Advertisement

Landscape Ecology

, Volume 29, Issue 4, pp 703–714 | Cite as

Vegetation structure moderates the effect of fire on bird assemblages in a heterogeneous landscape

  • Philip S. Barton
  • Karen Ikin
  • Annabel L. Smith
  • Christopher MacGregor
  • David B. Lindenmayer
Research Article

Abstract

Ecological theory predicting the impact of fire on ecological communities is typically focused on post-disturbance recovery processes or on disturbance-diversity dynamics. Yet the established relationship between vegetation structure and animal diversity could provide a foundation to predict the short-term effects of fire on biodiversity, but has rarely been explored. We tested the hypothesis that fire effects on bird assemblages would be moderated by increasing vegetation structure. We examined bird assemblages in burnt and unburnt sites at 1 and 6 years after a wildfire, and compared richness and composition responses among and within three structurally distinct vegetation types in the same landscape: heath, woodland and forest. We found that short-term changes in bird assemblage composition were largest in simple heath vegetation and smallest in complex forest vegetation. The short-term change in species richness was larger in forest than in heath. We also found that among-site assemblage variability was greater shortly after fire in heath and woodland vegetation compared with forest vegetation. Our results indicate that complexity in vegetation structure, particularly overstorey cover, can act as an important moderator of fire effects on bird assemblages. Mechanisms for this response include a greater loss of structure in vegetation characterised by a single low stratum, and a proportionally greater change in bird species composition despite a smaller absolute change in species richness. We discuss our results in the context of a new conceptual model that predicts contrasting richness and composition responses of bird assemblages following disturbance along a gradient of increasing vegetation structure. This model brings a different perspective to current theories of disturbance, and has implications for understanding and managing the effects of fire on biodiversity in heterogeneous landscapes.

Keywords

Conceptual model Community composition Disturbance Habitat complexity Patch-mosaic Succession 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank staff from Parks Australia and the Wreck Bay Aboriginal Community for their strong support of our work. We thank Claire Foster for comments on an early draft of the manuscript. Funding for this study came from Parks Australia, the Department of Defence, and the Australian Research Council. All work reported in this study complies with the current laws of Australia.

Supplementary material

10980_2014_17_MOESM1_ESM.docx (131 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 131 kb)

References

  1. Anderson MJ, Willis TJ (2003) Canonical analysis of principal coordinates: a useful method of constrained ordination for ecology. Ecology 84(2):511–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson MJ, Ellingsen KE, McArdle BH (2006) Multivariate dispersion as a measure of beta diversity. Ecol Lett 9(6):683–693PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atauri JA, de Lucio JV (2001) The role of landscape structure in species richness distribution of birds, amphibians, reptiles and lepidopterans in Mediterranean landscapes. Landscape Ecol 16(2):147–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. August PV (1983) The role of habitat complexity and heterogeneity in structuring tropical mammal communities. Ecology 64(6):1495–1507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barton PS, Cunningham SA, Manning AD, Gibb H, Lindenmayer DB, Didham RK (2013) The spatial scaling of beta diversity. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 22(6):639–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Biswas SR, Wagner HH (2012) Landscape contrast: a solution to hidden assumptions in the metacommunity concept? Landscape Ecol 27(5):621–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bohning-Gaese K (1997) Determinants of avian species richness at different spatial scales. J Biogeogr 24(1):49–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Borer ET, Seabloom EW, Tilman D (2012) Plant diversity controls arthropod biomass and temporal stability. Ecol Lett 15(12):1457–1464PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bradstock RA, Bedward M, Gill AM, Cohn JS (2005) Which mosaic? A landscape ecological approach for evaluating interactions between fire regimes, habitat and animals. Wildl Res 32(5):409–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bradstock RA, Gill AM, Williams RJ (eds) (2012) Flammable Australia: fire regimes, biodiversity and ecosystems in a changing world. CSIRO Publishing, CollingwoodGoogle Scholar
  11. Brotons L, Herrando S, Martin JL (2004) Bird assemblages in forest fragments within Mediterranean mosaics created by wild fires. Landscape Ecol 19(6):663–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clavero M, Brotons L, Herrando S (2011) Bird community specialization, bird conservation and disturbance: the role of wildfires. J Anim Ecol 80(1):128–136PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Collins SL, Calabrese LB (2012) Effects of fire, grazing and topographic variation on vegetation structure in tallgrass prairie. J Veg Sci 23(3):563–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Colwell RK (2013) EstimateS 9.1: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. http://purl.oclc.org/estimates
  15. Connell JH (1978) Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs—high diversity of trees and corals is maintained only in a non-equilibrium state. Science 199(4335):1302–1310PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Coppedge BR, Fuhlendorf SD, Harrell WC, Engle DM (2008) Avian community response to vegetation and structural features in grasslands managed with fire and grazing. Biol Conserv 141(5):1196–1203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cowling RM, Rundel PW, Lamont BB, Arroyo MK, Arianoutsou M (1996) Plant diversity in mediterranean-climate regions. Trends Ecol Evol 11:326–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cunningham RB, Lindenmayer DB, Nix HA, Lindenmayer BD (1999) Quantifying observer heterogeneity in bird counts. Austral Ecol 24:270–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Davis MA, Peterson DW, Reich PB et al (2000) Restoring savanna using fire: impact on the breeding bird community. Restor Ecol 8(1):30–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. de Lima RF, Dallimer M, Atkinson PW, Barlow J (2013) Biodiversity and land-use change: understanding the complex responses of an endemic-rich bird assemblage. Divers Distrib 19(4):411–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Driscoll DA, Lindenmayer DB (2010) Assembly rules are rare in SE Australian bird communities, but sometimes apply in fragmented agricultural landscapes. Ecography 33(5):854–865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Faivre N, Roche P, Boer MM, McCaw L, Grierson PF (2011) Characterization of landscape pyrodiversity in Mediterranean environments: contrasts and similarities between south-western Australia and south-eastern France. Landscape Ecol 26(4):557–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Farnsworth LM, Nimmo DG, Kelly LT, Clarke MF, Bennett AF (2014) Does pyrodiversity beget alpha, beta or gamma diversity? A case study using reptiles from semi-arid Australia. Divers Distrib. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00747.x Google Scholar
  24. Forman RTT (1995) Land mosaics: the ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  25. Fox JW (2013) The intermediate disturbance hypothesis should be abandoned. Trends Ecol Evol 28(2):86–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Franklin JF, Lindenmayer DB, MacMahon JA et al (2000) Threads of continuity: ecosystem disturbances, biological legacies and ecosystem recovery. Conserv Biol Pract 1:8–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Franklin JF, Spies TA, Van Pelt R et al (2002) Disturbances and structural development of natural forest ecosystems with silvicultural implications, using Douglas-fir forests as an example. For Ecol Manage 155(1–3):399–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fuhlendorf SD, Harrell WC, Engle DM, Hamilton RG, Davis CA, Leslie DM (2006) Should heterogeneity be the basis for conservation? Grassland bird response to fire and grazing. Ecol Appl 16(5):1706–1716PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Grossmann EB, Mladenoff DJ (2007) Open woodland and savanna decline in a mixed-disturbance landscape (1938–1998) in the Northwest Wisconsin (USA) Sand Plain. Landscape Ecol 22:43–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hansen RA (2000) Effects of habitat complexity and composition on a diverse litter microarthropod assemblage. Ecology 81(4):1120–1132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. He HS, Mladenoff DJ (1999) Spatially explicit and stochastic simulation of forest-landscape fire disturbance and succession. Ecology 80(1):81–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Heck KL, Wetstone GS (1977) Habitat complexity and invertebrate species richness and abundance in tropical seagrass meadows. J Biogeogr 4(2):135–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ikin K, Beaty RM, Lindenmayer DB, Knight E, Fischer J, Manning AD (2013) Pocket parks in a compact city: how do birds respond to increasing residential density? Landscape Ecol 28(1):45–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Keeley JE, Fotheringham CJ, Baer-Keeley M (2006) Demographic patterns of postfire regeneration in mediterranean climate shrublands of California. Ecol Monogr 76(2):235–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kelly LT, Nimmo DG, Spence-Bailey LM et al (2011) Influence of fire history on small mammal distributions: insights from a 100-year post-fire chronosequence. Divers Distrib 17(3):462–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kelly LT, Nimmo DG, Spence-Bailey LM et al (2012) Managing fire mosaics for small mammal conservation: a landscape perspective. J Appl Ecol 49(2):412–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kerby JD, Fuhlendorf SD, Engle DM (2007) Landscape heterogeneity and fire behavior: scale-dependent feedback between fire and grazing processes. Landscape Ecol 22(4):507–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kutt AS, Martin TG (2010) Bird foraging height predicts bird species response to woody vegetation change. Biodivers Conserv 19(8):2247–2262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lassau SA, Hochuli DF (2004) Effects of habitat complexity on ant assemblages. Ecography 27(2):157–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lavorel S (1999) Ecological diversity and resilience of Mediterranean vegetation to disturbance. Divers Distrib 5:3–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lindenmayer DB, Wood JT, Cunningham RB et al (2008a) Testing hypotheses associated with bird responses to wildfire. Ecol Appl 18(8):1967–1983PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lindenmayer DB, Wood JT, MacGregor C et al (2008b) How predictable are reptile responses to wildfire? Oikos 117(7):1086–1097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lindenmayer DB, MacGregor C, Wood JT et al (2009) What factors influence rapid post-fire site re-occupancy? A case study of the endangered Eastern Bristlebird in eastern Australia. Int J Wildland Fire 18(1):84–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lindenmayer DB, Blanchard W, McBurney L et al (2014) Complex responses of birds to landscape-level fire extent, fire severity and environmental drivers. Divers Distrib. doi: 10.1111/ddi.12172 Google Scholar
  45. MacArthur R, MacArthur JW (1961) On bird species-diversity. Ecology 42(3):594–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Magurran AE, McGill BJ (eds) (2011) Biological diversity: frontiers in measurement and assessment. Oxford University Press Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  47. McCune B, Grace JB (2002) Analysis of ecological communities. MjM Software Design, Gleneden BeachGoogle Scholar
  48. Monamy V, Fox BJ (2000) Small mammal succession is determined by vegetation density rather than time elapsed since disturbance. Austral Ecol 25(6):580–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Montague-Drake RM, Lindenmayer DB, Cunningham RB (2009) Factors affecting site occupancy by woodland bird species of conservation concern. Biol Conserv 142(12):2896–2903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Murphy BP, Bowman D (2012) What controls the distribution of tropical forest and savanna? Ecol Lett 15(7):748–758PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Parr CL, Andersen AN (2006) Patch mosaic burning for biodiversity conservation: a critique of the pyrodiversity paradigm. Conserv Biol 20(6):1610–1619PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pastro LA, Dickman CR, Letnic M (2011) Burning for biodiversity or burning biodiversity? Prescribed burn versus wildfire impacts on plants, lizards, and mammals. Ecol Appl 21(8):3238–3253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Peters DPC, Lugo AE, Chapin FS et al (2011) Cross-system comparisons elucidate disturbance complexities and generalities. Ecosphere 2(7):1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pickett STA, White PS (eds) (1985) The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  55. Pike DA, Webb JK, Shine R (2011) Removing forest canopy cover restores a reptile assemblage. Ecol Appl 21(1):274–280PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Recher HF (1969) Bird species diversity and habitat diversity in Australia and North America. Am Nat 103(929):75–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Recher HF, Holmes RT, Schulz M, Shields J, Kavanagh R (1985) Foraging patterns of breeding birds in eucalypt forest and woodland of southeastern Australia. Austral Ecol 10:399–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Santana J, Porto M, Gordinho L, Reino L, Beja P (2012) Long-term responses of Mediterranean birds to forest fuel management. J Appl Ecol 49(3):632–643Google Scholar
  59. Schimmel J, Granstrom A (1996) Fire severity and vegetation response in the boreal Swedish forest. Ecology 77(5):1436–1450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Smith AL, Bull CM, Driscoll DA (2012) Post-fire succession affects abundance and survival but not detectability in a knob-tailed gecko. Biol Conserv 145(1):139–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tanentzap AJ, Lee WG, Schulz KAC (2013) Niches drive peaked and positive relationships between diversity and disturbance in natural ecosystems. Ecosphere 4(11):133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Tews J, Brose U, Grimm V et al (2004) Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: the importance of keystone structures. J Biogeogr 31(1):79–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Thom D, Seidl R, Steyrer G, Krehan H, Formayer H (2013) Slow and fast drivers of the natural disturbance regime in Central European forest ecosystems. For Ecol Manage 307:293–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tscharntke T, Tylianakis JM, Rand TA et al (2012) Landscape moderation of biodiversity patterns and processes—eight hypotheses. Biol Rev 87(3):661–685PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Turner MG (ed) (1987) Landscape heterogeneity and disturbance. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  66. Turner MG (2010) Disturbance and landscape dynamics in a changing world. Ecology 91(10):2833–2849PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Tyre AJ, Tenhumberg B, Field SA, Niejalke D, Parris K, Possingham HP (2003) Improving precision and reducing bias in biological surveys: estimating false-negative error rates. Ecol Appl 13(6):1790–1801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Vandvik V, Heegaard E, Maren IE, Aarrestad PA (2005) Managing heterogeneity: the importance of grazing and environmental variation on post-fire succession in heathlands. J Appl Ecol 42(1):139–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. VSNI (2013) GenStat for windows, 14th edn. VSNI Ltd., Hemel HempsteadGoogle Scholar
  70. Watson SJ, Taylor RS, Nimmo DG et al (2012) Effects of time since fire on birds: how informative are generalized fire response curves for conservation management? Ecol Appl 22(2):685–696PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Westgate MJ, Driscoll DA, Lindenmayer DB (2012) Can the intermediate disturbance hypothesis and information on species traits predict anuran responses to fire? Oikos 121(10):1516–1524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Whelan RJ (1995) The ecology of fire. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  73. Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GM (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philip S. Barton
    • 1
    • 2
  • Karen Ikin
    • 1
    • 2
  • Annabel L. Smith
    • 1
    • 2
  • Christopher MacGregor
    • 1
  • David B. Lindenmayer
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Fenner School of Environment and SocietyThe Australian National UniversityCanberraAustralia
  2. 2.Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions and National Environmental Research Program Environmental Decisions HubThe Australian National UniversityCanberraAustralia
  3. 3.Long-Term Ecological Research NetworkThe Australian National UniversityCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations