Landscape Ecology

, Volume 31, Issue 3, pp 581–600 | Cite as

From past patterns to future potential: using historical ecology to inform river restoration on an intermittent California river

  • Erin E. Beller
  • Peter W. Downs
  • Robin M. Grossinger
  • Bruce K. Orr
  • Micha N. Salomon
Research Article

Abstract

Context

Effective river restoration requires understanding a system’s potential to support desired functions. This can be challenging to discern in the modern landscape, where natural complexity and heterogeneity are often heavily suppressed or modified. Historical analysis is therefore a valuable tool to provide the long-term perspective on riverine patterns, processes, and ecosystem change needed to set appropriate environmental management goals and strategies.

Objective

In this study, we reconstructed historical (early 1800s) riparian conditions, river corridor extent, and dry-season flow on the lower Santa Clara River in southern California, with the goal of using this enhanced understanding to inform restoration and management activities.

Method

Hundreds of cartographic, textual, and visual accounts were integrated into a GIS database of historical river characteristics.

Results

We found that the river was characterized by an extremely broad river corridor and a diverse mosaic of riparian communities that varied by reach, from extensive (>100 ha) willow-cottonwood forests to xeric scrublands. Reach-scale ecological heterogeneity was linked to local variations in dry-season water availability, which was in turn underpinned by regional geophysical controls on groundwater and surface flow.

Conclusions

Although human actions have greatly impacted the river’s extent, baseflow hydrology, and riparian habitats, many ecological attributes persist in more limited form, in large part facilitated by these fundamental hydrogeological controls. By drawing on a heretofore untapped dataset of spatially explicit and long-term environmental data, these findings improve our understanding of the river’s historical and current conditions and allow the derivation of reach-differentiated restoration and management opportunities that take advantage of local potential.

Keywords

Historical ecology Alluvial rivers Process-based restoration Intermittent flow regime Landscape reconstruction Floodplain and riparian habitats Ecohydrology Resilience 

References

  1. Al-Abdulrazzak D, Naidoo R, Palomares MLD, Pauly D (2012) Gaining perspective on what we’ve lost: the reliability of encoded anecdotes in historical ecology. PLoS ONE 7(8):e43386PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Alagona PS, Sandlos J, Wiersma YF (2012) Past imperfect: using historical ecology and baseline data for conservation and restoration projects in North America. Environ Philos 9(1):49–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrews ED, Antweiler RC, Neiman PJ, Ralph FM (2004) Influence of ENSO on flood frequency along the California coast. J Clim 17(2):337–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ardisson E. (1852) Land Case Map B-1264. U.S. District Court SD. Santa Barbara. Courtesy of The Bancroft LibraryGoogle Scholar
  5. Barry JA. (1893) Plat of measurements at river crossing for bridge across Santa Clara River, April 22, 1893. Courtesy of Ventura County Surveyor’s OfficeGoogle Scholar
  6. Beechie TJ, Sear DA, Olden JD, Pess GR, Buffington JM, Moir H, Roni P, Pollock MM (2010) Process-based principles for restoring river ecosystems. Bioscience 60(3):209–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beller E, Grossinger R, Salomon M, Dark S, Stein E, Orr B, Downs P, Longcore T, Coffman G, Whipple A, Askevold R, Stanford B, Beagle J (2011) Historical ecology of the lower Santa Clara River, Ventura River, and Oxnard Plain: an analysis of terrestrial, riverine, and coastal habitats. SFEI contribution #641. OaklandGoogle Scholar
  8. Benner PA, Sedell JR (1997) Upper Willamette River landscape: a historic perspective. In: Laenen Antonius, Dunnette David A (eds) River quality: Dynamics and restoration. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  9. Bernhardt ES, Palmer MA, Allan JD, Alexander G, Barnas K, Brooks S, Carr J, Clayton S, Dahm C, Follstad-Shah J, Galat D, Gloss S, Goodwin P, Hart D, Hassett B, Jenkinson R, Katz S, Kondolf GM, Lake PS, Lave R, Meyer JL, O'Donnell TK, Pagano, Powell B, Sudduth E (2005) Synthesizing U.S. river restoration efforts. Science 308(5722):636–637CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bowman JN (1947) The area of the mission lands. Courtesy of The Bancroft LibraryGoogle Scholar
  11. Brewer WH ([1930]1974) Up and down California in 1860–1864: the journal of William H. Brewer. In: FP Farquhar (ed) 3rd edn. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  12. California Department of Water Resources (CDWR) (1956) Ventura County Investigation, vol 1. Bulletin 12, Sacramento: State of California Department of Water ResourcesGoogle Scholar
  13. California Department of Water Resources (CDWR) (2003) California’s Groundwater. Bulletin 118—update 2003, Sacramento: State of California Department of Water ResourcesGoogle Scholar
  14. Campbell D, Fiske D (1959) Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychol Bull 56(2):81–105CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Chillson LD (1878) Map of 320 acres surveyed for Chaffee & McKeeby. Courtesy of Ventura County Surveyor’s OfficeGoogle Scholar
  16. Coffman GC, Ambrose RF (2011) Santa Clara River Riparian revegetation and monitoring handbook. Santa Clara River trustee council (US fish and wildlife service and California department of fish and game)Google Scholar
  17. Coffman GC, Ambrose RF, Rundel PW (2010) Wildfire promotes dominance of invasive giant reed (Arundo donax) in riparian ecosystems. Biol Invasions 12(8):2723–2734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Collins BD, Montgomery DR (2001) Importance of archival and process studies to characterizing pre-settlement riverine geomorphic processes and habitat in the Puget Lowland. Water Sci Appl 4:227–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Collins BD, Montgomery DR, Sheikh AJ (2003) Reconstructing the historical riverine landscape of the Puget Lowland. In: Montgomery David (ed) Restoration of Puget Sound rivers. University of Washington Press, Seattle, pp 79–128Google Scholar
  20. Cooper JG (1887) Additions to the birds of Ventura County. California. Auk 4(2):85–94Google Scholar
  21. Craven HS (1874) Field notes of the subdivision lines of Township 4 north, Range 19 west, San Bernardino Meridian, California. vol 425–24. pp 637–676. Courtesy of Bureau of Land ManagementGoogle Scholar
  22. Crespí J, Brown AK (2001) A description of distant roads: original journals of the first expedition into California, 1769–1770. San Diego State University Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  23. Daily Alta California (1857) Directory of the Pacific Coast of the United States. September 28. California Digital Newspaper CollectionGoogle Scholar
  24. Daily Alta California (1868) San Buenaventura and the country around it. Sept 16, 1868. Courtesy of CDNCGoogle Scholar
  25. Döll P, Zhang J (2010) Impact of climate change on freshwater ecosystems: a global-scale analysis of ecologically relevant river flow alterations. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Dis 7:1305–1342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Downs PW, Dusterhoff SR, Sears WA (2013) River channel sensitivity to human activities and natural events: quantifying 75 years of morphological change on the lower Santa Clara River, Ventura County, California. Geomorphology 189:121–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Eames N (1889) Autumn days in Ventura. Overl Mon 14(84):561–580Google Scholar
  28. Egan D, Howell EA (2001) The historical ecology handbook : a restorationist’s guide to reference ecosystems. Island Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  29. Fairchild Aerial Surveys (1927) [Aerial photos of Ventura County] C-104. Courtesy of Whittier CollegeGoogle Scholar
  30. Fairchild Aerial Surveys (1934) Mouth of Santa Clara River, 1-26-1934, no. 0-3849. Courtesy of UCLA Department of GeographyGoogle Scholar
  31. Foster DR (2000) Conservation lessons and challenges from ecological history. For Hist Today Fall 2000:2–10Google Scholar
  32. Freeman VM (1930) Santa Clara Valley Water Conservation District: annual report for fiscal year ending July 1, 1930. Courtesy of United WaterGoogle Scholar
  33. Freeman VM (1968) People-land-water: Santa Clara Valley and Oxnard Plain, Ventura County, California. Lorrin L. Morrison, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  34. Gregor HF (1952) The Southern California water problem in the Oxnard area. Geogr Rev 42(1):16–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gregor HF (1953) Agricultural shifts in the Ventura lowland of California. Economic Geography 29(4):340–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Grossinger RM (2005) Documenting local landscape change: the San Francisco Bay area historical ecology project. In: Egan Dave, Howell Evelyn (eds) The historical ecology handbook: a restorationist’s guide to reference ecosystems. Island Press, Washington DC, pp 425–442Google Scholar
  37. Grossinger R, Askevold R, Striplen C, Brewster E, Pearce S, Larned K, McKee L, Collins J (2006) Coyote Creek Watershed Historical Ecology Study. SFEI Contribution #426. OaklandGoogle Scholar
  38. Grossinger RM, Striplen CJ, Askevold RA, Brewster E, Beller EE (2007) Historical landscape ecology of an urbanized California valley: wetlands and woodlands in the Santa Clara Valley. Landscape Ecol 22:103–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Guillén J, Palanques A (1997) A historical perspective of the morphological evolution in the lower Ebro river. Environ Geol 30(3–4):174–180Google Scholar
  40. Gurnell AM, Peiry J-L, Petts GE (2005) Using historical data in fluvial geomorphology. In: Mathias Kondolf G, Piégay H (eds) Tools in fluvial geomorphology. Wiley, Chichester, pp 77–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hall HM (1902) Record for grassy tarweed (Madia gracilis), Santa Clara River valley; May 1902. Courtesy of The Jepson Online Interchange: California Floristics, UC BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  42. Hancock H (1854) Field notes of the survey into townships of that tract of country lying north of the San Bernardino base line, vol 14-42. pp 516–584. Courtesy of Bureau of Land ManagementGoogle Scholar
  43. Hancock H (1858) Field notes of the final survey of the tract of land called San Francisco…September 1st, 1858. In Reginaldo del Valle collection. Courtesy of The Huntington LibraryGoogle Scholar
  44. Hanes TL, Friesen RD, Keane K (1989) Alluvial scrub vegetation in coastal Southern California. In: Bell DL (ed) Proceedings of the California riparian systems conference, 1988 Sept 22–24, Davis, CA. PSW-GTR-110. Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Berkeley, pp 187–193Google Scholar
  45. Hanson RT, Martin R., Koczot KM (2003) Simulation of ground-water/surface-water flow in the Santa Clara–Calleguas Ground-Water Basin, Ventura County, California. US Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 02-4136, USGS, Sacramento, CAGoogle Scholar
  46. Harley JB (1989) Historical geography and cartographic illusion. J Hist Cartogr 15:80–91Google Scholar
  47. Harris JA, Hobbs RJ, Higgs E, Aronson J (2006) Ecological restoration and global climate change. Restor Ecol 14:170–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hoffman CF (1868). Field notes of the obsolete survey of the Rancho Sespe, Thomas W. Moore et al., confirmee. General Land Office, vol 283–30, pp 384–397. Courtesy of Bureau of Land ManagementGoogle Scholar
  49. Hoffmann R (1927) Record for big saltbush (Atriplex lentiformis), Camulos Ranch; Aug 30 and Sep 21, 1927. Courtesy of The Jepson Online Interchange: California Floristics, UC BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  50. Hohensinner S, Jungwirth M, Muhar S, Schmutz S (2011) Spatio-temporal habitat dynamics in a changing Danube River landscape 1812-2006. River Research and Applications 27:939–955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hohensinner S, Jungwirth M, Muhar S, Schmutz S (2014) Importance of multi-dimensional morphodynamics for habitat evolution: Danube River 1715–2006. Geomorphology 215:3–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hopkins RC (1871) U.S. v. Thomas H. Moore, Land Case No. 32 SD. Courtesy of The Bancroft LibraryGoogle Scholar
  53. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2007) Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC. GenevaGoogle Scholar
  54. Jackson ST, Hobbs RJ (2009) Ecological restoration in the light of ecological history. Science 325:567–568CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Johnson WM (1855a) Appendix No. 28, in Report of the superintendent of the Coast Survey. Washington, D.C.: A.O.P. NicholsonGoogle Scholar
  56. Johnson WM (1855b) Map of a part of the coast of California, from San Buenaventura southward to river Santa Clara (683). Washington, D.C. Courtesy of NOAAGoogle Scholar
  57. Jungwirth M, Muhar S, Schmutz S (2002) Re-establishing and assessing ecological integrity in riverine landscapes. Freshw Biol 47:867–887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. King N (1883) Journal of a trip visiting the county seats of Ventura, Santa Barbara, and San Luis Obispo counties. In William Hammond Hall collection, Field Books, Part II, Box-folder 8:18. Courtesy of the California State ArchivesGoogle Scholar
  59. Kondolf GM (1998) Lessons learned from river restoration projects in California. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 8:39–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Kondolf GM, Larson M (1995) Historical channel analysis and its application to riparian and aquatic habitat restoration. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 5(2):109–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Kondolf GM, Smeltzer MW (2001) Design and performance of a channel reconstruction project in a coastal California gravel-bed stream. Environ Manag 28(6):761–776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Kondolf GM, Boulton AJ, O’Daniel S et al (2006) Process-based ecological river restoration: visualizing three-dimensional connectivity and dynamic vectors to recover lost linkages. Ecol Soc 11(2):5Google Scholar
  63. Labbe T, Adams A, Conrad R (2013) Historical condition and change in riparian vegetation, Hood Canal and Eastern Strait of Juan de Fuca, Washington. Northwest Sci 87(1):24–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Lippincott JB (ca. 1930) Historical map with well locations and artesian boundary. Lippincott Papers, Box 54 (110-21). Courtesy of WRCAGoogle Scholar
  65. McAllister LS (2008) Reconstructing historical riparian conditions of two river basins in eastern Oregon, USA. Environ Manage 42:412–425CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. McClenachan L, Ferretti F, Baum JK (2012) From archives to conservation: why historical data are needed to set baselines for marine animals and ecosystems. Conserv Lett 5(5):349–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Meinzer OE (1923) Outline of ground-water hydrology, with definitions. Government Printing Office, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  68. Montgomery DR (2008) Dreams of natural streams. Science 319(5861):291–292CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Montgomery DR, Grant GE, Sullivan K (1995) Watershed analysis as a framework for implementing ecosystem management. Water Resour Bull 31:369–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) (2005 and 2009) Aerial photos of Ventura, Los Angeles Counties. Washington, D.CGoogle Scholar
  71. Norris RW (1853) Copy of field notes of surveys of portions of the Meridian line north, first and second lines north, vol 273–311. pp 227–243. Courtesy of Bureau of Land ManagementGoogle Scholar
  72. Orr BK, Diggory ZE, Coffman GC, et al. (2011) Riparian vegetation classification and mapping: important tools for large-scale river corridor restoration in a semi-arid landscape. In: Willoughby JW, Orr BK, Schierenbeck K, Jensen N (eds) Proceedings of the CNPS conservation conference (CNPS), 17–19 Jan 2009, SacramentoGoogle Scholar
  73. Palmer M, Bernhardt E, Allan JD, Lake P, Alexander G, Brooks S, Carr J, Clayton S, Dahm CN, Follstad Shah J, Galat DL, Loss SG, Goodwin P, Hart D, Hassett B, Jenkinson R, Kondolf G, Lave R, Meyer J, O'donnell T, Pagano L, Sudduth E (2005) Standards for ecologically successful river restoration. J Appl Ecol 42:208–217Google Scholar
  74. Parker SS, Remson E, Verdone LN (2014) Restoring conservation nodes to enhance biodiversity and ecosystem function along the Santa Clara River. Ecological Restoration 32(1):6–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Petts GE, Möller H, Roux AL (1989) Historical change of large alluvial rivers: Western Europe. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  76. Reichard EG, Crawford SM, Paybins KS, Martin P, Land MT, Nishikawa T (1999) Evaluation of surface water/ground-water interactions in the Santa Clara River Valley, Ventura County, California. USGS Water-Resources Investigations Report 98-4208, Sacramento: US Geological SurveyGoogle Scholar
  77. Reid MA, Ogden RW (2006) Trend, variability or extreme event? The importance of long-term perspectives in river ecology. River Res Appl 22:167–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Rhemtulla JM, Mladenoff DJ (2007) Why history matters in landscape ecology. Landscape Ecol 22(1):1–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Roe E (1998) Taking complexity seriously: policy analysis, triangulation and sustainable development. Kluwer Academic, BostonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Roni P, Beechie T (2013) Stream and watershed restoration: a guide to restoring riverine processes and habitats. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  81. Rundel PW (2007) Sage scrub. In: Barbour Michael, Keeler-Wolf Todd, Schoenherr Allan (eds) Terrestrial vegetation of California. UC Press, Berkeley, pp 208–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Safford H, Wiens JA, Hayward GD (2012) The growing importance of the past in managing ecosystems of the future. In: Hayward G, Wiens J, Safford H, Giffen C (eds) Historical environmental variation in conservation and natural resource management. Wiley, New York, pp 319–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Schuyler JD (1900) Report on the Santa Clara Water and Irrigation Company’s ditch and water supply for irrigation. SCHU 88 95-7. Los Angeles. Courtesy of WRCAGoogle Scholar
  84. Smith SM, Prestegaard KL (2005) Hydraulic performance of a morphology-based stream channel design. Water Resour Res 41(11):1–17Google Scholar
  85. Spence Air Photos (1924) E-163, Camulos Ranch in Piru. Courtesy of UCLA Department of GeographyGoogle Scholar
  86. Stanford B, Grossinger RM, Beagle J, Askevold RA, Leidy RA, Beller E, Salomon M, Striplen CJ, Whipple A (2013) Alameda Creek Watershed historical ecology study. San Francisco Estuary Institute, RichmondGoogle Scholar
  87. Stein ED, Dark S, Longcore T, Grossinger R, Hall N, Beland M (2010) Historical ecology as a tool for assessing landscape change and informing wetland restoration priorities. Wetlands 30:589–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Swetnam TW, Allen CD, Betancourt JL (1999) Applied historical ecology: using the past to manage for the future. Ecol Appl 9(4):1189–1206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Szabó P (2010) Why history matters in ecology: an interdisciplinary perspective. Environ Conserv 37(4):380–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Terrell JE (1861) Field-notes of the final survey of the Rancho Santa Clara del Norte, Juan Sanchez, confirmee, vol 279–335, pp 405–412. Courtesy of Bureau of Land ManagementGoogle Scholar
  91. The Nature Conservancy (TNC) (2008) Conservation plan for the lower Santa Clara River watershed and surrounding areas. https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=60245
  92. Thompson TH, West AA ([1883]1961) History of Santa Barbara and Ventura Counties. Howell-North, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  93. Timbrook J (2007) Chumash ethnobotany: plant knowledge among the Chumash people of southern California. Heyday Books, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  94. Trimble SW (2008) The use of historical data and artifacts in geomorphology. Prog Phys Geogr 32(1):3–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Van Dyke TS (1890) Millionaires of a day: an inside history of the great Southern California “boom”. Fords, Howard & Hulbert, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  96. Unknown (ca. 1843) Rancho San Francisco. Santa Clarita Valley history. http://www.scvhistory.com/scvhistory/jj2003a.htm
  97. Unknown (ca. 1860) Topographical map of the valley of the Santa Clara River. Courtesy of The Bancroft LibraryGoogle Scholar
  98. U.S. District Court (ca. 1840a) Diseño del Rancho Sespe: Calif. B-990. Courtesy of The Bancroft LibraryGoogle Scholar
  99. U.S. District Court (ca. 1840b) Diceño del Rio de Santa Clara. A-1268. Courtesy of The Bancroft LibraryGoogle Scholar
  100. USGS (1903) Santa Susana Quadrangle, California. Courtesy of CSU Northridge Map LibraryGoogle Scholar
  101. Walter RC, Merritts DJ (2008) Natural streams and the legacy of water-powered mills. Science 319:299–304CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. Ward J, Tockner K, Uehlinger U, Malard F (2001) Understanding natural patterns and processes in river corridors as the basis for effective river restoration. Regul Rivers Res Manag 17:311–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Warrick JA, Mertes LAK (2009) Sediment yield from the tectonically active semiarid Western Transverse Ranges of California. Geol Soc Am Bull 121:1054–1070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Wohl E (2005) Compromised rivers: understanding historical human impacts on rivers in the context of restoration. Ecol Soc 10(2):2Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erin E. Beller
    • 1
  • Peter W. Downs
    • 2
  • Robin M. Grossinger
    • 1
  • Bruce K. Orr
    • 3
  • Micha N. Salomon
    • 1
  1. 1.Resilient Landscapes ProgramSan Francisco Estuary InstituteRichmondUSA
  2. 2.School of Geography, Earth and Environmental SciencesPlymouth UniversityPlymouthUK
  3. 3.Stillwater SciencesBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations