Response of avian diversity to habitat modification can be predicted from life-history traits and ecological attributes
- 1.4k Downloads
Habitat conversion for agriculture is a major driver of global biodiversity loss, partly because of homogeneity within agri-ecosystems. Anthropogenic landscapes can also increase habitat heterogeneity and primary productivity, however, augmenting regional biodiversity, as species that exploit resources associated with human activities expand their ranges into novel ecological regions.
We used birds as a model in the Kruger to Canyons Biosphere, South Africa, to ask whether agriculture can add habitat components and bird species complementary to those already present, and whether habitat variables and bird functional traits can be used to identify bird species most likely to respond to such habitat changes.
We surveyed birds and measured habitat structure in 150 fixed-radius point counts each in natural habitat and mango orchards, and assessed relationships between habitat variables and bird functional traits.
Despite mango orchards having greater vertical height structure because of tall (average 20 m) Casuarina windbreaks, they were missing the low-scrub (1–2 m woody cover) component of natural vegetation. We found that species whose life-history traits and ecological attributes were associated with structures missing from mango orchards were correspondingly absent from the orchards, which translated into the exclusion of 35 % of the bird species; bird assemblages within mango orchards were only a subset of those found in natural habitat.
These findings suggest that knowledge of habitat structure, along with species’ functional traits can provide a predictive framework for effects that anthropogenic habitats may have on regional biodiversity, and allow management to reduce negative effects.
KeywordsAgroecosystem Anthropogenic habitats Ecological attributes Functional diversity Functional traits Habitat heterogeneity Life history traits Habitat transformation RLQ analysis
The research was conducted with financial support to the ‘NETWORK’ project from the European Commission Marie Curie International Research Staff Exchange Scheme (IRSES) (Grant agreement: PIRSES-GA-2012-318929). CLS was also financially assisted by DST Financial Assistance agreement DST/CON0054/2013 and NRF Grant 91039. We thank all the farmers involved for providing us access to the sites and D. Henri for statistical guidance.
- Bertzky B, Corrigan C, Kemsey J, Kenney S, Ravilious C, Besançon C, Burgess N (2012) Protected Planet Report 2012: tracking progress towards global targets for protected areas. IUCN & UNEP-WCMC, Gland, Switserland and Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
- Bibby C, Buckland S (1987) Bias of bird census results due to detectability varying with habitat. Acta Oecol 8:103–112Google Scholar
- Bibby C, Burgess N, Hill D (2000) Bird census techniques. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Chao A (1984) Nonparametric estimation of the number of classes in a population. Scand J Stat 11:265–270Google Scholar
- Chessel D, Dufour AB, Thioulouse J (2004) The ade4 package—1: one-table methods. R news 4:5–10Google Scholar
- Cleary DFR, Boyle TJB, Setyawati T, Anggraeni CD, Loon EE Van, Menken SBJ (2007) Bird species and traits associated with logged and unlogged forest in Borneo. Ecol Appl 17:1184–1197.Google Scholar
- Cowell RK (2006) EstimateS: Statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samplesGoogle Scholar
- Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism (2006) Chapter 4: Land. South Africa Environ. outlook. A Rep. State Environ. DEAT, Pretoria, pp 87–173Google Scholar
- Department of Horticultural Sciences (2002) Horticulture in the Limpopo Province. Abstr Agric Stat pp 1–23Google Scholar
- Doxa A, Bas Y, Paracchini ML, Pointereau P, Terres J-M, Jiguet F (2010) Low-intensity agriculture increases farmland bird abundances in France. J Appl Ecol 47:1348–1356. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01869.x
- Dray S, Dufour A-B (2007) The ade4 package: implementing the duality diagram for ecologists. J Stat Softw 22:1–20Google Scholar
- ESRI (Environmental Systems Research Institute) (2011) ArcGIS Desktop 10Google Scholar
- Fahrig L, Baudry J, Brotons L, Burel FG, Crist TO, Fuller RJ, Sirami C, Siriwardena GM, Martin J-L (2011) Functional landscape heterogeneity and animal biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. Ecol Lett 14:101–112. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01559.x
- Foley JA, Ramankutty N, Brauman KA, Cassidy ES, Gerber JS, Johnston M, Mueller ND, O’Connell C, Ray DK, West PC, Balzer C, Bennett EM, Carpenter SR, Hill J, Monfreda C, Polasky S, Rockström J, Sheehan J, Siebert S, Tilman D, Zaks DPM (2011) Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature 478:337–342. doi: 10.1038/nature10452
- Hanberry BB, Hanberry P, Riffell SK, Demarais S, Jones JC (2012) Bird assemblages of intensively established pine plantations in Coastal Plain Mississippi. J Wildl Manag 76:1205–1214. doi: 10.1002/jwmg.361
- Harper D, Ryan P (2001) PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electron 4:1–9Google Scholar
- Harrison JA, Allan DG, Underhill LG, Herremans M, Tree AJ, Parker V, Brown CJ (1997) The atlas of southern African birds. Vol. 2: Passerines. Birdlife South Africa, JohannesburgGoogle Scholar
- Hockey PAR, Dean WRJ, Ryan P (2005) Birds of Southern Africa, 7th edn. John Voelcker Bird Book Fund, Cape TownGoogle Scholar
- Hockey PAR, Sirami C, Ridley AR, Midgley GF, Babiker HA (2011) Interrogating recent range changes in South African birds: confounding signals from land use and climate change present a challenge for attribution. Divers Distrib 17:254–261. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00741.x
- Ikin K, Knight E, Lindenmayer DB, Fischer J, Manning AD (2012) Linking bird species traits to vegetation characteristics in a future urban development zone: implications for urban planning. Urban Ecosyst 15:961–977. doi: 10.1007/s11252-012-0247-2
- Jones JE, Kroll AJ, Giovanini J, Duke SD, Ellis TM, Betts MG (2012) Avian species richness in relation to intensive forest management practices in early seral tree plantations. PLoS ONE 7:1–10. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043290
- Joseph GS, Cumming GS, Cumming DHM, Mahlangu Z, Altwegg R, Seymour CL (2011) Large termitaria act as refugia for tall trees, deadwood and cavity-using birds in a miombo woodland. Landsc Ecol 26:439–448. doi: 10.1007/s10980-011-9572-8
- Kleyer M, Dray S, Bello F, Lepš J, Pakeman RJ, Strauss B, Thuiller W, Lavorel S (2012) Assessing species and community functional responses to environmental gradients: which multivariate methods? J Veg Sci 23:805–821. doi: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2012.01402.x
- Lenda M, Skórka P, Moroń D, Rosin ZM, Tryjanowski P (2012) The importance of the gravel excavation industry for the conservation of grassland butterflies. Biol Conserv 148:180–190. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.01.014
- Manning JC (2003) Photographic guide to the wildflowers of South Africa. Briza, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
- Mucina L, Rutherford MC (2011) The vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Strelitzia 19. South African National Biodiversity Institute, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
- R Development Core Team (2008) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
- Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (2010) Global Biodiversity. Outlook 3(104):1–94Google Scholar
- Sullivan D (2009) Google Earth Pro. 16–18Google Scholar
- Thioulouse J, Dray S (2007) Interactive multivariate data analysis in R with the ade4 and ade4tkgui packages. J Stat Softw 22:1–14Google Scholar
- Tscharntke T, Klein AM, Kruess A, Steffan-Dewenter I, Thies C (2005) Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity and ecosystem service management. Ecol Lett 8:857–874. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00782.x