Landscape Ecology

, Volume 25, Issue 9, pp 1433–1445

Effects of land-use history and the contemporary landscape on non-native plant invasion at local and regional scales in the forest-dominated southern Appalachians

  • Timothy R. Kuhman
  • Scott M. Pearson
  • Monica G. Turner
Research Article

Abstract

Determining what factors explain the distribution of non-native invasive plants that can spread in forest-dominated landscapes could advance understanding of the invasion process and identify forest areas most susceptible to invasion. We conducted roadside surveys to determine the presence and abundance of 15 non-native plant species known to invade forests in western North Carolina, USA. Generalized linear models were used to examine how contemporary and historic land use, landscape context, and topography influenced presence and abundance of the species at local and regional scales. The most commonly encountered species were Microstegium vimineum, Rosa multiflora, Lonicera japonica, Celastrus orbiculatus, Ligustrum sinense, and Dioscorea oppositifolia. At the regional scale, distance to city center was the most important explanatory variable, with species more likely present and more abundant in watersheds closer to Asheville, NC. Many focal species were also more common in watersheds at lower elevation and with less forest cover. At the local scale, elevation was important for explaining the species’ presence, but forest cover and land-use history were more important for explaining their abundance. In general, species were more common in plots with less forest cover and more area reforested since the 1940s. Our results underscore the importance of considering both the contemporary landscape and historic land use to understand plant invasion in forest-dominated landscapes.

Keywords

Exotic species Blue Ridge Roads City center Microstegium vimineum Rosa multiflora Lonicera japonica Celastrus orbiculatus Ligustrum sinense Dioscorea oppositifolia 

Supplementary material

10980_2010_9500_MOESM1_ESM.doc (1.2 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 1228 kb)
10980_2010_9500_MOESM2_ESM.doc (72 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOC 72 kb)
10980_2010_9500_MOESM3_ESM.doc (109 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (DOC 109 kb)

References

  1. Albright TP, Anderson DP, Keuler NS, Pearson SM, Turner MG (2009) The spatial legacy of introduction: Celastrus orbiculatus in the southern Appalachians, USA. J Appl Ecol 46:1229–1238Google Scholar
  2. Alston KP, Richardson DM (2006) The roles of habitat features, disturbance, and distance from putative source populations in structuring alien plant invasions at the urban/wildland interface on the Cape Peninsula, South Africa. Biol Conserv 132:183–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bates D, Sarkar D (2006) lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.995-2Google Scholar
  4. Beers TW, Dress PE, Wensel LC (1966) Aspect transformation in site productivity research. J For 64:691–692Google Scholar
  5. Brothers TS, Spingarn A (1992) Forest fragmentation and alien plant invasion of central Indiana old-growth forests. Conserv Biol 6:91–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown KA, Spector S, Wu W (2008) Multi-scale analysis of species introductions: combining landscape and demographic models to improve management decisions about non-native species. J Appl Ecol 45:1639–1648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buckley YM, Anderson S, Catterall CP, Corlett RT, Engel T, Gosper CR, Nathan R, Richardson DM, Setter M, Spiegel O, Vivian-Smith G, Voight FA, Weir JES, Westcott DA (2006) Management of plant invasions mediated by frugivore interactions. J Appl Ecol 43:848–857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (1998) Model selection and inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Carpenter RH (1970) Metamorphic history of the Blue Ridge province of Tennessee and North Carolina. Geol Soc Am Bull 81:749–761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Christen D, Matlack G (2006) The role of roadsides in plant invasions: a demographic approach. Conserv Biol 20:385–391CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Crawley MJ (1987) What makes a community invasible? In: Gray AJ, Crawley MJ, Edwards PJ (eds) Colonization, succession, and stability. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, pp 429–453Google Scholar
  12. Davis MA, Grime JP, Thompson K (2000) Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility. J Ecol 88:528–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. DeGasperis BG, Motzkin G (2007) Windows of opportunity: historical and ecological controls on Berberis thunbergii invasions. Ecology 88:3115–3125CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Elton CS (1958) The ecology of invasions by animals and plants. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  15. ESRI (2006) ArcGIS, vol. 9.1. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, CAGoogle Scholar
  16. Forman RTT, Alexander LE (1998) Roads and their major ecological effects. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 29:207–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gelbard JL, Belnap J (2003) Roads as conduits for exotic plant invasions in a semiarid landscape. Conserv Biol 17:420–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gragson TL, Bolstad PV (2006) Land use legacies and the future of southern Appalachia. Soc Nat Resour 19:175–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hobbs RJ, Huenneke LF (1992) Disturbance, diversity, and invasion: implications for conservation. Conserv Biol 6:324–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Horton JL, Neufeld HS (1998) Photosynthetic responses of Microstegium vimineum (Trin.) A. Camus, a shade-tolerant, C-4 grass, to variable light environments. Oecologia 114:11–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kitajima K (1994) Relative importance of photosynthetic traits and allocation patterns as correlates of seedling shade tolerance of 13 tropical trees. Oecologia 98:419–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Knight KS, Reich PB (2005) Opposite relationships between invasibility and native species richness at patch versus landscape scales. Oikos 109:81–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kolar CS, Lodge DM (2001) Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends Ecol Evol 16:199–204CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kowarik I (2008) On the role of alien species in urban flora and vegetation. In: Marzluff JM, Shulenberger E, Endlicher W, Alberti M, Bradley G, Ryan C, ZumBrunnen C, Simon U (eds) Urban ecology: an international perspective on the interaction between humans and nature. Springer, New York, pp 321–338Google Scholar
  25. Leicht SA, Silander JA, Greenwood K (2005) Assessing the competitive ability of Japanese stilt grass, Microstegium vimineum (Trin.) A. Camus. J Torrey Bot Soc 132:573–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lonsdale WM (1999) Global patterns of plant invasions and the concept of invasibility. Ecology 80:1522–1536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lundgren MR, Small CJ, Dreyer GD (2004) Influence of land use and site characteristics on invasive plant abundance in the Quinebaug Highlands of southern New England. North East Nat 11:313–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Martin PH, Canham CD, Marks PL (2009) Why forests appear resistant to exotic plant invasions: intentional introductions, stand dynamics, and the role of shade tolerance. Front Ecol Environ 7:142–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Parendes LA, Jones JA (2000) Role of light availability and dispersal in exotic plant invasion along roads and streams in the H. J. Andrews Experimental Forest, Oregon. Conserv Biol 14:64–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pinheiro JC, Bates DM (2000) Mixed-effects models in S and S-Plus. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pysek P, Richardson D (2006) The biogeography of naturalization in alien plants. J Biogeogr 33:2040–2050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. R Development Core Team (2008) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  33. Reichard SH, White P (2001) Horticulture as a pathway of invasive plant introductions in the United States. Bioscience 51:103–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rejmánek M (1989) Invasibility of plant communities. In: Drake JA, diCastri F, Groves R (eds) Biological invasions: a global perspective. Wiley and Sons, Chichester, pp 369–388Google Scholar
  35. Rejmánek M, Richardson DM (1996) What attributes make some plant species more invasive? Ecology 77:1655–1661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Richardson DM, Allsopp N, D’Antonio CM, Milton SJ, Rejmánek M (2000) Plant invasions—the role of mutualisms. Biol Rev 75:65–93CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. SAMAB (1996) The Southern Appalachian assessment summary report. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Southern Region, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
  38. Sanford NL, Harrington RA, Fownes JH (2003) Survival and growth of native and alien woody seedlings in open and understory environments. For Ecol Manage 183:377–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shea K, Chesson P (2002) Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 17:170–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stohlgren TJ, Chong GW, Schell LD, Rimar KA, Otsuki Y, Lee M, Kalkhan MA, Villa CA (2002) Assessing vulnerability to invasion by nonnative plant species at multiple spatial scales. Environ Manage 29:566–577CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Tikka PM, Hogmander H, Koski PS (2001) Road and railway verges serve as dispersal corridors for grassland plants. Landscape Ecol 16:659–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tilman D (1997) Community invasibility, recruitment limitation, and grassland biodiversity. Ecology 78:81–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Turner MG, Pearson SM, Bolstad P, Wear DN (2003) Effects of land-cover change on spatial pattern of forest communities in the Southern Appalachian Mountains (USA). Landscape Ecol 18:449–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Valladares F, Niinemets U (2008) Shade tolerance, a key plant feature of complex nature and consequences. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 39:237–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. von der Lippe M, Kowarik I (2007) Long-distance dispersal of plants by vehicles as a driver of plant invasions. Conserv Biol 21:986–996CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Von Holle B, Motzkin G (2007) Historical land use and environmental determinants of nonnative plant distribution in coastal southern New England. Biol Conserv 136:33–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wear DN, Bolstad P (1998) Land-use changes in Southern Appalachian landscapes: spatial analysis and forecast evaluation. Ecosystems 1:575–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Webb S, Dwyer M, Kaunzinger C, Wyckoff P (2000) The myth of the resilient forest: case study of the invasive Norway maple (Acer platanoides). Rhodora 102:332–354Google Scholar
  49. Wilson JB, Rapson GL, Sykes MT, Watkins AJ, Williams PA (1992) Distribution and climatic correlations of some exotic species along roadsides in South Island, New Zealand. J Biogeogr 19:183–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wilson JRU, Richardson DM, Rouget M, Proches S, Amis MA, Henderson L, Thuiller W (2007) Residence time and potential range: crucial considerations in modelling plant invasions. Divers Distrib 13:11–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. With KA (2002) The landscape ecology of invasive spread. Conserv Biol 16:1192–1203CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Timothy R. Kuhman
    • 1
  • Scott M. Pearson
    • 2
  • Monica G. Turner
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesEdgewood CollegeMadisonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Natural SciencesMars Hill CollegeMars HillUSA
  3. 3.Department of ZoologyUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations