Duarte CM (2009) Ecological thresholds and regime shifts: approaches to identification. Trends Ecol Evol 24:49–57

  2. Andrén H (1994) Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review. Oikos 71:355–366

  3. Asner GP (2014) Satellites and psychology for improved forest monitoring. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111:567–568

  4. Cadenasso ML, Pickett STA (2001) Effect of edge structure on the flux of species into forest interiors. Conserv Biol 15:91–97

  5. Carpenter SR, DeFries R, Dietz T, Mooney HA, Polasky S, Reid WV, Scholes RJ (2006) Millennium ecosystem assessment: research needs. Science 314:257–258

  6. Chazdon RL (2008) Beyond deforestation: restoring forests and ecosystem services on degraded lands. Science 320:1458–1460

  7. Fahrig L (2003) Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:487–515

  8. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (2010) Global forest resource assessment 2010. FAO Forestry Paper 163, Rome

  9. Gascon C, Williamson GB, da Fonseca GAB (2000) Receding forest edges and vanishing reserves. Science 288:1356–1358

  10. Haddad NM, Brudvig LA, Clobert J, Davies KF, Gonzalez A, Holt RD, Lovejoy TE, Sexton JO, Austin MP, Collins CD, Cook WM, Damschen EI, Ewers RM, Foster BL, Jenkins CN, King AJ, Laurance WF, Levey DJ, Margules CR, Melbourne BA, Nicholls AO, Orrock JL, Song D-X, Townshend JR (2015) Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth’s ecosystems. Sci Adv 1:e1500052

  11. Hansen MC, Potapov PV, Moore R, Hancher M, Turubanova SA, Tyukavina A, Thau D, Stehman SV, Goetz SJ, Loveland TR, Kommareddy A, Egorov A, Chini L, Justice CO, Townshend JRG (2013) High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science 342:850–853. http://earthenginepartners.appspot.com/science-2013-global-forest. Accessed 5 March 2014

  12. Harris LD (1984) The fragmented forest. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

  13. Heinz Center (The H. John Heinz III Center for Science, Economics, and the Environment) (2008) The state of the nation’s ecosystems 2008. Island Press, Washington, DC

  14. Hosonuma N, Herold M, De Sy V, De Fries R, Brockhaus M, Verchot L, Angelsen A, Romijn E (2012) An assessment of deforestation and forest degradation drivers in developing countries. Environ Res Lett 7:044009

  15. Innes JL, Koch B (1998) Forest biodiversity and its assessment by remote sensing. Glob Ecol Biogeogr Lett 7:397–419

  16. Kapos V (1989) Effects of isolation on the water status of forest patches in the Brazilian Amazon. J Trop Ecol 5:173–185

  17. Keddy PA, Drummond CG (1996) Ecological properties for the evaluation, management, and restoration of temperate deciduous forest ecosystems. Ecol Appl 6:748–762

  18. Kurz WA (2010) An ecosystem context for global gross forest cover loss estimates. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:9025–9026

  19. Laurance WF (2000) Do edge effects occur over large spatial scales? Trends Ecol Ecol 15:134–135

  20. Laurance WF (2008) Theory meets reality: how habitat fragmentation research has transcended island biogeography theory. Biol Conserv 141:1731–1744

  21. Laurance WF, Ferreira LV, Rankin-De Merona JM, Laurance SG (1998) Rain forest fragmentation and the dynamics of Amazonian tree communities. Ecology 79:2032–2040

  22. Loveland TR, Dwyer JL (2012) Landsat: building a strong future. Remote Sens Environ 122:22–29

  23. Luck GW (2005) An introduction to ecological thresholds. Biol Conserv 124:299–300

  24. Mather AS (2005) Assessing the world’s forests. Glob Environ Change 15:267–280

  25. McIntyre S, Hobbs R (1999) A framework for conceptualizing human effects on landscapes and its relevance to management and research models. Conserv Biol 13:1282–1292

  26. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: biodiversity synthesis. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC

  27. Murcia C (1995) Edge effects in fragmented forests: implications for conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 10:58–62

  28. Olson DM, Dinerstein E, Wikramanayake ED, Burgess ND, Powell GVN, Underwood EC, D’Amico JA, Itoua I, Strand HE, Morrison JC, Loucks CJ, Allnutt TF, Ricketts TH, Kura Y, Lamoreux JF, Wettengel WW, Hedao P, Kassem KR (2001) Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on Earth. Bioscience 51:933–938

  29. O’Neill RV, Hunsaker CT, Jones KB, Riitters KH, Wickham JD, Schwartz PM, Goodman IA, Jackson BL, Baillargeon WS (1997) Monitoring environmental quality at the landscape scale. Bioscience 47:513–519

  30. Pelletier J, Goetz SJ (2015) Baseline data on forest loss and associated uncertainty: advances in national forest monitoring. Environ Res Lett 10:021001

  31. Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML (1995) Landscape ecology: spatial heterogeneity in ecological systems. Science 269:331–334

  32. Ricketts TH (2001) The matrix matters: effective isolation in fragmented landscapes. Am Nat 158:87–99

  33. Ries L, Fletcher RJ, Battin J, Sisk TD (2004) Ecological responses to habitat edges: mechanisms, models, and variability explained. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:491–522

  34. Riitters KH, Wickham JD (2003) How far to the nearest road? Front Ecol Environ 1:125–129

  35. Riitters KH, Wickham JD (2012) Decline of forest interior conditions in the conterminous United States. Sci Rep 2:653

  36. Riitters KH, O’Neill RV, Jones KB (1997) Assessing habitat suitability at multiple scales: a landscape-level approach. Biol Conserv 81:191–202

  37. Riitters K, Wickham J, O’Neill RV, Jones B, Smith E (2000) Global-scale patterns of forest fragmentation. Ecol Soc 4(2):3

  38. Riitters KH, Wickham JD, O’Neill RV, Jones KB, Smith ER, Coulston JW, Wade TG, Smith JH (2002) Fragmentation of continental United States forests. Ecosystems 5:815–822

  39. Riitters KH, Coulston JW, Wickham JD (2012) Fragmentation of forest communities in the eastern United States. For Ecol Manage 263:85–93

  40. Robinson SK, Thompson FR III, Donovan TM, Whitehead DR, Faaborg J (1995) Regional forest fragmentation and the nesting success of migratory birds. Science 267:1987–1990

  41. Rose RA, Byler D, Eastman JR, Fleishman E, Geller G, Goetz S, Guild L, Hamilton H, Hansen M, Headley R, Hewson J, Horning N, Kaplin BA, LaPorte N, Leidner A, Leimgruber P, Morisette J, Musinsky J, Pintea L, Prados A, Radeloff VC, Rowen M, Saatchi S, Schill S, Tabor K, Turner W, Vodacek A, Vogelmann J, Wegmann M, Wilkie D, Wilson C (2014) Ten ways remote sensing can contribute to conservation. Conserv Biol 29:350–359

  42. Roy DP, Wulder MA, Loveland TR, Woodcock CE, Allen RG, Anderson MC, Helder D, Irons JR, Johnson DM, Kennedy R, Scambos TA, Schaaf CB, Schott JR, Sheng Y, Vermote EF, Belward AS, Bindschadler R, Cohen WB, Gao F, Hipple JD, Hostert P, Huntington J, Justice CO, Kilic A, Kovalskyy V, Lee ZP, Lymburner L, Masek JG, McCorkel J, Shuai Y, Trezza R, Vogelmann J, Wynne RH, Zhu Z (2014) Landsat-8: science and product vision for terrestrial global change research. Remote Sens Environ 145:154–172

  43. Scheffer M, Bascompte J, Brock WA, Brovkin V, Carpenter SR, Dakos V, Held H, Van Nes EH, Rietkerk M, Sugihara G (2009) Early-warning signals for critical transitions. Nature 461:53–59

  44. Sexton JO, Song XP, Feng M, Noojipady P, Anand A, Huang C, Kim D-H, Collins KM, Channan S, DiMiceli C, Townshend JR (2013) Global, 30-m resolution continuous fields of tree cover: landsat-based rescaling of MODIS vegetation continuous fields with lidar-based estimates of error. Int J Digit Earth 6:427–448

  45. Suding KN, Hobbs RJ (2009) Threshold models in restoration and conservation: a developing framework. Trends Ecol Evol 24:271–279

  46. Turner BL II, Lambin EF, Reenberg A (2007) The emergence of land change science for global environmental change and sustainability. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:2066–20671

  47. US Environmental Protection Agency (2008) EPA’s 2008 report on the environment. EPA/600/R-07/045F. National Center for Environmental Assessment, Washington, DC. Available from the National Technical Information Service, Springfield. http://www.epa.gov/roe

  48. USDA (United States Department of Agriculture) Forest Service (2004) National report on sustainable forests—2003. Publication FS-766. USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC

  49. USDA (United States Department of Agriculture) Forest Service (2011) National report on sustainable forests—2010. Publication FS-979. USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC

  50. USDA (United States Department of Agriculture) Forest Service (2012) Future of America’s forest and rangelands: Forest Service 2010 Resources Planning Act assessment. General Technical Report WO-87. Washington, DC

  51. Wade TG, Riitters KH, Wickham JD, Jones KB (2003) Distribution and causes of global forest fragmentation. Ecol Soc 7(2):7

  52. Weathers KC, Cadenasso ML, Pickett STA (2001) Forest edges as nutrient and pollutant concentrators: potential synergisms between fragmentation, forest canopies, and the atmosphere. Conserv Biol 15:1506–1514

  53. Wickham JD, Riitters KH, Wade TG, Coulston JW (2007) Temporal change in fragmentation at multiple scales. Landscape Ecol 22:481–489

  54. Wickham JD, Riitters KH, Wade TG, Homer C (2008) Temporal change in fragmentation of continental US forests. Landscape Ecol 23:891–898

  55. World Wildlife Fund (2004) Terrestrial ecoregions of the world. Version 2.0 (digital map). The World Wildlife Fund, Washington, DC. http://www.worldwildlife.org/publications/terrestrial-ecoregions-of-the-world. Accessed 4 Feb 2009

  56. Wulder MA, Masek JG, Cohen WB, Loveland TR, Woodcock CE (2012) Opening the archive: how free data has enabled the science and monitoring promise of Landsat. Remote Sens Environ 122:2–10

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank M. Hansen, his colleagues, and Google Earth Engine for the global forest change maps. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), through its Office of Research and Development, partially funded and collaborated in the research described here. It has been subjected to EPA review and approved for publication.

Author information

Correspondence to Kurt Riitters.

Additional information

Special issue: Macrosystems ecology: Novel methods and new understanding of multi-scale patterns and processes.

Guest Editors: S. Fei, Q. Guo, and K. Potter.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 33 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Riitters, K., Wickham, J., Costanza, J.K. et al. A global evaluation of forest interior area dynamics using tree cover data from 2000 to 2012. Landscape Ecol 31, 137–148 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-015-0270-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Spatial analysis
  • Forest fragmentation
  • Monitoring
  • Assessment