Empirical estimation of dispersal resistance surfaces: a case study with red-cockaded woodpeckers
- 898 Downloads
Persistence of wildlife populations depends on the degree to which landscape features facilitate animal movements between isolated habitat patches. Due to limited data availability, the effect of landscape features on animal dispersal is typically estimated using expert opinion. With sufficient data, however, resistance surfaces can be estimated empirically. After modeling suitable prospecting habitat using an extensive dataset from the federally endangered red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis), we used data from over 800 prospecting events from 34 radio-tagged birds to identify the best relationship between habitat suitability and resistance surfaces. Our results demonstrated that juvenile female P. borealis prospecting for new territories beyond their natal territories preferred to traverse through forests with tall canopy and minimal midstory vegetation. The non-linear relationship between habitat suitability and resistance surfaces was the most biologically relevant transformation, which in turn identified the specific forest composition that promoted and inhibited prospecting and dispersal behavior. These results corresponded with over 60 % of dispersal events from an independent dataset of short-distance dispersal events. This new understanding of P. borealis prospecting behavior will help to identify areas necessary for maintaining habitat connectivity and to implement effective management strategies. Our approach also provides a framework to not only estimate and evaluate resistance surfaces based on species-specific responses to intervening landscape features, but also addresses an often-neglected step, selecting a biologically relevant function to transform habitat suitability model into a resistance surface.
KeywordsNatal dispersal Picoides borealis Prospecting Radio-telemetry LiDAR
We thank D. Urban, C. Song, J. Weiss for suggestions regarding study design and analyses. J. Kappes, D. Kesler, and D. Kuefler collaborated in the design and execution of the radio-telemetry field study. We would also like to thank the Sandhills Ecological Institute and Fort Bragg’s Endangered Species Branch for all their efforts in collecting and organizing the extensive monitoring data. We are grateful to the North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program for providing LiDAR data. We thank Z. Cleveland, P. Beier and an anonymous reviewer for extremely helpful suggestions and comments. Funding for this project was provided by the U.S. Department of Defense Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (RC-1471).
- Britcher JJ, Patten JM (2004) Red-cockaded Woodpecker management on Fort Bragg: then and now. In: Costa R, Daniels SJ (eds) Red-cockaded Woodpecker: road to recovery. Hancock House Publishers, Blaine, pp 116–126Google Scholar
- Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Clobert J, Wolff JO, Nichols JD, Danchin E, Dhondt AA (2001) Introduction. In: Clobert J, Danchin E, Dhondt AA, Nichols JD (eds) Dispersal. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp xvii–xxiGoogle Scholar
- Conner RN, Rudolph DC, Walters JR (2001) The red-cockaded Woodpecker: surviving in a fire-maintained ecosystem. University of Texas Press, AustinGoogle Scholar
- Costa R, Daniels SJ (2004) Red-cockaded Woodpecker: road to recovery. Hancock House Publishers, BlaineGoogle Scholar
- Forsman ED, Anthony RG, Reid JA, Loschl PJ, Sovern SG, Taylor M, Biswell BL, Ellingson A, Meslow EC, Miller GS, Swindle KA, Thrailkill JA, Wagner FF, Seaman DE (2002) Natal and breeding dispersal of Northern spotted owls. Wildl Monogr 149:1–35Google Scholar
- Griffith GE, Omernik JM, McGinley M (2007) Ecoregions of North Carolina and South Carolina. In: Cleveland CJ (ed) Encyclopedia of Earth, http://www.epa.gov/wed/pages/ecoregions/ncsc_eco.htm edn. Environmental information coalition, National Council for Science and the Environment, Washington, D.C.
- Hall LS, Krausman PR, Morrison ML (1997) The habitat concept and a plea for standard terminology. Wildl Soc Bull 25:173–182Google Scholar
- Hooper RG, Lennartz MR (1981) Foraging behavior of the red-cockaded woodpecker in South Carolina. Auk 98:321–334Google Scholar
- Manly BFJ, McDonald LL, Thomas DL et al (2002) Resource selection by animals: statistical design and analysis for field studies. Kluwer, BostonGoogle Scholar
- McGaughey RJ (2008) FUSION/LDV: software for LIDAR data analysis and visualization—version 2.65:1-123Google Scholar
- Ott RL, Longnecker M (2001) An introduction to statistical methods and data analysis. Duxbury, Pacific GroveGoogle Scholar
- U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (2003) Recovery plan for the Red-cockaded Woodpecker (Picoides borealis): second revision. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
- U.S. Department of the Interior (1970) Conservation of endangered species and other fish or wildlife. Fed Regist 199:1647–1648Google Scholar
- Walters JR (1990) Red-cockaded Woodpeckers: a ‘primitive’ cooperative breeder. In: Stacey PB, Koenig WD (eds) Cooperative breeding in birds. Cambridge University Press, Great Britain, pp 69–101Google Scholar