Landscape Ecology

, Volume 29, Issue 4, pp 563–569 | Cite as

Deep time: the emerging role of archaeology in landscape ecology



Given the goals of landscape ecology, information from archaeological sites provides a useful source of evidence regarding cultural practices, anthropogenic change, local conditions, and distributions of organisms at a variety of scales across both space and time. Due to the time depth available from the archaeological record, long-term processes can be studied and issues of land use legacies, human influence on landscape heterogeneity, and system histories can be addressed. Archaeological data can produce a diachronic record of past population size, population structure, biogeography, age-at-death, and migration patterns, useful for making ecosystem and wildlife management decisions. Researchers can use archaeological knowledge to differentiate between native and alien taxa, inform restoration plans, identify sustainable harvesting practices, account for modern distributions of taxa, predict future biogeographic changes, and elucidate the interplay of long- and short-term ecological processes.


Archaeology Land use Prehistory Anthropogenic change History Restoration Management Paleoecology 



I would like to thank the many people who gave me excellent guidance, advice, and feedback on this manuscript, including Dr. Jianguo Wu, Editor-in-Chief of Landscape Ecology, my anonymous reviewers, faculty reviewers at the University of North Dakota, my research assistant, and Mr. Zane Johnson.


  1. Abrams MD (2005) Prescribing fire in eastern oak forests: is time running out? North J Appl For 22(3):190–196Google Scholar
  2. Abrams MD, Nowacki GJ (2008) Native Americans as active and passive promoters of mast and fruit trees in the eastern USA. The Holocene 18(7):1123–1137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barone JA (2005) Historical presence and distribution of prairies in the Black Belt of Mississippi and Alabama. Castanea 70(3):170–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bird RB, Bird DW, Codding BF, Parker CH, Jones JH (2008) The “fire stick farming” hypothesis: Australian aboriginal foraging strategies, biodiversity, and anthropogenic fire mosaics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(39):14796–14801Google Scholar
  5. Black BA, Ruffner CM, Abrams MD (2006) Native American influences on the forest composition of the Allegheny Plateau, northwest Pennsylvania. Can J For Res 36:1266–1275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blackburn TC, Anderson K (1993) Introduction: Managing the domesticated environment. In: Blackburn TC, Anderson K (eds) Before the wilderness: environmental management by native Californians. Ballena Press, Menlo Park, pp 15–25Google Scholar
  7. Briggs JM, Spielmann KA, Schaafsma H, Kintigh KW, Kruse M, Morehouse K, Schollmeyer K (2006) Why ecology needs archaeologists and archaeology needs ecologists. Front Ecol Environ 4(4):180–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Broughton JM (1999) Resource depression and intensification during the late Holocene, San Francisco Bay: evidence from the Emeryville Shellmound vertebrate fauna. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  9. Broughton JM (2004) Pristine benchmarks and indigenous conservation? Implications from California zooarchaeology. In: Lauwerier RCGM, Plug I (eds) The future from the past: archaeozoology in wildlife conservation and heritage management. Oxbow Books, Oxford, pp 6–18Google Scholar
  10. Butler VL, Delacorte MG (2004) Doing zooarchaeology as if it mattered: use of faunal data to address current issues in fish conservation biology in Owens Valley, California. In: Lyman RL, Cannon KP (eds) Zooarchaeology and conservation biology. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, pp 25–44Google Scholar
  11. Chapman J, Delcourt HR, Delcourt PA (1989) Strawberry fields, almost forever. Nat Hist 9:50–59Google Scholar
  12. Cubizolle H, Tourman A, Argant J, Porteret J, Oberlin C, Serieyssol K (2003) Origins of European biodiversity: palaeo-geographic signification of peat inception during the Holocene in the granitic eastern Massif Central (France). Landscape Ecol 18:227–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Delcourt PA, Delcourt HR (1998) The influence of prehistoric human-set fires on oak–chestnut forests in the Southern Appalachians. Castanea 63(3):337–345Google Scholar
  14. Delcourt PA, Delcourt HR, Ison CR, Sharp WE, Gremillion KJ (1998) Prehistoric human use of fire, the Eastern Agricultural Complex, and Appalachian oak–chestnut forests: paleoecology of Cliff Palace Pond, Kentucky. Am Antiq 63(2):263–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Denevan WM (1992) The pristine myth: the landscape of the Americas in 1492. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 82(3):369–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Denevan WM (1996) Carl Sauer and Native American population size. Geogr Rev 86(3):385–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Devall M (2000) What the Delta looked like before European settlers came. Delta Wildl 2000:8–9Google Scholar
  18. Dobyns H (1983) Their number became thinned. The University of Tennessee Press, KnoxvilleGoogle Scholar
  19. Etnier MA (2004) The potential of zooarchaeological data to guide pinniped management decisions in the eastern North Pacific. In: Lyman RL, Cannon KP (eds) Zooarchaeology and conservation biology. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, pp 88–102Google Scholar
  20. Etnier MA (2007) Defining and identifying sustainable harvests of resources: archaeological examples of pinniped harvests in the eastern North Pacific. J Nat Conserv 15(3):196–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Foster DR (2000) From bobolinks to bears: interjecting geographical history into ecological studies, environmental interpretation, and conservation planning. J Biogeogr 27(1):27–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Frazier J (2007) Sustainable use of wildlife: the view from archaeozoology. J Nat Conserv 15(3):163–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fyfe RM, Woodbridge J (2012) Differences in time and space in vegetation patterning: analysis of pollen data from Dartmoor, UK. Landscape Ecol 27:745–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gillson L (2009) Landscapes in time and space. Landscape Ecol 24:149–155Google Scholar
  25. Gimmi U, Bugmann H (2013) Preface: integrating historical ecology and ecological modeling. Landscape Ecol 28:785–787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gimmi U, Poulter VB, Wolf A, Portner H, Weber P, Bürgi M (2013) Soil carbon pools in Swiss forests show legacy effects from historic forest litter raking. Landscape Ecol 28:835–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Goldewijk KK, Verburg PH (2013) Uncertainties in global-scale reconstructions of historical land use: an illustration using the HYDE data set. Landscape Ecol 28:861–877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hamel PB, Buckner ER (1998) How far could a squirrel travel in the treetops? A prehistory of the southern forest. In: Transactions of the 63rd North American wildlife and natural resources conference; 1998 March 20–25; Orlando, FL. Wildlife Management Institute, Washington DC, pp 309–315Google Scholar
  29. Harpole JL (2004) Zooarchaeological implications for Missouri’s elk (Cervus elaphus) reintroduction effort. In: Lyman RL, Cannon KP (eds) Zooarchaeology and conservation biology. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, pp 103–115Google Scholar
  30. Hughes SS (2004) Postcontact changes in the behavior and distribution of Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis) in northwestern Wyoming. In: Lyman RL, Cannon KP (eds) Zooarchaeology and conservation biology. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, pp 116–135Google Scholar
  31. Johnson JK, Scott SL, Atkinson JR, Shea AB (1994) Late prehistoric/protohistoric settlement and subsistence on the Black Prairie: buffalo hunting in Mississippi. N Am Archaeol 15(2):167–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jones R (1969) Fire stick farming. Austral Nat Hist 16:224–228Google Scholar
  33. Lyman RL (2006) Paleozoology in the service of conservation biology. Evol Anthropol 15:11–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lyman RL, Cannon KP (2004) Applied zooarchaeology, because it matters. In: Lyman RL, Cannon KP (eds) Zooarchaeology and conservation biology. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, pp 1–24Google Scholar
  35. Mann RB (2000) Fire in the central hardwoods: why are we concerned? In: Yaussy D (ed) Proceedings: workshop on fire, people, and the central hardwoods landscape. USDA Forest Service general technical report NE-274. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station, Newton Square, pp 1–2Google Scholar
  36. McKechnie I (2007) Investigating the complexities of sustainable fishing at a prehistoric village on western Vancouver Island, British Columbia. Canada. J Nat Conserv 15(3):208–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Panzacchi M, Van Moorter B, Jordhøy P, Strand O (2013) Learning from the past to predict the future: using archaeological findings and GPS data to quantify reindeer sensitivity to anthropogenic disturbance in Norway. Landscape Ecol 28:847–859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Peacock E, Schauwecker T (2003) Blackland prairies of the Gulf Coastal Plain: nature, culture, and sustainability. University of Alabama Press, TuscaloosaGoogle Scholar
  39. Plue J, Hermy M, Verheyen K, Thuillier P, Saguez R, Decocq G (2008) Persistent changes in forest vegetation and seed bank 1,600 years after human occupation. Landscape Ecol 23(6):673–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pyne SJ (1997) World fire: the culture of fire on Earth. University of Washington Press, SeattleGoogle Scholar
  41. Ramenofsky AF (1987) Vectors of death: the archaeology of European contact. University of New Mexico Press, AlbuquerqueGoogle Scholar
  42. Rhemtulla JM, Mladenoff DJ (2007) Why history matters in landscape ecology. Landscape Ecol 22:1–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rhemtulla JM, Mladenoff DJ, Clayton MK (2007) Regional land-cover conversion in the U.S. upper Midwest: magnitude of change and limited recovery (1850–1935–1993). Landscape Ecol 22:57–75Google Scholar
  44. Risser PG, Karr JR, Forman RTT (1984) Landscape ecology: directions and approaches. Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, Special Publ 2Google Scholar
  45. Rostlund E (1960) The geographic range of the historic bison in the southeast. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 50(4):395–407Google Scholar
  46. Scharf EA (2010a) Archaeology, land use, pollen and restoration in the Yazoo Basin (Mississippi, USA). Veg Hist Archaeobot 19(3):159–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Scharf EA (2010b) A statistical evaluation of the relative influences of climate, vegetation, and prehistoric human population on the charcoal record of Five Lakes, Washington (USA). Quatern Int 215(1):74–86Google Scholar
  48. Schoonmaker PK, Foster DR (1991) Some implications of paleoecology for contemporary ecology. Bot Rev 57(3):204–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Silbernagel J, Martin SR, Gale MR, Chen JQ (1997) Prehistoric, historic, and present settlement patterns related to ecological hierarchy in the eastern Upper Peninsula of Michigan, USA. Landscape Ecol 12:223–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Stanturf JA, Schoenholtz SH, Schweitzer CJ, Shepard JP (2001) Achieving restoration success: myths in bottomland hardwood forests. Restor Ecol 9:189–200Google Scholar
  51. Stevenson AE (2011) Using archaeological fish remains to determine the native status of anadromous salmonids in the Upper Klamath Basin (Oregon, USA) through mtDNA and geochemical analysis. Ph.D. Dissertation, Portland State University, PortlandGoogle Scholar
  52. Stewart OC (2002) Forgotten fires: Native Americans and the transient wilderness. University of Oklahoma Press, NormanGoogle Scholar
  53. Swetnam TW, Allen CD, Betancourt JL (1999) Applied historical ecology: using the past to manage for the future. Ecol Appl 9(4):1189–1206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Whitaker AR (2008) The role of human predation in the structuring of prehistoric prey populations in northwestern California. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, DavisGoogle Scholar
  55. Whyte TR (2004) Zooarchaeological evidence of the native ichthyofauna of the Roanoke River in Virginia and North Carolina. In: Lyman RL, Cannon KP (eds) Zooarchaeology and conservation biology. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, pp 193–200Google Scholar
  56. Wu J (2013) Key concepts and research topics in landscape ecology revisited: 30 years after the Allerton Park workshop. Landscape Ecol 28(1):1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of North DakotaGrand ForksUSA

Personalised recommendations