Landscape Ecology

, Volume 28, Issue 9, pp 1743–1754 | Cite as

Habitat edge effects alter ant-guard protection against herbivory

  • Daniel M. Evans
  • Nash E. Turley
  • Joshua J. Tewksbury
Research article

Abstract

Edge effects are among the most important drivers of species interactions in fragmented habitats, but the impacts of edge effects on multitrophic interactions are largely unknown. In this study we assess edge effects on species interactions within an ant–plant mutualistic system—where ants protect plants against herbivory—to determine whether habitat edges alter the amount of protection ants provide. We focus on a single species of myrmecophytic plant, Solanum americanum, and experimentally manipulate ant access to study plants in large-scale fragmented habitat patches at the Savannah River Site National Environmental Research Park, USA. In this system, S. americanum commonly hosts honeydew-producing aphids that are tended by ants, and grasshoppers are the primary herbivores. We measured edge effects on the per-plant abundance of aphids and protective ants as well as the abundance of grasshoppers in each habitat patch, and we evaluated levels of ant protection against herbivory near and far from habitat edges. We found that ants provided significant protection to plants far from edges, where herbivory pressure was highest, despite the fact that aphids and ants were least abundant on these plants. Conversely, ants did not provide significant protection near edges, where herbivory pressure was lowest and aphids and ants were most abundant. We conclude that a strong edge effect on grasshopper abundance was a key factor determining the amount of protection ants provided against herbivory. Future studies of the impacts of habitat fragmentation on ant–plant mutualisms will benefit from studies of ant behavior in response to herbivory threats, and studies of edge effects on other species interactions may also need to consider how species’ behavioral patterns influence the interactions in question.

Keywords

Habitat edges Multitrophic species interactions Ant–plant mutualism Insect herbivory Solanum americanum Savannah River Site, South Carolina, USA 

References

  1. Agrawal AA (2011) Current trends in the evolutionary ecology of plant defence. Funct Ecol 25:420–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agrawal AA, Rutter MT (1998) Dynamic anti-herbivore defense in ant-plants: the role of induced responses. Oikos 83:227–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bach CE, Kelly D (2004) Effects of forest edges on herbivory in a New Zealand mistletoe, Alepis flavida. N Z J Ecol 28:195–205Google Scholar
  4. Bates D, Sarkar D (2010) lme4: Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using S4 Classes. R package version 0.999375-33. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/index.html. Accessed 17 July 2013
  5. Beattie AJ (1985) The evolutionary ecology of ant–plant mutualisms. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beattie AJ, Hughes L (2002) Ant–plant interactions. In: Herrera CM, Pellmyr O (eds) Plant–animal interactions: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp 211–235Google Scholar
  7. Braschler B, Lampel G, Baur B (2003) Experimental small-scale grassland fragmentation alters aphid population dynamics. Oikos 100:581–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bretz F, Hothorn T, Westfall P (2010) Multiple Comparisons Using R. CRC Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bronstein JL (1994) Conditional outcomes in mutualistic interactions. Trends Ecol Evol 9:214–217PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bruna EM, Lapola DM, Vasconcelos HL (2004) Interspecific variation in the defensive responses of obligate plant–ants: experimental tests and consequences for herbivory. Oecologia 138:558–565PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bruna EM, Vasconcelos HL, Heredia S (2005) The effect of habitat fragmentation on communities of mutualists: amazonian ants and their host plants. Biol Conserv 124:209–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carroll CR, Janzen DH (1973) Ecology of foraging ants. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 4:231–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carvalho KS, Vasconcelos HL (1999) Forest fragmentation in central amazonia and its effects on litter-dwelling ants. Biol Conserv 91:151–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Casida JE, Quistad GB (eds) (1995) Pyrethrum flowers: production, chemistry, toxicology, and uses. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  15. Collinge SK (2009) Ecology of fragmented landscapes. Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  16. Crawley MJ (2007) The R book. Wiley and Sons, ChichesterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cushman JH, Addicott JF (1991) Conditional interactions in ant–plant-herbivore mutualisms. In: Huxley CR, Cutler DF (eds) Ant–plant interactions. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 92–103Google Scholar
  18. Debuse VJ, King J, House APN (2007) Effect of fragmentation, habitat loss and within-patch habitat characteristics on ant assemblages in semi-arid woodlands of eastern Australia. Landscape Ecol 22:731–745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Evans DM, Turley NE, Levey DJ, Tewksbury JJ (2012) Habitat patch shape, not corridors, determines herbivory and fruit production of an annual plant. Ecology 93:1016–1025PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fagan WE, Cantrell RS, Cosner C (1999) How habitat edges change species interactions. American Naturalist 153:165–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fiala B, Maschwitz U (1990) Studies on the South East-Asian ant–plant association crematogaster: Borneensis macaranga—adaptations of the ant partner. Insectes Soc 37:212–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Frechette B, Bejan M, Lucas E, Giordanengo P, Vincent C (2010) Resistance of wild Solanum accessions to aphids and other potato pests in Quebec field conditions. J Insect Sci 10:16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Futuyma DJ, Agrawal AA (2009) Macroevolution and the biological diversity of plants and herbivores. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:18054–18061PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gibb H, Johansson T (2010) Forest succession and harvesting of hemipteran honeydew by boreal ants. Ann Zool Fenn 47:99–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Horvitz CC, Schemske DW (1984) Effects of ants and an ant-tended herbivore on seed production of a Neotropical herb. Ecology 65:1369–1378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hothorn TF, Bretz P, Westfall RM, Heiberger, Schutzenmeister A (2010) multcomp: Simultaneous Inference for General Linear Hypotheses. R package version 1.1-7. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/multcomp/index.html. Accessed 17 July 2013
  28. Hubner G (2000) Differential interactions between an aphid endohyperparasitoid and three honeydew-collecting ant species: a field study of Alloxysta brevis (Thomson) (Hymenoptera:Alloxystidae). J Insect Behav 13:771–784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Janzen DH (1966) Coevolution of mutualism between ants and acacias in Central America. Evolution 20:249–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Janzen DH (1967) Interaction of the bull’s-horn acacia (Acacia cornigera L.) with an ant inhabitant (Pseudomyrmex ferruginea F. Smith) in eastern Mexico. Univ Kans Sci Bull 47:315–558Google Scholar
  31. Janzen DH (1969) Allelopathy by myrmecophytes: ant azteca as an allelopathic agent of Cecropia. Ecology 50:147–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Johnson JB, Omland KS (2004) Model selection in ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 19:101–108PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kaplan I, Eubanks MD (2005) Aphids alter the community-wide impact of fire ants. Ecology 86:1640–1649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lapola DM, Bruna EM, Vasconcelos HL (2003) Contrasting responses to induction cues by ants inhabiting Maieta guianensis (Melastomataceae). Biotropica 35:295–300Google Scholar
  35. Laurance WF, Camargo JLC, Luizao RCC, Laurance SG, Pimm SL, Bruna EM, Stouffer PC, Williamson GB, Benitez-Malvido J, Vasconcelos HL, Van Houtan KS, Zartman CE, Boyle SA, Didham RK, Andrade A, Lovejoy TE (2011) The fate of Amazonian forest fragments: a 32-year investigation. Biol Conserv 144:56–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lopez-Barrera F, Manson RH, Gonzalez-Espinosa M, Newton AC (2006) Effects of the type of montane forest edge on oak seedling establishment along forest-edge-exterior gradients. For Ecol Manag 225:234–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Martinson H (2009) Interactions lost and gained: a review of how trophic interactions are impacted by the fragmentation of habitats. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Maryland, College ParkGoogle Scholar
  38. Massad TJ, Fincher RM, Smilanich AM, Dyer L (2011) A quantitative evaluation of major plant defense hypotheses, nature versus nurture, and chemistry versus ants. Arthropod Plant Interact 5:125–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Meiners SJ, Handel SN, Pickett STA (2000) Tree seedling establishment under insect herbivory: edge effects and interannual variation. Plant Ecol 151:161–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Messina FJ (1981) Plant protection as a consequence of an ant-membracid mutualism: interactions on goldenrod (Solidago sp.). Ecology 62:1433–1440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ness JH, Bronstein IL (2004) The effects of invasive ants on prospective ant mutualists. Biol Invasions 6:445–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Oliveira PS, Del-Claro K (2005) Multitrophic interactions in a Neotropical savannah: ant-hemipteran systems, associated insect herbivores, and a host plant. In: Burslem DFRP, Pinard MA, Hartley SE (eds) Biotic interactions in the tropics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  43. Oliveira PS, Freitas AVL (2004) Ant-plant-herbivore interactions in the neotropical cerrado savanna. Naturwissenschaften 91:557–570PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Orrock JL, Curler GR, Danielson BJ, Coyle DR (2011) Large-scale experimental landscapes reveal distinctive effects of patch geometry and connectivity on arthropod communities. Landscape Ecol 26:1361–1372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pompon J, Li XQ, Pelletier Y (2011) Resistance level to an aphid potato pest varies between genotypes from the same solanum accession. J Econ Entomol 104:1075–1079PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. R Development Core Team (2010) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  47. Rico-Gray V, Oliveira PS (2007) The ecology and evolution of ant–plant interactions. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ries L, Fletcher RJ, Battin J, Sisk TD (2004) Ecological responses to habitat edges: mechanisms, models, and variability explained. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:491–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schupp EW, Feener DH (1991) Ant-defended plants in a Panamanian forest. In: Huxley CR, Cutler DF (eds) Ant–plant interactions. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  50. Semtner PJ, Tilson WM, Dara SK (1998) Performance of the tobacco aphid (Homoptera:Aphididae) on various host plants. J Entomol Sci 33:180–195Google Scholar
  51. Shibao H, Morimoto M, Okumura Y, Shimada M (2009) Fitness costs and benefits of ant attendance and soldier production for the social aphid Pseudoregma bambucicola (Homoptera:Aphididae:Hormaphidinae). Sociobiology 54:673–698Google Scholar
  52. Stadler B, Dixon AFG (2005) Ecology and evolution of aphid–ant interactions. Annual Review Of Ecology Evolution And Systematics, pp 345–372 Google Scholar
  53. Stechmann DH, Volkl W, Stary P (1996) Ant-attendance as a critical factor in the biological control of the banana aphid Pentalonia nigronervosa Coq (Homptera:Aphididae) in Oceania. J Appl Entomol Zeitschrift Fur Angewandte Entomologie 120:119–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Styrsky JD, Eubanks MD (2010) A facultative mutualism between aphids and an invasive ant increases plant reproduction. Ecol Entomol 35:190–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tscharntke T, Brandl R (2004) Plant–insect interactions in fragmented landscapes. Annu Rev Entomol 49:405–430PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tscharntke T, Steffan-Dewenter I, Kruess A, Thies C (2002) Characteristics of insect populations on habitat fragments: a mini review. Ecol Res 17:229–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Valladares G, Salvo A, Cagnolo L (2006) Habitat fragmentation effects on trophic processes of insect–plant food webs. Conserv Biol 20:212–217PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Vasconcelos HL (1991) Mutualism between Maieta guianensis Aubl, a myrmecophytic melastome, and one of its ant inhabitants: ant protection against insect herbivores. Oecologia 87:295–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Warriner RA, Gold RE, Austin JW (2008) Ecology of Dorymyrmex flavus (Hymenoptera:Formicidae) in Central Texas, including aspects of competition with Solenopsis invicta Buren. Sociobiology 52:229–250Google Scholar
  60. Way MJ (1963) Mutualism between ants and honeydew-producing homoptera. Ann Rev Entomol 8:307–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Westfall PH (1997) Multiple testing of general contrasts using logical constraints and correlations. J Am Stat Assoc 92:299–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Westfall PH, Troendle JF (2008) Multiple testing with minimal assumptions. Biometrical J 50:745–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wimp GM, Murphy SM, Lewis D, Ries L (2011) Do edge responses cascade up or down a multi-trophic food web? Ecol Lett 14:863–870PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel M. Evans
    • 1
  • Nash E. Turley
    • 2
  • Joshua J. Tewksbury
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  2. 2.Department of BiologyUniversity of Toronto MississaugaMississaugaCanada

Personalised recommendations