Advertisement

Landscape Ecology

, Volume 24, Issue 8, pp 1015–1026 | Cite as

Sustainable landscape architecture: implications of the Chinese philosophy of “unity of man with nature” and beyond

  • Xiangqiao Chen
  • Jianguo Wu
Research Article

Abstract

As the world population continues to grow and as global urbanization continues to unfold, our ecosystems and landscapes will be increasingly domesticated and designed. Developing and maintaining sustainable landscapes have become one of the most challenging and imperative tasks for scientists and stakeholders of all sorts. To accomplish this task, landscape ecology and landscape architecture can and must play a critical role. Landscape architects intentionally modify and create landscapes, and their imprints and influences are pervasive and profound, far beyond the physical limits of the designed landscapes. As an interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary enterprise that integrates the science and art of studying and influencing the relationship between spatial pattern and ecological processes, the theory, methods, and applications of landscape ecology are directly relevant to sustainability. However, neither landscape ecology nor landscape architecture is likely to achieve its expected goal if they are not truly integrated to produce a sustainable landscape architecture. In this paper, we argue that the ancient Chinese philosophy of “unity of man with nature” and its associated design principles can provide useful guidelines for this integration as well as for the development of a sustainable landscape architecture. We discuss several principles and models of Chinese landscape architecture, including “unity of man with nature” philosophy, “peach blossom spring” ideal, “world-in-a-pot” model, and Feng–Shui theory, and their implications for developing a sustainable landscape architecture. Although differences in the philosophical roots and design traditions between Eastern and Western landscape architecture will continue to exist, interactions and integration between the two will continue to increase under the theme of sustainability. To promote the translation of scientific knowledge into practice, we urge landscape ecologists to work proactively with landscape architects to integrate pattern–process–scale and holistic perspectives into the design and planning of landscapes.

Keywords

Landscape architecture Sustainability Landscape design and planning Human–nature relationship Unity of man with nature China 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Chris Clark, David Iwaniec, Jen Litteral, Laura Musacchio, Yun Ouyang, Michael Rosenzweig, Lihua Yang, and Tong Wu for reviewing an earlier version of this paper. JW also thanks Michael Rosenzweig for discussions on reconciliation ecology. JW’s research on urban ecology and sustainability has been supported partly by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. BCS-0508002 (Biocomplexity/CNH) and under Grant No. DEB-0423704, Central Arizona-Phoenix Long-Term Ecological Research (CAP LTER).

References

  1. Ahern J (2005a) Integration of landscape ecology and landscape architecture: an evolutionary and reciprocal process. In: Wiens JA, Moss MR (eds) Issues and perspectives in landscape ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 311–319Google Scholar
  2. Ahern J (2005b) Theories, methods and strategies for sustainable landscape planning. In: Tress B, Tress G, Fry G, Opdam P (eds) From landscape research to landscape planning: aspects of integration, education and application. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahern J, Leduc E, York ML (2006) Biodiversity planning and design: sustainable practices. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  4. ASLA (2009) American society of landscape architects. http://www.asla.org/nonmembers/publicrelations/factshtpr.htm. Accessed 10 Jan 2009
  5. Bastian O, Kronert R, Lipsky Z (2006) Landscape diagnosis on different space and time scales—a challenge for landscape planning. Landscape Ecol 21:359–374. doi: 10.1007/s10980-005-5224-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bell S, Apostol D (2008) Designing sustainable forest landscapes. Taylor and Francis, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Botequilha Leitao A, Ahern J (2002) Applying landscape ecological concepts and metrics in sustainable landscape planning. Landsc Urban Plan 59:65–93. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00005-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carreiro MM, Song YC, Wu JG (eds) (2008) Ecology, planning, and management of urban forests: international perspectives. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen XQ (2008) New ideas and practices of Chinese gardens and ecological landscape architecture. Ph.D Dissertation. Zhejiang University, HangzhouGoogle Scholar
  10. Forman RTT (1990) Ecologically sustainable landscapes: the role of spatial configuration. In: Zonneveld IS, Forman RTT (eds) Changing landscapes: an ecological perspective. Springer, New York, pp 261–278Google Scholar
  11. Forman TTR (2008) The urban region: natural systems in our place, our nourishment, our home range, our future. Landscape Ecol 23:251–253. doi: 10.1007/s10980-008-9209-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fu B, Lü Y, Chen L (2008) Expanding the bridging capability of landscape ecology. Landscape Ecol 23:375–376. doi: 10.1007/s10980-008-9214-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Golley FB, Bellot J (1991) Interactions of landscape ecology, planning and design. Landsc Urban Plan 21:3–11. doi: 10.1016/0169-2046(91)90028-K CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hong S-K, Song I-J, Wu J (2007) Feng shui theory in urban landscape planning. Urban Ecosyst 10:221–237. doi: 10.1007/s11252-006-3263-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kareiva P, Watts S, McDonald R, Boucher T (2007) Domesticated nature: shaping landscapes and ecosystems for human welfare. Science 316:1866–1869. doi: 10.1126/science.1140170 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kates RW, Clark WC, Corell R, Hall JM, Jaeger CC, Lowe I, McCarthy JJ, Schellnhuber HJ, Bolin B, Dickson NM, Faucheux S, Gallopin GC, Grubler A, Huntley B, Jager J, Jodha NS, Kasperson RE, Mabogunje A, Matson P, Mooney H, Moore BIII, O’Riordan T, Svedin U (2001) Sustainability science. Science 292:641–642. doi: 10.1126/science.1059386 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kaufman DG, Franz CM (1996) Biosphere 2000: protecting our global environment, 2nd edn. Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company, DubuqueGoogle Scholar
  18. Leopold A (1949) A sand county almanac. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Lindenmayer DB, Wood JT, Cunningham RB, Crane M, Macgregor C, Michael D, Montague-Drake R (2009) Experimental evidence of the effects of a changed matrix on conserving biodiversity within patches of native forest in an industrial plantation landscape. Landscape Ecol. doi: 10.1007/s10980-008-9244-5
  20. Linehan JR, Gross M (1998) Back to the future, back to basics: the social ecology of landscapes and the future of landscape planning. Landsc Urban Plan 42:207–223. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(98)00088-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mak MY, Ng ST (2005) Theart and science of Feng Shui—a study on architects’ perception. Build Environ 40:427–434. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2004.07.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. March AL (1968) An appreciation of Chinese geomancy. J Asian Stud 27:256–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McHarg IL (1969) Design with nature. Natural History Press, Garden CityGoogle Scholar
  24. McLennan JF (2004) The philosophy of sustainable design: the future of architecture. Ecotone, Kansas CityGoogle Scholar
  25. Metzger JP (2008) Landscape ecology: perspectives based on the 2007 IALE world congress. Landscape Ecol 23:501–504. doi: 10.1007/s10980-008-9217-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Musacchio LR (2009) Scientific basis for design of landscape sustainability: key characteristics of an emerging concept. Landscape Ecol (this issue)Google Scholar
  27. Musacchio LR, Wu J (2004) Collaborative landscape-scale ecological research: emerging trends in urban and regional ecology. Urban Ecosyst 7:175–178. doi: 10.1023/B:UECO.0000044034.55695.bd CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nassauer JI, Opdam P (2008) Design in science: extending the landscape ecology paradigm. Landscape Ecol 23:633–644. doi: 10.1007/s10980-008-9226-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Naveh Z (1991) Some remarks on recent developments in landscape ecology as a transdisciplinary ecological and geographical science. Landscape Ecol 5:65–73. doi: 10.1007/BF00124661 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Naveh Z (2000) What is holistic landscape ecology? A conceptual introduction. Landsc Urban Plan 50:7–26. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00077-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Naveh Z (2007) Landscape ecology and sustainability. Landscape Ecol 22:1437–1440. doi: 10.1007/s10980-007-9171-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Opdam P (2007) Deconstructing and reassembling the landscape system. Landscape Ecol 22:1445–1446. doi: 10.1007/s10980-007-9169-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Opdam P, Foppen R, Vos C (2001) Bridging the gap between ecology and spatial planning in landscape ecology. Landscape Ecol 16:767–779. doi: 10.1023/A:1014475908949 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML (1995) Landscape ecology: spatial heterogeneity in ecological systems. Science 269:331–334. doi: 10.1126/science.269.5222.331 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML (2008) Linking ecological and built components of urban mosaics: an open cycle of ecological design. J Ecol 96:8–12Google Scholar
  36. Poiani KA, Richter BD, Anderson MG, Richter HE (2000) Biodiversity conservation at multiple scales: functional sites, landscapes, and networks. Bioscience 50:133–146. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0133:BCAMSF]2.3.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Potschin M, Haines-Young R (2006) “Rio + 10”, sustainability science and Landscape Ecology. Landsc Urban Plan 75:162–174. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.03.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pregill P, Volkman N (1999) Landscapes in history: design and planning in the Eastern and Western traditions. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. Ren H (2000) Feng Shui and Chinese traditional domestic architecture. M.S. Thesis. University of Cincinnati, CincinnatiGoogle Scholar
  40. Rosenzweig ML (2003a) Reconciliation ecology and the future of species diversity. Oryx 37:194–205. doi: 10.1017/S0030605303000371 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rosenzweig ML (2003b) Win-win ecology: how the earth’s species can survive in the midst of human enterprise. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  42. Skinner S (2001) Guide to Feng Shui. DK Publishing, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  43. Su YL (2006) On the fusion of the two theories of hte eight trigrams and five elements. Stud Zhouyi 76:83–86Google Scholar
  44. Termorshuizen JW, Opdam P (2009) Landscape services as a bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development. doi: 101007/s10980-008-9314-8
  45. Termorshuizen JW, Opdam P, van den Brink A (2007) Incorporating ecological sustainability into landscape planning. Landsc Urban Plan 79:374–384. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.04.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. United Nations (2004) World population to 2300. United Nations, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  47. Van der Ryn S, Calthorpe P (1986) Sustainable communities: a new design synthesis for cities, suburbs and towns. Sierra Club Books, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  48. Vitousek P, Mooney H (1997) Human domination of earth’s ecosystems. Science 277:494–499. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5325.494 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wang R (2004) Towards eco-integration—ecopolis plannign in China. In: Hong SK, Lee JA, Ihm BS, Farina A, Son Y, Kim ES, Choe JC (eds) Ecological issues in a changing world. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 311–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wang R, Ye Y (2004) Eco-city development in China. Ambio 33:341–342PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Wiens JA (2009) Landscape ecology as a foundation for sustainable conservation. Landscape Ecol. doi: 10.1007/s10980-008-9284-x
  52. Wilson EH (1929) China: mother of gardens. Stratford, BostonGoogle Scholar
  53. World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  54. Wu JG (2006) Landscape ecology, cross-disciplinarity, and sustainability science. Landscape Ecol 21:1–4. doi: 10.1007/s10980-006-7195-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wu JG (2008a) Toward a landscape ecology of cities: beyond buildings, trees, and urban forests. In: Carreiro MM, Song YC, Wu JG (eds) Ecology, planning and management of urban forests: international perspectives. Springer, New York, pp 10–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wu JG (2008b) Making the case for landscape ecology: an effective approach to urban sustainability. Landsc J 27:41–50. doi: 10.3368/lj.27.1.41 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wu JG (2008c) Changing perspectives on biodiversity conservation: from species protection to regional sustainability. Biodivers Sci 16:205–213Google Scholar
  58. Wu J, David JL (2002) A spatially explicit hierarchical approach to modeling complex ecological systems: theory and applications. Ecol Modell 153:7–26. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00499-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wu J, Hobbs R (eds) (2007) Landscape ecology: the-state-of-the-science. In: Key topics in landscape ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 271–287Google Scholar
  60. Wu J, Loucks OL (1995) From balance-of-nature to hierarchical patch dynamics: a paradigm shift in ecology. Q Rev Biol 70:439–466. doi: 10.1086/419172 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Xu J (2003) A framework for site analysis with emphasis on Feng Shui and contemporary environmental design principles. Ph.D. Dissertation. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, BlacksburgGoogle Scholar
  62. Yu KJ (2006) Positioning contemporary landscape architecture in China. China Construction Industry Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  63. Zhou W (1999) History of classic Chinese gardens. Qinghua University Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  64. Zhou LX, Chen Y (1992) Principles of classic arts and aesthetics. Res Lit Arts 1992:31–33Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Life ScienceZhejiang UniversityHangzhouChina
  2. 2.School of Life Sciences and Global Institute of SustainabilityArizona State UniversityTempeUSA
  3. 3.Sino-US Center for Conservation, Energy, and Sustainability (SUCCESS)Inner Mongolia UniversityHohhotChina

Personalised recommendations