Landscape Ecology

, Volume 25, Issue 7, pp 1041–1054 | Cite as

Modeling seasonal dynamics of small fish cohorts in fluctuating freshwater marsh landscapes

  • Fred JoppEmail author
  • Donald L. DeAngelis
  • Joel C. Trexler
Research Article


Small-bodied fishes constitute an important assemblage in many wetlands. In wetlands that dry periodically except for small permanent waterbodies, these fishes are quick to respond to change and can undergo large fluctuations in numbers and biomasses. An important aspect of landscapes that are mixtures of marsh and permanent waterbodies is that high rates of biomass production occur in the marshes during flooding phases, while the permanent waterbodies serve as refuges for many biotic components during the dry phases. The temporal and spatial dynamics of the small fishes are ecologically important, as these fishes provide a crucial food base for higher trophic levels, such as wading birds. We develop a simple model that is analytically tractable, describing the main processes of the spatio-temporal dynamics of a population of small-bodied fish in a seasonal wetland environment, consisting of marsh and permanent waterbodies. The population expands into newly flooded areas during the wet season and contracts during declining water levels in the dry season. If the marsh dries completely during these times (a drydown), the fish need refuge in permanent waterbodies. At least three new and general conclusions arise from the model: (1) there is an optimal rate at which fish should expand into a newly flooding area to maximize population production; (2) there is also a fluctuation amplitude of water level that maximizes fish production, and (3) there is an upper limit on the number of fish that can reach a permanent waterbody during a drydown, no matter how large the marsh surface area is that drains into the waterbody. Because water levels can be manipulated in many wetlands, it is useful to have an understanding of the role of these fluctuations.


Wetlands Transient and permanent waterbodies Aquatic food web Trophic cascades Water level fluctuations Wetland management Maximum biomass production Everglades 



FJ was supported by U. S. Geological Survey’s Florida Integrated Science Center, and by the University of Miami, Biology Departement. DLD was supported by the U. S. Geological Survey’s Florida Integrated Science Center, and by the USGS’s Greater Everglades Priority Ecosystem funding. JCT was supported by cooperative agreement J5284060020 between Everglades National Park and Florida International University, and funding provided by the Comprehensive Ecosystem Science Initiative (CESI). Aspects of this paper are based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. DBI-0620409 and Grant No. DEB-9910514. We thank Adam Obaza for comments on earlier versions of this draft.

Supplementary material

10980_2010_9478_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (121 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 120 kb)


  1. Batzer DP (1998) Trophic interactions among detritus, benthic midges, and predatory fish in a freshwater marsh. Ecology 79:1688–1698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Batzer DP, Cooper R, Wissinger SA (2006) Wetland animal ecology. In: Batzer DP, Sharitz RR (eds) Ecology of freshwater and estuarine wetlands. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 242–284Google Scholar
  3. Beddington JR (1975) Mutual interference between parasites or predators and its effect on searching efficiency. J Anim Ecol 44:331–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chick JH, Coyne S, Trexler JC (1999) Effectiveness of airboat electrofishing for sampling fishes in shallow vegetated habitats. N Am J Fish 19:957–967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chick JH, Ruetz CR III, Trexler JC (2004) Spatial scale and abundance patterns of large fish communities in freshwater marshes of the Florida Everglades. Wetlands 24:652–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chick JH, Geddes P, Trexler JC (2008) Periphyton mat structure mediates trophic interactions in a subtropical wetland. Wetlands 28:378–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davis SM, Ogden JC (eds) (1994) Everglades: the system and its restoration. St. Lucie Press, Delray Beach, FLGoogle Scholar
  8. DeAngelis DL, Goldstein RA, O’Neill RV (1975) A model for trophic interaction. Ecology 56:881–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. DeAngelis DL, Loftus WF, Trexler JC, Ulanowicz RE (1997) Modeling fish dynamics and effects of stress in a hydrologically pulsed ecosystem. J Aquat Ecosyst Stress Recovery 1:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. DeAngelis DL, Trexler JC, Loftus WF (2005) Life history trade-offs and community dynamics of small fishes in a seasonally pulsed wetland. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 62:781–790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. DeAngelis DL, Trexler JC, Cosner C, Obaza A, Jopp F (2010) Fish Population dynamics in a seasonally varying wetland. Ecol Modell (2010) doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.12.021 (in print)
  12. Dorn NJ, Trexler JC, Gaiser EE (2006) Exploring the role of large predators in marsh food webs: evidence for a behaviorally-mediated trophic cascade. Hydrobiologia 569:375–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fisher R (1937) The wave of advance of advantageous genes. Ann Eugenics 7:353–369Google Scholar
  14. Goss CW (2006) Fish colonization of temporary wetlands in the context of the Everglades landscape. MS thesis, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, 45 ppGoogle Scholar
  15. Halls AS, Welcomme RL (2004) Dynamics of river fish populations in response to hydrological conditions: A simulation study. River Res Appl 20:985–1000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Howard KS (1995) The seasonal dynamics of fishes in artificial culvert ponds in the C-111 Basin, Dade County, Florida. M. S. Thesis, Florida International University, Miami. 83 ppGoogle Scholar
  17. Jopp F (2006) The impact of local spatial resistance on the movement behavior of Tenebrio molitor L. Centr Eur J Biol 1(3):412–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jordan CF, Coyne S, Trexler JC (1997) Sampling fishes in heavily vegetated habitats: the effects of habitat structure on sampling characteristics of the 1-m2 throw trap. Trans Am Fish Soc 126:1012–1020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Junk WJ, Ohly JJ, Piedade MTF, Soares MGM (2000) The Central Amazon Floodplain: actual use and options for sustainable management. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  20. Kobza RM, Trexler JC, Loftus WF, Perry SA (2004) Community structure of fishes inhabiting aquatic refuges in a threatened karstic wetland and its implication for ecosystem management. Biol Conserv 116:153–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kushlan JA (1976) Environmental stability and fish community diversity. Ecology 57:821–825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kushlan JA (1980) Population fluctuations of Everglades fishes. Copeia 1980:870–874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kushlan JA (1987) External threats and internal management—the hydrologic regulation of the Everglades, Florida, U.S.A. Environ Manag 11:109–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Loftus WF, Eklund AM (1994) Long-term dynamics of an Everglades fish community. In: Davis SM, Ogden JC (eds) Everglades: the system and its restoration. St. Lucie Press, Delray Beach, FL, pp 461–483Google Scholar
  25. Loftus WF, Kushlan JA (1987) Freshwater fishes of southern Florida. Bull Fla State Mus Biol Sci 31:147–344Google Scholar
  26. Loftus WF, Johnson RA, Anderson GH (1992) Ecological impacts of the reduction of groundwater levels in short-hydroperiod marshes of the Everglades. In: Stanford JA, Simons JJ (eds) Proceedings of the first international conference on ground water ecology. American Water Resources Association, pp 199–208Google Scholar
  27. Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG (2007) Wetlands. Wiley, Hoboken, NJGoogle Scholar
  28. Naiman RJ, Turner MG (2000) A future perspective on North America’s freshwater ecosystems. Ecol Appl 10:958–970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nelson CM, Loftus WF (1996). Effects of high-water conditions on fish communities in Everglades alligator ponds. In: Armentano TV (ed) Proceedings of the 1996 conference: ecological assessment of the 1994–1995 high water conditions in the Southern Everglades. Florida International University, Miami, FL, 22–23 August 1996, pp 89–101Google Scholar
  30. NRC (National Research Council) (1992) Restoration of aquatic ecosystems: science, technology and public policy. National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  31. Obaza AK (2009) Effectiveness of drift fences in modeling fish movement rates. MS thesis, Florida International University, Miami, 43 ppGoogle Scholar
  32. Ogden JC (1994) A comparison of wading bird nesting colony dynamics (1931–1946 and 1974–1989) as an indication of ecosystem conditions in the southern Everglades. In Davis SM, Ogden JC (eds) Everglades: the system and its restoration. St. Lucie Press, Delray Beach, FL, pp 533–570Google Scholar
  33. Ogden JC, Davis SM, Jacobs KT, Barnes T, Fling HE (2005) The use of conceptual ecological models to guide ecosystem restoration in South Florida. Wetlands 25:795–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Okubo A (1980) Diffusion and ecological problems: mathematical models. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 254 ppGoogle Scholar
  35. Rehage JS, Loftus WF (2007) Seasonal fish community variation in headwater mangrove creeks in the southwestern everglades: an examination of their role as dry-down refuges. Bull Mar Sci 80:625–645Google Scholar
  36. Rehage JS, Trexler JC (2006) Assessing the net effect of anthropogenic disturbance on aquatic communities in wetlands: community structure relative to distance from canals. Hydrobiologia 569:359–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ruetz CR III, Trexler JC, Jordan F, Loftus WF, Perry SA (2005) Population dynamics of wetland fishes: spatiotemporal patterns shaped by hydrological disturbance? J Anim Ecol 74:322–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Skalski GT, Gilliam JF (2000) Modeling diffusive spread in a heterogeeous population: a movement study with stream fish. Ecology 81(6):1685–1700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Skellam JG (1951) Random dispersal in theoretical populations. Biometrika 38:196–218PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Snodgrass JW, Burger J (2001) Management of wetland fish populations: population maintenance and control. In: Rader RB, Batzer DP, Wissinger SA (eds) Bioassessment and management of North American freshwater wetlands. Wiley, NY, pp 357–386Google Scholar
  41. Trexler JC, Goss CW (2009) Aquatic fauna as indicators for Everglades restoration: applying dynamic targets in assessments. Ecol Indic 9(6):108–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Trexler JC, Loftus WF, Jordan CF, Chick J, Kandl KL, McElroy TC, Bass OL (2001) Ecological scale and its implications for freshwater fishes in the Florida Everglades. In: Porter JW, Porter KG (eds) The Everglades, Florida Bay, and Coral Reefs of the Florida Keys: an ecosystem sourcebook. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 153–181Google Scholar
  43. Trexler JC, Loftus WF, Perry S (2005) Disturbance frequency and community structure in a twenty-five year intervention study. Oecologia 145:140–152CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Welcomme RL (1976) Some general and theoretical considerations on the fish yield of African rivers. J Fish Biol 8:351–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Welcomme RL, Hagborg D (1977) Towards a model of a floodplain fish population and its fishery. Environ Biol Fish 2:1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Welcomme RL, Halls A (2001) Some considerations of the effects of differences in flood patterns on fish populations. Ecohydrol Hydrobiol 13:313–321Google Scholar
  47. Wissinger SA (1999) Ecology of wetland invertebrates. Synthesis and applications for conservation and management. In: Batzer DP, Rader RB, Wissinger SA (eds) Invertebrates in freshwater wetlands of North America: ecology and management. Wiley, NY, pp 1043–1086Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fred Jopp
    • 1
    Email author
  • Donald L. DeAngelis
    • 2
  • Joel C. Trexler
    • 3
  1. 1.Biology DepartmentUniversity of MiamiCoral GablesUSA
  2. 2.U. S. Geological Survey and University of MiamiCoral GablesUSA
  3. 3.Department of Biological SciencesFlorida International UniversityMiamiUSA

Personalised recommendations