Advertisement

Landscape Ecology

, Volume 23, Issue 5, pp 501–504 | Cite as

Landscape ecology: perspectives based on the 2007 IALE world congress

  • Jean Paul MetzgerEmail author
Editorial

Sixty-nine years since Carl Troll first coined the term “landscape ecology”, 25 years of existence of the International Association for Landscape Ecology (IALE), and 20 years since the first issue of the journal Landscape Ecology, can we now consider landscape ecology a more mature science? This question was discussed at a roundtable during the 2007 IALE World Congress. As one of the invited speakers, I read carefully all 401 abstracts of the open sessions and symposia of the congress, and analysed them in a quantitative way based on the following criteria: country of origin, technologies used for spatial quantification, organizational level (such as population, community, ecosystem), cross-disciplinarity (i.e. multi-, inter- or transdisciplinarity; for definitions, see Fry et al. 2007), temperate versus tropical landscapes, habitat modification, type of landscape, spatial and temporal scales, kind of human disturbance, main research topics as per Wu and Hobbs’s (2002) classification....

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to acknowledge Rob Jongman and Bob Bunce for the invitation to the IALE World Congress 2007, and Jianguo Wu, Cristina Banks, Vânia Pivello, Danilo Boscolo and Sandra Luque for comments on previous versions of this manuscript.

References

  1. Andersen BJ (2008) Research in the journal landscape ecology, 1987–2005. Landsc Ecol 23:129–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antrop M (2007) Reflecting upon 25 years of landscape ecology. Landsc Ecol 22:1441–1443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fazey I, Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB (2005) What do conservation biologists publish? Biol Conser 124:63–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fry G, Tress B, Tress G (2007) Integrative landscape research: facts and challenges. In: Wu J, Hobbs R (eds) Key topics in landscape ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 246–268Google Scholar
  5. Gardner RH, Jopp F, Cary GJ, Verburg PH (2008) World congress highlights need for action. Landsc Ecol 23:1–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hinchey EK, Nicholson MC, Zajac RN, Irlandi EA (2008) Preface: marine and coastal applications in landscape ecology. Landsc Ecol 23:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hobbs R (1997) Future landscapes and the future of landscape ecology. Landsc Urban Plan 37:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Naveh Z (2007) Landscape ecology and sustainability. Landsc Ecol 22:1437–1440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Opdam P (2007) Deconstructing and reassembling the landscape system. Landsc Ecol 22:1445–1446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Pivello V, Metzger JP (2007) Diagnóstico da pesquisa em Ecologia de Paisagens no Brasil (2000–2005). Biota Neotrop 7: http://www.biotaneotropica.org.br/v7n3/pt/abstract?point-of-view(bn00107032007
  11. Wiens JA (1992) What is landscape ecology, really? Landsc Ecol 7:149–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Wiens JA (1999) Landscape ecology: the science and the action. Landsc Ecol 14:103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Wiens JA (2005) Toward a unified landscape ecology. In: Wiens JA, Moss M (eds) Issues and perspectives in landscape ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 365–373Google Scholar
  14. Wu J (2006) Landscape ecology, cross-disciplinarity, and sustainability science. Landsc Ecol 21: 1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Wu J, Hobbs R (2002) Key issues and research priorities in landscape ecology: an idiosyncratic synthesis. Landsc Ecol 17:355–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wu J, Hobbs R (2007) Landscape ecology: the state-of-the-science. In: Wu J, Hobbs R (eds) Key topics in landscape ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 271–287Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ecology, Institute of BioscienceUniversity of São PauloSao PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations