Landscape Ecology

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 95–107 | Cite as

The historic influence of dams on diadromous fish habitat with a focus on river herring and hydrologic longitudinal connectivity

  • Carolyn J. Hall
  • Adrian Jordaan
  • Michael G. Frisk
Research Article


The erection of dams alters habitat and longitudinal stream connectivity for migratory diadromous and potamodromous fish species and interrupts much of organismal exchange between freshwater and marine ecosystems. In the US, this disruption began with colonial settlement in the seventeenth century but little quantitative assessment of historical impact on accessible habitat and population size has been conducted. We used published surveys, GIS layers and historical documents to create a database of 1356 dams, which was then analyzed to determine the historical timeline of construction, use and resultant fragmentation of watersheds in Maine, US. Historical information on the anadromous river herring was used to determine natural upstream boundaries to migration and establish total potential alewife spawning habitat in nine watersheds with historic populations. Dams in Maine were constructed beginning in 1634 and by 1850 had reduced accessible lake area to less than 5% of the virgin 892 km2 habitat and 20% of virgin stream habitat. There is a near total loss of accessible habitat by 1860 that followed a west-east pattern of European migration and settlement. Understanding historic trends allows current restoration targets to be assessed and prioritized within an ecosystem-based perspective and may inform expectations for future management of oceanic and freshwater living resources.


Historical Ecology Gulf of Maine Habitat fragmentation Alewife Blueback herring Forage fish Ecosystem Energy flux Restoration targets 



This work has benefited from conversations with Robert M. Cerrato, William Leavenworth, Karen Alexander, Theodore Willis, Michele Dionne, Gail Wippelhauser and Tom Squiers. We are indebted to the staff of The Maine Historical Society, The Maine State Archives, The Fogler Library Special Collections at the University of Maine Orono, and The Bangor Public Library Local History/Special Collections. We would like to thank J Wu, G Poole, D Cote and 1 anonymous reviewer for comments that improved this manuscript. We also thank undergraduate researchers Jaime Wright and Veronica Scorcia. This research was funded by a 2007 Mia J. Tegner Memorial Research Grant in Marine Historical Ecology and Environmental History (awarded to Adrian Jordaan) and NOAA award NA07NMF4550320.

Supplementary material

10980_2010_9539_MOESM1_ESM.doc (94 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 635 kb)
10980_2010_9539_MOESM2_ESM.doc (636 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOC 94 kb)


  1. Ames EP (2004) Atlantic Cod stock structure in the Gulf of Maine. Fisheries 29:10–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anonymous (1798) Legislature of Massachusetts. The Eastern Herald and Gazette of Maine [Portland] 26 March, 1798Google Scholar
  3. ASMFC (2009) Amendment 2 to the Interstate Fishery Plan for shad and river herring (river herring management). Atlantic States Marine Fisheries CommissionGoogle Scholar
  4. Atkins CG (1887) The river fisheries of Maine. In: Goode BG (ed) The fisheries and fishery industries of the United States, Section V, vol. 1, pp 673–728Google Scholar
  5. Atkins CG, Foster N (1868) First Report of the Commissioners of Fisheries of the State of Maine, 1867. Owen and Nash, Printers to the State, Augusta, MEGoogle Scholar
  6. Atkins CG, Foster N (1869) Second Report of the Commissioners of Fisheries of the State of Maine, 1868. Owen and Nash, Printers to the State, Augusta, MEGoogle Scholar
  7. Atkins CG, Stillwell EM (1874) Obstructions to the upward movement of fishes in streams, and the remedy In: US Commission of Fish and Fisheries, Part II, Report of the Commissioner for 1872 and 1873. Appendix E; Sections XXIII and XXIV. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, pp 589–621Google Scholar
  8. Baird ST (1872) Letter to Maine Commissioner of Fisheries on the diminution of the supply of food-fishes. In: Atkins CG (ed) 1872 Sixth Report of the Commissioners of Fisheries of the State of Maine, 1872. Owen and Nash, Augusta, ME, pp 7–10Google Scholar
  9. Baird ST (1883) US Commission of Fish and Fisheries Report of the Commissioner for 1883. Government Printing Office, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  10. Bigelow HB, Schroeder WC (1953) Fishes of the Gulf of Maine. US Fish and Wildlife Service Fishery Bulletin #74, vol 53. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 577 ppGoogle Scholar
  11. Bilby RE, Fransen BR, Bisson PA (1996) Incorporation of nitrogen and carbon from spawning coho salmon into the trophic system of small streams: evidence from stable isotopes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 53:164–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brady PD (2009) Marine fisheries to work with local river herring officials on sustainable management of Massachusetts River Herring. DMF News 30: 9. Massachusetts Department of Marine Fisheries, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  13. Brown ME, Maclaine JE, Flagg L (2008) Anadromous fish restoration in the Androscoggin River Watershed. 2007 report on the operation of the Brunswick fishway. FERC #2284, Maine Dept of Marine Resources. PL 89-304, 28 ppGoogle Scholar
  14. Clark CE (1970) The Eastern Frontier: the settlement of Northern New England 1610–1713. Alfred A Knopf, New York, 419 ppGoogle Scholar
  15. Cote D, Kehler DG, Bourne C, Wiersma YF (2009) A new measure of longitudinal connectivity for stream networks. Landscape Ecol 24:101–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dynesius M, Nilsson C (1994) Fragmentation and flow regulation of river systems in the Northern third of the World. Science 266(5186):753–762CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Ellison AM, Bank MS, Clinton BD, Colburn EA, Elliott K, Ford CR, Foster DR, Kloeppel BD, Knoepp JD, Lovett GM, Mohan J, Orwig DA, Rodenhouse NL, Sobczak WV, Stinson KA, Stone JK, Swan CM, Thompson J, Von Holle B, Webster JR (2005) Loss of foundation species: consequences for the structure and dynamics of forested ecosystems. Front Ecol Environ 3(9):479–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Emery E (1901) In: Emery WM (ed) The history of Sanford Maine 1661–1900. Fall River, ME, 537 ppGoogle Scholar
  19. Fay C (2003) Biological and ecological role of alewives. Maine Rivers annual conference 2003, September 27–28, 2003 Indian Island, MEGoogle Scholar
  20. Federal Register (2006) Vol 71, No 200/Tuesday, October 17, 2006/Notices, pp 61022–61025Google Scholar
  21. Foster DR (2002) Thoreau’s country: a historical-ecological perspective to conservation in the New England landscape. J Biogeogr 29:1537–1555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Foster DR, Motzkin G, Slater B (1998) Land-use history as long-term broad-scale disturbance: regional forest dynamics in central New England. Ecosystems 1:96–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Foster DR, Motzkin G, Bernardos D, Cardoza J (2002) Wildlife dynamics in the changing New England landscape. J Biogeogr 29:1337–1357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Foster DR, Swanson FJ, Aber JD, Burke I, Brokaw N, Tilman D, Knapp A (2003) The importance of land-use legacies to ecology and conservation. Bioscience 53:77–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Graham J, Engle S, Recchia M (2002) Local knowledge and local stocks: an atlas of groundfish spawning in the Bay of Fundy. The Centre for Community-based Management, Extension Dept., St. Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, NS, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  26. Greenleaf M (1829) A survey of the State of Maine: In: Reference to its geographical features, statistics and political economy. Shirley and Hyde, 460 ppGoogle Scholar
  27. Haila Y (2002) A conceptual genealogy of fragmentation research: from island biogeography to landscape ecology. Ecol Appl 12(2):321–334Google Scholar
  28. Hilborn R, Quinn TP, Schindler DE, Rogers DE (2003) Biocomplexity and fisheries sustainability. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100:6564–6568CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Humphries P, Winemiller KO (2009) Historical impacts on river fauna, shifting baselines, and challenges for restoration. Bioscience 59(8):673–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. IUCN (2003) Guidelines for application of IUCN Red List criteria at regional levels: version 3.0. IUCN Species Survival Commission. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK, ii + 26 ppGoogle Scholar
  31. IUCN Standards and Petitions Working Group (2008) Guidelines for using the IUCN Red List categories and criteria. Version 7.0. Prepared by the Standards and Petitions Working Group of the IUCN SSC Biodiversity Assessments Sub-Committee in August 2008. Downloadable from
  32. Jackson JBC (2008) Ecological extinction and evolution in the brave new ocean. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105(Suppl 1):11458–11465CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Jackson JBC, Kirby M, Berger W, Bjorndal KA, Botsford L, Bourque BJ, Bradbury RH, Cooke RG, Erlandson J, Estes JA, Hughes TP, Kidwell S, Lange C, Lenihan H, Pandolfi JM, Peterson C, Steneck R, Tegner MJ, Warner RR (2001) Historical overfishing and the collapse of coastal ecosystems. Science 293:629–638CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Judd RW (1997) Common lands, common people. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 335 ppGoogle Scholar
  35. Kline TC, Goering JJ, Mathisen OA, Poe PH, Parker PL (1990) Recycling of elements transported upstream by runs of Pacific salmon I ∂15N and ∂13C evidence in Sashin Creek, southeastern Alaska. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 47:136–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kritzer J, Black P (2007) Oceanic distribution and bycatch of river herring. An analysis of federal fishery-independent and fishery-dependent data. Progress report. October 2007. Environmental DefenseGoogle Scholar
  37. Lichter J, Caron H, Pasakarnis TS, Ridgers SL, Squiers TS Jr, Todd CS (2006) The ecological collapse and partial recovery of a freshwater tidal ecosystem. Northeastern Nat 13(2):153–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lotze HK, Milewski I (2004) Two centuries of multiple human impacts and successive changes in a North Atlantic food web. Ecol Appl 14(5):1428–1447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lotze HK, Lenihan HS, Bourque BJ, Bradbury RH, Cooke RG, Kay MC, Kidwell SM, Kirby MX, Peterson CH, Jackson JBC (2006) Depletion, degradation, and recovery potential of estuaries and coastal seas. Science 312(5781):1806–1809CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. MacAvoy SE, Macko SA, McIninch SP, Garman GC (2000) Marine nutrient contributions to freshwater apex predators. Oecologia 122:568–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Maine Secretary of State. Fish Inspector Records (1804–1893) Boxes 1–9. Maine State Archives. Augusta, MEGoogle Scholar
  42. MBSRFH (2007) Draft strategic plan for the restoration of diadromous and resident fishes to the Penobscot River. Maine Bureau of Sea-Run Fisheries and Habitat, Department of Marine Resources, Augusta, MEGoogle Scholar
  43. MDEP (2009) January 1, 2009 status reports: hydropower projects in Maine, DEPLW0363-H2009, and Dam Removals in Maine and Dams Subject to Regulated Minimum Flow Releases. Maine Department of Environmental ProtectionGoogle Scholar
  44. MDMR (1982) Statewide river fisheries management plan. Maine Department of Marine Resources, Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife, and Atlantic Sea Run Salmon Commission. State of Maine Augusta, MEGoogle Scholar
  45. MDMR (2008) Kennebec River anadromous fish restoration Annual progress report—2007. Maine Department of Marine Resources, Bureau of Sea-Run Fisheries and Habitat, 131 ppGoogle Scholar
  46. MEGIS (2004) Watershed, county line and coast base layers. Maine Geographic Information Systems (comp, ed), United States Geological Survey. Last accessed April 2009 at http://megismainegov/catalog/
  47. MEGIS (Maine Geographic Information Systems) (comp, ed), Army Corp of Engineers (USACE), Maine Emergency Management Agency (MEMA), Maine Department of Environmental Protection (MEDEP)(comp, ed) (2006) Impound database. Last accessed August 2008 at http://megismainegov/catalog/catalogasp?state=2andextent=cover
  48. Moody RE (1933) The Maine Frontier 1607–1763. Yale University, New Haven, CT, 462 ppGoogle Scholar
  49. Morita K, Morita SH, Yamamoto S (2009) Effects of habitat fragmentation by damming on salmonid fishes: lessons from white-spotted charr in Japan. Ecol Res 24(4):711–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mullen DM, Fay CW, Moring JR (1986) Species profiles: life histories and environmental requirements of coastal fishes and invertebrates (North Atlantic)—alewife/blueback herring U S Fish Wildl Serv Biol Rep 82(1156) U S Army Corps of Engineers, TR EL-82-4, 21 ppGoogle Scholar
  51. Pardue GB (1983) Habitat suitability index models: alewife and blueback herring. USFWS, FWS/OBS-82/10.58, 22 ppGoogle Scholar
  52. Pess GR, McHenry ML, Beechie TJ, Davies J (2008) Biological impacts of the Elwha River dams and potential salmonid reasons to dam removal. Northwest Sci 82(Sp Iss SI):72–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Petts GE (1989) Perspectives for ecological management of regulated rivers. In: Alternatives in regulated river management by JA Gore and GE Petts. CRC Press, pp 3–24Google Scholar
  54. Poff NL, Hart DD (2002) How dams vary and why it matters for the emerging science of dam removal. Bioscience 52(8):659–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Poff NL, Allan JD, Bain MB, Karr JR, Prestegaard KL, Richter BD, Sparks RE, Stromberg JC (1997) The natural flow regime: a paradigm for river conservation and restoration. Bioscience 47(11):769–784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Poole G (2002) Fluvial landscape ecology: addressing uniqueness within the river discontinuum. Freshw Biol 47:641–660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pope CH (1965) The pioneers of Maine and New Hampshire 1623 to 1660. Originally published Boston, 1908. Geneological Pub Co, Baltimore, MD, 252 ppGoogle Scholar
  58. Pringle CM, Freeman MC, Freeman BJ (2000) Regional effects of hydrologic alterations on riverine macrobiota in the New World: tropical-temperate comparisons. Bioscience 50:807–823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rounsefell GA, Stringer LD (1945) Restoration and management of the New England alewife fisheries with special reference to Maine. US Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. Trans Am Fish Soc 73:394–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Saunders R, Hachey MA, Fay CW (2006) Maine’s diadromous fish community: past, present, and implications for Atlantic salmon recovery. Fisheries 31(11):537–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Schindler DE, Scheuerell MD, Moore JW, Gende SM, Francis TB, Palen WJ (2003) Pacific salmon and the ecology of coastal ecosystems. Front Ecol Environ 1(1):31–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Smith HM (1899) Notes on the extent and condition of the alewife fisheries of the United States in 1896. In: US Commissioner of Fish and Fisheries Report part XXIV for the year ending June 30, 1898. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, pp 31–43Google Scholar
  63. Walter RC, Merritts DJ (2008) Natural streams and the legacy of water-powered mills. Science 319:299–304CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Walters AW, Barnes RT, Post DM (2009) Anadromous alewives (Alosa pseudoharengus) contribute marine-derived nutrients to coastal stream food webs. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 66:439–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wells W (1869) The Waterpower of Maine Hydrographic Survey of Maine Sprague. Owen and Nash, Printers to the State, Augusta, ME, 526 ppGoogle Scholar
  66. Willis TV (2006) St. Croix River alewife—smallmouth bass interaction study. Final Report to Maine Rivers, Hallowell, MaineGoogle Scholar
  67. Wu J, Huang J, Han X, Zongqiang X, Gao X (2003) Three Gorges Dam—experiment in habitat fragmentation? Science 300:1239–1240CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Wu J, Huang J, Han X, Gao X, He F, Jiang M, Jiang Z, Primack RB, Shen Z (2004) The Three Gorges Dam: an ecological perspective. Front Ecol Environ 2(5):241–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carolyn J. Hall
    • 1
  • Adrian Jordaan
    • 1
  • Michael G. Frisk
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Marine and Atmospheric SciencesStony Brook UniversityStony BrookUSA

Personalised recommendations