Landscape Ecology

, Volume 28, Issue 6, pp 1161–1173 | Cite as

Highlighting order and disorder in social–ecological landscapes to foster adaptive capacity and sustainability

  • Giovanni Zurlini
  • Irene Petrosillo
  • K. Bruce Jones
  • Nicola Zaccarelli
Research Article

Abstract

Landscape sustainability can be considered in terms of order and disorder, where order implies causality, well-defined boundaries and predictable outcomes, while disorder implies uncertain causality, shifting boundaries and often-unpredictable outcomes. We address the interplay of order and disorder in social–ecological landscapes (SELs) using spatiotemporal analysis of entropy-related indices of Normalized Difference Vegetation Index time-series. These indices can provide insights for complex systems analysis for the evaluation of adaptive capacity in SELs. In particular, our overarching aim is to help interpret what an increase of order/disorder means with regards to SELs and the underlying drivers and causes of conditions in SELs. The approach can be used to increase spatially explicit anticipatory capability in environmental science and natural resource management based on how the system has responded to stress in the past. Such capability is crucial to address SEL adaptive capacity and for sustainable planning given that surprises may increase as a consequence of both climate change and multiple interacting anthropogenic stressors. These advancements should greatly contribute to the application of spatial resilience strategies in general, and to sustainable landscape planning in particular, and for the spatially explicit adaptive comanagement of ecosystem services.

Keywords

Spectral entropy Order and disorder Adaptive capacity Sustainability NDVI-related indices 

References

  1. Adger N (1999) Social vulnerability to climate change and extremes in coastal Vietnam. World Dev 2:249–269Google Scholar
  2. Ahern JF (2011) From fail-safe to safe-to-fail: sustainability and resilience in the new urban world. Landscape architecture & regional planning graduate research and creative activity. Paper 8 (online). http://scholarworks.umass.edu/larp_grad_research/8
  3. Antrop M (2005) Why landscapes of the past are important for the future. Landsc Urban Plan 70(1–2):21–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Avery J (2003) Information theory and evolution. World Scientific, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barnes JA, Allan DW (1966) A statistical model of flicker noise. Proc IEEE 54(2):176–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bates JE, Shepard HK (1993) Measuring complexity using information fluctuation. Phys Lett A 172:416–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berkes F, Folke C (eds) (1998) Linking social and ecological systems: management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  8. Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (eds) (2003) Navigating social–ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  9. Bogaert J, Farina A, Ceulemans R (2005) Entropy increase of fragmented habitats: a sign of human impact? Ecol Ind 5:207–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carpenter SR, Brock WA (2008) Adaptive capacity and traps. Ecol Soc 13(2):40 (online). http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss2/art40/ Google Scholar
  11. Carpenter SR, Walker BH, Anderies JM, Abel N (2001) From metaphor to measurement: resilience of what to what? Ecosystems 4:765–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen X, Li B-L, Collina SL (2005) Multiscale monitoring of a multispecies case study: two grass species at Sevilleta. Plant Ecol 179:149–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clark WC, Dickson NM (2003) Sustainability science: the emerging research program. PNAS 100(14):8059–8061PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Costanza R (2003) A vision of the future science: reintegrating the study of human and the rest of nature. Futures 35:651–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Costanza R, Graumlich L, Steffen W, Crumley C, Dearing J, Hibbard K, Leemans R, Redman C, Schimel D (2007a) Sustainability or collapse: what can we learn from integrating the history of humans and the rest of nature? Ambio 36(7):522–527Google Scholar
  16. Costanza R, Fisher B, Mulder K, Shuang L, Treg C (2007b) Biodiversity and ecosystem services: a multi-scale empirical study of the relationship between species richness and net primary production. Ecol Econ 61:478–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Costanza R, Hart M, Posner S, Talberth J (2009) Beyond GDP: the need for new measures of progress. The Pardee papers no. 4. The Frederick S. Pardee Center for the Study of the Longer-Range Future, Boston University, BostonGoogle Scholar
  18. Cumming GS (2011) Spatial resilience: integrating landscape ecology, resilience, and sustainability. Landscape Ecol 26:899–909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Daly H, Cobb J (1989) For the common good. Beacon Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  20. Doak DF, Estes JA, Halpern BS, Jacob U, Lindberg DR, Lovvorn J, Monson DH, Tinker MT, Williams TM, Wootton JT, Carroll I, Emmerson M, Micheli F, Novak M (2008) Understanding and predicting ecological dynamics: are major surprises inevitable? Ecology 89:952–961Google Scholar
  21. Foley JA, DeFries R, Asner GP, Barford C, Bonan G, Carpenter SR, Chapin FS, Coe MT, Daily GC, Gibbs HK, Helkowski JH, Holloway T, Howard EA, Kucharik CJ, Monfreda C, Patz JA, Prentice JC, Ramankutty N, Snyder PK (2005) Global consequences of land use. Science 309(5734):570–574Google Scholar
  22. Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson P, Norberg J (2005) Adaptive governance of social–ecological systems. Annu Rev Environ Resour 30:441–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Folke C, Carpenter SR, Walker B, Scheffer M, Chapin T, Rockström J (2010) Resilience thinking: integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecol Soc 15(4):20 (online). http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art20/ Google Scholar
  24. Green JL, Hastings A, Arzberger P, Ayala FJ, Cottingham KL, Cuddington K, Davis F, Dunne JA, Fortin M-J, Gerber L, Neubert M (2005) Complexity in ecology and conservation: mathematical, statistical, and computational challenges. Bioscience 55:501–510Google Scholar
  25. Guerschman JP, Paruelo JM, Burke IC (2003) Land use impacts on the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index in temperate Argentina. Ecol Appl 13:616–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gunderson LH, Holling CS (eds) (2002) Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  27. Holling CS (2001) Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems 4:390–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Holling CS, Meffe GK (1996) Command and control, and the pathology of natural-resource management. Conserv Biol 10:328–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hrabik TR, Greenfield BK, Lewis DB, Pollard AI, Wilson KA, Kratzet TK (2005) Landscape-scale variation in taxonomic diversity in four groups of aquatic organisms: the influence of physical, chemical, and biological properties. Ecosystems 8:301–317Google Scholar
  30. Jassby AD, Powell TM (1990) Detecting changes in ecological time series. Ecology 71:2044–2052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Johnson GD, Myers WL, Patil GP, Taillie C (2001) Characterizing watershed delineated landscapes in Pennsylvania using conditional entropy profiles. Landscape Ecol 16:597–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kates RW, Clark WC, Corell R (2001) Sustainability science. Science 292(5517):641–642PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kerr JT, Ostrovsky M (2003) From space to species: ecological applications for remote sensing. Trends Ecol Evol 18:299–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kim J, Oki T (2011) Visioneering: an essential framework in sustainability science. Sustain Sci 6:247–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lambin EF, Turner BL, Geist HJ (2001) The causes of land-use and land-cover change: moving beyond the myths. Glob Environ Chang 11:261–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Leitão Botequilha A, Ahern J (2002) Applying landscape ecological concepts and metrics in sustainable landscape planning. Landsc Urban Plan 59:65–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Levin SA (1999) Fragile dominions: complexity and the commons. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. Levin SA, Clark WC (2010) Toward a science of sustainability, CID working paper No. 196. Center for International Development, Harvard University, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  39. Li B-L (2000) Fractal geometry applications in description and analysis of patch patterns and patch dynamics. Ecol Model 132:33–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Li H, Reynolds JF (1994) A simulation experiment to quantify spatial heterogeneity in categorical maps. Ecology 75(8):2446–2455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lindenmayer DB, Likensa GE, Krebsc CJ, Hobbs RJ (2010) Improved probability of detection of ecological “surprises”. PNAS 107(51):21957–21962PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Magurran AE (2004) Measuring biological diversity. Blackwell Science, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  43. McAlpine CA, Seabrook LM, Rhodes JR, Maron M, Smith C, Bowen ME, Butler SA, Powell O, Ryan JG, Fyfe CT, Adams-Hosking C, Smith A, Robertson O, Howes A, Cattarino L (2010) Can a problem-solving approach strengthen landscape ecology’s contribution to sustainable landscape planning? Landscape Ecol 25:1155–1168Google Scholar
  44. Meadows D (2008) Thinking in systems: a primer. Chelsea Green, VermontGoogle Scholar
  45. Mildrexler DJ, Zhao M, Heinsch FA, Running SW (2007) A new satellite-based methodology for continental scale disturbance detection. Ecol Appl 17(1):235–250PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment [MEA] (2005) Ecosystems and human wellbeing: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  47. Musacchio L (2009) The scientific basis for the design of landscape sustainability: a conceptual framework for translational landscape research and practice for designed landscapes and the six Es of landscape sustainability. Landscape Ecol 24:993–1013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Musacchio L (2011) The grand challenge to operationalize landscape sustainability and the design-in-science paradigm. Landscape Ecol 26:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Nassauer JI, Opdam P (2008) Design in science: extending the landscape ecology paradigm. Landscape Ecol 23:633–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Naveh Z (2007) Landscape ecology and sustainability. Landscape Ecol 22:1437–1440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Olsson P, Folke C, Berkes F (2004) Adaptive comanagement for building resilience in social–ecological systems. Environ Manag 34:75–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Opdam P, Wascher D (2004) Climate change meets habitat fragmentation: linking landscape and biogeographical scale levels in research and conservation. Biol Conserv 117:285–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Opdam P, Foppen R, Vos CC (2002) Bridging the gap between ecology and spatial planning in landscape ecology. Landscape Ecol 16:767–779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Parrott L (2005) Quantifying the complexity of simulated spatiotemporal population dynamics. Ecol Complex 2:175–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Parrott L (2010) Measuring ecological complexity. Ecol Ind 10:1069–1076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Peterson GD (2002) Estimating resilience across landscapes. Conserv Ecol 6(1):17 (online). http://www.consecol.org/vol6/iss1/art17/ Google Scholar
  57. Petrosillo I, Müller F, Jones KB, Zurlini G, Krauze K, Victorov S, Li B-L, Kepner WG (2008) Use of landscape sciences for the assessment of environmental security. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  58. Petrosillo I, Zaccarelli N, Zurlini G (2010a) Multiscale vulnerability of natural capital. Ecol Complex 7:359–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Petrosillo I, Vassallo P, Valente D, Mensa JA, Fabiano M, Zurlini G (2010b) Mapping the environmental risk of a tourist harbor in order to foster environmental security: objective vs. subjective assessments. Marine Pollut Bull 60:1051–1058Google Scholar
  60. Pettorelli N, Vik JO, Mysterud A, Gaillard J-M, Tucker CJ, Stenseth NC (2005) Using the satellite-derived NDVI to assess ecological responses to environmental change. Trends Ecol Evol 20(9):503–510Google Scholar
  61. Potter C, Tan PN, Steinbach M, Klooster S, Kumar V, Myneni R, Genovese V (2003) Major disturbance events in terrestrial ecosystems detected using global satellite data sets. Glob Change Biol 9:1005–1021Google Scholar
  62. Rocchini D, Andreini Butini S, Chiarucci A (2005) Maximizing plant species inventory efficiency by means of remotely sensed spectral distances. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 14:431–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson Å, Chapin FS III, Lambin E, Lenton TM, Scheffer M, Folke C, Schellnhuber HJ, Nykvist B, de Wit CA, Hughes T, van der Leeuw S, Rodhe H, Sörlin S, Snyder PK, Costanza R, Svedin U, Falkenmark M, Karlberg L, Corell RW, Fabry VJ, Hansen J, Walker B, Liverman D, Richardson K, Crutzen P, Foley J (2009) Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecol Soc 14(2):32 (online). http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss2/art32/ Google Scholar
  64. Rodríguez-Arias M, Rodó X (2004) A primer on the study of transitory dynamics in ecological series using the scale-dependent correlation analysis. Oecologia 138:485–504PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Scheffer M, Carpenter SR (2003) Catastrophic regime shifts in ecosystems: linking theory to observation. Trends Ecol Evol 18(12):648–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Scheffer M, Brock WA, Westley F (2000) Socioeconomic mechanisms preventing optimum use of ecosystem services: an interdisciplinary theoretical analysis. Ecosystems 3:451–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Scheffer M, Bascompte J, Brock WA, Brovkin V, Carpenter SR, Dakos V, Held H, van Nes EH, Rietkerk M, Sugihara G (2009) Early-warning signals for critical transitions. Nature 461:53–59Google Scholar
  68. Shuman B, Henderson AK, Plank C, Stefanova I, Ziegler SS (2009) Woodland-to-forest transition during prolonged drought in Minnesota after ca. AD 1300. Ecology 90:2792–2807Google Scholar
  69. Snowden DJ, Boone ME (2007) A leader’s framework for decision making. Harv Bus Rev 85:68–76PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Steel JH (1985) A comparison of terrestrial and marine ecological systems. Nature 313:355–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Termorshuizen JW, Opdam P (2009) Landscape services as a bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development. Landscape Ecol 24:1037–1052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Turner BL II, Lambin EF, Reenberg A (2007) The emergence of land change science for global environmental change and sustainability. PNAS 104(52):20666–20671PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Ulanowicz RE (2001) Information theory in ecology. Comput Chem 25:393–399PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wackerbauer R, Witt A, Atmanspacher H, Kurths J, Scheingraber H (1994) A comparative classification of complexity measures. Chaos Soliton Fract 4(1):133–173Google Scholar
  75. Wagner HH, Wildi O, Ewald KC (2000) Additive partitioning of plant species diversity in an agricultural mosaic landscape. Landscape Ecol 15:219–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Walker BH, Salt D (2006) Resilience thinking: sustaining ecosystems and people in a changing world. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  77. Walker BH, Carpenter SR, Anderies J, Abel N, Cumming G, Janssen M, Lebel L, Norberg J, Peterson GD, Pritchard R (2002) Resilience management in social–ecological systems: a working hypothesis for a participatory approach. Conserv Ecol 6(1):14 (online). http://www.consecol.org/vol6/iss1/art14 Google Scholar
  78. Westley F, Zimmerman B, Patton M (2006) Getting to maybe. Random House of Canada, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  79. White PS, Jentsch A (2001) The search for generality in studies of disturbance and ecosystem dynamics. Prog Bot 62:399–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Williams JW, Jackson ST (2007) Novel climates, no-analog communities, and ecological surprises. Front Ecol Environ 5:475–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wu J (2006) Landscape ecology, cross-disciplinarity, and sustainability science. Landscape Ecol 21:1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Wu J (2010) Urban sustainability: an inevitable goal of landscape research. Landscape Ecol 25:1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Wylie BK, Zhang L, Bliss N, Ji L, Tieszen LL, Jolly WM (2008) Integrating modelling and remote sensing to identify ecosystem performance anomalies in the boreal forest, Yukon River Basin, Alaska. Int J Digit Earth 1(2):196–220Google Scholar
  84. Young SS, Harris R (2005) Changing patterns of global-scale vegetation photosynthesis, 1982–1999. Int J Remote Sens 26(20):4537–4563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Zaccarelli N, Petrosillo I, Zurlini G, Riitters KH (2008) Source/sink patterns of disturbance and cross-scale effects in a panarchy of social–ecological landscapes. Ecol Soc 13(1):26. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss1/art26/ Google Scholar
  86. Zaccarelli N, Li B-L, Petrosillo I, Zurlini G (2012) Order and disorder in ecological time-series: introducing normalized spectral entropy. Ecol Ind. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.07.008 Google Scholar
  87. Zhang X, Friedl MA, Schaaf CB, Strahler AH, Hodges JCF, Gao F, Reed BC, Huete A (2003) Monitoring vegetation phenology using MODIS. Remote Sens Environ 84:471–475Google Scholar
  88. Zurlini G, Zaccarelli N, Petrosillo I (2006a) Indicating retrospective resilience of multi-scale patterns of real habitats in a landscape. Ecol Ind 6:184–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Zurlini G, Riitters KH, Zaccarelli N, Petrosillo I, Jones KB, Rossi L (2006b) Disturbance patterns in a social–ecological system at multiple scales. Ecol Complex 3(2):119–128Google Scholar
  90. Zurlini G, Riitters KH, Zaccarelli N, Petrosillo I (2007) Patterns of disturbance at multiple scales in real and simulated landscapes. Landscape Ecol 22:705–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giovanni Zurlini
    • 1
  • Irene Petrosillo
    • 1
  • K. Bruce Jones
    • 2
  • Nicola Zaccarelli
    • 1
  1. 1.Landscape Ecology Laboratory, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences and TechnologiesUniversity of SalentoLecceItaly
  2. 2.U.S. Geological SurveyLas VegasUSA

Personalised recommendations