Advertisement

Landscape Ecology

, Volume 23, Issue 8, pp 945–959 | Cite as

Spatio-temporal variability in human and natural sounds in a rural landscape

  • Yiannis G. Matsinos
  • Antonios D. Mazaris
  • Kimon D. Papadimitriou
  • Andreas Mniestris
  • George Hatzigiannidis
  • Dimitris Maioglou
  • John D. Pantis
Research Article

Abstract

The study of landscape structure and functions, including the underlying ecological and anthropogenic processes has traditionally relied on visual aspects without considering information of non-visionary cues, e.g. auditory. In this work we applied a complementary approach for the study of landscapes using qualitative information for the sonic environment. In particular we studied the qualitative linkages between landscape structure and functions and daily sound patterns. The main objectives were the investigation of the spatial and temporal variability in sound perception, and the identification of the dominant sound categories (anthropogenic, biological, geophysical originated sounds) in relation to landscape characteristics. Our results showed significant spatio-temporal variability in the intensity of different sound categories, which reflects distinct soundscape patterns. Temporal sound variability reflected the daily cycle of anthropogenic activities and biological processes, whereas the spatial sound viability was mainly shaped by landscape attributes. The combination of the visual landscape information and its emergent acoustic profile enhances our perception and understanding of nature and this integrated approach may have many practical applications in landscape management, monitoring and planning.

Keywords

Soundscape Perceived sound intensity Landscape attributes Sound classification 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the researchers who have participated to the field work: (in alphabetical order) Dionysis Batzakis, Ioanna Etmektsogolou, Giorgos Frangiskos, Iordanis Houvardas, Nikos Kefalogiannis, Evagelia Drakou, Eleni Kotali, Hristos Koutsodimakis, Theodoros Lotis, Apostolos Loufopoulos, Filippos Theoharidis, Katerina Tzedaki and Nikos Valsamakis. This research is supported by the PYTHAGORAS project of the Operational Program for Education and Initial Vocational Training (EPEAEK) of the Hellenic Ministry of Education under the 3rd European Community Support Framework for Greece. We thank J. Tzanopoulos and two anonymous reviewers for helpful and constructive comments on previous draft of this manuscript.

References

  1. Andersen JB (2008) Research in the journal Landscape Ecology 1987–2005. Landsc Ecol 23:129–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arkette S (2004) Sounds like city. Theory Cult Soc 21:159–168. doi: 10.1177/0263276404040486 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bonaiuto M, Fornara F, Bonnes M (2003) Indexes of perceived residential environment quality and neighbourhood attachment in urban environments: a confirmation study on the city of Rome. Landsc Urban Plan 65:43–54. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00236-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Botteldooren D, De Coensel B, De Muer T (2006) The temporal structure of urban soundscapes. J Sound Vibrat 292:105–123. doi: 10.1016/j.jsv.2005.07.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown AL, Muhar A (2004) An approach to the acoustic design of outdoor space. J Environ Plann Manage 47:827–842. doi: 10.1080/0964056042000284857 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carles JL, Barrio IL, de Lucio JV (1999) Sound influence on landscape values. Landsc Urban Plan 43:191–200. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(98)00112-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coates PA (2005) The strange stillness of the past: toward an environmental history of sound and noise. Environ Hist 10:636–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Corbin A (1998) Village bells. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. EU (2002) European parliament and of the council. Relating to the assessment and management of environmental noise. Directive 2002/49/EC, 2002Google Scholar
  10. Farina A, Belgrano A (2006) The eco-field hypothesis: toward a cognitive landscape. Landsc Ecol 21:5–17. doi: 10.1007/s10980-005-7755-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hedfors P, Grahn P (1998) Soundscapes in urban and rural planning and design. In: Schafer RM, Järviluoma H (eds) Northern soundscapes—yearbook of soundscape studies, vol 1. Department of Folk Tradition Publication, Tampere, pp 67–82Google Scholar
  12. Hellenic Ministry for the Environment, Physical Planning and Public Works (1999–2001) Identification and description of habitat types in areas of interest for the conservation of natureGoogle Scholar
  13. Kilman T, Kropp W (2001) City traffic noise: a local or global problem? J Noise Contr Eng 49:165–169. doi: 10.3397/1.2839653 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Klæboe R, Engelien E, Steinnes M (2006) Context sensitive noise impact mapping. Appl Acoust 67:620–642. doi: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2005.12.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Krause BL (2002) Wild soundscapes in the national parks: an educational program guide to listening and recording. National Park ServiceGoogle Scholar
  16. Laiolo P, Tella JT (2006) Landscape bioacoustics allow detection of the effects of habitat patchiness on population structure. Ecology 87:1203–1214. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1203:LBADOT]2.0.CO;2 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mace BL, Bell PA, Loomis RJ (1999) Aesthetic, affective, and cognitive effects 563 of noise on natural landscape assessment. Soc Nat Resour 12:225–242. doi: 10.1080/089419299279713 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Matless D (2000) Action and noise over a hundred years: the making of a nature region. Body Soc 6:141–165. doi: 10.1177/1357034X00006003008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Matless D (2005) Sonic geography in a nature region. Soc Cult Geogr 6:745–766. doi: 10.1080/14649360500258245 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McDonnell MJ, Pickett STA (1990) The study of ecosystem structure and function along urban-rural gradients: an unexploited opportunity for ecology. Ecology 71:1231–1237. doi: 10.2307/1938259 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Miller PN (2008) US national parks and management of park soundscapes: a review. Appl Acoust 69:77–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mitasova H, Mitas L, Harmon RS (2005) Simultaneous spline approximation and topographic analysis for lidar elevation data in open source GIS. IEEE GRSL 2:375–379Google Scholar
  23. Nagendra N, Munroe DK, Southworth J (2004) From pattern to process: landscape fragmentation and the analysis of land use/land cover change. Agric Ecosyst Environ 101:111–115. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2003.09.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Öhrström E, Skånberg A, Svensson H, Gidlöf-Gunnarsson A (2006) Effects of road traffic noise and the benefit of access to quietness. J Sound Vibr 295:40–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Parker DC, Meretsky V (2004) Measuring pattern outcomes in an agent-based model of edge effect externalities using spatial metrics. Agric Ecosyst Environ 101:233–250. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2003.09.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schafer RM (1969) The new soundscape: a handbook for the modern music teacher. BMI, Don Mills, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  27. Schafer RM (1977) The tuning of the world. Knopf, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Schafer RM (1994) The soundscape. Our sonic environments and the tuning of the world. Destiny Books, Rochester, VermontGoogle Scholar
  29. Skånberg G, Öhrström E (2002) Advence health effects in relation to urban residential sounds-scapes. J Sound Vibrat 250:151–155. doi: 10.1006/jsvi.2001.3894 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Truax B (1984) Acoustic communication. Ablex, New JerseGoogle Scholar
  31. Truax B (1999) Handbook of acoustic ecology, 2nd edn, (CD-ROM version). Street Publishing, Burnaby, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  32. van Poll R (1997) The perceived quality of the urban residential environment–a multi-attribute evaluation. Roermund, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  33. Wu J, Hobbs R (eds) (2007) Key topics in landscape ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yiannis G. Matsinos
    • 1
  • Antonios D. Mazaris
    • 2
  • Kimon D. Papadimitriou
    • 2
  • Andreas Mniestris
    • 3
  • George Hatzigiannidis
    • 2
  • Dimitris Maioglou
    • 2
  • John D. Pantis
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Environmental Studies, Biodiversity Conservation LaboratoryUniversity of the AegeanMitileneGreece
  2. 2.Department of EcologyAristotle UniversityThessalonikiGreece
  3. 3.Department of Music StudiesIonian UniversityCorfuGreece

Personalised recommendations