Landscape Ecology

, Volume 25, Issue 8, pp 1219–1230 | Cite as

Integration by case, place and process: transdisciplinary research for sustainable grazing in the Lachlan River catchment, Australia

  • Kate Sherren
  • Joern Fischer
  • Helena Clayton
  • Jacki Schirmer
  • Stephen Dovers
Research article

Abstract

In a context of global agricultural intensification, integrating conservation and agricultural production is a major challenge. We have tackled the problem using a transdisciplinary research framework. Our work focuses on part of the upper Lachlan River catchment in southeastern Australia. The region is dominated by livestock grazing, and is part of an internationally recognised threatened ecoregion because most native woodland vegetation has been cleared. In productive areas, most remnant vegetation occurs as scattered and isolated paddock trees, which are dying from old age and not regenerating due to agricultural practices. The policy context and industry trends present additional risks for sparse trees. These declining trees provide many ecosystem services, including enhanced water infiltration, shade for livestock, aesthetic and cultural values, and habitat for native species. Our research aims to identify management options and policy settings that enable landscape-scale tree regeneration while maintaining grazing production. Our findings highlight tensions between the trajectory of tree cover in the region and stakeholder values. Under status quo management, many scattered and isolated paddock trees will be lost from farms, although most farmers would like to see them persist. Case studies on selected farms reveal management strategies that may be more sustainable in terms of tree regeneration and agricultural productivity, such as rotational grazing. In addition to these applied insights, our work provides a case study illustrating how a transdisciplinary study can be conducted efficiently by a small team. Our pragmatic approach has successfully combined targeted disciplinary activities with strategic collaborations and stakeholder engagement, all united by shared landscape, case graziers, and outreach activities.

Keywords

Fertiliser use Landscape restoration Rotational grazing Scattered trees Sustainable grazing Transdisciplinary research Tree decline 

References

  1. ABS (2007a) Australia’s environment: issues and trends ABS cat. no. 4613.0. Australian Government, Australian Bureau of Statistics, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  2. ABS (2007b) Census quickstats—Boorowa (A) (local government area). Australian Government, Australian Bureau of Statistics, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  3. ABS (2007c) Census quickstats—Cowra (A) (local government area). Australian Government, Australian Bureau of Statistics, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  4. ABS (2008) Natural resource management on Australian farms—4620.04620.0. Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra, p 37Google Scholar
  5. Antrop M (2003) Expectations of scientists towards interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research. In: Tress B, Tress G, van der Valk A, Fry G (eds) Interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary landscape studies: potential and limitations. DELTA Program, Wageningen, pp 44–54Google Scholar
  6. Asner G, Elmore A, Olander L, Martin R, Harris A (2004) Grazing systems, ecosystem responses, and global change. Annu Rev Environ Resour 29:261–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barjak F (2006) Team diversity and research collaboration in life sciences teams: Does a combination of research cultures pay off? 2006-W02. University of Applied Sciences, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  8. Barnett J, Ellemor H, Dovers S (2003) Sustainability and interdisciplinarity. In: Dovers SSD, Young M (eds) New dimensions in ecological economics: integrating people and nature. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 53–76Google Scholar
  9. Barr N (2004) The micro-dynamics of change in Australian agriculture, 1976-2001ABS cat. no. 255.0. Canberra, ACTGoogle Scholar
  10. Barr N, Cary JW (1992) Greening a brown land: the Australian search for sustainable land use. MacMillan Education Australia Pty. Ltd., MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  11. Beeton RJS, Buckley KI, Jones GJ, Morgan D, Reichelt RE, Trewin D (2006) Australia: state of the environment report 2006. Australian Government, Department of the Environment and Heritage, Canberra, p 141Google Scholar
  12. Bird PR, Bicknell D, Bulman PA, Burke SJA, Leys JF, Parker JN, Van der Sommen FJ, Voller P (1992) The role of shelter in Australia for protecting soils, plants and livestock. Agrofor Syst 20:59–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bohnet I, Smith DM (2007) Planning future landscapes in the Wet Tropics of Australia: a social-ecological framework. Landsc Urban Plan 80:137–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cain JD, Jinapala K, Makin IW, Somaratna PG, Ariyaratna BR, Perera LR (2003) Participatory decision support for agricultural management: a case study from Sri Lanka. Agric Syst 76:457–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carpenter SR, Folke C (2006) Ecology for transformation. Trends Ecol Evol 21:309–315CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Cary JW (1993) The nature of symbolic beliefs and environmental behaviour in a rural setting. Environ Behav 25:555–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Clayton H, Schirmer J, Price R, Sherren K, Fischer J, Dovers S (2009) Sustainable Farms II: emerging results, interpretations and research priorities—outcomes from the Sustainable Farms mid-term project workshop Australian National University, p 46. http://fennerschool-research.anu.edu.au/sustfarms/downloads/SustFarmsII.pdf
  18. Crosthwaite J, Malcolm B, Moll J, Dorrough J (2008) Future investment in landscape change in southern Australia. Landsc Res 33:225–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Daily GC, Ehrlich PR (1999) Managing Earth’s ecosystems: an interdisciplinary challenge. Ecosystems 2:277–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dorrough J, Moxham C (2005) Eucalypt establishment in agricultural landscapes and implications for landscape-scale restoration. Biol Conserv 123:55–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dorrough J, Scroggie MP (2008) Plant responses to agricultural intensification. J Appl Ecol 45:1274–1283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dovers S (2005) Clarifying the imperative of integration research for sustainable environmental management. J Res Pract 1: Article M1, 19 ppGoogle Scholar
  23. Duff G, Garnett D, Jacklyn P, Landsberg J, Ludwig J, Morrison J, Novelly P, Walker D, Whitehead P (2009) A collaborative design to adaptively manage for landscape sustainability in north Australia: lessons from a decade of cooperative research. Landscape Ecol 24:1135–1143Google Scholar
  24. Fischer J, Brosi B, Daily GC, Ehrlich PR, Goldman R, Goldstein J, Lindenmayer D, Manning AD, Mooney HA, Pejchar L, Ranganathan J, Tallis H (2008) Should agricultural policies encourage land sparing or wildlife-friendly farming? Front Ecol Environ 6:380–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fischer J, Sherren K, Clayton H (2009a) Working in tandem with natural variability: new paradigms for livestock grazing in Australia. House of Representatives Standing Committee on Primary Industries and Resources. http://www.aph.gov.au/house/committee/pir/australianfarmers/subs/sub004.pdf
  26. Fischer J, Stott J, Forrester R, Law B, Adams M (2009b) Designing effective habitat studies: quantifying multiple sources of variability in bat activity. Acta Chiropt 11:127–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fischer J, Stott J, Zerger A, Warren G, Sherren K, Forrester RI (2009c) Reversing a tree regeneration crisis in an endangered ecoregion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:10386–10391CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Fischer J, Sherren K, Stott J, Zerger A, Warren G, Stein J (2010) Towards landscape-wide conservation outcomes in Australia’s temperate grazing region. Front Ecol Environ 8:69–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Foley JA, DeFries R, Asner GP, Barford C, Bonan G, Carpenter SR, Chapin FS, Coe MT, Daily GC, Gibbs HK, Helkowski JH, Holloway T, Howard EA, Kucharik CJ, Monfreda C, Patz JA, Prentice IC, Ramankutty N, Snyder PK (2005) Global consequences of land use. Science 309:570–574CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Fry GLA (2001) Multifunctional landscapes—towards transdisciplinary research. Landsc Urban Plan 57:159–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Funtowicz SO, Ravetz JR (1993) Science for the post-normal age. Futures 25:739–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, Schwartzman S, Scott P, Trow M (1994) The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  33. Gibbons P, Lindenmayer DB, Fischer J, Manning AD, Weinberg A, Seddon J, Ryan P, Barrett G (2008a) The future of scattered trees in agricultural landscapes. Conserv Biol 22:1309–1319CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Gibbons P, Lindenmayer DB, Fischer J, Manning AD, Weinberg A, Seddon J, Ryan P, Barrett G (2008b) The future of scattered trees in agricultural landscapes. Conserv Biol 22:1309–1319Google Scholar
  35. Gibbons P, Briggs SV, Ayers D, Seddon J, Doyle S, Cosier P, McElhinny C, Pelly V, Roberts K (2009) An operational method to assess impacts of land clearing on terrestrial biodiversity. Ecol Indic 9:26–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hadorn GH, Bradley D, Pohl C, Rist S, Wiesmann U (2006) Implications of transdisciplinarity for sustainability research. Ecol Econ 60:119–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hodgkins D, Goldney D, Watson G, Tyson G (1999) The attitudes of landholders to a range of environmental issues, including the values of remnant bushland in the central western region of New South Wales. In: Hobbs RJ, Yates CJ (eds) Temperate eucalypt woodlands in Australia: biology, conservation, management and restoration. Surrey Beatty & Sons, Chipping Norton, pp 336–350Google Scholar
  38. Hoekstra JM, Boucher TM, Ricketts TH, Roberts C (2005) Confronting a biome crisis: global disparities of habitat loss and protection. Ecol Lett 8:23–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. House APN, MacLeod ND, Cullen B, Whitbread AM, Brown SD, McLvor JG (2008) Integrating production and natural resource management on mixed farms in eastern Australia: the cost of conservation in agricultural landscapes. Agric Ecosyst Environ 127:153–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jurin RR, Fortner RW (2002) Symbolic beliefs as barriers to responsible environmental behaviour. Environ Educ Res 8:373–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kaine G, Crosby E, Stayner R (1997) Succession and inheritance on Australian family farms. The Rural Development Centre, University of New England, ArmidaleGoogle Scholar
  42. Lawrence G, Richards CA, Cheshire L (2004) The environmental enigma: why do producers professing stewardship continue to practice poor natural resource management. J Environ Policy Plan 6:251–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. LCMA (2006) Lachlan catchment action plan. Lachlan Catchment Management Authority, p 208. http://www.lachlan.cma.nsw.gov.au/downloads/Catchment_Action_Plan/Lachlan_Catchment_Action_Plan_V9.pdf
  44. Lele S, Norgaard RB (2005) Practicing interdisciplinarity. Bioscience 55:967–975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. MacLeod ND, McIvor JG (2006) Reconciling economic and ecological conflicts for sustained management of grazing lands. Ecol Econ 56:386–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Manning AD, Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB (2006) Scattered trees are keystone structures—implications for conservation. Biol Conserv 132:311–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Manning AD, Gibbons P, Lindenmayer DB (2009) Scattered trees: a complementary strategy for facilitating adaptive responses to climate change in modified landscapes? J Appl Ecol 46:915–919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Maron M, Fitzsimons JA (2007) Agricultural intensification and loss of matrix habitat over 23 years in the West Wimmera, south-eastern Australia. Biol Conserv 135:587–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Melin G (2000) Pragmatism and self-organisation: research collaboration on the individual level. Res Policy 29:31–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Moss MR (2000) Interdisciplinarity, landscape ecology and the “Transformation of Agricultural Landscapes”. Landscape Ecol 15:303–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Naiman RJ (1999) A perspective on interdisciplinary science. Ecosystems 2:292–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pannell D (2003) Balancing economics and sustainability in building an integrated agricultural system. Pac Conserv Biol 9:23–29Google Scholar
  53. Pannell DJ, Marshall GR, Barr N, Curtis A, Vanclay F, Wilkinson R (2006) Understanding and promoting adoption of conservation practices by rural landholders. Aust J Exp Agric 46:1407–1424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pawson E, Dovers S (2003) Environmental history & the challenges of interdisciplinarity. Environ Hist 9:53–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pressey RL, Hager TC, Ryan KM, Schwarz J, Wall S, Ferrier S, Creaser PM (2000) Using abiotic data for conservation assessments over extensive regions: quantitative methods applied across New South Wales, Australia. Biol Conserv 96:55–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Richards C, Lawrence G (2009) Adaptation and change in Queensland’s rangelands: cell grazing as an emerging ideology of pastoral-ecology. Land Use Policy 26:630–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Santelmann MV, White D, Freemark K, Nassauer JI, Eilers JM, Vaché KB, Danielson BJ, Corry RC, Clark ME, Polasky S, Cruse RM, Sifneos J, Rustigian H, Coiner C, Wu J, Debinski D (2004) Assessing alternative futures for agriculture in Iowa, U.S.A. Landscape Ecol 19:357–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Schirmer J, Kanowski P, Race D (2000) Factors affecting adoption of plantation forestry on farms: implications for farm forestry development in Australia. Aust For 63:44–51Google Scholar
  59. Semple WS, Koen TB (2003) Effect of pasture type on regeneration of eucalypts in the woodland zone of south-eastern Australia. Cunninghamia 8:76–84Google Scholar
  60. Sherren K, Dovers S, Fischer J, Schirmer J (2008a) Sustainable Farms I: indentifying leverage points for reversing paddock tree loss—background and scoping workshop results Australian National University, p. 34. http://fennerschool-research.anu.edu.au/sustfarms/downloads/SustFarmsIfinal.pdf
  61. Sherren K, Fischer J, Dovers S, Schirmer J (2008b) Leverage points for reversing paddock tree loss in Upper Lachlan grazing landscapes—a workshop report. Ecol Manag Restor 9:237–240Google Scholar
  62. Sherren K, Fischer J, Price R (2010) Using photography to elicit grazier values and management practices related to tree survival and recruitment. Land Use Policy 27:1056–1067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sherren K, Fischer J, Pink J, Stott J, Stein J, Yoon H-J (in press) Australian graziers value sparse trees in their pastures: a viewshed analysis of photo elicitation. Society and Natural ResourcesGoogle Scholar
  64. Tilman D, Cassman KG, Matson P, Naylor R, Polasky S (2002) Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 418:671–677CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Tress B, Tress G, van der Valk A, Fry G (2003) Interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary landscape studies: potential and limitations. DELTA Program, WageningenGoogle Scholar
  66. Tress G, Tress B, Fry G (2005) Clarifying integrative research concepts in landscape ecology. Landscape Ecol 20:479–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Tscharntke T, Klein AM, Kruess A, Steffan-Dewenter I, Thies C (2005) Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity—ecosystem service management. Ecol Lett 8:857–874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. van Kerkhoff L (2005) Integrated research: concepts of connection in environmental science and policy. Environ Sci Policy 8:452–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Vanclay F (1992) Barriers to adoption: a general overview of the issues. Rural Soc 2:10–14Google Scholar
  70. Vennix JAM (1999) Group model-building: tackling messy problems. Syst Dyn Rev 15:379–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Vesk PA, MacNally R (2006) The clock is ticking—revegetation and habitat for birds and arboreal mammals in rural landscapes of southern Australia. Agric Ecosyst Environ 112:356–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Walpole SC (1999) Assessment of the economic and ecological impacts of remnant vegetation on pasture productivity. Pac Conserv Biol 5:28–35Google Scholar
  73. Wiens JA (2009) Landscape ecology as a foundation for sustainable conservation. Landscape Ecol 24:1053–1065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wu JG (2006) Landscape ecology, cross-disciplinarity, and sustainability science. Landscape Ecol 21:1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kate Sherren
    • 1
  • Joern Fischer
    • 1
  • Helena Clayton
    • 1
  • Jacki Schirmer
    • 1
  • Stephen Dovers
    • 1
  1. 1.Fenner School of Environment and SocietyAustralian National UniversityCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations