Advertisement

Landscape Ecology

, Volume 25, Issue 8, pp 1169–1183 | Cite as

Exploring the relevance of a landscape ecological paradigm for sustainable landscapes and livelihoods: A case-application from the Northern Territory Australia

  • Diane M. Pearson
  • Julian T. Gorman
Research Article

Abstract

Global change is exacerbating the need for more effective mechanisms and approaches for working towards economic, social/cultural and environmental sustainability. It is now well recognised that science for sustainability will require integrated problem-focussed research that is by nature trans-disciplinary. Resolutions to both global and regional scale issues must involve participation of a diverse number of stakeholders. One region that would benefit greatly from such an integrated approach is the Northern Territory of Australia. This area is home to some of the most pristine savanna landscapes in the world and it is also occupied by one of the oldest living human cultures which are still in existence today. However, in recent years there has been increasing pressure to develop this region. The Northern Territory is also facing problems associated with having a growing Aboriginal population with deepening health and social problems. So as well as needing to facilitate adaptation in response to global change and development for economic prosperity of the region, there is an obligation to alter management practices to reduce social disadvantage. In light of this, it will be important that future landscapes are multifunctional and designed to ensure the preservation of biological and cultural diversity, as well as having provision for the livelihoods of the people that live within them. This article recommends the adoption of a landscape ecological approach for strategic development and sustainable planning, which captures and incorporates the values and identities of the different stakeholders, as well as engaging them in a continuous, adaptive process of planning and management, and in doing so discusses the importance of human ecological holism as part of the conceptual framework for landscape ecology.

Keywords

Sustainability Indigenous Human ecological holism Multifunctional landscapes 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Charles Darwin University for supporting this research. We would also like to acknowledge the valuable comments of the anonymous reviewers, and the input from Clive McAlpine which contributed towards getting this article ready for publication.

References

  1. Adams WM (2006) The future of sustainability: re-thinking environment and development in the twenty-first century. Report of the IUCN renowned thinkers meeting. Available: http://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/iucn_future_of_sustanability.pdf
  2. Ahern J (1999) Spatial concepts, planning strategies and future scenarios: a framework method for integrating landscape ecology into landscape planning. In: Klotpeck JM, Gardner RH (eds) Landscape ecological analysis: issues and applications. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 175–201Google Scholar
  3. Alberti M, Marzluff JM (2004) Ecological resilience in urban ecosystems: linking urban patterns to human and ecological functions. Urban Ecosyst 7:241–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Altman JC, Kerins S, Fogarty B, Webb K (2008) Why the Northern Territory government needs to support outstations/homelands in the Aboriginal Northern Territory and national interests. Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research, Australian National University, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  5. Aslin H, Bennett DH (2005) Two tool boxes for wildlife management? Hum Dimen Wildl 10:95–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Australia Commonwealth Government (2009) Increasing indigenous economic opportunity. A discussion paper on the future of the CDEP and indigenous employment programs. Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  7. Australian Bureau of Statistics (2006) Corrective services, Australia. Australian Bureau of Statistics, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  8. Australian Bureau of Statistics (2008a) National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Survey (NATSISS). Australian Bureau of Statistics, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  9. Australian Bureau of Statistics (2008b) Australian demographic statistics, December quarter 2008. Australian Bureau of Statistics, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  10. Australian Government (2007) Community Development Employment Projects (CDEP) program guidelines 2009–12. Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  11. Australian Government (2009) Factsheet. Climate change—potential impacts and costs Northern Territory. Department of Climate Change, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  12. Bishop ID, Ford R, Loiterton D, Williams K (2005) Studying the acceptability of forest management practices using visual simulation of forest regrowth. In: Bishop ID, Lange E (eds) Visualization in landscape and environmental planning: technology and applications. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 112–119Google Scholar
  13. Bohnet IC (2010) Integrating social and ecological knowledge for planning sustainable land and sea-scapes: experiences from the Great Barrier Reef region, Australia. Landscape Ecol. doi: 10.1007/s10980-010-9504-z
  14. Botequilha Leitão A, Ahern J (2002) Applying landscape ecological concepts and metrics in sustainable landscape planning. Landsc Urban Plan 59:65–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bowman DMJS (1998) Tansley review no. 101. The impact of Aboriginal landscape burning on Australian biota. New Phytol 40:135–410Google Scholar
  16. Brunckhorst D, Coop P, Reeve I (2006) ‘Eco-civic’ optimization: a nested framework for planning and managing landscapes. Landsc Urban Plan 75:265–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Burgess CP, Johnston FH, Bowman DMJS, Whitehead PJ (2005) Healthy country, healthy people? Exploring the health benefits of Indigenous natural resource management. Aust N Z J Public Health 29:117–122CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Cork S (2001a) Ecosystem services: the many ways in which biodiversity sustains and fulfills human life food for healthy people and a healthy planet, internet conference organised by the Nature and Society ForumGoogle Scholar
  19. Cork S, Shelton D, Binning C, Parry R (2001b) A framework for applying the concept of ecosystem services to natural resource management in Australia. In: Rutherford I, Sheldon F, Brierley G, Kenyon C (eds) Australian stream management conference, August 27–29, 2001. Cooperative Research Centre for Catchment Hydrology, Brisbane, pp 157–162Google Scholar
  20. Costanza R (2003) A vision of the future of science: reintegrating the study of humans and the rest of nature. Futures 35:651–671Google Scholar
  21. Costanza R, Daly HE (1992) Natural capital and sustainable development. Conserv Biol 6:37–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. CSIRO, Australian Bureau of Meteorology (2007) Climate change in Australia. Technical report 2007. CSIROGoogle Scholar
  23. Daily GE (1997) Nature’s services—societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  24. de Groot R (2006) Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use conflicts in planning for sustainable, multifunctional landscapes. Landsc Urban Plan 75:175–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. de Groot RS, Wilson M, Boumans R (2002) A typology for the description, classification and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecol Econ 41(3):393–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. di Castri F, Hadley M (1986) Enhancing the credibility of ecology: is interdisciplinary research for land use planning useful? GeoJournal 13(4):299–325Google Scholar
  27. Field DR, Voss PR, Kuczenzki TR, Hammer RB, Radeloff VC (2003) Reaffirming social landscape analysis in landscape ecology: a conceptual framework. Soc Nat Resour 16:349–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Flood J (1995) Archaeology of the dreamtime: the story of prehistoric Australia and its people. Harper Collins, Pymble, NSWGoogle Scholar
  29. Forman RTT, Godron M (1986) Landscape ecology. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, USAGoogle Scholar
  30. Franklin DC, Whitehead PJ, Pardon G, Matthew J, McMahon P, McIntyre D (2005) Geographic patterns and correlates of decline of granivorous birds in northern Australia. Wildl Res 32:299–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Garnett ST, Woinarski JCZ (2007) A case for indigenous threatened species management. In: Luckert MK, Campbell BM, Gorman JT, Garnett ST (eds) Investing in indigenous natural resource management. Charles Darwin University Press, DarwinGoogle Scholar
  32. Garnett ST, Woinarski JCZ, Gerritsen R, Duff G (2008) Future options for North Australia. Charles Darwin University Press, DarwinGoogle Scholar
  33. Gettys WE (1939) Human ecology and social theory. Soc Forces 18:469–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gorman JT, Vemuri S (2010) Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) as a model for Integrated Natural Cultural Resource Management (INCRM). Int J Environ Cult Econ Soc Sustain 6(3):11–21Google Scholar
  35. Gorman JT, Williams R, Russell-Smith J, Hutley L, Cook G (2007) A case for indigenous fire management. In: Luckert MK, Campbell BM, Gorman JT, Garnett ST (eds) Investing in indigenous natural resource management. Charles Darwin University Press, DarwinGoogle Scholar
  36. Griffiths AD, McKay JL (2005) Monitoring the impacts of cane toads on goanna species in Kakadu National Park. Department of Environment and Heritage, JabiruGoogle Scholar
  37. Grove JM, Burch WRJ (1997) A social ecology approach and application of urban ecosystem and landscape analyses: a case study of Baltimore. Md Urban Ecosyst 1:259–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gunderson LH, Allen CR, Holling CS (eds) (2010) Foundations of ecological resilience. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  39. Hersperger AM (1994) Landscape ecology and its potential application to planning. J Plan Lit 9:14–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hobbs R (1994) Landscape ecology and conservation: moving from description to application. Pac Conserv Biol 1:170–176Google Scholar
  41. Holling CS (ed) (1978) Adaptive environmental assessment and management. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  42. Hunt J, Smith D (2006) Building indigenous community governance in Australia. Preliminary research findings. CAEPR Working Paper No. 31. Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research, Australian National University, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  43. Johnston FH, Burgess P, Bowman MJS (2007) A case for indigenous natural resource management and health. In: Luckert MK, Campbell BM, Gorman JT, Garnett ST (eds) Investing in indigenous natural resource management. Charles Darwin University Press, DarwinGoogle Scholar
  44. Kajikawa Y (2008) Research core and framework of sustainability science. Sustain Sci 3:215–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kuczenski TK, Field DR, Voss PR, Radeloff VC, Hagen AE (2000) Integrating demographic and Landsat TM data at a watershed scale. J AmWater Resour Assoc 36:215–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Landcare Council of the Northern Territory (2005) Sustaining our resources—people, country and enterprises. Integrated natural resource management plan for the Northern Territory. Natural Resource Management Board, DarwinGoogle Scholar
  47. Lovell ST, Johnston DM (2009a) Designing landscapes for performance based on emerging principles in landscape ecology. Ecol Soc 14:44Google Scholar
  48. Lovell ST, Johnston DM (2009b) Creating multifunctional landscapes: how can the field of ecology inform the design of the landscape? Front Ecol Environ 7(4):212–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Luckert MK, Campbell BM, Gorman J, Garnett ST (eds) (2007) Investing in indigenous natural resource management. Charles Darwin University Press, DarwinGoogle Scholar
  50. Martens P (2006) Sustainability: science or fiction? Sustainability: science. Pract Policy 2:36–41Google Scholar
  51. Matson P (2009) The sustainability transition. Issues Sci Technol 25:39–42Google Scholar
  52. McAlpine C, Price B, Seabrook L, Rhodes J, Maron M (2010) How do we make landscape ecology an integrated problem solving science? Landscape Ecol (special edition)Google Scholar
  53. McKenzie R (1925) The ecological approach to the study of the human community. In: Park RE, Burgess E, McKenzie RD (eds) The city. Chicago, pp 63–79Google Scholar
  54. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Board (2005) Statement of the MA Board. Living beyond our means: natural assets and human well-being. http://www.millenniumassessment.org/en/BoardStatement.aspx. Accessed January 2010
  55. Morrison J, Josef P (2007) A case for indigenous coastal management. In: Luckert MK, Campbell BM, Gorman J, Garnett ST (eds) Investing in indigenous natural resource management. Charles Darwin University Press, DarwinGoogle Scholar
  56. Muller S (2008) Indigenous Payment for Environmental Service (PES) opportunities in the Northern Territory: negotiating with customs. Aust Geogr 39:149–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Nassauer J, Opdam P (2008) Design in science: extending the landscape ecology paradigm. Landscape Ecol 23:633–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Naveh Z (2007) Landscape ecology and sustainability. Landscape Ecol 22:1437–1440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Northern Land Council (2006) Celebrating ten years of caring for country, a Northern Land Council Initiative. Northern Land Council, DarwinGoogle Scholar
  60. Northern Territory Treasury (2009) Northern Territory population projections. Northern Territory Government, DarwinGoogle Scholar
  61. Pachauri R (2008) Climate change and sustainability science. Sustain Sci 3:1–1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Pearson N (2007) Stuck on the welfare pedestal. The weekend Australian. Inquirer, Perth, p 28Google Scholar
  63. Pearson D, Gorman JT (2010) Managing landscapes in Australian Northern Territory for sustainability: visions, issues and solutions. Futures. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2010.04.008
  64. Pettit C, Pullar D (2004) A way forward for land-use planning to achieve policy goals by using spatial modelling scenarios. Environ Plann B: Plann Des 32:213–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Pickett STA, Burch WR,SED, Foresman TW, Grove JM, Rowntree R (1997) A conceptual framework for the study of human ecosystems in urban areas. Urban Ecosyst 1:185–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Potschin MB, Haines-Young RH (2003) Improving the quality of environmental assessments using the concept of natural capital: a case study from southern Germany. Landsc Urban Plan 6:93–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Potschin MB, Haines-Young RH (2006a) Editorial—landscapes and sustainability. Landsc Urban Plan 75:155–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Potschin MB, Haines-Young RH (2006b) Rio+10, sustainability science and landscape ecology. Landsc Urban Plan 75:162–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Putnis A, Josif P, Woodward E (2007) Healthy country, healthy people: supporting indigenous engagement in the sustainable management of Northern Territory land and seas: a strategic framework, CSIRO, DarwinGoogle Scholar
  70. Quinn JA (1939) The nature of human ecology: reexamination and redefinition. Am J Sociol 30:161–168Google Scholar
  71. Radeloff VC, Hagen AE, Voss PR, Field DR, Mladenoff DJ (2000) Exploring the spatial relationship between census and land-cover data. Soc Nat Resour 13(6):599–609Google Scholar
  72. Radeloff VC, Hammer RB, Voss PR, Hagen AE, Field DR, Mladenoff DJ (2001) Human demographic trends and landscape level forest management in the northwest Wisconsin Pine Barrens. For Sci 47:229–241Google Scholar
  73. Rose DB (1996) Nourishing terrains: Australian Aboriginal views of landscape and wilderness. Australian Heritage Commission, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  74. Russell-Smith J, Ryan GP, Cheal D (2002) Fire regimes and conservation of sandstone heaths in monsoonal northern Australia: frequency, interval, patchiness. Biol Conserv 104:91–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Shelton D, Cork S, Binning C, Parry R, Hairsine P, Vertessy R, Stauffacher M (2001) Application of an ecosystem services inventory approach to the Goulbourn Broken Catchment. In: Rutherford I, Sheldon F, Brierley G, Kenyon C (Eds) Third Australian stream management conference, 27–29, 2001. Cooperative Research Centre for Catchment Hydrology. Brisbane pp 157–162Google Scholar
  76. Smyth D, Szabo S, George M (2004) Case studies in indigenous engagement in natural resource management. Australian Government Department of Environment and Heritage, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  77. Stock C, Bishop ID, Green R (2007) Exploring landscape changes using an envisioning system in rural community workshops. Landsc Urban Plan 79(3–4):229–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Taylor J (2003) Indigenous economic futures in the Northern Territory: the demographics and socioeconomic background. Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research, Australian National University, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  79. Termorshuizen JW, Opdam P (2009) Landscape services as a bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development. Landscape Ecol (on line 4 January 2009)Google Scholar
  80. Tress B, Tress G, Fry G (2005) Key steps for reaching integration. In: Tress B, Tress G, Frey G, Opdam P (eds) From landscape research to landscape planning: aspects of integration, education and application. Springer, WageningenGoogle Scholar
  81. Turner MG, Gardner RH, O’Neill RV (2001) Landscape ecology in theory and practice: pattern and process. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  82. Walker B, Salt D (2006) Resilience thinking: sustaining ecosystems and people in a changing world. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  83. Wang Y, Dawson R, Peng D, Liu HJ, Ding Y (2001) Landscape ecological planning and design of degraded mining land. Land Degrad Dev 12:449–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Wang Y, Fu B (1995) Landscape ecology: the theoretical foundation of sustainable agrolandscape planning and design. J Environ Sci 7:289–296Google Scholar
  85. Watson M, Woinarski JCZ (2004) Vertebrate monitoring and resampling in Kakadu National Park, 2003. Parts Australia North and Parks Wildlife Commission of the Northern Territory, DarwinGoogle Scholar
  86. Woinarski JCZ (2007) Nature’s infinite variety: conservation choice and management for dynamic ecological systems. In: Lindenmayer D, Hobbs R (eds) Managing and designing landscapes for conservation: moving from perspectives to principles. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 101–110Google Scholar
  87. Wu J (2006) Editorial—landscape ecology, cross disciplinarity and sustainability science. Landscape Ecol 21:1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Wu J (2008) Making the case for landscape ecology: an effective approach to urban sustainability. Landsc J 27:41–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Wu J, Hobbs R (2007) Landscape ecology: the state-of-the-science. In: Wu J, Hobbs R (eds) Key topics in landscape ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 271–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Environmental and Life SciencesCharles Darwin UniversityDarwinAustralia
  2. 2.School for Environmental ResearchCharles Darwin UniversityDarwinAustralia

Personalised recommendations