Conservation planning in a fire-prone Mediterranean region: threats and opportunities for bird species
In response to the processes threatening biodiversity such as habitat loss, effective selection of priority conservation areas is required. However, reserve selection methods usually ignore the drivers of future habitat changes, thus compromising the effectiveness of conservation. In this work, we formulated an approach to explicitly quantify the impact of fire on conservation areas, considering such disturbance as a driver of land-cover changes. The estimated fire impact was integrated as a constraint in the reserve selection process to tackle the likely threats or opportunities that fire disturbance might cause to the targeted species depending on their habitat requirements. In this way, we selected conservation areas in a fire-prone Mediterranean region for two bird assemblages: forest and open-habitat species. Differences in conservation areas selected before and after integrating the impact of fire in the reserve selection process were assessed. Integration of fire impact for forest species moved preferences towards areas that were less prone to burn. However, a larger area was required to achieve the same conservation goals. Conversely, integration of fire impacts for open-habitat species shifted preferences towards conservation areas in locations where the persistence of their required habitat is more likely (i.e. shrublands). In other words, we prioritized the conservation of not only the current distribution of open-habitat birds, but also the disturbance process (i.e. fire) that favours their preferred habitat and distributions in the long term. Finally, this work emphasizes the need to consider the opposing potential impacts of wildfires on species for an effective conservation planning.
KeywordsWildfires Land-cover changes Priority areas Fire impact Bird assemblage Marxan Spatial planning
We thank all volunteers that participated in the CBBA. This work has received financial support from the Spanish Government Grants CGL2008-05506-C02-01/BOS, Consolider-Montes CSD2008-00040, the Catalan Government Grant SGR2009-531, the EU-FP7-SCALES project and CGL2011-29539/BOS BIONOVEL project. Thanks to D. Guixé for their help with the species classification. SV benefited from a BE grant and FI fellowship with the support from the CUR of the DIUE from the GC and the European Social Fund.
- Ardron JA, Possingham HP, Klein CJ (eds) (2008) Marxan good practices handbook. Pacific Marine Analysis and Research Association, VancouverGoogle Scholar
- Ball IR, Possingham HP, Watts M (2009) Marxan and relatives: software for spatial conservation prioritisation. In: Moilanen A, Wilson KA, Possingham HP (eds) Spatial conservation prioritisation: quantitative methods and computational tools. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 185–195Google Scholar
- Estrada J, Pedrocchi V, Brotons L, Herrando S (2004) Atles dels ocells nidificants de Catalunya (1999–2002). Lynx Edicions, BarcelonaGoogle Scholar
- International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) (2003) Guidelines for application of IUCN red list criteria at regional levels: Version 3.0. IUCN Species Survival Commission. IUCN, Gland and Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
- Kinnaird MF, O’brien TG (1998) Ecological effects of wildfire on lowland rainforest in Sumatra. Conserv Biol 12:954–956Google Scholar
- Moilanen A, Wilson KA, Possingham HP (eds) (2009) Spatial conservation prioritisation: quantitative methods and computational tools. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Tucker GM, Heath MF, Tomialocjc L, Grimmett RFA (1994) Birds in Europe: their conservation status. Birdlife International, CambridgeGoogle Scholar