Landscape Ecology

, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 299–313 | Cite as

Forest cover changes in the Prignitz region (NE Germany) between 1790 and 1960 in relation to soils and other driving forces

Research Article


Decadal to centennial land-cover changes are important drivers of many environmental issues, including biodiversity, biogeochemical cycles and, especially, the global carbon balance. In general, changes are well documented over only a few decades. Studies of land-cover changes and its drivers over centuries are rare. Therefore, the main objectives of this study are (1) to trace the development of the actual pattern of forest-open land over 170 years, and (2) to associate land-cover classes with site conditions (soils) as well as with other driving forces during three periods (1790–1838, 1838–1870, and 1870–1960). For these purposes, we used a combined approach of GIS-techniques and historical reconstructions from archives. The shifts of percentages for established forests, afforestation, clearings and open land on different soils were checked using a chi square test. From the archives, we obtained information on demographic, political/institutional and economic/technological factors, which are assumed to be drivers for past land-cover changes. Percentages of most land-cover classes hardly differed between the periods. However, established forests remained mainly on sandy soils and, to a large extend, afforestation was realised on sandy soils. Clearings reached high percentages on fluvial sands and organic sediments in the early period. A complex of demographic, political/institutional and economic/technological factors also had a considerable impact on land use/cover change in the Prignitz region. Thus, in addition to the strong association of land-cover classes with soils, our study demonstrated that other driving forces, i.e. political and economic factors, played an important role in the full understanding of land use from the past to the present.


Afforestation Archival documents Drainage Clearings GIS Historical maps Open land Soil map 

Supplementary material


  1. Andersen O, Crow TR, Lietz SM, Stearns F (1996) Transformation of a landscape in the upper mid-west, USA: the history of the lower St. Croix river valley, 1830 to present. Landsc Urban Plan 35:247–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anonymous (2000) MINITAB. Release 13 for windows. Minitab, State College, PAGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker L (1995) Satellite remote sensing atlas of Europe. Justus Perthes, GothaGoogle Scholar
  4. Brandt J, Primdahl J, Reenberg A (1999) Rural land-use and landscape dynamics—analysis of ‘driving forces’ in space and time. In: Krönert R, Baudry J, Bowler IR, Reenberg A (eds) Land-use changes and their environmental impact in rural areas in Europe. Man and the Biosphere Series 24:81–102Google Scholar
  5. Bratring FWA (1804) Statistisch-topographische Beschreibung der gesamten Mark Brandenburg. Bd. 1–3. Reprint: Büsch O, Heinrich G (eds) (1968) Walter de Gruyter, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  6. Cousins SAO (2001) Analysis of land-cover transitions based on 17th and 18th century cadastral maps and aerial photographs. Landscape Ecol 16:41–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Enders L (2000) Die Prignitz—Geschichte einer kurmärkischen Landschaft vom 12. bis zum 18. Jahrhundert. Veröffentlichungen des Brandenburgischen Landeshauptarchiv 38:1–1352Google Scholar
  8. Foster DR (1992) Land-use history (1730–1990) and vegetation dynamics in central new England, USA. J Ecol 80:753–772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Glaser FF, Hauke U (2004) Historisch alte Waldstandorte und Hudewälder in Deutschland. Angewandte Landschaftsökologie 61:1–193Google Scholar
  10. Haase D, Walz U, Neubert M, Rosenberg M (2007) Changes to central European landscapes—analysing historical maps to approach current environmental issues, examples from Saxony, central Germany. Land Use Policy 24:248–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hagen WW (2002) Ordinary prussians. Brandenburg junkers and villagers, 1500–1840. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  12. Hall B, Motzkin G, Foster DR (2002) Three hundred years of forest and land-use change in Massachusetts, USA. J Biogeogr 29:1319–1335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Heimatkundliche Arbeitsgemeinschaft (AG) im Lehrerverein Wittenberge, Bezirk Potsdam (ed) (1925) Bilder aus der Geschichte der Prignitz. Martin Böcker-Verlag, WittenbergeGoogle Scholar
  14. Heuer R (1927) Aus der Geschichte der Prignitz. Adolf Tienken-Verlag, PritzwalkGoogle Scholar
  15. Institut für Forsteinrichtung und Standortserkundung (IFS) (ed) (1960) Ergebnisse der Standortserkundung im Staatlichen Forstwirtschaftsbetrieb Perleberg. Self-publisher, PotsdamGoogle Scholar
  16. Institut für Forsteinrichtung und Standortserkundung (IFS) (ed) (1961) Ergebnisse der Standortserkundung im Staatlichen Forstwirtschaftsbetrieb Kyritz. Self-publisher, PotsdamGoogle Scholar
  17. ISSS; ISRIC; FAO (1998) World reference base for soil resources. FAO World Soil Resources Reports 84, RomeGoogle Scholar
  18. Iverson LR (1988) Land-use changes in Illinois, USA: the influence of landscape attributes on current and historic land use. Landscape Ecol 2:45–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kienast F (1993) Analysis of historic landscape patterns with a geographical information system—a methodological outline. Landscape Ecol 8:103–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Krausch HD (1956) Flurnamen als Quellen zur Forstgeschichte, dargestellt am Beispiel Brandenburgs. Märkische Heimat 1:21–28Google Scholar
  21. Krenzlin A (1952) Dorf, Feld und Wirtschaft im Gebiet der großen Täler und Platten östlich der Elbe. Forschungen zur deutschen Landeskunde 70:1–144Google Scholar
  22. Krumbiegel D, Schwinge W (1991) Witterung-Klima, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Brandenburg und Berlin. DWD, Wetteramt Potsdam, pp 1–80Google Scholar
  23. Krzymowski R (1961) Geschichte der deutschen Landwirtschaft unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der technischen Entwicklung der Landwirtschaft bis zum Ausbruch des 2. Weltkrieges 1939, 3rd edn. Duncker- and Humblot-Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  24. Lambin EF, Geist H (eds) (2006) Land-use and land-cover-change. Local processes and global impacts. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–222Google Scholar
  25. Lambin EF, Turner BL II, Geist HJ, Agbola SB, Angelsen A, Bruce JW, Coomes O, Dirzo R, Fischer G, Folke C, George PS, Homewood K, Imbernon J, Leemans R, Li X, Moran EF, Mortimore M, Ramakrishnan PS, Richards JF, Skånes H, Stone GD, Svedin U, Verldkamp TA, Vogel C, Xu J (2001) The causes of land-use and land-cover change: moving beyond the myths. Glob Environ Chang 11:261–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Landesamt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe Brandenburg (LGRB) (2001) Bodenübersichtskarte des Landes Brandenburg (BÜK 300). Self-publisher, PotsdamGoogle Scholar
  27. Lesschen JP, Verburg PH, Staal SJ (2005) Statistical methods for analysing the spatial dimension of changes in land use and farming systems. LUC report series no. 7, pp 1–80Google Scholar
  28. Marcucci DJ (2000) Landscape history as a planning tool. Landsc Urban Plan 49:67–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mauch C (ed) (2004) Nature in German history. Berghahn Books, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  30. Pan D, Domon G, de Blois S, Bouchard A (1999) Temporal (1958–1993) and spatial patterns of land use changes in Haut-Saint-Laurent (Quebec, Canada) and their relation to landscape physical attributes. Landscape Ecol 14:35–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schmidt R (1975) Grundlagen der mittelmaßstäbigen landwirtschaftlichen Standortkartierung. Archiv für Acker und Pflanzenbau und Bodenkunde 19:533–543Google Scholar
  32. Schneider LC, Pontius RG (2001) Modeling land-use change in the ipswich watershed, Massachussetts, USA. Agric Ecosyst Environ 85:83–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schultze J (1956) Die Prignitz. Aus der Geschichte einer märkischen Landschaft. Böhlau-Verlag, Köln, GrazGoogle Scholar
  34. Schulze E (1995) 7500 Jahre landwirtschaft in Deutschland. Merkur-Verlag, LeipzigGoogle Scholar
  35. Staatliche Zentralverwaltung für Statistik. Bezirksstelle Potsdam (ed) (1966a) Statistisches Jahrbuch des Bezirkes Potsdam. Self-publisher, PotsdamGoogle Scholar
  36. Staatliche Zentralverwaltung für Statistik. Bezirksstelle Schwerin (ed) (1966b) Statistisches Jahrbuch des Bezirkes Schwerin. Self-publisher, PotsdamGoogle Scholar
  37. Stackebrandt W, Ehmke G, Manhenke V (eds) (1997) Atlas zur Geologie von Brandenburg. Self-publisher, Landesamtes für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe Brandenburg, KleinmachnowGoogle Scholar
  38. Wiens JA (1989) Spatial scaling in ecology. Funct Ecol 3:385–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wimberly MC, Ohmann JL (2004) A multi-scale assessment of human and environmental constraints on forest land cover change on the Oregon (USA) coast range. Landscape Ecol 19:631–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wulf M (2004a) Auswirkungen des Landschaftswandels auf die Verbreitungsmuster von Waldpflanzen. Diss Bot 392:1–306Google Scholar
  41. Wulf M (2004b) Species richness of afforestations with different former use and habitat continuity. For Ecol Manage 195:191–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wulf M, Groß J (2004) The Schmettau-Schulenburgsche map—a legend for the state of Brandenburg (eastern Germany) with critical comments (in German with English summary). Allgemeine Forst und Jagdzeitung 175:189–198Google Scholar
  43. Wulf M, Schmidt R (1996) Die Entwicklung der Waldverteilung in Brandenburg in Beziehung zu den naturräumlichen Bedingungen. Beiträge für Forstwirtschaft und Landschaftsökologie 30:125–131Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Land Use SystemsLeibniz Centre for Agricultural Research (Leibniz-ZALF e.V.)MünchebergGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Soil Landscape ResearchLeibniz Centre for Agricultural Research (Leibniz-ZALF e.V.)MünchebergGermany
  3. 3.Institute of GeoecologyUniversity PotsdamPotsdamGermany
  4. 4.EberswaldeGermany

Personalised recommendations