Landscape Ecology

, Volume 23, Issue 1, pp 79–89

Presence and abundance of the Eurasian nuthatch Sitta europaea in relation to the size, isolation and the intensity of management of chestnut woodlands in the NW Iberian Peninsula

  • Juan P. González-Varo
  • José V. López-Bao
  • José Guitián
Research Article

Abstract

Throughout most of the north-west Iberian Peninsula, chestnut (Castanea sativa) woods are the principal deciduous woodland, reflecting historical and ongoing exploitation of indigenous forests. These are traditionally managed woodlands with a patchy distribution. Eurasian nuthatches (Sitta europaea) inhabit mature deciduous woods, show high site fidelity, and are almost exclusively found in chestnut woods in the study area. We studied the presence and abundance of nuthatch breeding pairs over two consecutive years, in relation to the size, degree of isolation and intensity of management of 25 chestnut woods in NW Spain. Degree of isolation was assessed in view of the presence of other woodland within a 1-km band surrounding the study wood. Wood size was the only variable that significantly predicted the presence of breeding pairs (in at least one year, R2 = 0.69; in both years, R2 = 0.50). The number of pairs was strongly predicted by wood size, isolation and management (R2 = 0.70 in 2004; R2 = 0.84 in 2005); interestingly, more isolated woods had more breeding pairs. Breeding density was likewise significantly or near-significantly (P ≤ 0.1) higher in small isolated woods, which is possibly attributable to lower juvenile dispersal in lightly forested areas and/or to lower predator density in smaller and more isolated patches. Breeding density was higher (though not significantly so) in more heavily managed woods, possibly due to the presence of larger chestnut crops and larger trees (with higher nuthatch prey abundance). Our findings highlight the complexity of the relationships between the patch properties and the three studied levels (presence, number and density of pairs), and also the importance of traditionally managed woodlands for the conservation of forest birds.

Keywords

Habitat fragmentation Sitta europaea Forest birds Traditional management  Castanea sativa Presence Number of pairs Breeding density Habitat quality 

References

  1. Alderman J, McCollin D, Hinsley SA, Bellamy PE, Picton P, Crockett R (2005) Modelling the effects of dispersal and landscape configuration on population distribution and viability in fragmented habitat. Landsc Ecol 20:857–870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ambuel B, Temple SA (1983) Area-dependent changes in the bird communities and vegetation of Southern Wisconsin forests. Ecology 64:1057–1068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrén H (1994) Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review. Oikos 71:355–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bas S, Guitián J, Sánchez Canals J, De Castro A (1978) Contribución al estudio de los vertebrados terrestres de la sierra de Caurel. Lugo. Volúmen I. Informe del Instituto para la Conservación de la Naturaleza de la provincia de Lugo, Galicia, EspañaGoogle Scholar
  5. Bélisle M, Desrochers A, Fortin M-J (2001) Influence of forest cover on the movements of forest birds: a homing experiment. Ecology 82:1893–1904Google Scholar
  6. Bellamy PE, Brown NJ, Enoksson B, Firbank LG, Fuller RJ, Hinsley SA, Schotman AGM (1998) The influences of habitat, landscape structure and climate on local distribution patterns of the nuthatch (Sitta europaea L.). Oecologia 115:127–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bellamy PE, Rothery P, Hinsley SA, Newton I (2000) Variation in the relationship between numbers of breeding pairs and woodland area for passerines in fragmented habitat. Ecography 23:130–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bender JD, Tischendorf L, Fahrig L (2003) Using patch isolation metrics to predict animal movement in binary landscapes. Landsc Ecol 18:17–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, New York Berlin HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  10. Christensen R (1990) Log-linear models. Springer, New York Berlin HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  11. Cody ML (ed.) (1985) Habitat selection in birds. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  12. Cramp S, Perrins CM (eds) (1993) The birds of western Paleartic, vol 7. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  13. Debinski DM (2006) Forest fragmentation and matrix effects: the matrix does matter. J Biogeogr 33:1791–1792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Debinski DM, Holt RD (2000) A survey and overview of habitat fragmentation experiments. J Biogeogr 14:342–345Google Scholar
  15. Desrochers A, Hannon SJ (1997) Gap crossing decisions by forest songbirds during the post-fledging period. Conserv Biol 11:1204–1210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Enoksson B (1990) Autumn territories and population regulation in the nuthatch Sitta europaea: an experimental study. J Anim Ecol 59:1047–1062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Environmental Systems Research Institute (1999) ArcView GIS, version 3.2. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, Calif., USAGoogle Scholar
  18. Fahrig L (2003) Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:487–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ferraz G, Nichols JD, Hines JE, Stouffer PC, Bierregaard RO, Lovejoy TE (2007) A large-scale deforestation experiment: effects of patch area and isolation on Amazon birds. Science 315:238–241PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB (2006) Beyond fragmentation: the continuum model for fauna research and conservation in human-modified landscapes. Oikos 112:473–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Franken RJ, Hik DS (2004) Influence of habitat quality, patch size and connectivity on colonization and extinction dynamics of collared pikas Ochotona collaris. J Anim Ecol 73:889–896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gibbons DW, Hill DA, Sutherland WJ (1996) Birds. In: Sutherland WJ (ed) Ecological census techniques: a handbook. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 227–259Google Scholar
  23. Götmark F, Post P (1996) Prey selection by sparrowhawks, Accipiter nisus: relative predation risk for breeding passerine birds in relation to their size, ecology and behaviour. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 351:1559–1577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Guitián J, Munilla I, González M, Arias M (2004) Guía de las aves de O Caurel. Lynx Editions, BarcelonaGoogle Scholar
  25. Haila Y (2002) A conceptual genealogy of fragmentation research: from island biogeography to landscape ecology. Ecol Appl 12:321–334Google Scholar
  26. Haila Y, Hanski IK, Raivio S (1993) Turnover of breeding birds in small forest fragments: the “sampling” colonization hypothesis corroborated. Ecology 74:714–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hanski I (1998) Metapopulation dynamics. Nature 396:41–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hinsley SA, Bellamy PE, Newton I, Sparks TH (1995) Habitat and landscape factors influencing the presence of individual breeding bird species in woodland fragments. J Avian Biol 26:94–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Howe RW (1984) Local dynamics of bird assemblages in small forest habitat islands in Australia and North America. Ecology 65:1585–1601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Matthysen E (1999) Nuthatches (Sitta europaea: Aves) in forest fragments: demography of a patchy population. Oecologia 119:501–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Matthysen E, Curie D (1996) Habitat fragmentation reduces disperser succes in juvenile nuthatches Sitta europaea: evidence from patterns of territory establishment. Ecography 19:67–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Matthysen E, Schmidt K-H (1987) Natal dispersal in the nuthatch. Ornis Scand 18:313–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Matthysen E, Adriaensen F, Dhondt AA (1995) Dispersal distances of nuthatches, Sitta europaea, in a highly fragmented forest habitat. Oikos 72:375–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Morrison ML (2001) A proposed research emphasis to overcome the limits of wildlife-habitat relationship studies. J Wildl Manage 65:613–623 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nilsson SG (1987) Limitation and regulation of population density in the nuthatch Sitta europaea (Aves) breeding in natural cavities. J Anim Ecol 56:921–937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Opdam P, Foppen R, Reijnen R, Schotman A (1995) The landscape ecological approach in bird conservation: integrating the metapopulation concept into spatial planning. Ibis 137:s139–s146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Quinn GP, Keough MJ (2002) Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  38. Ryall KL, Fahrig L (2006) Response of predators to loss and fragmentation of prey habitat: a review of theory. Ecology 87:1086–1093PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Santos T, Tellería JL, Carbonell R (2002) Bird conservation in fragmented Mediterranean forest of Spain: effects of geographical location, habitat and landscape degradation. Conserv Biol 105:113–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Seoane J, Bustamante J, Díaz-Delgado R (2004) Are existing vegetation maps adequate to predict birds distributions? Ecol Modell 175:137–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Statsoft (2001) STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 6. StatSoft, www.statsoft.comGoogle Scholar
  42. Trzcinski MK, Fahrig L, Merriam G (1999) Independent effects of forest cover and fragmentation on the distribution of forest breeding birds. Ecol Appl 9:586–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Turner MG, Gardner RH, O´Nell RV (2001) Landscape ecology in theory and practice. Pattern and process. Springer, New York Berlin HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  44. Van Langevelde F (2000) Scale of habitat connectivity and colonization in fragmented nuthatch populations. Ecography 23:614–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Verboom J, Shotman A, Opdam P, Metz JAJ (1991) European nuthatch metapopulations in a fragmented agricultural landscape. Oikos 61:149–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Villard M-A, Trzcinski MK, Merriam G (1999) Fragmentation effects on forest birds: relative influence of woodland cover and configuration on landscape occupancy. Conserv Biol 13:774–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zanette L (2001) Indicators of habitat quality and the reproductive output of a forest songbird in small and large fragments. J Avian Biol 32:38–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zanette L, Smith JNM, van Oort H, Clinchy M (2003) Synergistic effects of food and predators on annual reproductive success in song sparrows. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:799–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Juan P. González-Varo
    • 1
  • José V. López-Bao
    • 2
  • José Guitián
    • 3
  1. 1.Dep. Biología Vegetal y EcologíaUniversidad de SevillaSevillaSpain
  2. 2.Estación Biológica de Doñana, CSICSevillaSpain
  3. 3.Dep. Bioloxía Celular y EcoloxíaUniversidade de SantiagoSantiago de CompostelaSpain

Personalised recommendations