Landscape Ecology

, 24:833 | Cite as

Pre-EuroAmerican settlement forests in Redwood National Park, California, USA: a reconstruction using line summaries in historic land surveys

  • Joy A. Fritschle
Research Article


Extensive logging in the twentieth century destroyed much of the coniferous forests in the lower Redwood Creek basin of Redwood National Park. Restoration of cutover lands requires the identification of historical, pre-logging reference conditions. Field notes from the original Public Land Surveys were used to reconstruct the pre-EuroAmerican settlement forests. Most reconstructive studies based on historic surveys rely on bearing tree evidence over large areas to determine vegetation patterns over several hundreds to thousands of square kilometers. Due to the small size of the study area (approximately 200 km2), bearing tree evidence could not accurately reconstruct the vegetation at this scale. Instead, lists of the overstory and understory vegetation for each surveyed mile (line summaries) were employed. Analysis of line summaries evidence identified the historical importance, geographical range, and environmental influences on woody species and vegetation communities. Topography, especially elevation, and soil texture were significantly correlated with plot-scale ordination scores derived from non-metric multidimensional scaling. The influence of topography and distance to ocean coast on the historical distribution of dominant woody species concurs with findings from present-day field studies of local and regional old-growth forest. A comparison with present-day vegetation maps revealed that coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens), Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis), and red alder (Alnus rubra) experienced the most substantive changes in the vegetation as a result of twentieth century land use activities.


Vegetation reconstruction Public Land Survey Sequoia sempervirens Reference ecosystems Topography 



I would like to thank Ted Sickley for assistance in GIS data preparation and Stephen Veirs for guidance in the formative stages of the project. I am also grateful to Tom Vale, Matt Turner, Caroline Fritschle, Joan Welch, and the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments on the manuscript.


  1. Abrams MD (2001) Eastern white pine versatility in the presettlement forest. Bioscience 51(11):967–979. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0967:EWPVIT]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Almendinger JC (1997) Minnesota’s bearing tree database. Natural heritage information system. Section of Ecological Services, Division of Fish and Wildlife, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, MinnesotaGoogle Scholar
  3. Best DW (1995) History of timber harvest in the Redwood Creek basin, northwestern California. U.S. geological survey professional paper 1454-C. In: Nolan KM, Kelsey HM, Marron DC (eds) Geomorphic processes and aquatic habitat in the Redwood Creek basin, northwestern California. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, pp C1–C7Google Scholar
  4. Biringer J, Hansen LJ (2005) Restoring forest landscapes in the face of climate change. In: Mansourian S, Vallauri D, Dudley N (eds) Forest restoration in landscapes: beyond planting trees. Springer, New York, pp 31–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bollinger J, Schulte LA, Burrows SN, Sickley TA, Mladenoff DJ (2004) Assessing ecological restoration potentials of Wisconsin (U.S.A.) using historical landscapes reconstruction. Restor Ecol 12(1):124–142. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2004.00285.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burns RM, Honkala BH (tech coords) (1990) Silvics of North America, vol 1: conifers, vol 2: Hardwoods, Agriculture Handbook 654, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC. Accessed 09 Mar 2009
  7. Busing RT, Fujimori T (2002) Dynamics of composition and structure in an old Sequoia sempervirens forest. J Veg Sci 13(6):785–792Google Scholar
  8. Calflora: Information on California Plants for Education, Research and Conservation (2006) Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirbel) Franco var. menziesii, Taxon report 6907. The Calflora Database, Berkeley, California. Accessed 18 Mar 2009
  9. California Environmental Resources Evaluation System (CERES) (1997) Digital elevation model (30 m). Teale GIS Solutions Group, California Environmental Resources Evaluation System, California. Accessed 18 Mar 2009
  10. Chase AW (1874) Timber belts of the Pacific coast. Overl Mon Out W Mag 13(3):242–249Google Scholar
  11. Cogbill CV, Burk J, Motzkin G (2002) The forests of presettlement New England, U.S.A.: spatial and compositional patterns based on town proprietor surveys. J Biogeogr 29:1279–1304. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2699.2002.00757.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Collins BD, Montgomery DR, Sheikh AJ (2003) Reconstructing the historical riverine landscape of the Puget Sound Lowland. In: Montgomery DR, Bolton S, Booth DB, Wall L (eds) Restoration of Puget sound rivers. University of Washington Press, Seattle, pp 79–128Google Scholar
  13. Daly C, Taylor G (1998) Klamath network average annual precipitation, 1961-90. Water and climate center of the natural resources conservation service, Portland, Oregon. Accessed 24 Feb 2007
  14. Davey CA, Redmond KT, Simeral DB (2007) Weather and climate inventory, National Park Service Klamath Network. Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/KLMN/NRTR—2007/035, WRCC Report 2007-10. Natural Resource Program Center, National Park Service, U.S. Department of Interior, Fort Collins, ColoradoGoogle Scholar
  15. Egan D, Howell EA (2005) Introduction. In: Egan D, Howell EA (eds) The historical ecology handbook: a restorationist guide to reference ecosystem. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 1–23Google Scholar
  16. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (1998) Redwood creek sediment total maximum daily load. Water Division, Region 9, U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyGoogle Scholar
  17. ESRI (2005) ArcMap 9.1. Environmental Systems Research Institute, RedlandsGoogle Scholar
  18. Fritschle JA (2007) An intermediate-scale reconstruction of historic vegetation in Redwood National Park using the Public Land Survey. Dissertation, University of Wisconsin-MadisonGoogle Scholar
  19. Fritschle JA (2008) Reconstructing historic ecotones using the Public Land Survey: the lost prairies of Redwood National Park. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 98(1):24–39. doi: 10.1080/00045600701734018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Greene LW (1980) Historical overview of the Redwood Creek Basin and Bald Hills regions of Redwood National Park, California. National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, DenverGoogle Scholar
  21. Grimm EC (1984) Fire and other factors controlling the big woods vegetation of Minnesota in the mid-nineteenth century. Ecol Monogr 54(3):291–311. doi: 10.2307/1942499 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Harris JA, Hobbs RJ, Higgs E, Aronson J (2006) Ecological restoration and global climate change. Restor Ecol 14(2):170–176. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2006.00136.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kent M, Coker P (1992) Vegetation description and analysis: a practical approach. CRC Press, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  24. Lenihan JM (1990) Forest associations of Little Lost Man Creek, Humboldt County, California: reference-level in the hierarchical structure of old-growth coastal redwood vegetation. Madrono 37(2):69–87Google Scholar
  25. Lenihan JM, Bachelet D, Neilson RP, Drapek R (2008) Response of vegetation distribution, ecosystem productivity, and fire to climate change scenarios for California. Clim Change 87(suppl 1):S215–S230. doi: 10.1007/s10584-007-9362-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Little EL (1994) National Audubon society field guide to North American trees, western region. Alfred A. Knopf, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Mahony TM, Stuart JD (2000) Old-growth forest associations in the northern range of coastal redwood. Madrono 47(1):53–60Google Scholar
  28. Mahony TM, Stuart JD (2007) Status of vegetation classification in redwood ecosystems. In: Standiford RB, Giusti GA, Valachovic Y, Zielinski WJ, Furniss MJ (eds) Proceedings of the redwood region forest science symposium: what does the future hold? General technical report PSW-GTR-194. Pacific Southwest Research Station, Forest Service, US Department of Agriculture, Albany, pp 207–214Google Scholar
  29. Manies KL, Mladenoff DJ (2000) Testing methods to produce landscape-scale presettlement vegetation maps from the U.S. Public Land Survey records. Landscape Ecol 15:741–754. doi: 10.1023/A:1008115200471 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Manies KL, Mladenoff DJ, Nordheim EV (2001) Assessing large-scale surveyor variability in the historic forest data of the original U.S. Public Land Survey. Can J For Res 31:1719–1730. doi: 10.1139/cjfr-31-10-1719 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McCune B, Grace JB (2002) Analysis of ecological communities. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, OregonGoogle Scholar
  32. McCune B, Keon D (2002) Equations for potential annual direct incident radiation and heat load. J Veg Sci 13:603–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McCune B, Mefford MJ (1999) PC-ORD, Multivariate analysis of ecological data, version 5.0. MjM Software, Gleneden Beach, OregonGoogle Scholar
  34. Muldavin EH, Lenihan JM, Lennox WS, Veirs SD (1981) Vegetation succession in the first 10 years following logging of the coast redwood forests. Redwood National Park technical report no. 6. National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, Arcata, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  35. Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) (2007) Partial soil survey geographic (SSURGO) database for Humboldt and Del Norte Area, California. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Fort Worth, Texas. Accessed 18 Mar 2009
  36. Redwood National Park (RNP) (1996) Checklist of the vascular plants of Redwood National Park. Species in parks, flora and fauna database, online query system. Information Center for the Environment, University of California, Davis, and National Park Service, Davis, California. Accessed 12 July 2006
  37. Redwood National and State Parks (RNSP) (2000) General management plan, Redwood National and State Parks, Humboldt and Del Norte Counties, California. National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, California Department of Parks and Recreation, Denver Service Center, ColoradoGoogle Scholar
  38. Redwood National and State Parks (RNSP) (2008) Fact sheet. Redwood Park Association, National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, California Department of Parks and Recreation, Redwood National and State Parks, California. Accessed 18 Mar 2009
  39. Remote Sensing Lab (2004) Vegetation Classification, Vegetation Descriptions, North Coast and Montane Ecological Province—CALVEG Zone 1. Pacific Southwest Region, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. Accessed 18 Mar 2009
  40. Remote Sensing Lab (2005) FSSDE.EvegTile01A/B (vector digital data), 1:100,000. Pacific Southwest Region, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, McClellan, California. Accessed 18 Mar 2009
  41. Russell WH, Jones C (2001) The effects of timber harvesting on the structure and composition of adjacent old-growth coast redwood forest, California, USA. Landscape Ecol 16:731–741. doi: 10.1023/A:1014486030462 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sawyer JO, Gray J, West GJ, Thornburgh DA, Noss RF, Engbeck JH Jr, Marcot BG, Raymond R (2000a) History of redwood and redwood forests. In: Noss RF (ed) The redwood forest: history, ecology and conservation of the coast redwoods. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 7–38Google Scholar
  43. Sawyer JO, Sillett SC, Popenoe JH, LaBanca A, Scholars T, Largent DL, Euphrat F, Noss RF, Van Pelt R (2000b) Characteristics of redwood forests. In: Noss RF (ed) The redwood forest: history, ecology and conservation of the coast redwoods. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 39–80Google Scholar
  44. Schulte LA, Mladenoff DJ (2001) The original US Public Land Survey Records: their use and limitations in reconstructing presettlement vegetation. J For 99:5–10Google Scholar
  45. Scull P, Richardson JL (2007) A method to use ranked timber observations to perform forest composition reconstructions from land survey data. Am Midl Nat 158:446–460. doi: 10.1674/0003-0031(2007)158[446:AMTURT]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Seischab FK (1990) Presettlement forests of the Phelps and Gorham Purchase in western New York. Bull Torrey Bot Club 117:27–38. doi: 10.2307/2997126 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Seischab FK (1992) Forests of the Holland Land company in western New York, circa 1798. In: Marks PL, Gardescu S, Seischab FK (eds) Late eighteenth century vegetation of central and western New York State on the basis of original land survey records, New York State Museum Bulletin, New York State Museum. University of the State of New York, Albany, pp 36–53Google Scholar
  48. Society for Ecological Restoration Science & Policy Working Group (SER) (2004) The SER International primer on ecological restoration, version 2. Accessed 18 Mar 2009
  49. Stewart LO (1935) Public land surveys: history, instructions, methods. Arno Press Inc, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  50. Tart D, Williams C, DiBenedetto J, Crowe E, Girard M, Gordon H, Sleavin K, Manning M, Haglund J, Short B, Wheeler D (2005) Sect. 2: existing vegetation classification protocol. In: Brohman R and Bryant L (eds) Existing vegetation classification and mapping technical guide, Gen. Tech. Rep. WO–67, Ecosystem Management Coordination Staff, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., pp. 2.1–2.34Google Scholar
  51. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (1997) Recovery plan for the marbled murrelet (Brachyramphus marmoratus) in Washington, Oregon and California. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, PortlandGoogle Scholar
  52. Uzes FD (1977) Chaining the land: a history of surveying in California. Landmark Enterprises, SacramentoGoogle Scholar
  53. Veirs SD (1982) Coast redwood forest: stand dynamics, successional status, and the role of fire. In: Means JE (ed) Forest succession and stand development research in the northwest. Forest Research Laboratory, Oregon State University, Corvallis, pp 119–141Google Scholar
  54. Veirs SD (1986) Redwood second-growth forest stand rehabilitation study, Redwood National Park: evaluation of 1978–79 thinning experiments. Redwood National Park, Orick, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  55. Veirs SD, Lennox WS (1981) Rehabilitation and long-term management of cutover redwood forests: problems of natural succession. Symposium of Watershed Rehabilitation in Redwood National Park and Other Pacific Coastal Areas, Redwood National Park Archives, Arcata, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  56. Wang Y (2005) Presettlement land survey records of vegetation: geographic characteristics, quality and modes of analysis. Prog Phys Geogr 29(4):568–598. doi: 10.1191/0309133305pp463ra CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Waring RH, Major J (1964) Vegetation of the California coastal redwood region in relation to gradients of moisture, nutrients, light, and temperature. Ecol Monogr 34(2):167–215. doi: 10.2307/1948452 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. White CA (1984) A history of the rectangular survey system. Bureau of Land Management, Government Printing Office, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geography & PlanningWest Chester University of PennsylvaniaWest ChesterUSA

Personalised recommendations