Advertisement

Landscape Ecology

, Volume 27, Issue 7, pp 1015–1030 | Cite as

Evaluating the effects of upstream lakes and wetlands on lake phosphorus concentrations using a spatially-explicit model

  • Tao Zhang
  • Patricia A. Soranno
  • Kendra Spence Cheruvelil
  • Daniel B. Kramer
  • Mary Tate Bremigan
  • Arika Ligmann-Zielinska
Research Article

Abstract

Lake phosphorus concentrations are strongly influenced by the surrounding landscape that generates phosphorus loads and water inflow to lakes, and the physical characteristics of the lake that determine the fate of these inputs. In addition, the presence, connectivity, and configuration of upstream lakes and wetlands likely affect downstream lake phosphorus concentrations. These freshwater landscape features have only sometimes been incorporated into phosphorus loading models, perhaps because of the need for spatially-explicit approaches that account for their location and hydrologic configuration. In this paper, we developed a lake phosphorus concentration model that includes three modules to estimate phosphorus loading, water inflow, and phosphorus retention, respectively. In modeling phosphorus loading and water inflow, we used a spatially-explicit approach to address their export at sources and their attenuation along flow-paths. We used 161 headwater lakes for model calibration and 28 headwater lakes for model validation. Using the calibrated model, we examined the effects of upstream lakes and wetlands on downstream lake phosphorus concentrations. To examine the effects of upstream lakes, we compared the output of the calibrated model for three additional datasets (208 lakes in total) that contained increasing area of upstream lakes. To examine the effect of upstream wetlands, we used the calibrated model to compare flow-path cell series that contained wetlands and those that did not. In addition, we simulated catchments in which all wetlands were converted to forest and recalculated downstream lake phosphorus concentrations. We found that upstream lakes decreased the phosphorus concentrations in downstream lakes; and, counter-intuitively, we found that wetlands increased phosphorus concentrations in most downstream lakes. The latter result was due to the fact that although wetlands reduced phosphorus loads to downstream lakes, they also reduced water inflow to downstream lakes and thus increased the phosphorus concentration of inflows to lakes. Our results suggest that when modeling lake phosphorus concentrations, freshwater features of the landscape and their spatial arrangement should be taken into account.

Keywords

Lake phosphorus concentration Spatially-explicit modeling Wetland Upstream lake Flow-path Distance-attenuation effect 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Financial support for this work was provided by the Center for Water Sciences at Michigan State University (MSU). We thank Katie Droscha for assembling the lake nutrient and LULC datasets, and C. Emi Fergus for help with the literature related to wetland effects and comments on earlier drafts. Thanks to Sarah AcMoody, Justin Booth, and Dave Lusch at MSU’s Remote Sensing and GIS Outreach and Research Services for consultation and creation of some of the databases used in this study as well as for catchment delineations and LULC summaries. We also thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions.

References

  1. Abu-Zreig M, Rudra RP, Whiteley HR, Lalonde MN, Kaushik NK (2003) Phosphorus removal in vegetated filter strips. J Environ Qual 32:613–619PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahlgren I, Frisk T, Kamp-Nielsen L (1988) Empirical and theoretical models of phosphorus loading, retention and concentration vs. lake trophic state. Hydrobiologia 170:285–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alexander RB, Elliott AH, Shankar U, McBride GB (2002) Estimating the sources and transport of nutrients in the Waikato River Basin, New Zealand. Water Resour Res 38:1268. doi: 10.1029/2001WR000878 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baker LA (1992) Introduction to nonpoint source pollution in the United States and propects for wetland use. Ecol Eng 1:1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baker ME, Weller DE, Jordan TE (2006) Improved methods for quantifying potential nutrient interception by riparian buffers. Landscape Ecol 21:1327–1345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beckert KA, Fisher TR, O’Neil JM, Jesien RV (2011) Characterization and comparison of stream nutrients, land use, and loading patterns in Maryland coastal bay watersheds. Water Air Soil Pollut 221:255–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bedford BL, Walbridge MR, Aldous A (1999) Patterns in nutrient availability and plant diversity of temperate North American wetlands. Ecology 80:2151–2169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Borah DK, Bera M (2003) Watershed-scale hydrologic and nonpoint-source pollution models: review of mathematical bases. Trans ASAE 46:1553–1566Google Scholar
  9. Borah DK, Bera M (2004) Watershed-scale hydrologic and nonpoint-source pollution models: review of applications. Trans ASAE 47:789–803Google Scholar
  10. Bouraoui F (1994) Development of a continuous, physically-based, distributed parameter, nonpoint source model. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, DissertationGoogle Scholar
  11. Bowden WB (1987) The biogeochemistry of nitrogen in freshwater wetlands. Biogeochemistry 4:313–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brett MT, Benjamin MM (2008) A review and reassessment of lake phosphorus retention and the nutrient loading concept. Freshw Biol 53:194–211Google Scholar
  13. Brett MT, Arhonditsis GB, Mueller SE, Hartley DM, Frodge JD, Funke DE (2005) Non-point-source impacts on stream nutrient concentrations along a forest to urban gradient. Environ Manage 35:330–342PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Breuer L, Vaché KB, Julich S, Frede H-G (2008) Current concepts in nitrogen dynamics for mesoscale catchments. Hydrol Sci J 53:1059–1074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bryhn AC, Håkanson L (2007) A comparison of predictive phosphorus load-concentration models for lakes. Ecosystems 10:1084–1099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Canham CD, Pace ML, Papaik MJ, Primack AGB, Roy KM, Maranger RJ, Curran RP, Spada DM (2004) A spatially-explicit watershed-scale analysis of dissolved organic carbon in Adirondack lakes. Ecol Appl 14:839–854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cifaldi RL, Allan JD, Duh JD, Brown DG (2004) Spatial patterns in land cover of exurbanizing watersheds in southeastern Michigan. Landsc Urban Plan 66:107–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Detenbeck NE, Johnston CA, Niemi GJ (1993) Wetland effects on lake water quality in the Minneapolis/St. Paul metropolitan area. Landscape Ecol 8:39–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Detenbeck NE, Taylor DL, Lima A, Hagley C (1996) Temporal and spatial variability in water quality of wetlands in the Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN metropolitan area: implications for monitoring strategies and designs. Environ Monit Assess 40:11–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Devito KJ (1997) Flow reversals in peatlands influenced by local groundwater systems. Hydrol Process 11:103–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Devito KJ, Creed IF, Rothwell RL, Prepas EE (2000) Landscape controls on phosphorus loading to boreal lakes: implications for the potential impacts of forest harvesting. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 57:1977–1984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Diebel MW, Maxted JT, Robertson DM, Han S, Vander Zanden MJ (2009) Landscape planning for agricultural nonpoint source pollution reduction III: assessing phosphorus and sediment reduction potential. Environ Manage 43:69–83PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fergus CE, Soranno PA, Spence Cheruvelil K, Bremigan MT (2011) Multiscale landscape and wetland drivers of lake total phosphorus and color. Limnol Oceanogr 56:2127–2146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fisher J, Acreman MC (2004) Wetland nutrient removal: a review of the evidence. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 8:673–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fuller LM, Minnerick RJ (2008) State and regional water quality characteristics and trophic conditions of MI’s inland lakes, 2001–2005. Scientific Investigations Report 2008–5188, U.S. Geological SurveyGoogle Scholar
  26. Gémesi Z, Downing JA, Cruse RM, Anderson PF (2011) Effects of watershed configuration and composition on downstream lake water quality. J Environ Qual 40:517–527PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gergel SE (2005) Spatial and non-spatial factors: when do they affect landscape indicators of watershed loading? Landscape Ecol 20:177–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Giasson E, Bryant RB, DeGloria SD (2002) GIS-based spatial indices for identification of potential phosphorous export at watershed scale. J Soil Water Conserv 57:373–381Google Scholar
  29. Goodman KJ, Baker MA, Wurtsbaugh WA (2010) Mountain lakes increase organic matter decomposition rates in streams. J N Am Benthol Soc 29:521–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Grayson RB, Moore ID, McMahon TA (1992) Physically based hydrologic modeling: 2. Is the concept realistic? Water Resour Res 26:2659–2666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hunsaker CT, Levine DA (1995) Hierarchical approaches to the study of water quality in rivers. Bioscience 45:193–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Imboden DM (1974) Phosphorus model of lake eutrophication. Limnol Oceanogr 19:297–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Johnson GD, Myers WL, Patil GP (2001) Predictability of surface water pollution loading in Pennsylvania using watershed-based landscape measurements. J Am Water Resour Assoc 37:821–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Johnston CA (1991) Sediment and nutrient retention by freshwater wetlands: effects on surface water quality. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 21:491–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jones KB, Neale AC, Nash MS, Van Remortel RD, Wickham JD, Riitters KH, O’Neill RV (2001) Predicting nutrient and sediment loadings to streams from landscape metrics: a multiple watershed study from the United States Mid-Atlantic Region. Landscape Ecol 16:301–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kadlec RH, Bevis FB (1990) Wetlands and wastewater: Kinross, Michigan. Wetlands 10:77–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt CD Jr, Vecchi MP (1983) Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220:671–680PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Levine DA (1992) A geographic information system approach to modeling nutrient and sediment transport. Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, PhD dissertationGoogle Scholar
  39. Malmaeus JM, Blenckner T, Markensten H, Persson I (2006) Lake phosphorus dynamics and climate warming: a mechanistic model approach. Ecol Model 190:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Marcarelli AM, Wurtsbaugh WA (2007) Effects of upstream lakes and nutrient limitation on periphytic biomass and nitrogen fixation in oligotrophic, subalpine streams. Freshw Biol 52:2211–2225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Moriasi DN, Arnold JG, Van Liew MW, Bingner RL, Harmel RD, Veith TL (2007) Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Trans ASABE 50:885–900Google Scholar
  42. Neff BP, Day SM, Piggott AR, Fuller LM (2005) Base flow in the Great Lakes Basin. Scientific Investigations Report 2005–5217, U.S. Geological SurveyGoogle Scholar
  43. Ontkean GR, Chanasyk DS, Riemersma S, Bennett DR, Brunen JM (2003) Enhanced prairie wetland effects on surface water quality in Crowfoot Creek, Alberta. Water Qual Res J Can 38:335–359Google Scholar
  44. Powers SM, Johnson RA, Stanley EH (2012) Nutrient retention and the problem of hydrologic disconnection in streams and wetlands. Ecosystems. doi: 10.1007/s10021-012-9520-8 Google Scholar
  45. Prairie YT, Kalff J (1986) Effect of catchment size on phosphorus export. Water Resour Bull 22:465–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Prepas EE, Planas D, Gibson JJ, Vitt DH, Prowse TD, Dinsmore WP, Halsey LA, McEachern PM, Paquet S, Scrimgeour GJ, Tonn WM, Paszkowski CA, Wolfstein K (2001) Landscape variables influencing nutrients and phytoplankton communities in Boreal Plain lakes of northern Alberta: a comparison of wetland- and upland-dominated catchments. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58:1286–1299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Reckhow KH, Chapra SC (1983) Engineering approaches for lake management, volume 1: data analysis and empirical modeling. Butterworth Publisher, BostonGoogle Scholar
  48. Reddy KR, DeLaune RD (2008) Biogeochemistry of wetlands: science and applications, chapter 3: biogeochemical characteristics. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 27–65Google Scholar
  49. Reddy KR, Kadlec RH, Flaig E, Gale PM (1999) Phosphorus retention in streams and wetlands: a review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 29:83–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Reinhardt M, Gächter R, Wehrli B, Müller B (2005) Phosphorus retention in small constructed wetlands treating agricultural drainage water. J Environ Qual 34:1251–1259PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sivapalan M (2003) Prediction in ungauged basins: a grand challenge for theoretical hydrology. Hydrol Process 17:3163–3170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Smerdon BD, Mendoza CA, Devito KJ (2007) Simulations of fully coupled lake-groundwater exchange in a subhumid climate with an integrated hydrologic model. Water Resour Res 43:W01416. doi: 10.1029/2006WR005137
  53. Smith RA, Alexander RB, Schwarz GE (2003a) Natural background concentrations of nutrients in streams and rivers of the conterminous United States. Environ Sci Technol 37:3039–3047PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Smith SV, Swaney DP, Talaue-Mcmanus L, Bartley JD, Sandhei PT, McLaughlin CJ, Dupra VC, Crossland CJ, Buddemeier RW, Maxwell BA, Wulff F (2003b) Humans, hydrology, and the distribution of inorganic nutrient loading to the ocean. Bioscience 53:235–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Snelder TH, Biggs BJF (2002) Multiscale river environment classification for water resources management. J Am Water Resour Assoc 38:1225–1239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Soranno PA, Hubler SL, Carpenter SR, Lathrop RC (1996) Phosphorus loads to surface waters: a simple model to account for spatial pattern of land use. Ecol Appl 6:865–878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Soranno PA, Spence Cheruvelil K, Stevenson RJ, Rollins SL, Holden SW, Heaton S, Torng EK (2008) A framework for developing ecosystem-specific nutrient criteria: integrating biological thresholds with predictive modeling. Limnol Oceanogr 53:773–787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Soranno PA, Spence Cheruvelil K, Webster KE, Bremigan MT, Wagner T, Stow CA (2010) Using landscape limnology to classify freshwater ecosystems for multi-ecosystem management and conservation. Bioscience 60:440–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Taylor CH, Pierson DC (1985) The effect of a small wetland on runoff response during spring snowmelt. Atmos Ocean 23:137–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tompkins TM, Whipps WW, Manor LJ, Wiley MJ, Radcliffe CW, Majewski DM (1997) Wetland effects on hydrological and water quality characteristics of a mid-Michigan river system. In: Trettin CC, Jurgensen MF, Grigal DF, Gale MR, Jeglum JK (eds) Northern forested wetlands: ecology and management. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 273–285Google Scholar
  61. Vanni MJ, Renwick WH, Headworth JL, Auch JD, Schaus MH (2001) Dissolved and particulate nutrient flux from three adjacent agricultural watersheds: a five-year study. Biogeochemistry 54:85–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Verhoeven JTA, Arheimer B, Yin C, Hefting MM (2006) Regional and global concerns over wetlands and water quality. Trends Ecol Evol 21:96–103PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Vollenweider RA (1976) Advances in defining critical loading levels for phosphorus in lake eutrophication. Memorie dell’Istituto Italiano di Idrobiologia 33:53–83Google Scholar
  64. Wang Y, Choi W (2005) Long-term impacts of land-use change on non-point source pollutant loads for the St. Louis metropolitan area, USA. Environ Manage 35:194–205PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Weller DE, Jordan TE, Correll DL (1998) Heuristic models for material discharge from landscapes with riparian buffers. Ecol Appl 8:1156–1169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Weller DE, Jordan TE, Correll DL, Liu Z (2003) Effects of land-use change on nutrient discharges from the Patuxent River Watershed. Estuaries 26:244–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. White JS, Bayley SE (2001) Nutrient retention in a northern prairie marsh (Frank Lake, Alberta) receiving municipal and agro-industrial wasterwater. Water Air Soil Pollut 126:63–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Winter TC (1999) Relation of streams, lakes, and wetlands to groundwater flow systems. Hydrogeol J 7:28–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Woltemade CJ (2000) Ability of restored wetlands to reduce nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations in agricultural drainage water. J Soil Water Conserv 55:303–309Google Scholar
  70. Zedler JB (2003) Wetlands at your service: reducing impacts of agriculture at the watershed scale. Front Ecol Environ 1:65–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zedler JB, Kercher S (2005) Wetland resources: status, trends, ecosystem services, and restorability. Ann Rev Environ Resour 30:39–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zhang T (2011) Distance-decay patterns of nutrient loading at watershed scale: regression modeling with a special spatial aggregation strategy. J Hydrol 402:239–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tao Zhang
    • 5
  • Patricia A. Soranno
    • 1
  • Kendra Spence Cheruvelil
    • 2
  • Daniel B. Kramer
    • 3
  • Mary Tate Bremigan
    • 1
  • Arika Ligmann-Zielinska
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Fisheries and WildlifeMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA
  2. 2.Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Lyman Briggs CollegeMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA
  3. 3.Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, James Madison CollegeMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA
  4. 4.Department of Geography, Environmental Science and Policy ProgramMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA
  5. 5.Department of BiologyUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations