Advertisement

Landscape Ecology

, Volume 29, Issue 6, pp 941–948 | Cite as

Realigning the land-sharing/land-sparing debate to match conservation needs: considering diversity scales and land-use history

  • Henrik von Wehrden
  • David J. Abson
  • Michael Beckmann
  • Anna F. Cord
  • Stefan Klotz
  • Ralf Seppelt
Perspective

Abstract

The “land sharing versus land sparing” concept provides a framework for comparing potential land use patterns in terms of trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and agricultural yields at a landscape scale. Here, we raise two additional aspects to be considered in the sparing/sharing debate, supported by a review of available literature. First, beta and gamma (instead of alpha) diversity measures capture landscape scale variance in biodiversity in response to land use changes and should be considered for the long-term management of agricultural landscapes. Moreover, beta and gamma diversity may better account for comparisons of biodiversity between spared and shared land use options. Second, land use history has a pronounced influence on the complexity and variance in agricultural habitat niches at a landscape scale, which in turn may determine the relevance of sparing or sharing land use options. Appropriate and comparable biodiversity metrics and the recognition of landscape history are two vital preconditions in aligning biological conservation goals with maximized yields within the sparing/sharing framework.

Keywords

Biodiversity Yields Land management Beta-diversity Agricultural landscape 

Supplementary material

10980_2014_38_MOESM1_ESM.docx (11 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 10 kb)
10980_2014_38_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx (24 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (XLSX 24 kb)

References

  1. Baessler C, Klotz S (2006) Effects of changes in agricultural land-use on landscape structure and arable weed vegetation over the last 50 years. Agric Ecosyst Environ 115(1–4):43–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balmford A, Bond W (2005) Trends in the state of nature and their implications for human well-being. Ecol Lett 8(11):1218–1234PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beckmann M, von Wehrden H (2012) Where you search is what you get: literature mining—Google Scholar vs ISI using a dataset from a literature search in vegetation science. J Veg Sci 23(6):1197–1199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benton TG, Vickery JA, Wilson JD (2003) Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? Trends Ecol Evol 18:182–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blanco V, Waltert M (2013) Does the tropical agricultural matrix bear potential for primate conservation? a baseline study from Western Uganda. J Nat Conserv 21(6):383–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chandler RB, King DI, Raudales R, Trubey R, Chandler C, Arce Chávez VJ (2013) A small-scale land-sparing approach to conserving biological diversity in tropical agricultural landscapes. Conserv Biol 27(4):785–795PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clough Y, Barkmann J, Juhrbandt J et al (2011) Combining high biodiversity with high yields in tropical agroforests. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(20):8311–8316PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Edwards DP, Hodgson JA, Hamer KC et al (2010) Wildlife-friendly oil palm plantations fail to protect biodiversity effectively. Conserv Lett 3(4):236–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Edwards DP, Gilroy JJ, Woodcock P et al (2014) Land-sharing versus land-sparing logging: reconciling timber extraction with biodiversity conservation. Glob Chang Biol 20(1):183–191PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Egan JF, Mortensen DA (2012) A comparison of land-sharing and land-sparing strategies for plant richness conservation in agricultural landscapes. Ecol Appl 22(2):459–471PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ellis EC, Kaplan JO, Fuller DQ, Vavrus S, Goldewijk KK, Verburg PH (2013) Used planet: a global history. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110(20):7978–7985PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fischer J, Brosi B, Daily GC et al (2008) Should agricultural policies encourage land sparing or wildlife-friendly farming? Front Ecol Environ 6(7):382–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fischer J, Batary P, Bawa KS et al (2011) Conservation: limits of land sparing. Science 334(6056):593–594PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Foreman R (1995) Land mosaics: the ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  15. Foster DR, Motzkin G, Bernardos D, Cardoza J (2002) Wildlife dynamics in the changing New England landscape. J Biogeogr 29(10–11):1337–1357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gabriel D, Roschewitz I, Tscharntke T, Thies C (2006) Beta diversity at different spatial scales: plant communities in organic and conventional agriculture. Ecol Appl 16(5):2011–2021PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gabriel D, Sait SM, Kunin WE, Benton TG (2013) Food production vs. biodiversity: comparing organic and conventional agriculture. J Appl Ecol 50(2):355–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grau R, Kuemmerle T, Macchi L (2013) Beyond ‘land sparing versus land sharing’: environmental heterogeneity, globalization and the balance between agricultural production and nature conservation. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 5:477–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hall SJ, Trujillo J, Nakase D et al (2013) Legacies of prehistoric agricultural practices within plant and soil properties across an arid ecosystem. Ecosystems 16(7):1273–1293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hayashi K (2011) Conservation: model management intensity. Science 334:593–594PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hodgson JA, Kunin WE, Thomas CD, Benton TG, Gabriel D (2010) Comparing organic farming and land sparing: optimizing yield and butterfly populations at a landscape scale. Ecol Lett 13(11):1358–1367PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hulme MF, Vickery JA, Green RE et al (2013) Conserving the birds of Uganda’s banana–coffee arc: land sparing and land sharing compared. PLoS ONE 8(2):e54597PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Keil P, Schweiger O, Kuhn I et al (2012) Patterns of beta diversity in Europe: the role of climate, land cover and distance across scales. J Biogeogr 39(8):1473–1486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lentini PE, Gibbons P, Fischer J, Law B, Hanspach J, Martin TG (2012) Bats in a farming landscape benefit from linear remnants and unimproved pastures. PLoS ONE 7(11):e48201PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lindborg R, Eriksson O (2004) Historical landscape connectivity affects present plant species diversity. Ecology 85(7):1840–1845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Macchi L, Grau HR, Zelaya PV, Marinaro S (2013) Trade-offs between land use intensity and avian biodiversity in the dry Chaco of Argentina: a tale of two gradients. Agric Ecosyst Environ 174:11–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mahood SP, Lees AC, Peres CA (2012) Amazonian countryside habitats provide limited avian conservation value. Biodivers Conserv 21(2):385–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Maskell LC, Crowe A, Dunbar MJ et al (2013) Exploring the ecological constraints to multiple ecosystem service delivery and biodiversity. J Appl Ecol 50(3):561–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Maurer K, Weyand A, Fischer M, Stocklin J (2006) Old cultural traditions, in addition to land use and topography, are shaping plant diversity of grasslands in the Alps. Biol Conserv 130(3):438–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Navarro, LM Pereira, HM (2012) Rewilding abandoned landscapes in Europe. Ecosystems 15(6):900–912Google Scholar
  31. Phalan B, Onial M, Balmford A, Green RE (2011a) Reconciling food production and biodiversity conservation: land sharing and land sparing compared. Science 333(6047):1289–1291PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Phalan B, Balmford A, Green RE, Scharlemann JPW (2011b) Minimising the harm to biodiversity of producing more food globally. Food Policy 36(Suppl 1):62–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pimm SL, Raven P (2000) Biodiversity: extinction by numbers. Nature 403:843–845PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pywell RF, Heard MS, Bradbury RB et al (2012) Wildlife-friendly farming benefits rare birds, bees and plants. Biol Lett 8(5):772–775PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Quinn JE, Brandle JR, Johnson RJ (2012) The effects of land sparing and wildlife-friendly practices on grassland bird abundance within organic farmlands. Agric Ecosyst Environ 161:10–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Quinn JE, Oden A, Brandle JR (2013) The influence of different cover types on American Robin nest success in organic agroecosystems. Sustainability (Switz) 5(8):3502–3512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ramankutty N, Rhemtulla J (2012) Can intensive farming save nature? Front Ecol Environ 10(9):455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ramankutty N, Rhemtulla J (2013) Land sparing or land sharing: context dependent. Front Ecol Environ 11(4):178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ranganathan J, Daniels RJR, Chandran MDS, Ehrlich PR, Daily GC (2008) Sustaining biodiversity in ancient tropical countryside. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(46):17852–17854PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schuch S, Wesche K, Schaefer M (2012) Long-term decline in the abundance of leafhoppers and planthoppers (Auchenorrhyncha) in Central European protected dry grasslands. Biol Conserv 149(1):75–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sheldon F, Styring A (2011) Bird diversity differs between industrial tree plantations on Borneo: implications for conservation planning. Raff Bull Zool 59(2):295–309Google Scholar
  42. Steffan-Dewenter I, Kessler M, Barkmann J et al (2007) Tradeoffs between income, biodiversity, and ecosystem functioning during tropical rainforest conversion and agroforestry intensification. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(12):4973–4978PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tscharntke T, Clough Y, Wanger TC et al (2012a) Global food security, biodiversity conservation and the future of agricultural intensification. Biol Conserv 151(1):53–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tscharntke T, Tylianakis JM, Rand TA et al (2012b) Landscape moderation of biodiversity patterns and processes—eight hypotheses. Biol Rev 87(3):661–685PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Vos W, Meekes H (1999) Trends in European cultural landscape development: perspectives for a sustainable future. Landsc Urban Plan 46(1–3):3–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wade ASI, Asase A, Hadley P et al (2010) Management strategies for maximizing carbon storage and tree species diversity in cocoa-growing landscapes. Agric Ecosyst Environ 138(3–4):324–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wu JG (2013) Landscape sustainability science: ecosystem services and human well-being in changing landscapes. Landscape Ecol 28(6):999–1023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zobel M, Otto R, Laanisto L, Naranjo-Cigala A, Partel M, Fernandez-Palacios JM (2011) The formation of species pools: historical habitat abundance affects current local diversity. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 20(2):251–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Henrik von Wehrden
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • David J. Abson
    • 2
  • Michael Beckmann
    • 5
  • Anna F. Cord
    • 5
  • Stefan Klotz
    • 6
  • Ralf Seppelt
    • 5
    • 7
    • 8
  1. 1.Institute of Ecology, Faculty of Sustainability and Centre of MethodsLeuphana UniversityLueneburgGermany
  2. 2.FuturES Leuphana UniversityLueneburgGermany
  3. 3.Research Institute of Wildlife EcologyViennaAustria
  4. 4.Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal and Cátedra de BiografíaFCEFyN (CONICET-Universidad Nacional de Córdoba)CórdobaArgentina
  5. 5.Department Computational Landscape EcologyUFZ - Helmholtz Centre for Environmental ResearchLeipzigGermany
  6. 6.Department Community EcologyUFZ - Helmholtz Centre for Environmental ResearchHalleGermany
  7. 7.Institute of Geosciences and GeographyMartin-Luther University Halle WittenbergHalleGermany
  8. 8.iDiv-German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research Halle-Jena-LeipzigLeipzigGermany

Personalised recommendations