Advertisement

Landscape Ecology

, Volume 23, Supplement 1, pp 1–5 | Cite as

Preface: Marine and coastal applications in landscape ecology

  • Elizabeth K. Hinchey
  • Matthew C. Nicholson
  • Roman N. Zajac
  • Elizabeth A. Irlandi
Research Article

Abstract

Landscape ecology traditionally has been limited to the study of terrestrial systems; however, the questions and methods defining the science are equally relevant for marine and coastal systems. The reciprocal relationship between spatial pattern and ecological processes and the overarching effect of scale on this relationship was being explored in some marine and coastal settings as the general discipline of landscape ecology was evolving throughout the latter two decades of the last century. As with all components of the biosphere, an understanding of these relationships is critical for successful management of marine and coastal systems. In these systems, widely dispersed field or ship-based observations and lack of broad scale data have historically precluded quantification of large-scale patterns and processes and hindered management efforts. However, relatively recent advances in geographic information systems, remote sensing and computer technologies have begun to address these issues and are now permitting assessments of pattern and process in oceans. The intent of this special issue is to highlight research that is adapting the tools of landscape ecology to answer ecological questions within marine and coastal systems, to address the unique challenges faced in these landscapes, and to stimulate an exchange of ideas and solutions to common problems. Inspiration for this special issue of Landscape Ecology began with a special session on “Marine and Coastal Applications in Landscape Ecology” that was held at the 19th Annual Symposium of the United States Regional Association of the International Association for Landscape Ecology, March 31–April 2, 2004 in Las Vegas, Nevada.

Keywords

Benthic landscapes Habitat fragmentation Landscape ecology Larval dispersal Marine coral reef reserves Polychaete species diversity Reef fish communities Seagrass landscape pattern Sediment metal concentrations 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Each of the manuscripts was reviewed by at least two independent experts and one or more of the guest editors. We would like to thank the reviewers for their detailed and constructive reviews. We also acknowledge the efforts of Brad Robbins and Jeff Hollister, who worked with us to plan the special session on “Marine and Coastal Applications in Landscape Ecology”. The final quality of this issue reflects the efforts of the Editor-in-Chief, Jianguo (Jingle) Wu, to whom we are appreciative for the opportunity to publish this issue. We would like to thank the U.S. EPA Office of Research and Development-Atlantic Ecology Division for funding this special issue. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S.EPA). This manuscript has been reviewed by the U.S. EPA National Health and Environmental Research Laboratory, Atlantic Ecology Division, Narragansett, Rhode Island, USA, and has been approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of the U.S. EPA. NHEERL-AED contribution number AED-07–025. This project was also approved for publication as manuscript 2007-18094 by the Purdue University Agricultural Research Program.

References

  1. Agardy TM (1994) Advances in marine conservation: the role of marine protected areas. Trends Ecol Evol 9(7):267–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartholomew A, Bohnsack JA, Smith SG, Ault JS, Harper DE, McClellan DB (2007) Influence of marine reserve size and boundary length on the initial response of exploited reef fishes in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary, USA. Landsc Ecol, doi: 10.1007/s10980-007-9136-0 (this issue)
  3. Bell SS, Fonseca MS, Kenworthy WJ (2007) Dynamics of a subtropical seagrass landscape: links between disturbance and mobile seed banks. Landsc Ecol, doi: 10.1007/s10980-007-9137-z (this issue)
  4. Bell SS, Fonseca MS, Motten LB (1997) Linking restoration and landscape ecology. Restor Ecol 5(4):318–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Crawford TW, Commito JA, Borowik AM (2005) Fractal characterization of Mytilus edulis L. spatial structure in intertidal landscapes using GIS methods. Landsc Ecol 21:1033–1044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Darcy MC, Eggleston DB (2005) Do habitat corridors influence animal dispersal and colonization in estuarine systems? Landsc Ecol 20:841–855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Garza C (2007) Relating spatial scale to patterns of polychaete species diversity in coastal estuaries of the western United States. Landsc Ecol, doi: 10.1007/s10980-007-9142-2 (this issue)
  8. Greene HG, Yoklavich MM, Starr R, O’Connell VM, Wakefield WW, Sullivan DL, MacRea JE, Cailliet GM (1999) A classification scheme for deep-water seafloor habitats. Oceanogr Acta 22(6):63–678Google Scholar
  9. Grober-Dunsmore R, Frazer TK, Beets JP, Lindberg WJ, Zwick P, Funicelli NA (2007) Influence of landscape structure on reef fish assemblages. Landsc Ecol doi:  10.1007/s10980-007-9147-x (this issue)
  10. Hewitt JE, Thrush SF, Legendre P, Funnell GA, Ellis J, Morrison M (2004) Mapping of marine soft-sediment communities: integrated sampling for ecological interpretation. Ecol Appl 14:1203–1216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hollister JW, August PV, Paul JF (2007) Effects of spatial extent on landscape structure and sediment metal concentration relationships in small estuarine systems of the United States’ Mid-Atlantic Coast. Landsc Ecol, doi: 10.1007/s10980-007-9143-1 (this issue)
  12. Hovel KA, Regan HM (2007) Using an individual-based model to examine the roles of habitat fragmentation and behavior on predator–prey relationships in seagrass landscapes. Landsc Ecol doi:  10.1007/s10980-007-9148-9 (this issue)
  13. Irlandi EA, Ambrose Jr. WG, Orlando BA (1995) Landscape ecology and the marine environment: how spatial configuration of seagrass habitat influences growth and survival of the bay scallop. Oikos 72(3):307–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kneib RT (2003) Bioenergetic and landscape considerations in scaling estimates of nekton production from natural and restored intertidal marshes. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 264:279–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lindholm J, Auster P, Valentine P (2004) Role of a large marine protected area for conserving landscape attributes of sand habitats on Georges Bank (Northwest Atlantic). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 269:61–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McCormick-Ray MG (1998) Oyster reefs in 1878 seascape pattern: Winslow revisited. Estuaries 21(4B):784–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Paine RT, Levin SA (1981) Intertidal landscapes: disturbance and the dynamics of pattern. Ecol Monogr 51(2):145–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pittman SJ, McAlpine CA, Pittman KM (2004) Linking fish and prawns to their environment: a hierarchical landscape approach. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 283:233–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Robbins BD, Bell SS (1994) Seagrass landscapes: a terrestrial approach to the marine subtidal environment. Trends Ecol Evol 9(8):301–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Steele JH (1989) The ocean ‘landscape’. Landsc Ecol 3(3/4):185–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Treml EA, Halpin PN, Urban DL, Pratson LF (2007) Modeling population connectivity by ocean currents, a graph-theoretic approach for marine conservation. Landsc Ecol (This issue)Google Scholar
  22. Wiens JA (2002) Riverine landscapes: taking landscape ecology into the water. Freshw Biol 47:501–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wu J, Hobbs R (2002) Key issues and research priorities in landscape ecology: an idiosyncratic synthesis. Landsc Ecol 17:355–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Zajac RN (2007) Challenges in marine, soft-sediment benthoscape ecology. Landsc Ecol, doi: 10.1007/s10980-007-9140-4 (this issue)
  25. Zajac RN, Lewis RS, Poppe LJ, Twichell DC, Vozarik J, DiGiacomo-Cohen ML (2003) Responses of infaunal populations to benthoscape patch structure and the potential importance of transition zones. Limnol Oceanogr 48:829–842CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elizabeth K. Hinchey
    • 1
    • 2
  • Matthew C. Nicholson
    • 1
    • 3
  • Roman N. Zajac
    • 4
  • Elizabeth A. Irlandi
    • 5
  1. 1.U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Atlantic Ecology DivisionNarragansettUSA
  2. 2.Illinois-Indiana Sea Grant College ProgramPurdue UniversityChicagoUSA
  3. 3.U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 3, Environmental Information and Analysis Branch, Environmental Assessment & Innovation DivisionPhiladelphiaUSA
  4. 4.Graduate Program in Environmental Science, Department of Biology and Environmental ScienceUniversity of New HavenWest HavenUSA
  5. 5.Department of Marine and Environmental SystemsFlorida Institute of TechnologyMelbourneUSA

Personalised recommendations