Advertisement

Landscape Ecology

, Volume 30, Issue 10, pp 1913–1929 | Cite as

Effects of 80 years of forest management on landscape structure and pattern in the eastern Canadian boreal forest

  • Dominique BoucherEmail author
  • Louis De Grandpré
  • Daniel Kneeshaw
  • Benoît St-Onge
  • Jean-Claude Ruel
  • Kaysandra Waldron
  • Jean-Martin Lussier
Research Article

Abstract

Context

Forest management alters patterns generated by natural disturbances, particularly in ecosystems with infrequent fires. Management effects can differ according to spatial scale and affect ecological processes.

Objectives

To assess the effect of 80 years of forest management at both the landscape and burn/harvest scales on forest age, composition, density, spatial pattern and heterogeneity.

Methods

Forest inventory maps and satellite images were used to compare two contiguous landscapes, respectively managed and unmanaged, of the eastern boreal forest of Canada, in a region with infrequent fires. Burns and harvests occurring from 1920–1950 were also compared.

Results

In addition to reducing the proportion of old-growth stands in the landscape, forest management changed forest composition at both scales, favouring the late-successional species balsam fir. Landscape metrics indicated that old-growth forests and spruce-dominated ones were more fragmented, less connected, and confined to smaller patches in the managed landscape than in the unmanaged one. Forest management increased heterogeneity at the landscape scale, but decreased it at the burn/harvest scale. Logging had a homogenizing effect at the burn/harvest scale by attenuating the effect of the physical environment on forest density.

Conclusions

This study provides knowledge to help reduce effects of forest management at both scales. In this forest region with low fire recurrence, the goal should be to manage for greater forest heterogeneity at the burn/harvest scale whereas, at the landscape scale, restoration strategies should aim to create large contiguous patches of coniferous forests to increase spatial continuity as these were reduced by past management activities.

Keywords

Logging Fires Multi-scale Heterogeneity Forest composition Old-growth forests 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the Fonds de recherche Nature et technologies du QuébecProgramme de recherche en partenariat sur l’aménagement et l’environnement forestier. We thank Martin Simard and two anonymous reviewers for their useful comments on the manuscript, Isabelle Lamarre for English editing.

Supplementary material

10980_2015_220_MOESM1_ESM.docx (12 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 11 kb)

References

  1. Andrén H (1994) Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review. Oikos 71:355–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barrette J, Pothier D, Ward C (2013) Temporal changes in stem decay and dead and sound wood volumes in the northeastern Canadian boreal forest. Can J For Res 43:234–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bergeron Y, Leduc A, Harvey BD, Gauthier S (2002) Natural fire regime: a guide for sustainable management of the Canadian boreal forest. Silva Fenn 36:81–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blais JR (1957) Some relationships of the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem.) to black spruce, Picea mariana (Moench) Voss. For Chron 33:364–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blais JR (1983) Trends in the frequency, extent, and severity of spruce budworm outbreaks in eastern Canada. Can J For Res 13:539–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bobiec A (1998) The mosaic diversity of field layer vegetation in the natural and exploited forests of Białowieża. Plant Ecol 136:175–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bouchard M, Kneeshaw D, Bergeron Y (2008) Ecosystem management based on large-scale disturbance pulses: a case study from sub-boreal forests of western Quebec (Canada). For Ecol Manag 256:1734–1742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bouchard M, Pothier D (2011) Long-term influence of fire and harvesting on boreal forest age structure and forest composition in eastern Québec. For Ecol Manag 261:811–820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boucher Y, Arsenault D, Sirois L, Blais L (2009) Logging pattern and landscape changes over the last century at the boreal and deciduous forest transition in Eastern Canada. Landscape Ecol 24:171–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Calabrese JM, Fagan WF (2004) A comparison-shopper’s guide to connectivity metrics. Front Ecol Environ 2:529–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cappuccino N, Lavertu D, Bergeron Y, Régnière J (1998) Spruce budworm impact, abundance and parasitism rate in a patchy landscape. Oecologia 114:236–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carlson DJ, Reich PB, Frelich LE (2011) Fine-scale heterogeneity in overstory composition contributes to heterogeneity of wildfire severity in southern boreal forest. J For Res 16:203–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chappell CB, Agee JK (1996) Fire severity and tree seedling establishment in Abies magnifica forests, Southern Cascades, Oregon. Ecol Appl 6:628–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Christensen NL, Agee JK, Brussard PF, Hughes J, Knight DH, Minshall GW, Peek JM, Pyne SJ, Swanson FJ, Thomas JW, Wells S, Williams SE, Wright HA (1989) Interpreting the Yellowstone fires of 1988. Ecosyst Responses Manag Implic 39:678–685Google Scholar
  15. Cimon-Morin J, Ruel J-C, Darveau M (2010) Short term effects of alternative silvicultural treatments on stand attributes in irregular balsam fir-black spruce stands. For Ecol Manag 260:907–914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Claveau Y, Messier C, Comeau PG, Coates KD (2002) Growth and crown morphological responses of boreal conifer seedlings and saplings with contrasting shade tolerance to a gradient of light and height. Can J For Res 32:458–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cyr D, Gauthier S, Bergeron Y (2007) Scale-dependent determinants of heterogeneity in fire frequency in a coniferous boreal forest of eastern Canada. Landscape Ecol 22:1325–1339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cyr D, Gauthier S, Bergeron Y, Carcaillet C (2009) Forest management is driving the eastern North American boreal forest outside its natural range of variability. Front Ecol Environ 7:519–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Delong SC, Tanner D (1996) Managing the pattern of forest harvest: lessons from wildfire. Biodivers Conserv 5:1191–1205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dickinson Y, Zenner EK, Miller D (2014) Examining the effect of diverse management strategies on landscape scale patterns of forest structure in Pennsylvania using novel remote sensing techniques. Can J For Res 44:301–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Edman M, Jönsson M, Jonsson BG (2007) Fungi and wind strongly influence the temporal availability of logs in an old-growth spruce forest. Ecol Appl 17:482–490CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Environment Canada (2013) Canadian climate normals, 1971–2000. http://climate.weather.gc.ca/climate_normals. Accessed Nov 2014
  23. Etheridge DA, MacLean DA, Wagner RG, Wilson JS (2005) Changes in landscape composition and stand structure from 1945–2002 on an industrial forest in New Brunswick, Canada. Can J For Res 35:1965–1977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fahrig L (2003) Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:487–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Forman RTT (1995) Land mosaics. The ecology of landscape and regions. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  26. Foster DR, Motzkin G, Slater B (1998) Land-use history as long-term broad-scale disturbance: regional forest dynamics in central New England. Ecosystems 1:96–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fourrier A, Pothier D, Bouchard M (2013) A comparative study of long-term stand growth in eastern Canadian boreal forest: fire versus clear-cut. For Ecol Manag 310:10–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Franklin JF, Forman RTT (1987) Creating landscape patterns by forest cutting: ecological consequences and principles. Landscape Ecol 1:5–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Freedman B, Zelazny V, Beaudette D, Fleming T, Flemming S, Forbes G, Gerrow JS, Johnson G, Woodley S (1996) Biodiversity implications of changes in the quantity of dead organic matter in managed forests. Environ Rev 4:238–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Frenette P (ed) (1996) Histoire de la Côte-Nord. Les Presses de l’Université Laval, Sainte-FoyGoogle Scholar
  31. Friedman SK, Reich PB (2005) Regional legacies of logging: departure from presettlement forest conditions in northern Minnesota. Ecol Appl 15:726–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gauthier S, Boucher D, Morissette J, De Grandpré L (2010) Fifty-seven years of composition change in the eastern boreal forest of Canada. J Veg Sci 21:772–785Google Scholar
  33. Gray DR, MacKinnon WE (2006) Outbreak patterns of the spruce budworm and their impacts in Canada. For Chron 82:550–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Grondin P (1996) Écologie forestière. In: Bérard JA, Côté M (eds) Manuel de foresterie. Les Presses de l’Université Laval, Sainte-Foy, pp 133–279Google Scholar
  35. Groot A, Lussier J-M, Mitchell AK, MacIsaac DA (2005) A silvicultural systems perspective on changing Canadian forestry practices. For Chron 81:50–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gustafson EJ, Crow TR (1998) Simulating spatial and temporal context of forest management using hypothetical landscapes. Environ Manag 22:777–787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Haire SL, McGarigal K (2010) Effects of landscape patterns of fire severity on regenerating ponderosa pine forests (Pinus ponderosa) in New Mexico and Arizona, USA. Landscape Ecol 25:1055–1069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Halpern CB, Spies TA (1995) Plant species diversity in natural and managed forests of the Pacific Northwest. Ecol Appl 5:913–934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hargrove WW, Pickering J (1992) Pseudoreplication: a sine qua non for regional ecology. Landscape Ecol 6:251–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Harvey BD, Leduc A, Gauthier S, Bergeron Y (2002) Stand-landscape integration in natural disturbance-based management of the southern boreal forest. For Ecol Manag 155:369–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hennigar CR, MacLean DA, Quiring DT, Kershaw JA Jr (2008) Differences in spruce budworm defoliation among balsam fir and white, red and black spruce. For Sci 54:158–166Google Scholar
  42. Hessburg PF, Salter RB, James KM (2007) Re-examining fire severity relations in pre-management era mixed conifer forests: inferences from landscape patterns of forest structure. Landscape Ecol 22:5–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jackson SM, Pinto F, Malcolm JR, Wilson ER (2000) A comparison of pre-European settlement (1857) and current (1981–1995) forest composition in central Ontario. Can J For Res 30:605–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Jaeger JAG (2000) Landscape division, splitting index, and effective mesh size: new measures of landscape fragmentation. Landscape Ecol 15:115–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. James PMA, Sturtevant BR, Townsend P, Wolter P, Fortin M-J (2011) Two-dimensional wavelet analysis of spruce budworm host basal area in the Border Lakes landscape. Ecol Appl 21:2197–2209CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Kashian DM, Turner MG, Romme WH, Lorimer CG (2005) Variability and convergence in stand structural development on a fire-dominated subalpine landscape. Ecology 86:643–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kivinen S, Berg A, Moen J, Ostlund L, Olofsson J (2012) Forest fragmentation and landscape transformation in a reindeer husbandry area in Sweden. Environ Manag 49:295–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Koivula M, Kuuluvainen T, Hallman E, Kouki J, Siitonen J, Valkonen S (2014) Forest management inspired by natural disturbance dynamics (DISTDYN)—a long-term research and development project in Finland. Scand J For Res 29:579–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kouki J, Löfman S, Martikainen P, Rouvinen S, Uotila A (2001) Forest fragmentation in Fennoscandia: linking habitat requirements of wood-associated threatened species to landscape and habitat changes. Scand J For Res 16:27–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kulakowski D, Veblen TT, Bebi P (2003) Effects of fire and spruce beetle outbreak legacies on the disturbance regime of a subalpine forest in Colorado. J Biogeogr 30:1445–1456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kuuluvainen T (2009) Forest management and biodiversity conservation based on natural ecosystem dynamics in northern Europe: the complexity challenge. Ambio 38:309–316CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) Numerical Ecology, 2nd edn. Elselvier Science, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  53. Leimgruber P, McShea WJ, Schnell GD (2002) Effects of scale and logging on landscape structure in a forest mosaic. Environ Monit Assess 74:141–166CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Linder P, Östlund L (1998) Structural changes in three mid-boreal Swedish forest landscapes, 1885–1996. Biol Conserv 85:9–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Löfman S, Kouki J (2001) Fifty years of landscape transformation in managed forests of southern Finland. Scand J For Res 16:44–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lomolino MV, Perault DR (2000) Assembly and disassembly of mammal communities in a fragmented temperate rain forest. Ecology 81:1517–1532Google Scholar
  57. McGarigal K (2014) FRAGSTATS help. University of Massachusetts, Amherst. http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/documents/fragstats.help.4.2.pdf. Accessed Nov 2014
  58. McGarigal K, Cushman SA (2002) Comparative evaluation of experimental approaches to the study of habitat fragmentation effects. Ecol Appl 12:335–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. McGarigal K, Cushman SA, Ene E (2013) FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for categorical maps. University of Massachusetts, Amherst. http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html. Accessed Nov 2014
  60. McRae DJ, Duchesne LC, Freedman B, Lynham TJ, Woodley S (2001) Comparisons between wildfire and forest harvesting and their implications in forest management. Environ Rev 9:223–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Ministère des Ressources naturelles et de la Faune du Québec (MRNFQ, 2009) Normes de cartographie écoforestière. Troisième inventaire écoforestier. Direction des inventaires forestiers, Forêt Québec, QuébecGoogle Scholar
  62. Minville E (1944) La forêt. Éditions Fides, MontréalGoogle Scholar
  63. Mladenoff DJ, White MA, Pastor J, Crow TR (1993) Comparing spatial pattern in unaltered old-growth and disturbed forest landscapes. Ecol Appl 3:294–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Nealis VG, Régnière J (2004) Insect-host relationships influencing disturbance by the spruce budworm in a boreal mixedwood forest. Can J For Res 34:1870–1882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ohmann JL, Gregory MJ, Spies TA (2007) Influence of environment, disturbance, and ownership on forest vegetation of coastal Oregon. Ecol Appl 17:18–33CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Oksanen L (2001) Logic of experiments in ecology: is pseudoreplication a pseudoissue? Oikos 94:27–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Olsson J, Johansson T, Jonsson BG, Hjältén J, Edman M, Ericson L (2012) Landscape and substrate properties affect species richness and community composition of saproxylic beetles. For Ecol Manag 286:108–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Östlund L, Zackrisson O, Axelsson A-L (1997) The history and transformation of a Scandinavian boreal forest landscape since the 19th century. Can J For Res 27:1198–1206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Palik BJ, Goebel PC, Kirkman LK, West L (2000) Using landscape hierarchies to guide restoration of disturbed ecosystems. Ecol Appl 10:189–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Parent S, Messier C (1995) Effets d’un gradient de lumière sur la croissance en hauteur et la morphologie de la cime du sapin baumier régénéré naturellement. Can J For Res 25:878–885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Perera AH, Baldwin DJB (2000) Spatial patterns in the managed forest landscape of Ontario. In: Perera AH, Euler DL, Thompson ID (eds) Ecology of a managed terrestrial landscape: patterns and processes of forest landscapes in Ontario. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver, pp 74–99Google Scholar
  72. Quayle D, Régnière J, Cappuccino N, Dupont A (2003) Forest composition, host-population density, and parasitism of spruce budworm Choristoneura fumiferana eggs by Trichogramma minutum. Entomol Exp Appl 107:215–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Raffa KF, Aukema BH, Bentz BJ, Carroll AL, Hicke JA, Turner MG, Romme WH (2008) Cross-scale drivers of natural disturbances prone to anthropogenic amplification: the dynamics of bark beetle eruptions. Bioscience 58:501–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Ripple WJ, Bradshaw GA, Spies TA (1991) Measuring forest landscape patterns in the cascade range of Oregon, USA. Biol Conserv 57:73–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Robert L-E, Kneeshaw D, Sturtevant BR (2012) Effects of forest management legacies on spruce budworm (Choristoneura fumiferana) outbreaks. Can J For Res 42:463–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Robitaille A, Saucier J-P (1998) Paysages régionaux du Québec méridional. Les Publications du Québec, Sainte-FoyGoogle Scholar
  77. Romme WH, Boyce MS, Gresswell R, Evelyn H, Minshall GW, Whitlock C, Turner MG (2011) Twenty years after the 1988 Yellowstone fires: lessons about disturbance and ecosystems. Ecosystems 14:1196–1215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Ruel J-C (2000) Factors influencing windthrow in balsam fir forests: from landscape studies to individual tree studies. For Ecol Manag 135:169–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Ruel J-C, Benoit R (1999) Analyse du chablis du 7 novembre 1994 dans les régions de Charlevoix et de la Gaspésie, Québec, Canada. For Chron 75:293–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. SAS Institute, Inc. (2010) SAS/STAT user’s guide, version 9.3. SAS Institute, Inc., CaryGoogle Scholar
  81. Saucier J-P, Bergeron J-F, Grondin P, Robitaille A (1998) Les régions écologiques du Québec méridional (3e version): un des éléments du système hiérarchique de classification écologique du territoire mis au point par le ministère des Ressources naturelles du Québec. L’Aubelle 124:S1–S12Google Scholar
  82. Schmiegelow FKA, Machtans CS, Hannon SJ (1997) Are boreal birds resilient to forest fragmentation? An experimental study of short-term community responses. Ecology 78:1914–1932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Schulte LA, Maldenoff DJ, Crow TR, Merrick LC, Cleland DT (2007) Homogenization of northern U.S. Great Lakes forests due to land use. Landscape Ecol 22:1089–1103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Schumaker NH (1996) Using landscape indices to predict habitat connectivity. Ecology 77:1210–1225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Seymour RS, White AS, deMaynadier PG (2002) Natural disturbance regimes in northeastern North America—evaluating silvicultural systems using natural scales and frequencies. For Ecol Manag 155:357–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Shannon C, Weaver W (1949) The mathematical theory of communication. University Illinois Press, UrbanaGoogle Scholar
  87. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry, 3rd edn. WH Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  88. Spies TA, Ripple WJ, Bradshaw GA (1994) Dynamics and pattern of a managed coniferous forest landscape in Oregon. Ecol Appl 4:555–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Su Q, MacLean DA, Needham TD (1996) The influence of hardwood content on balsam fir defoliation by spruce budworm. Can J For Res 26:1620–1628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Taylor PD, Fahrig L, Henein K, Merriam G (1993) Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure. Oikos 68:571–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Tinker DB, Romme WH, Despain DG (2003) Historic range of variability in landscape structure in subalpine forests of the Greater Yellowstone Area, USA. Landscape Ecol 18:427–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Tischendorf L, Fahrig L (2000) On the usage and measurement of landscape connectivity. Oikos 90:7–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Turner MG (2005) Landscape ecology in North America: past, present, and future. Ecology 86:1967–1974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Turner MG (2010) Disturbance and landscape dynamics in a changing world. Ecology 91:2833–2849CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Turner MG, Hargrove WW, Gardner RH, Romme WH (1994) Effects of fire on landscape heterogeneity in Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming. J Veg Sci 5:731–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Waldron K, Ruel J-C, Gauthier S, Goulet P (2014) Comparisons of spatial patterns between windthrow and logging at two spatial scales. Can J For Res 44:740–749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Wallin DO, Swanson FJ, Marks B, Cissel JH, Kertis J (1996) Comparison of managed and pre-settlement landscape dynamics in forests of the Pacific Northwest, USA. For Ecol Manag 85:291–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Wang X, Cumming SG (2010) Configuration dynamics of boreal forest landscapes under recent fire and harvesting regimes in western Canada. Landscape Ecol 25:1419–1432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Wang X, Blanchet FG, Koper N (2014) Measuring habitat fragmentation: an evaluation of landscape pattern metrics. Methods Ecol Evol 5:634–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Wimberly MC, Ohmann JL (2004) A multi-scale assessment of human and environmental constraints on forest land cover change on the Oregon (USA) coast range. Landscape Ecol 19:631–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Wulder MA, White JC, Cranny M, Hall RJ, Luther JE, Beaudoin A, Goodenough DG, Dechka JA (2008) Monitoring Canada’s forests. Part 1: completion of the EOSD land cover project. Can J Remote Sens 34:549–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Wyatt JL, Silman MR (2010) Centuries-old logging legacy on spatial and temporal patterns in understory herb communities. For Ecol Manag 260:116–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht (outside the USA) 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dominique Boucher
    • 1
    Email author
  • Louis De Grandpré
    • 1
  • Daniel Kneeshaw
    • 2
  • Benoît St-Onge
    • 3
  • Jean-Claude Ruel
    • 4
  • Kaysandra Waldron
    • 4
  • Jean-Martin Lussier
    • 5
  1. 1.Laurentian Forestry Centre, Canadian Forest ServiceNatural Resources CanadaQuébecCanada
  2. 2.Centre d’étude de la forêt (CEF)Université du Québec à MontréalMontréalCanada
  3. 3.Département de géographieUniversité du Québec à MontréalMontréalCanada
  4. 4.Centre d’étude de la forêt (CEF), Département des sciences du bois et de la forêtUniversité LavalQuébecCanada
  5. 5.Canadian Wood Fibre CentreNatural Resources CanadaQuébecCanada

Personalised recommendations